Sun's Bold New Ad Campaign 426
Celeritas writes "Sun is making some noise over their latest x64server entries by doing a fly by over Dell's HQ yesterday. A few pictures were snapped to capture the event. Sun has continued the offensive by running some interesting ads as well as designing some that were rejected due to the controversial content or as Sun calls them 'bold ad concepts'"
Looks like some great ads (Score:5, Insightful)
McNealy is sure paying a lot of money to keep Michael's name in the big lights.
No kidding (Score:3, Interesting)
x64 (Score:5, Informative)
Sun would probably say AMD64, since that is what they sell, except that they also want you to run Solaris on your non-Sun boxes, which may have 64 bit Intel x86 processors. They may also want to avoid burning bridges, in case Intel processors become more compelling in the future.
Re:No kidding (Score:3, Informative)
The 8-bit progenitor of these was the 8080. The 8086/8088 were designed to be assembly-compatible with the 8080, but not binary-compatible. (i.e. you took your 8080 assembly and ran it in an 8086 assembler that was 8080-aware and it would produce working code with little-to-no tweaking).
Re:No kidding (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:5, Informative)
specs. The Suns cost 50% less,
and use 66% less power. If anyone did
any investigation (which is often the case when
buying servers), then Sun gets the benefit of
this ad. If, however, buying servers is merely
about name recognition and "branding" then,
yes, Dell benefits. But honestly, home
users do not buy 1U devices. People who
buy 1U devices look at price, performance,
and power consumption. So, these adds help
Sun.
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:5, Funny)
From the looks of it (Score:4, Funny)
Informed Customers would rather wax their butt cracks with an angry wasp than buy a Dell. On the other hand, they like our dual power supplies.
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:5, Funny)
not where I work....
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:5, Funny)
Quick, get the holy water!
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:2)
He apparently didn't see the Sun logo, which was very hard to see.
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:3, Interesting)
I wound up buying a Dell P1110 monitor instead and no one bid on the (probably superior, but I'm not sure) Sun moni
Re:Looks like some great ads (Score:2, Funny)
News at 11 (Score:5, Funny)
Re:News at 11 (Score:5, Funny)
"SUNS GOT AN X64 SERVER...WATCH OUT DELL"
Hell, I thought they were just gonna toss the thing over the side of the cockpit. With a B-52 they could drop mainframes.
billy - remember mainframes?
I am a bit disappointed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I am a bit disappointed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I am a bit disappointed (Score:5, Funny)
Well its official (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Well its official (Score:5, Funny)
Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:5, Insightful)
When you have to insult your competition, you insinuate that you are losing to them. Sun looks like they are losing to Dell, which they may very well be, I don't know. But this ad campaign cements that idea.
Link to the Quark ads (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:2)
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:2)
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:2)
Or when Microsoft relaunched MSN and our boy Bill dressed as a big purple butterfly and went out and harassed anyone nearby, recording it all with MS cameras.
Oh, wait... maybe it's not the same thing...
haha, those were hilarious (Score:2)
"What's the matter with you people?! Haven't you ever seen a bandicoot before?"
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly. When you have to spend a lot of time trying to convince people why you're better than someone else, you need to start asking yourself why it's not obvious.
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Reminds me of QuarkExpress (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, high end PCs are fast as hell now, and they're competing directly with Suns and IBM's fastest processors, and in the case of raw cpu speed, sometimes they even win. However, PCs have never been able to compete with the I/O bandwidth of the best servers out there, and they still can't.
(Though I don't know how the new Sun x86_64 boxes do. I suspect they compete nicely with other x86_64 boxes, but that the big Sun machines still beat them, especially in I/O. But when it comes to performance for a given price, it's been hard to beat a good PC for quite some time now, and I don't see this changing any time soon.)
As for high availability, you can have that with x86, x86_64, Sparc, RS6K, PPC, whatever. The good server boxes have basically caught up with what the servers have had for a long time -- redundant power supplies, RAID, etc. And of course you can't really have a high availability environment with a single computer anyways ...
desperation? (Score:4, Interesting)
I know jack about marketing, but this stinks of desperation.
Idiots (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Idiots (Score:5, Insightful)
Whats the point of a mature ad campaign that nobody notices. An obnoxious one is almost always better. Just ask AFLAK.
So that's my take. Can you hear me now?
