A High-School Hacker's Notebook 339
An anonymous reader writes: "Remember those high-school lunchtimes, back in the day, when you and your computer-nerd friends would hang out by the Krunch Korral, discussing that cool computer game that you were all going to write? And one guy did the music, and one guy made the levels, and you wrote it all down in a notebook? Well, just in case you lost it, here's that notebook."
Better ways to publish.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Mine was similiar (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Mine was similiar (Score:2)
Re:Mine was similiar (Score:1)
Re:Mine was similiar (Score:3, Insightful)
Incedentally, GEICO is a large insurer around the washington, DC area... I'm not sure if they are across the U.S. GEICO stands for Government Enployees Insurance Company... but they have been a commercial company serving the general public for a long time (20+ years).
Re:Mine was similiar (Score:2)
Re:Mine was similiar (Score:2)
Re: Cor, I did that too!! (Score:3, Interesting)
One wouldn't have sold at all well outside Northern Ireland as nobody would understand the humour.
The other was based on the actions of an estranged young man around the time(1989) by the name of Michael. I can't remember the details of the incident but he decided to take pot shots at people in his town then turned his rifle on himself. We were going to call it Michaels Shoot-out Challenge.
Good job we didn't go through with it, we'd have been sued to b*ggery...
Re:Mine was similiar (Score:2)
I forgot (Score:4, Funny)
I basically am about to get a degree in potato farming and the Irish Potato Famine just happened.
Re:I forgot (Score:3, Funny)
Even worse (Score:4, Funny)
prespective... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:prespective... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:prespective... (Score:4, Funny)
uh oh. (Score:5, Funny)
But not in bed. The girlfriend put the kibosh on that one early on.
now they can make a new game... (Score:2, Funny)
I cant see the notebook, but (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I cant see the notebook, but (Score:2, Funny)
you know, for kids
(can't see it either myself)
Hasent Changed.. much (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hasent Changed.. much (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hasent Changed.. much (Score:2)
I do... got a porblem with taht?
we did it (Score:2, Interesting)
Well, it was created in 'klik'n'create' which was some sort of scripting language game creation tool, but hey, it was a working side scroller! Not much real programming happenned.
Re:we did it (Score:4, Interesting)
Delusions... (Score:1)
Anyway I must still be delusional cause I'm starting my 4th year of formal game programming education this year, maybe I'll make a published game yet.
At any rate this reminded me of just how long I've been trying this game making stuff, Yay
Re:Delusions... (Score:2)
It started even before highschool, like sometime in middle school.
Problem is that 3 of the 5 knew basic and 1 of the 5 knew C (I was still learning). So the C guy made a couple dozen games (Starquest? Galaxyquest? it was certainly his best, and had 3-4 different versions, including a 3d prototype during out Junior year).
These days I'm spending time compiling a huge classic ff-based world and refining the idea of using Java reflection & some of my own code validation schemes to have a programmer's RPG. I.E. your sword is a Java class that must follow certain pre & post condition & statistical rules or it's either rejected or breaks.
Re:Delusions... (Score:2)
heard of it... but haven't played with it much.
the principle is simmilar, but I'm working on a greater range of complex interactions (think final fantasy tactics calculator on crack)
Re:Delusions... (Score:2)
Deader than . . . dead (Score:3, Informative)
Dead, or just defending his wallet? (Score:2)
Hmm... maybe somebody could make a new product out of this concept - McAfee Slashdot Protector or Symantec Anti-Slashdot or some such. If they do, and patent it, I officially declare this post to be prior art.
Re:Deader than . . . dead (Score:2)
So imagine going from a $50/month hosting fee to $15k.
And it happens, and companies go out of business dealing with it -- if you make $30k/year from this side job and only half of that is profit, you just got your profit for an entire year eaten by a
Re:Deader than . . . dead (Score:2)
Often they have limits on how much storage space you get though, like 50 megs...maybe that helps prevent them running out of pipe.
