The dude explicitly went yabbering online. But yeah, I wouldn't be trusting Windoze not to copy everything to M$ servers nowadays either. Safe bet is get off of M$ products entirely.

Run straight off every sideline, ploughing through bystanders, ripping off clothing, flushing every toilet, breaking down locked doors, scratching paint jobs, running into traffic, ...

Black holes are not the extraordinary claim though is it. That's the mundane ordinary matter claim. Albeit, out of reach. So it's on you to prove how some etherial untouchable matter, that we supposedly live amongst, could ever exist. You're the one out on a limb here.

Well, as the saying goes, extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence. When this mythical matter of yours is ever discovered I'll happily come on board. Until then, I'll leave you with your hoaxers. You seem strong on that juice.

Right, and everything is the fault of the great depression too. :roll-eyes:

Or the article is spot on and it's simple market downturn prompting belt tightening. ie: Tariffs are impacting.

That's a bloody long time to hang on to supposed dead weight. I'm taking a lot of salt on that excuse too.

I think it's more proactive layoffs. They're expecting AI to boost productivity and are spending on AI like it will. But the pudding is still to be proven.

Ah, but the first material that pops out of a star is helium.

I have to say, irrespective of the definition, this terminology is a strange one.

And like I said, I'm just putting your statements together. Which appears there isn't enough evidence for the maths. There certainly isn't any evidence of mythical gravity-only matter in particle experiments. It's all a lot of guessing at this point.

It's actually difficult to glean any point you're making.

The latter paragraph seems to be off on a tangent about pushback when the article is about yes-men that gleefully promote every blingy idea.

Doesn't seem to be anything overwhelming at all. There just isn't the evidence as you've presented it. You clearly stated how difficult it is to see microlensing. That leaves plenty of leeway for black holes to fully explain dark matter.

It sounds like you're making even more assumptions than me. Black holes seem perfectly plausible from what you've said.

They're still selling to the rest of the world. Presumably can buy them in Mexico and Canada.

Oh, that easily leaves open DM being black holes then.

I guess that make this new find an excellent candidate for identifying a higher concentration of microlensing then.