Re:Idiots (Score:5, Informative)
That would be a valid point if you were selling soft drinks to teenagers. Then, plublicity is everything. Instead, you are selling servers to people who spend a lot of money on computers. People like that are generally not particularly impressed by childish, insecure ads. While you are allowed to have brash, bold, ad campaings, the general rule in corporate "stuff" advertising is NEVER ADVERTISE YOUR COMPETITION. If you do, the target of the campaign might get the idea that you are tyring a Jedi Mind Trick on him, and figure out that maybe he/she should take a closer look at the company your ad is telling him to ignore.
Ads that extol how great your stuff is are taken far more seriously than ads that say how much your competition sucks.
You can come up with a witty, fun way to do this (IBM's ads come to mind), without resorting to childish insults. (Sun Example: "Their servers run on twice the power and are slow [or something like that]. No wonder their name rhymes with HELL.")
Gimme a break... this is schoolyard recess crap. Most of us outgrew this in fourth grade.
SirWired
Re:Idiots (Score:5, Interesting)
I think those ads speak very well of Sun's merits.
A) Sun's servers use less power
B)Sun's servers put off less heat
C)Sun's servers are faster than Dell's.
Really, one thing to consider here: Sun makes an OS, makes CPUs, makes chipsets.. And we're not talking just the fabrication. They have engineers designing this stuff... What has Dell ever developed? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. They've developed nothing, except for a business model that takes other people's desgins and hard work, and mass produces them so each unit can make a $5 profit, and hope that they'll sell a million units.
They are the leech of the industry, and with our patronage, future R&D is in grave trouble, because they give nothing back to the community.
Re:Idiots (Score:4, Insightful)
Sorry, but this statement is total bullshit. Nothing back to the community ? Giving the customer a much better price-performance than everybody else means nothing?
I agree with most of your comment, Sun's boxes are usually better engineered. However, innovation does not always have to be in the technical domain; there's as much innovation happening in other fields, including marketing. Would you say Amazon.com has done nothing interesting because they did not invent any of their products? If Dell's products are so poor, why does Sun feel the need to compare themselves with Dell?
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
First thought (Score:2)
"...'atsa bol' statement."
i've always kinda liked Sun (grew up on 'em) and even when things seem dark, Sun and Co. come up with something that is pretty damn bold
Re:First thought (Score:3, Interesting)
From an advertising copywriter... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm gonna go wash the taste of those out of my mouth now...
Re:From an advertising copywriter... (Score:2)
The ad was on the radio, and it was for some chipotle-chicken sub or something, and it had this little jingle that just went, "Chipotle! Chipotle! da da da, Chipotle!"
The problem came in when I didn't realize that it was an ad for Subway. I thought it was an ad for Chipotle, [chipotle.com] not Subway.
These aren't that bad by comparison.
Re:From an advertising copywriter... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose (Score:3, Informative)
The 2100 is basically a reference design -- the 4100 and 4200 boxes are designed entirely by Sun and are most excellent.
I guess it pays to RTFA (Score:2)
Re:It's payback for Dell flying over San Jose (Score:2)
More that they rejected (Score:3, Funny)
-Dell Sucks: Sun swallows. You owe us one. Buy our servers.
-No, that's not IBM biting my ass. DELL SUCKS.
Daisolaris (Score:2, Funny)
(Because we know how well *that* campaign is remembered.)
wow (Score:5, Funny)
Shades of Daikatana (Score:4, Funny)
Worked well for John Romero, I'm sure it would work great for Sun.
I'm just surprised they didn't call the server line "Xtreeeme64".
Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sun knows exactly who they're marketing to (Score:4, Funny)
Well, not necessarily hand in hand.
That's real smart (Score:2)
Re:That's real smart (Score:2)
It's indirectly targeted at us.
Sun doesn't want people to see the flyover so much as post pics of the flyover on Slashdot. Think about it. This is the first Sun related thread in sometime where Linux is rarely mentioned.
Sun hopes that some of us making buying decisions on server hardware and software at our businesses, and that this will but Sun back in our heads
I have a few ideas... (Score:5, Funny)
When you buy Dell, it makes the baby Jesus cry. You don't want to make the baby Jesus cry, do you?
Hey Dell, we just fucked your girlfriend.
LK
Re:I have a few ideas... (Score:2)
I want to see some yo mama jokes.
Re:I have a few ideas... (Score:3, Funny)
Considering Dell is Microsoft's and Intel's crack whore, I hope Sun wore protection.
Works for me (Score:2)
This the way that I figure it. Everyone knows that kids are good at computers. And everyone knows that geeks lack social skills. Heck, I'm a geek and I lack them.
