
AMD Opteron "Hammer" Preview 252
Melvin Tong writes "Hardware Extreme has posted a preview of AMD's 8th-generation processor that AMD is currently developing with a few exclusive pics of the mechanical sample. AMD Athlon processors based on Hammer technology are expected to ship in the forth quater of 2002. The preview is located over at HW Extreme."
AMD Opteron + Linux (Score:2, Interesting)
forseeable future, plus have yet to prove themselves in the higher end, attract the appropriate support and build an image they don't yet have when compared to Intel, Sun or IBM.
It also looks like they have their work cut out for them already, with not as fast clock/rampup on 0.13 micron as expected and a tight line to get the Hammer line done properly as they are pretty strung out on cash compared to Intel, while the latter seems to have no trouble in increasing clock all the time (by throwing huge gobs of money at it of course).
Re:AMD Opteron + Linux (Score:2)
dup dup * . (Score:4, Funny)
Re:dup dup * . (Score:2)
I was going to make a crack about it running Postscript real well, but I thought it might be too obscure...
Re:dup dup * . (Score:2)
I suspect more people are familiar with PostScript than Forth...
72 720 moveto
(Hammer Time) show
showpage
(I usually use "This is a test," but seeing as this article is about certain microprocessors with a tool as their codename...)
A basic knowledge of PostScript is useful to tell if a printer or a print server is running properly. By comparison, does anybody use Forth for anything? (I downloaded a couple of Forth interpreters for the Apple II years ago, but never got around to doing anything with them.)
Re:dup dup * . (Score:2)
Re:dup dup * . (Score:2)
What I don't understand is why this would be Score:4 Funny.
It was probably 2 but then the subject line executed.
AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2)
"The AMD Opteron is designed to be scalable, reliable and compatible, which can result in lower total cost of ownership."
Gee, the whole article sounds like a lame press release. I want the real low down, not a marketing piece!
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:1, Informative)
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2)
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2)
You may want to avoid hardwareextreme, then. I knew I shouldn't even have bothered reading this one. I've never read a thing there that wasn't "written" in the same style (ie, copy a bunch of press releases and call yourself a hardware site).
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:1)
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:1)
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2, Insightful)
There are way more "mindless mainstream users" than techies, and without them, there's no AMD. I've rather have them advertise more, charge me extra $5 per chip, and develop a better faster chip through competition that would've cost me extra $50 if AMD wasn't around.
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2)
I don't consider advertising a total waste, but AMD's cash for this battle is not stacked aywhere near as high as Intel's. They couldn't hope to win an advertising/marketing war, even with superior products.
You must pick your battles, and putting money into R&D, and keeping the pressure on Intel to meet their prices, has paid off for AMD so far. I basically agree with the "unintelligent" poster.
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2)
I'd love to see AMD ads more often, but lets be a bit more realistic... Intel spends almost a third of the total earnings of AMD for a year on advertising... AMD couldn't keep up with that unless they were much bigger...
Re:AMD Marketeers Rock! (Score:2)
Yes, Opteron will be cheaper than Itanium but might only be significantly cheaper for those who assemble their own systems.
Nothing we haven't seen before. (Score:1)
Yikes (Score:1)
not much there.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Benchmarks on OpenSSL (Score:3, Informative)
As a side bonus, you can find SPEC benchmarks for Itanium and Itanium IIs on that chart (search for the word Itanium - Dell and HP have both submitted results).
Re:Benchmarks on OpenSSL (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not a POWER4 advocate either -- the chip may be cleaner than x86 (wow, that's not hard), but proprietary is proprietary.
Back to Hammer vs Itanium though. I am much, much more excited about the pending Hammer/Opteron release than I am about Itanium2 or McKinley or whatever. Why? Because Hammer is made for consumer systems. Itanium (w/ or w/o the "2") is still priced somewhere in the stratosphere and it's performance on desktop systems is abysmal. Sure, the SPEC numbers are pretty, but there's no software out there, the compilers continue to suck, and I don't expect either situation to improve anytime soon. When Hammer comes out there will be a plethora of software that will already run (and probably run faster, even in 32-bit mode) and compiling 64-bit apps will be relatively straight forward. VLIW is a nifty idea, but we're nowhere close to optimizing code perfectly now. Adding on the additional layer of VLIW makes the problem even worse.
High end computing has always been a totally different realm from desktop computing anyway. I don't really expect the Hammer/Opteron to compete in that realm -- it's too limited by the load of crap that comes with x86. But it's a far better future desktop computing solution than anything Intel has to offer thus far, and that's why you see so many people excited about it.