Not mine... (Score:4, Funny)
Hmmm... that doesn't look like my handwriting.
We didn't have time to make games (Score:5, Funny)
Re:We didn't have time to make games (Score:3, Funny)
A decade later, we're now all quite successful and happy in our lives. In contrast, while home visiting the 'rents a few years ago, I caught a story on the local news about one of the worst bullies we had to deal with. He got his kicks throwing fist-sized rocks at us in high school. He has just been convicted of attacking a randomly chosen homeless man with a bat, just for fun. They said they were postponing his sentencing hearing pending tests to see if he had brain damage. Nothing any of us couldn't have told everybody years before. .
Re:We didn't have time to make games (Score:2)
So one day I'm watching the news, and I see this guy has been arrested for statchatory(sp?) rape. I move to the phone so fast I created a paradox in my living room. All of my friends lines are busy, for at least 20 minutes, maybe 10-15 people. Finally I get through to one. "Oh SHIT! Did you hear about Mr. C'Debaca? Bastard is in jail, yo!" "Hell yeah I heard, my phone hasn't stopped ringing in 20 minutes!"
From that point on, if I suspected that of any other teachers(cough, Mr. Eberhardt, cough), I mor or less assumed it to be true.
Remember when? High school? (Score:3, Insightful)
"Hey, I have an idea, but I have no skills, so I'm looking for people to do all the work and I just want all the credit! What, no takers? Open source sucks!"
Who's got 100 half-finished games? (Score:1)
Rinse, lather, repeat for my entire life...
Jeez (Score:5, Funny)
It's not funny. (Score:3, Informative)
Posting a link on slashdot is very much like a DOS attack. Slashdot knows how many users visit its site, and knows that most of the sites that they link to cannot handle the load. This is wreckless and negligent, and one day Slashdot is going to get into trouble over it.
Re:It's not funny. (Score:2)
Hosted by The Braindead Monkeys (Score:1)
I got this and none of the seemingly endless number of JPGs that made up the rest of the page. I'd say this much is apparent from the page design and willingness to submit to the Slashdot Effect.
-N
Curious... this discussion (Score:1)
Re:Curious... this discussion (Score:2)
Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:3, Offtopic)
1. Any time an article is submitted that refers to a non-news site (such as the one in this story), slashdot should automatically pull a copy of the page/story and put it somewhere in a temporary cache. The story would automatically generate the "slashdot cache" link and content when the article is posted.
2. The temporary cache that these web pages are pulled into only exist for the stories that are on the front page (or perhaps a day). After that specified time, the cache is flushed.
This code would be VERY simple to write. All it is is a simple screen scrape! A list of sites to not cache (such as yahoo news, cnn, etc.) could be kept in a simple text file.
Despite copyright laws, I think people that have sites that can't handle a slashdot load would prefer a copy of their content on slashdot as opposed to an effective DDOS. Both readers and site owners would be MUCH HAPPIER.
Just my 2c. PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS! IT IS VERY ANNOYING, ALMOST AS ANNOYING AS WHEN SOMEONE TYPES IN ALL CAPS.
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
I still get a pang of regret every time I see a hit in my Apache logs for somebody looking for that picture of a computer case made out of a beer box that I posted to Slashdot about 3 years ago. Why did I remove that picture?
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
If Webwasher, Omniweb et al can spot an Ad, surely it's not beyond the
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:3, Interesting)
As a sysadmin, is there any information anywhere on what sort of machine/connection can handle a slashdot load? I've seen hitcounters of slashdotted sites, and the hits weren't as bad as I was expecting, is it really just that slashdotted servers are 486s in someone's shed?
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
My goal is to get my server slashdotted so I can monitor and tweak it over the time period to see how it handles the load. Lucky sods...
I aggree (Score:2)
A sensible self promothing poster would move there content to a high bandwidth site before posting.