So it follows that a company that comes off like a bunch of adolescent jerks would have really good stuff.
All sarcasm aside, I haven't had a sun server in a long time, but my old sparc 5 boxes were really great. Extremely
Sun against Dell (Score:2)
Service Processor (Score:2)
Features include full remote KVM functionality with video and media redirection. System administrators can access the service processor via the dedicated management Ethernet port.
I'll tell you what, for $150 (Service processor), and for the total price of these servers. I'm very tempted to grab a few of these and try them out - if Sun can get the message out, these prices are unbelievable from Sun, I thi
Re:Service Processor (Score:2)
Bascically it's a separate unit that is inside the server that runs it's own os (In this case it's linux) that has it's own IP. It lets you do things like poweroff, poweron and reset the host box.
You can also do something like "attach terminal" and if you have solaris/linux it will give you a tty (as long as you enabled serial redirection in linux) login to the box so you can see your kernel panic or install your
Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option (Score:2)
My desired system is a dual 27x Opteron with 4-6 hot-swap SATA drive bays. What's with all the SCSI out there? There doesn't seem to be any brand-name dual-CPU rack servers out there which have a SATA option.
Yes, I know SCSI is much faster, has a fraction of the CPU overhead that PATA has, and has been hot-swap capable since probably before I learnt how to read.
Perhaps I'm trying to stretch my budget too thin, but the best I can do is build my own from
Re:Still sticking to SCSI, no SATA option (Score:2, Informative)
Rejected ads? (Score:2)
Shit, I'm sold.
But seriously, I love Sun hardware. That thing takes a beating and keeps on ticking. The old e220r and e240r have never given me trouble (*knock on wood*)
But Dells are really cheap. I was told (candidly) by an IBM vendor that they just can't compete with Dell in the inexpensive server market. And I suppose that neither can Sun.
I have plenty of Dell servers also, and I've never had a major problem with them. The 24 hours support contract gets you rep
The last time Sun pulled a stunt like this (Score:4, Insightful)
Do some research, over time Sun has done more for Open Source than any other company.
The facts are simple (Score:5, Interesting)
The AMD64 platform is a better platform than Intel's at the moment, in every way. And on top of that, Sun has a hell of a lot more experience in building bulletproof hardware. When you factor in Solaris & a lower price tag
You can spin this whatever way you want, but I'm looking forward to seeing Sun trash the company that brought us the "Dell dude". Dell can go back to selling their overpriced PCs at Christmas, and the people who actually run the important servers in the world, doing billion dollar transactions, have a clear path to keep the Windows/Dell bozos out of the server room in the basement of the bank.
Isn't this missing the point? (Score:2)
Power efficiency is the point (Score:4, Interesting)
The competition has given Sun an opening, by sticking with Intel even in an area where AMD has better technology (though Intel will probably catch up in a year or two). Ordinarily I'd laugh at Sun for saying "we're number 6". But if they can partner with AMD well, and AMD can deliver in volume, Sun may survive, they might even do well.
But the people I know are only going to be interested in buying those boxes if they run Linux. To be specific, Red Hat Enterprise, since that's pretty much the standard for electronic design automation these days at least in the US. That's why Sun is suddenly making nice to Red Hat.
Re:Isn't this missing the point? (Score:3, Informative)
At anyrate here are some reason why lower power is becoming more and more important. First all large datacenters costs tons to cool. You are talking huge air conditioni
With apologies to Nappy D (Score:5, Funny)
Scott McNealy: Your mom goes to college.
SUN is back. (Score:3, Interesting)
Special offer from Sun (Score:3, Interesting)
Trade in any qualified Dell server and get a 20% trade-up allowance off the list price on eligible new Sun Fire X4100 and X4200 servers with 3-year support services. That's a potential savings of up to $1,900 on new entry level Sun servers that have 1.5 times the performance of Xeon-based Dell servers.* Sun Fire X4100 and X4200 servers also offer up to 56% savings in power and cooling costs per year over comparable Dell servers.
Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? (Score:5, Interesting)
You think server admins usually get to choose what to buy?
I don't think so.
It looks to me the ads are probably targeted at getting the mindshare of PHB types.
Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? (Score:2)
Viral Marketing [wikipedia.org]
Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? (Score:2)
Wouldn't work at a place where the PHB made technology purchasing decisions.
Fortunately for you, you are lucky for now, but unfortunately, it does not seem to be the norm.
Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? (Score:2)
Wouldn't work at a place where the PHB made technology purchasing decisions.