Intel (Score:2, Interesting)
Either way, It would be funny if Intel ended up having to license AMD's x86-64 technology. Even though I don't think that would happen, I suspect Intel would rather fork the 64bit platform with their Itanic (part 2) than license from AMD... but you never know!
Re:Intel (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Intel (Score:2)
Intel ALREADY licensed x86-64. This is one of the reasons that Yamhill (Intel's x86-64) might be happening.
Read any (good - unlike this one) preview of the opteron and they almost always mention this fact.
Derek
Re:Intel (Score:1)
I believe so, but I'm not sure if it was crosslicense per se. AMD had to go through the courts (if my memory serves me correctly) to allow them to use 80x86 technology, hence the codename 'Barton' for one of the upcoming Athlon cores... Barton was the name of the presiding Judge who granted them the license.
Do you trust those specs? (Score:1)
Re:Do you trust those specs? (Score:2)
Why not? The specs are cribbed from the PR kit, so they're about as trustworthy as what the company itself says.
Remember, "sneak previews" on hardware sites are like trailers in movie theaters. They're there to get you interested in the product, not to critique it.
Nice cap! (Score:3, Interesting)
I look forward to lapping the cap to a shinny mirror finish!
Re:Nice cap! (Score:5, Interesting)
No doubt. Actually, that worked to my advantage, when I was trying to get Fry's to take back an Athlon XP that had gone bad... when they told me they had to test it, I was worried, because their idea of a testbed is another customer's board hooked up to crappy "PC Doctor" software, and has rarely caught transient errors in the past.
Wouldn't you know it, though, they cracked it during mounting, so of course it became "oops, let's get you credit for that chip" instead of "we can't find a problem in 30 minutes of running crappy test software so it must not be bad."
Re:Nice cap! (Score:2)
Re:Nice cap! (Score:2)
CAREFULL!!!!!! (Score:2)
Just don't sand off any DRM bits, or it's your ass in the slammer! The DMCA is watching you, punk.
Re:Nice cap! (Score:2)
Re:Nice cap! (Score:2)
bolt-mounted heatsinks (Score:2)
Re:Buy a P4 (Score:2)
Re:Nice cap! (Score:2)
It can't be that tiring. Maybe you need to drink more water.
I don't know, try replacing a few dozen heatsinks in an oven/warehouse and you might get a bit weary as well.
AMD (Score:5, Funny)
As opposed to the 8th-generation AMD processor that Intel is developing....
(/sarcasm)
Re:AMD (Score:2)
It'll be Intel's 9th generation processor that is AMD's 8th generation--after the Itanic sinks.
Preview??? (Score:3, Funny)
-Spackler
PS: spelt was a joke
Re:Preview??? (Score:2)
Re:Preview??? (Score:2)
That wasn't that bad. My boss just call me over to evaluate vendor's technology - by arranging a meeting with the sales.
pics (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.hwextreme.com/reviews/processor
the pins on the left side are bent!!
these have got to be worth about $1000-$2000 right now (actually, $10, if it's beat up that badly)
Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:5, Informative)
Clearly a blatant rip-off.
Re:Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:4, Insightful)
Shoddy journalism.
Re:Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:2, Interesting)
Emphasis mine. Looks like they've gone and changed it now. Must be readers of slashdot.
Re:Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:2)
Re:Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:2)
If they really wanted to file off the serial numbers, they should remove at least half the adjectives, and all the buzzwords: AMD's 64-bit processors extend their long history of semiconductor products.
Re:Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:2)
?
That doesn't even make sense, let alone be true in any way.
Re:Clearly a reprint of AMD Marketing material (Score:2)
I would bet they meant to say:
One year ago, AMD introduced their first-ever multiprocessor solution designed for the commercial market.
amd fluf (Score:1)
Don't bother reading this article (Score:5, Informative)
The boundry between news and advertisement gets more porous each year...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Don't bother reading this article (Score:2)
Notice the spread eagle in... (Score:2, Interesting)
Too extreme (Score:1)
Not even any theoretical benchmarks? (Score:2)
Mmmm... nostalgia.
Journalism????? (Score:1)
This is just a poorly cut/pasted buch of marketing speak. So ok, the new athlons will have heat spreading.. No need to waste so much space on that.
Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controller (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, for high-integration CPUs designed for embedded style apps I can see it, but for a main-line CPU it seems to me that tying the memory controller to the CPU limits the lifespan of the design.
I realize that should POITRAM become the new speed king that the RAM controller block of the CPU can be redesigned, and I understand that putting the RAM controller in the chip can increase the memory bandwidth to the CPU.
But it does cause me to think....
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:5, Informative)
This is great for memory intensive & system intensive tasks (from gaming to high demand servers)...
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
Not to be argumentative, but this IS slashdot.
I'd like to see these "serious articles" about memeory and clock latency that say that moving a memory controller from off chip to on chip will reduce latency from 70 cycles to 6.
The latency for retrieving data from main memory is an effect of current memory technology, data can only be fetched so fast from DRAM based memory. DRAM uses a capacative effect to store data and it is relatively slow especially compared to the ever faster modern processors. This is the reason for using physically more complex SRAM which stores data in much faster transistor based latches. SRAM is used for cache in modern computers.
The memory controller, which is primarily comprised of some addressing logic as well as analog stages to interface with the memory bus, must be physically positioned in between the processor and the DRAM based memory banks. Whether it is on the same piece of silicon as the CPU or on a seperate chip has only a very small effect on the latency of the CPU making requests to main memory. The reasons for positioning the controller on the die are mostly economic, and it may by a very tiny speed advantage. The IBM POWER4 [ibm.com] processor integerates the Main memory and L3 Cache controller on the processor.
I realize I called you on your lack of references, so I should probably provide some. Unfortunately I don't know of any good web links, but I recommend reading some books on Computer Architecture and/or Computer Organization:
The Modern Computer Architecture: A common textbook in Computer Architecture/Organization classes [amazon.com]
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
I do remember they were talking about the way current memory controllers (then on some VIA & AMD boards, the article itself was talking about asyncronous vs synchronous memory) and the path used to reach the memory that multiplied the base latency (those CAS/RAS latencies really) of the whole system...
having the controller on the chip & optimizing the path to the memory you drop the extra cycles it would take as the data moves thorugh the system...
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:4, Informative)
CPU designs are pretty modular. It shouldn't be hard at all to swap in a new controller when the time comes. If the internal hardware interfaces weren't very clean, design would take a lot longer.
Doesn't really matter (Score:3, Insightful)
As new (faster) memory becomes available, they'll simply update the memory controller on the (new) CPUs (just as they updated the FSB from 100 to 133 to 166 to 200 to 266 and soon to 333 or 400).
RMN
~~~
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
You'd just drop in a new memory controller. Keep in mind that new memory interfaces don't come around all that often. You might get speed bumps like PC100/PC133 and the various flavors of DDR. But a single model of controller can often handle multiple speeds. Think about how many flavors of PIII/Celeron came out that used the PC66/PC100/PC133 SDR memory interface.
If this gives AMD a big performance boost, which it should, it's a good move.
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:3, Funny)
and BINGGO was his name-o
gee, then you would have to buy something even more often. Boy I bet they will cry all the way to the bank.
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
Either way, it will not be a problem.
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
However, look at what happened during the transition from SDR to DDR, or from DDR to RDRAM - all that had to be redesigned was the external memory controller chip, which allowed the release of mobos that supported the new RAM standards fairly quickly. How quickly would they have been supported if the Celeron/Duron chips had not had external memory controllers?
Also, something that occurred to me as I slept - how do they handle memory coherency in a multiprocessor system? Does each CPU have its own memory, and they coordinate cachelines? (sort of a ccNUMA type arrangement) Or do they have a single external memory controller that all the CPUs talk to (and take the speed hit)?
If the former, that would have a pretty large impact on Linux. If the latter, then a SMP machine would take a large speed hit relative to a UMP machine due to the slower memory access.
Re:Longevity of CPU w/ integrated memory controlle (Score:2)
Given recent trends, the new POITRAM would require a new chipset which would require a new processor anyway. Might as well make it a single chip.
Newisys (Score:2)
Somehow, I suspect their designs are going to get licensed by some very big vendors. Call it a hunch.
Re:Newisys (Score:2)
Where can I get more pics? (Score:1)
Wow. (Score:2, Insightful)
AMD Hammer FAQ (Score:3, Interesting)
AMD releases the 2400+ and 2600+ Athlons tommorrow (Score:5, Informative)
Expect reviews from the usual suspects.
