A9 Search Engine Launches Yellow Pages 157
vmalik writes "The A9 search engine has launched a Yellow Pages service, and the listings in major cities include photographs of the storefronts. The site also contains information on how they did it. It seems to be pretty good with lots of store images and driving information from MapQuest."
Current? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Current? (Score:5, Interesting)
Their interface did not give me a chance to upload a picture. You can only "share a picture" if you're a customer. Being I'm an Amazon customer, I reviewed the business as 5 stars but will not shill it out by writing a review.
Re:Current? (Score:2)
That is odd... It seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen at this point almost. I wonder if/who a store could sue if someone put a defamitory description on this thing.
-Jesse
Re:Current? (Score:1)
Re:Current? (Score:1)
Current and ACCURATE? (Score:5, Interesting)
The entry came up with a photo and everything, but the photo was wrong. They had the right block but they were off by about half a block. Impressive technological feat to be within half a block, but it makes the technology totally useless.
In the case of D&B, if you scan up the street you can see the big orange and blue awning and find it. But then I knew the street and so knew which direction to scroll when I saw that they were off. So now they combine the sometimes humorous inaccuracy of on-line maps with a new level of inaccuracy using street level photos.
You may be better off asking for directions from a real person
Re:Current and ACCURATE? (Score:2, Insightful)
Even if you don't know the business, that scanning over the street is sure to help you find the location, since now you can see what's around. And even if you've never been there, if the actual business is in a different photo than the original shown, you likely can help select the proper one for it.
They were able to get
nobody uses A9 (Score:5, Insightful)
A9 is like Google and Claria combined, with webbugs, click tracking and paid inserts all tied to your Amazon cookie which is tied to your credit card
it only exists to maximise Amazon and their partners (those who pay the most) revenue
at work we classify A9 as a "severe privacy threat" and therefore it is blocked at the firewall
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:5, Insightful)
So... how is this different from most businesses? Not to be a free-market fundie or anything, but at least one of the motivations for all businesses is to earn revenue. A9 has decided to earn revenue for it's owners by providing better features to and tighter tracking of it's customers. However, I fail to see how what A9 is doing is different than the paid inserts or supercookie that Google uses, or for that matter the wealth of info that Yahoo keeps on it's customers. Some businesses can be said to only exist to increase revenue for their owners. Look at all of the old software that is "supported" for the sake of businesses at extortionist rates and without any updates. Compared to them and a lot of other software businesses, A9 is pretty customer-focused.
I hate to say this, but if people keep spouting words like "severe privacy threat," when actual severe privacy threats (like Claria) arise, people won't listen.
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:2, Interesting)
User's should be able to make an informed decision about what they are willing to give up in exchange for valuable service. Some of that might be privacy.
The real thing to fear is what happens if Amazon.com were to violate the provisions contained within its privacy agreement or if it were to attempt to distort or hide the nature of that agreement or in some other way not properly acquire informed consent from the user. For that, user's have the court system at their d
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:2)
(Banging head against wall)
I mean, I did buy at $8 or so. It's not like I didn't make *any* profit on it.
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:2)
And note, I'm not defending the free market. Markets can never be "free." Nature abhorrs a power vaccuum too much. But when people start saying that such-and-such is making money for their owners... Lots of stuff does that. Heck, the place where I work makes money. That in and of itself is not enough to make a company evil.
Red Hat makes money. They're not evil.
So they correlate your search patterns with your buying history. Great, so they know that I search for Karaoke CD's
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:1)
What Amazon cookie? You mean you allow them to set a cookie on your machine? I don't.
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:2)
What about the cookie-free http://generic.a9.com/ [a9.com]?
Re:nobody uses A9 (Score:1, Troll)
It freaked me out! (Score:1)
Re:It freaked me out! (Score:2)
Re:It freaked me out! (Score:3, Interesting)
-Jesse
Re:It freaked me out! (Score:2)
Get tougher on cookies. I clean mine out multiple times per day, and rarely allow more than 3 or 4 to overstay their sessions (and two of those are Slashdot's!). With Mozilla, you can even leave the "Manage Cookies" dialog up and watch 'em as they come in; then it's just a click to get rid of the ones you don't want.