Then you would not be influenced by any ad, it is then not targetted at you but at PHBs who do make decisions.
There's a part of their market that they have to get with technical merit and a part that they have to get with publicity.
Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? Exactly (Score:2)
Certainly, firms can survive and even thrive like that, but for Sun it is surely bad news.
Re:Cute, but is it really necessary? Exactly (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:or these (Score:2)
Re:Unfortunately... (Score:5, Informative)
Oh, and I think these boxes are supported by Sun for Windows, Linux (Redhat and Suse) and of course Solaris.
And of course they push Solaris. Some people actually think that it MIGHT be a better Unix that Linux (Moderators, you didnt read that...)
Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. (Score:5, Informative)
A Sun Fire X2100 starts at $745 LIST. Go through a reseller and you're guaranteed to get discounts on top of that. These prices that UNHEARD OF for Sun. They have completely slashed their prices down to levels that I never thought I would ever see. I've been working with Sun hardware for 10 years and I've been cursing their outrageous prices for nine of those years as I saw Intel after Intel replace numerous Sun workstations and servers. I've had no excuse to curse Sun's prices in the past 12 months.
If we were talking about the Sun of the past, you'd be absolutely correct. They charged outrageous prices because your were buying the Sun name and the Sun R&D. That arrogance died very recently. Look at any of their x86 offerings, like the Ultra 20, which is also available for less than $900 list.
Half the quality? They offer a 3 year warranty on all hardware. Every other vendor I've had to deal with wants a service contract ($$$) for that amount of coverage. I doubt they'd give that warranty if they thought the quality was such that the systems wouldn't last at least that long. Otherwise, they'd expect to lose a shitload of money to spare parts and customer service calls, which would not be a wise move at all.
Oh, by the way
It's blatantly obvious that you don't have a clue what you're talking about or you just want to bash on Sun for the sake of bashing on Sun.
Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. (Score:5, Interesting)
As I mentioned in a different Slashdot story, one of the local Windows admins got a loaner Sun system with Windows installed on it and he was very impressed with its speed and stability. That can open a whole, new market base for Sun. And even if those servers don't run Solaris now, who's to say that they won't in the future as current systems are put into end-of-life or replaced and therefore can serve other functions? Now that we've moved the data to a bigger server, what should we do with this one? Let's put that Solaris on it and see what we can do with it. Hey, it's a very distinct possibility.
Personally, I think that it's about time that McNealy swallowed a bit of that arrogant pride of his. It's been a long time coming. As a Sun admin for over 10 years I'm very excited about this new direction that Sun has been taking. Let's hope it's not too little, too late.
Clarification... (Score:4, Informative)
That's still half the price of the low-end xServe. Hmmm....
Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. (Score:2)
Grrrr. If I could run OpenBSD on the latest Sun offerings, I'd snap up Sun gear like it was going out of style. (No comments from the peanut gallery o
Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. (Score:3, Insightful)
Au contraire. The reason they advertise Linux compatibility with their servers is precisely the same reason they advertise Windows compatibility: it's what their customers want to run. If they could, I'm sure they'd wave a magic wand and make their clients all hot and bothered to run Solaris.
Most likely the reason you don't hear them outright trashing Linux these days is that some
Re:Wow. The clue meter is reading zero. (Score:2)
Re:Inflammatory (Score:5, Informative)
You act like this is new for Sun. Let's not forget that this is the same Sun that sent a boatload of exterminator trucks to the Windows 2000 launch just to remind everyone that Win2K had 65,000 bugs in it. Or the constant bickering between Sun and IBM.
Not to mention McNealy's comments about HP: "They make great printers!"
Nope, nothing new under the Sun.
Re:Rhymes with... (Score:2)
Re:Rhymes with... (Score:2)
http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x2100/benchmarks
and ever think you'd see this?
http://www.sun.com/service/support/windows/ [sun.com]
Re:They have a point (Score:2)
True dat.
Re:Sun selling commodity hardware is big news? (Score:2)
Re:photoshopped (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Mirrors Mirrors mirrors! (Score:2)
Re:wtf? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I have a theory about "advertising" (Score:4, Funny)
HJ
Re:I have a theory about "advertising" (Score:5, Interesting)
my theory is: ... Good products don't need much if any advertising.
That was the attitude over at Digital. Their head honcho believed that they would dominate by just having the best products, and that marketing was therefore a waste of time. Instead they got bought out by some commodity PC outfit called Compaq.