AMD have modified there ratings a little so as
to keep the model numbers fair compared with
the newer faster Northwood pentium 4s. So while
the old rating system would have had 2400+ as a 1933MHz Athlon, and 2600+ as a 2066Mhz Athlon, in
fact the 2400+ is the first 2GHz Athlon while the
2600+ clocks in a 2133MHz.
We can expected newer Athlons to be released later
with 333MHz Front Side buses, and later 512MB of cache. Even when Hammer comes out, AMD will still to selling Athlons for around a year afterwoods, the Athlon will move done the low end to replace the Duron, and thats going give the celeron a real kicking. In fact Intel seems to have blown
there wad completely, with nothing to compete with
the Hammer until there Prescott strink of the
P4 in Q4 2003.
Re:AMD releases the 2400+ and 2600+ Athlons tommor (Score:2)
There's already a review [aceshardware.com] on Ace's Hardware [aceshardware.com] which concludes that the Athlon 2600+ has again leapfrogged the fastest Intel CPU. Of course, when Intel releases the 2.8GHz P4 next Monday, it will yet again leap over AMD.
Ad infinitum.
Re:AMD releases the 2400+ and 2600+ Athlons tommor (Score:2)
Where are the Palladium tests? (Score:2)
Will the first series of Opteron prevent me from downloading mp3s, or will that be an optional extra / firmware upgrade?
Of course I expect users will be able to 'opt-out' of these new features for the next year or so, until the US government, in their infinite wisdom, decide that opt-out is no longer an option, and that there will only be one licensed implementation
Gee thanks HWExtreme...NOT (Score:2)
Yet another article implying Linux is not for the home. People read enough of these articles and they will conclude a priori Linux is not to be used in the home and never try it for themselves.
Note I'm not saying it's completely ready for home use, especially by people with extremely limited computer knowledge, but people should decide for themselves. If everything they read says or implies Linux isn't for the home, they won't even consider it an option.
I hope... (Score:4, Interesting)
looking-under-the-hood? (Score:2)
Mechanical sample? (Score:2, Funny)
RMN
~~~
What a copout! (Score:2)
Reading this truly was a waste of my time. The ad when I clicked on the final "next" link added to my frustration.
Re:What a copout! (Score:2)
It's sad that slashdot actually linked to such utter shit. I'd accuse them of being paid for links, but it's not like it's the first time...
Benchmarks (Score:3, Interesting)
And here's a comparison, openssl 0.9.6b (as shipped with Redhat 7.3) running on a 400 MHz
What was that about lies, damned lies and...
OpenSSL benchmark (Score:2)
Read the marketing fluff (Score:2)
Oh hell! (Score:2)
I was mostly interested in the pictures, 'cause the article was terrible -- I think it was bashed together from press releases. I won't even get into the benchmarking, except to say that benchmarks should *not* compare two completely different architectures running at significantly different clock speeds with different software and OS versions. What were they trying to demonstrate?
The big image on the third page was a shocker. Ack. Sure, it's just a mechanical sample, but adding a big page showing that you bent the pins on the processor doesn't particularly add to your breathless and misleading review. Wow. That was a terrible article. If AMD wants positive press in the technical crowd, they should be giving the samples to folks who know what they're doing.
Umm... Space Heater anyone? (Score:2)
Seriously though... Is AMD or Intel showing any signs of reducing the power consumption and heat output of their chips? Or are they just going to gradually reduce the maximum operating temperature until you need to get a dedicated freezer just to cool your computer?
Until they get on the ball, any alternative processor suggestions? I'm willing to pay more for decent equipment, and because everything I use is in source-form, any processor will be fine. The problem is that I've never seen anything but Intel and PPC notebooks... But, even if I've got to use a different processor on a laptop than on my desktop machines, I'd be willing to. It's really time for me to change.
One hot day, I went into my BIOS and checked out the hardware section, only to find that my CPU and case were 256 degrees F, and my CPU fan was spinning at several hundred-thousand RPMs. You might instantly disregard that, but here, where room temp is often 130F, and I'd had several fans croak already, it was a coffee-spitting moment (on a related note, I need a new keyboard too
Re:In the forth quater? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:In the forth quater? (Score:1)
Wait, are we using Cthulhian algebra again?
Re:In the forth quater? (Score:2)
If you're Enron or WorldCom... For most of us, the fourth quarter is the last 3 months of the year.
Re:In the forth quater? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Slashdot... (Score:1)
(Man, you asked for that one!)
Re:Slashdot... (Score:1)
Re:Question (Score:2)
Can't we all just get along?!