Next step (Score:2)
Really - "spidering" the country... Dear. Will they refresh the info every year? No? How often then? I now understand what all those flying cams are doing in HL2.
Google (Score:1)
Another case where competition is benefic for the end-users.
Google? (Score:1)
Re:Google? (Score:2)
google (Score:1)
It is worth mentioning, though, that A9's improved searching capabilities do provide much needed competition for google.
Not a bad idea though from them, it must have cost them one hell of a lot of money to do though.
Re:google (Score:2)
Re:google (Score:1)
Patents? (Score:2)
Re:Patents? (Score:1)
They're not the first.
Heck, they're not even the first to be profiled on Slashdot. There was an insurance company, or maybe a supplier of data to insurance companies, a few months ago doing the same thing, if I recall correctly.
And then there's The PennDOT VideoLog [164.156.5.83].
Concerns/Observations (Score:3, Interesting)
Otherwise, very interesting. Some of the storefronts for businesses I know of were one or two pictures off to the left or right though, guess they're still working out the bugs.
-Jesse
Re:Concerns/Observations (Score:1)
I was taking a virtual drive around Boston, and could clearly see many people's faces. Do those people know that they're photographed, and on the internet for all to see?
There is no legal problem. When you're in a public place (e.g. on the streets of Boston), anyone can photograph you and publish the photos.
But IANAL
Re:Concerns/Observations (Score:2)
-Jesse
Re:Concerns/Observations (Score:2)
Okay, so let's look at some sceanrios...
- A picture of a man walking into a porn shop.
- A picture of a man walking into a strip club.
- Someone standing outside a concert/sporting venue waving tickets in the air.
Granted, it's unlikely these things would be noticed, but there are certainly circumstances where someone could be intimidated, harmed, or black
Re:Concerns/Observations (Score:2)
There's a whole host of rules and regulations about when you need to get permission and when you don't for photographs of people, places, and things.
A good article is here [photosecrets.com].
It seems news media usually get away with photographs of identifiable people in states with publicity laws under a fair use exemption for newsworthy reporting. In some states the publicity law
Re:Concerns/Observations (Score:3, Interesting)
For anyone who needs an example, search for 'sears' with zip code 60641. You'll get a picture of a store called 'Hats Plus' with only the edge of the sears store visible in the leftmost photo.
Now search for 'hats plus' and you'll get an imagine even further east along the same strip mall. You can verify they're next door by comparing the rightmost pics of the first search to the leftmost pics of the second search. Looks like the whole thing is about 50-100 feet off in that area.
Now,
Hmmm.. (Score:1, Funny)
This is an awesome idea, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Basically I searched for some things in New York, and got some cool images. Not once was I looking at the actual storefront I asked for. Once, I was able to find the store by moving left two images down the block (a neat feature) but the next time I searched, I was not even on the same block with the restaurant I was looking for. Next search, there was a giant truck in front of the store I wanted. Woo!
It is really entertaining to walk up and down the block and take a look at all the poor slobs who A9 caught scratching themselves on some streetcorner. I wonder when we can count on the first lawsuit?
Justin
Re:This is an awesome idea, but... (Score:1)
Re:This is an awesome idea, but... (Score:2)
You're not a geek unless you automate the process of using Terraserver to get aerial (not satellite) photos of locations you're going to be.
Real geeks automate this [parkrrrr.com].
And if you automate this [parkrrrr.com], you're beyond hope. (It's hard to see, but that's a Terraserver image used as a backdrop in GPSPilot Tracker for the Palm.)
Re:This is an awesome idea, but... (Score:2)
I wonder if it caught some people in first floor apartments getting undressed? neato.
I say it is a funky idea, and in the land of GPS enabled cameras, and the amazon 'I found this helpful' system (google needs this on page search results... with accounts etc, yes it can still be screwed over) people will be auto posting GPS encoded info to the amazon site for bonus points of purchases, and free pic hosting.