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Well, I had the Slashdot Effect hit me. My problem was not machine speed (well, yeah, it was), but more the bandwidth. I had a 4 meg GIF file on a webserver over a T-1 connection to AT&T. This file sat on a Pentium II with 96 MB RAM. This machine also runs many other functions, including Spam Assassin and mail for about 2,000 users. Also, my main website runs Post Nuke [postnuke.com] and so I got bandwidth Slashdotted because I had 30,000 requests for a 4 MB file by noon of day one. That is over 100 gigabytes to transfer, and a single T-1 can only handle 17 gigabytes per day! I replaced the image with a smaller images (5K), but the number of requests made the webserver go haywire. Before it ran a load average of maybe 0.70 fulfilling all its requests, but when I cut to the smaller size GIF and more requests came in, the load average went to more than 100.00!
The end result was three days of monitoring, firewalling, changing GIFs, etc. My main website (running Post Nuke) got more traffic that day than any other in its history. More than 3,000 requests came day one just from the link with my name. I feel that it is still majorly responsible for the traffic I get, and I still get many links to the 4 MB GIF file.
On another note, I had submitted a story once before that did not point to me, but the link from my name generated more than 10,000 hits in that month.
Could my webserver stand up to Slashdot? If I had more memory -- yes! However, the bandwidth was the problem. It is a marriage of the two bottlenecks that allows systems to beat the effect. If I had my site distributed across several Internet connections and many different, powerful systems it would have been no problem -- just a heavy day.
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:5, Interesting)
I have been slashdotted twice myself (Streaming RealAudio From a Commodore 64 [slashdot.org] and VNC Server for Toasters and Light-Switches [slashdot.org]). In both cases the web server running on the Commodore 64 was really slow because of the load, whereas the "regular" web server hosting the description pages behaved differently in the two cases. The first time there were a number of pictures on the linked page, and the web server was sluggish because of the load. The other time the web page only consisted of a single HTML text page with a single picture and the load on the web server was hardly noticeable.
The web server on the first occation was a dual CPU PC with 2 GB RAM and for the second occation the server was a single CPU PC with 256 MB RAM. The first web server also hosts some hundred domains, whereas the second only hosts one. The Commodore 64 has 64kB RAM and runs at 1 MHz, but only hosted one domain.
To sum up: a web server running on a Commodore 64 is a little too slow to be able to deliver pages in full speed during a slashdotting, whereas a PC can handle it, given that the web page consists mostly of text and doesn't have too many heavy scripts.
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Both were very small pages with relatively small downloads, and both survived the Slashdot effect relatively well. However, this is probably because both were behind an OC-48 connection to the Internet...
I don't know about the Christmas tree's load, but it was a P100 with 64MB RAM, and it surivived the load fairly well. (I think - it appears that everybody was able to access the tree and view it and several people were able to bitch about it "not really being a Linux powered Christmas tree" by either contesting it being a Christmas tree or by contesting it being "Linux powered" - but now is not the time or place to argue that. However, if posters could come to conclusions about that, then they probably could view the site.)
The bottom line is that most servers, assuming they aren't doing some serious server side scripting, can safely handle the Slashdot effect without melting down. The Slashdot Effect is almost always a bandwidth issue and can easily be compared with a DDOS attack - massive incoming requests and outgoing answers filling the available bandwidth. Except that in the case of a Slashdotting, the requests are all valid and are attempting to access the resource, and not just run it off the net.
And while the caching suggestion to help the Slashdot Effect has been given many, many times - enough to appear in the FAQ - the reality is that the editors should actually consider implementing it instead of just dismissing it. I still believe that the right thing to do is to contact the site authors and determine whether or not the site can handle the load. The stories are staggered anyway; seriously, this story could have safely waited a month or longer to come to a mutual agreement with the site operator about how to handle the load.
Six hours is nothing if it means the site won't get taken off the net due to excessive bandwidth usage.
