I'd be surprised if anything other than thriving is the case. There is obvious heat and plenty of water and nutrients.

It's liquid! That makes it really comfy. Unless it's somehow 100degC then I don't see how temperature is going to be any sort of barrier. And even exceeding 100degC is not out of bounds for extremophiles.

A composition of any chemicals beyond pure H2O is just a treasure trove for microbes.

For a board with Gigabytes of DRAM? I'd say quite a lot these days. More than enough for the scum to rise on.

Not to mention Trump will just change his mind the next day anyway. No one trusts Trump to honour anything he signs.

Some people clearly still have too much money.

It's only for five years, so none of it really matters.

Entirely fictitious boogie-men made out to be real ... just so they can drop more bombs.

These programs are the responsibility of the companies that run them. CEOs need to be held accountable, not just for the damage, but for what it represents. People have been thrown in jail for just mentioning there is a weakness. Yet these companies are scouring the internals of everyone, including themselves, and literally hacking their victims ... all while the authorities aren't saying boo.

It must be time for everyone with some money to get in on the act I guess. It was the AI, not me. LOL.

Red states will be spared, of course.

I suspect "community bank" is not the "greed is good" type Wall Street speculator.

I figured AI speculation had sucked the life out of crypto speculation.

It has all been smoke and mirrors so far. Why stop now?

Yup, and I think that's exactly how the judge has seen it too. And I'd expect the investigation to conclude the lawyer is a lying little shit.

That's called hypocrisy ... do as I say, not as I do. A political strategy to weaken competitors, if that's your thing. Tell everyone else to do the wrong thing while doing it right yourself. In other words lying, and doing it with a smirk.

Oops! MW-h, not WM/h. That was pure dyslexic typing.

Why can't these journos get that right? Either they're talking about 17000 MW of max power delivery rate, or they're talking about 17000 MW/h of storage. Either can be true and each have separate importance and both valuable figures to quote. But it's unlikely both the MW max power rate and MW/h storage capacity are the same values.