Just becaus
Re:This is an awesome idea, but... (Score:2)
Big Dunkin Donuts truck in front of pizza restaurant [amazon.com]
Seems to be a fairly common occurance unfortunately.
A bit inaccurate (Score:1, Insightful)
Of course Mapquest has had me driving into the lake many times but maybe they need to add pattern recognition to there pics for error checking, there should at least be a building in the shot
Irony (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Irony (Score:2)
Plumber (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Plumber (Score:2)
ej
Cheeburger Cheeburger (Score:1)
http://a9.com/cheeburger [a9.com]
Kinda neat... I go to cheeburger cheeburger, its a real popular place near my house for burgers.. It even showed a jpg of the menu! and the fat asses eating burgers and on the wall of fame for eating a one pounder.
Get a FREE Mini Mac http://www.freeminimacs.com/?r=14172807 [freeminimacs.com]
Better link (Score:1)
Here's a direct link [a9.com].
Yellow Pages? How 1980s... (Score:2)
I can't think of a more annoying, inefficient, and time wasting publication. If there's one that that I would love to see be replaced entirely by technology it's the Yellow Pages.
Re:Yellow Pages? How 1980s... (Score:2)
Yellow pages web sites are neat are much more handy, but I'd always want to have an old fashion hard copy around. Quite often when I need to use it, it is for something fairly urgent, if I need an electrician or a plumber quickly I may not be able to look something up on the net.
I definately dig the more technological alternatives, but I wouldn't want them to replace the big book completely.
Re:Yellow Pages? How 1980s... (Score:2)
I like to read the ads in the yellow pages for these types of businesses. ie I was trying to find some new tires for my car so I opened up the yellow pages and all of the tire places had adds telling me what types of tires they carry... so I knew which ones to call (I was looking for specific tires).
But, I agree, I don't use the yellowpages very often... only if I need a good smattering of local stores for a specific purpose.
Friedmud
Brothels (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Adult Video Stores (Score:2)
That's a funny pic you found there. On the left, a guy is walking with his two little sons! Wait until the wife finds out how he educates sex... :D
Slow.... (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not insane, it's genius (Score:1)
The problem for Microsoft is that these projects really belong on a server. Now that we can send email and write documents, all the exciting stuff is on the web. And people play games on consoles.
I imagine after Blue Gene, IBM may attempt thi
Re:Slow.... (Score:2)
Time from typing google.com and hitting enter to a usable page: less than 1 second.
Performance first. Features later.
Yellow pages? (Score:3, Insightful)
crap (Score:1, Informative)
Sponsored Links from Google? (Score:2)
So in the http://a9.com/plumber example, you'll find A9 directs through Google at the very bottom. I guess they need to make a dime somehow.
Paris: pagesjaunes.fr, since 1998 (at least) (Score:1)
To Save Space... (Score:2, Funny)
They can use the same picture for all the Best Buys, Wal-Marts, etc...
Non-cookie version (Score:2, Informative)
Ok, it's not bad (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not perfect, and the landscape is constantly changing. How often do they plan to refresh? How will they even do that?
A block in NYC can change dramatically in a year. Kind of hard to keep those pics up to date. Take a building down, put a new one up, or just remove the scafolding, and it looks like a different block.
Just my $0.02, but I think keeping that up to date and useful is going to be nearly impossible.
Re:Ok, it's not bad (Score:1)
It might not be inconceivable if this catches on. The Amazon rating and review system is pretty widely used. Aside from some astroturfing, I've generally found it to be pretty useful to look at user-volunteered info. And it seems like this would be an instance where astroturfing would be welcomed. If it catches on, it would be in the best interests of small businesses
White House (Score:2, Funny)
Duh.
I was right with them, till they said "Mapquest" (Score:1)
The A9 web site is heavily weighted toward ads. (Score:2)
As far as I can tell, A9 is asinine. Maybe that's what A9 stands for.
The web site is so heavily weighted toward pushing advertising that it is just disgusting.
It's amazing that other people cannot learn for Google's success.
Asinine Manager #1: Hey, why don't we imitate Google, and not abuse customers?
