'You Don't Own Web3': A Coinbase Curse and How VCs Sell Crypto To Retail (substack.com) 37
Fais Khan, writing in a blog post: First, Coinbase is like the New York Stock Exchange of crypto -- a listing there is a huge deal, and usually leads to massive profits for everyone involved. But unlike the NYSE or NASDAQ, Coinbase gets to choose whatever assets they want, using their own process. Second, a16z and Coinbase's own returns are particularly interesting, given a16z is supposedly the best investor in this space, and there's a potential for conflict of interest. Is the game rigged? Third, Coinbase pivoted its strategy last year to go from being cautious to listing as many coins as they can. That raises the ante even higher for them and their users.
So I started to dig in, and what I found surprised me: most coins underperformed, returns got worse over time, and VC-backed coins did worst of all. But I was able to do one better - for the last few years, Coinbase put out the names of coins they were thinking to list, but never did. I analyzed those coins - and found they did even better than the ones that made it, and the VC-backed ones didn't show any of the same underperformance. Let's dig in. For years, being listed for trading on Coinbase has been the holy grail of crypto - the equivalent of an IPO on Wall Street. And like an IPO, that seems to come up with a "pop" -- Messari, a crypto research firm, documented in a report that the average Coinbase listing leads to a 91% gain in 5 days, on average.
So I started to dig in, and what I found surprised me: most coins underperformed, returns got worse over time, and VC-backed coins did worst of all. But I was able to do one better - for the last few years, Coinbase put out the names of coins they were thinking to list, but never did. I analyzed those coins - and found they did even better than the ones that made it, and the VC-backed ones didn't show any of the same underperformance. Let's dig in. For years, being listed for trading on Coinbase has been the holy grail of crypto - the equivalent of an IPO on Wall Street. And like an IPO, that seems to come up with a "pop" -- Messari, a crypto research firm, documented in a report that the average Coinbase listing leads to a 91% gain in 5 days, on average.
really good info (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
>> most coins underperformed, returns got worse over time, and VC-backed coins did worst of all.
No shit sherlock !
Cryptomoney is a giant ponzi scheme.
Slashcoin: News for CryptoBros. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
yeah, I trust having Internet access when I really need my money.
Ever try to pay for something with a credit card when the merchant's internet is out?
Re: (Score:3)
Depends on the merchant. We have no trouble at all taking credit cards offline. We accept a small degree of risk of bogus cards being rejected on upload, but that's not the customer's problem.
And that's a completely different issue that the one at hand.
Re: (Score:3)
Ever try to pay for something with a credit card when the merchant's internet is out?
Yeah, but that internet outage is most likely a connection problem between a client and a server. With defi it's exactly that, decentralized. Much less chance of outage (or censorship and surveillance).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With defi it's exactly that, decentralized.
Wrong. I see you drank the crypto kool-aid; "DeFi" really stands for Deregulated Finance.
??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
I will stipulate that things that are decentralized are harder to regulate than centralized things. Maybe that's why regulatory agencies are resistant to crypto, laziness and/or incompetence.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think NFTs are actually more legit than crypto currency. Allowing ticketing companies to release tickets as NFT smart contracts would allow them to ensure they have some control over how tickets are resold and even give them a cut on the resale of tickets.
IPOs are an exit strategy (Score:1)
IPOs are an exit strategy. Coinbase listing are like IPOs. Thus, coinbase listing is somebody's exit strategy.
Note that in the case of IPOs, it isn't *always* a bad deal. Companies like Amazon, Google, etc. are counter-examples that prove the rule. If you bought them on IPO day, you still took a loss but after the lock-out and various market fluctuations (I think Amazon bottomed shortly after 9/11) you came out way ahead.
In the case of companies, you evaluate it after the IPO "dust" has settled. In the
All these statements seem false (Score:2)
Performance is varied and indexes are created as a measure of an e Ganges or industry or sectors performance. Different indexes will do better at different times. And fund mangers who do better of course are going to promote their success. A lot of time this success is based on fraud.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fetch (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Returns got worse over time ? (Score:4, Insightful)
Returns on pyramid schemes decreasing over time? What a relevation !
All these digital currencies are created by people who've usually already mined hundreds of millions of coins. As with all pyramid schemes the value of the coins go up until those initial coins start to get sold (converted back to fiat). As soon as that happens it represents a transfer of real wealth from those further down the pyramid to those who got in above. All these coins are the same, bitcoin has only held its price because the coins mined by "Satoshi" have never been sold, if / those coins ever started getting sold the price of bitcoin would completely collapse.
I'm absolutely staggered that bitcoin has become so legitimized when the creator "Satoshi Nakamoto" is actually a fiction, created by people who've chosen to remain anonymous. Everyone's too busy being greedy to think about who these people are and why they've chosen to remain anonymous. If these people still have access to these millions of coins, and they started selling them, it would be the greatest swindle of all time, they'd literally be stealing billions from their "investors".
Re: (Score:2)
Crypto is just BY FAR the most convenient asset class that exists for this digital age. The younger generation that uses Tik Tok and plays Fortnite all day?
Try buying some Fortnite v-Bucks with crypto, and tell how that worked out for you.
V-Bucks for BTC (Score:1)
Disclaimer: I have no relation to the site or fortnite and I own no BTC.
Re: (Score:2)
That site just takes your BTC, converts it to cash, and uses it to pay Epic - which won't accept anything other than hard cash. Crypto is hence not used as "currency" in any meaningful way; f.ex. there's no guaranteed exchange fee.
It would be like saying you can redeem your car for v-Bucks. Sure, if you visit CarMax first.
Re: (Score:2)
Apologies for pointing out how reality works.
Re: (Score:2)
I was making a point dude. Just in case this one buzzed over your head: maybe you should consider the possibility that crypto is not the most convenient asset class for this digital age as you seem convinced it is.
Re: (Score:2)
Eventually these forms of crypto will be forced to migrate to true blockchain crypto as consumers become more enlightened.
I'm sorry, but if you think this is true, then you're grossly misunderstanding what in-game "currencies" are intended to achieve.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, beats the hell out of putting money on what "younger generation that uses Tik Tok and plays Fortnite all day" deems a good investment.