Asinine Manager #2: What! Customers like to be abused! Didn't you know that?
I put in an address in Portland, Oregon, and selected Within 1 Mile, and it changed the selection back to Within 5 Mile
Shock! YP lists business addresses (Score:2)
I should have said abusive ads. (Score:2)
Okay, I should have said "abusive ads presented in an abusive way", such as trying to get you to look at things that have nothing to do with what you are searching for.
Re:I should have said abusive ads. (Score:2)
Sports: (Score:1)
1. Criminal Activity
2. Law enforcement officials
3. Men with their shirts off
4. Bodily fluids.
B) Product Place-a-thon.
THey've probably already figured out they can use the "car passing" technology demoed in the xmas lights hoax [komar.org] and are digital inserting posters, vans, newspapers and any number of other things.
C) Date the drive. Using context
The French did it a few years ago (Score:2, Informative)
Not a first (Score:1)
Lawsuit! (Score:2)
Is it just me? (Score:1)
--
http://www.coingo.net/freemacmini -- Get a FREE Mac mini!
The other side of the street (Score:1)
I think that the fact that most of the store-front searches are one or two stores off will not be a huge problem. Amazon has provided the users with a way to easily specify which is the "best picture" for any given search. I think the user base will quickly refine the accuracy of the image search using this feature. Store owners themselves perhaps might take the time to make sure that their store
missed Houston,third largest city (Score:2)
That is absolutely BRILLIANT... (Score:1)
SERIOUSLY cool idea.
*sigh* Missing my city again (Score:2)
this has been done in France for 6,7 years now (Score:1)
The company that started it (in 1996, I think, three young guys, a scooter and a digital camera at the start) is now part of France Telecom and has mapped major cities in France, now doing Spain. The stuff is really cool and very handy for prospective tenants, buyers for housing!
Examples:
http://www.pagesjaunes.fr/pj . cgi
Not so new idea, but promising implementation (Score:1)
Make a search there ( [pagesjaunes.fr] using for example:
nom: Follies Bergere
localite: Paris
In the answer you can click in the Photo link and voila (May be you can see the dancers getting into the theater
Amazon implementation is interesting. They have done great in terms of inte
Some Editing Needed (Score:2)
Look here [amazon.com]
Much better (but one city only) version (Score:2)
Local sites just can't be that cool, unless they're ACTUALLY local, which is why I think NowTowns is kinda neat. It only cat
loose acceptance, strict issuance (Score:2)
Evidence (Score:2)
massaging the data (Score:2)
Remembering that this is Amazon, they can limit updates to logged in users, even to users who have made clean credit card transactions. This would help eliminate most abuse.
Some have noted that the locations are sometimes off by a block or something. I noted above that you can correct data for a locatio
We do same, but on foot... (Score:2)
Re:Invasion of privacy (Score:1)
erm, are you retarded? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:erm, are you retarded? (Score:2)
I would question the security and common sense of any defense company that keeps a storefront where public citizens can walk by and see anything useful.
Re:Invasion of privacy (Score:2)
As for government sites... I think the guards would notice someone snapping pictures at a non-obvious site.
Re:Invasion of privacy (Score:4, Informative)
So short answer, "no".
Re:Invasion of privacy (Score:1)
I don't think this is necessarily a serious invasion of privacy, but you have to draw some distinctions.
Re:Cool! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:overjoyed (Score:2)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/yp/B00036LLZO/002-513305
Re:overjoyed (Score:2, Insightful)
-Jesse
Re:overjoyed (Score:1)
I'm guessing that when he first looked at the page, the UPS truck pic was the main pic.
Re:overjoyed (Score:2)
which is actually pretty neat. in searching for a restaurant in NYC i was able to move two blocks to the left and find a friend of mine's apartment.
Re:overjoyed (Score:2)
For those that aren't reading whom I'm responding to, apparently there's a series of images that can pop up. The one that I saw was the storefront with no problems at all. Another one apparently has a UPS truck all in the way.
-Jesse
Re:overjoyed (Score:1)
SharkJumper
Re:doesn't work for me (Score:1)