In relation to the KDE links, I still have my server logs of the connections and would at some point like to try and give a better view of the Slashdot effect from the side of a server. For simple text articles, it's not that bad. For movies and large images, on the other hand, I'd imagine it could be a lot harsher. If anyone's interested, I could release the logs minus the IP information. Due to the state of flux my e-mail is currently in, either reply via Slashdot or simply send via Sourceforge [sourceforge.net] - I'll find it :)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:2, Informative)
Goddamn taco-raping Jesus H. Christ jumping up and down on a motherfucking pogo stick. LURK BEFORE YOU POST.
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:3, Insightful)
(I always find it amazing a high-hit-rate site as such could not make profit. Well, nevermind...)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Suggestion to help SLASHDOT EFFECT (Score:4, Funny)
Geekshelf [geekshelf.com] and not worry about it
Re:Tell us more about this (Score:2)
for browsing through folders. Try "Recent Gallery Uploads".
New uploads are held for moderation (unfortunate but necessary). Once moderated, any visitor can
browse the folder. Even when not yet moderated,
the files are viewable to the owner, and deep-linking works all the time (moderated or not).
It is a spinoff of Brickshelf [brickshelf.com]. Brickshelf has a LEGO only gallery. On Geekshelf, anything "geeky" is on-topic.
Re:Slash Cache? too costly... (Score:4, Interesting)
It sounds like you're assuming the problem is technical. I think it is not. Judging by Rob Malda's comments surrounding the subscription thing, Slashdot's largest expense is the bandwidth. Serving up cached articles could easily increase their bandwidth consumption several times over. (Rob says very few people read comments. So instead of loading one front page, the readers now load one front page plus four cached articles. Bandwidth consumption has just pentupled!)
The other issue here, obviously, is copyright infringement. Sure, you and I know that it's benign, even helpful to the site creator, but not everyone is going to see it that way. I can't imagine the slashdot editors want to deal with the legal headaches that could arise here.
I have an idea, though... maybe Google would be willing to set up a "streamlined" URL submission page for "trusted" submitters - I bet quite a few Google employees read slashdot. It would allow the trusted users to submit URL's that would be immediately cached and indexed, instead of the usual several week lag time. Google can afford the bandwidth, and their cache is already a generally accepted part of the net landscape. Of course, this doesn't help with image-intensive pages, but those stories are usually lame anyway (woahhhh, dude, check out that case mod! it's got a big hole chopped in the side and it's filled with strawberry Jell-O.)
Re:Slash Cache? too costly... (Score:2)
Judging from all the editors' comments that "people don't come here to read the comments", by process of elimination they come here to read the front page and visit neat links. And if they want to keep shoving ads down our throat and bitching about [donations|subscriptions|/. pity parties], they'd better deliver the fucking content. And if the content is on a DSL line with a P2 as a webserver, it's their responsibility to ensure that i'm getting some value in exchange for that annoying banner ad at top.
Just like the elitist fucks that review 7 inch singles that nobody can find in indie magazines and then bitch about why nobody cares about their reviews.
Re:A good suggestion, except... (Score:3, Insightful)
That said, it would be very nice if there was some standard machine readable mechanism to indicate, "yes, you may cache this to avoid slashdotting this site" that the site could serve. Of course, then it gets complex: the caching parameters have to be specified, you ight want allow/deny lists for cachers, etc. Finally, if someone does cache such a site, they'd want to have legal proof that permission was granted, and that brings us to the use of PKI and certified digital signatures.
Great idea, but the overhead of a practical implementation with legal safeguards is probably too high. Hmm, perhaps such caching could be construed as a "fair use" of copyright material?
Re:A good suggestion, except... (Score:2)
It's called robots.txt [robotstxt.org] and that's what Google and archive.org use.
Re:A good suggestion, except... (Score:2)
Furthermore, how do you defend against people changing their robots.txt configurations after the fact that their site has been scraped and claiming that scraping was not permitted in the first place?
Remember when... (Score:5, Funny)
memories (Score:3, Interesting)
My high school lunchtimes were either spent eating lunch, joking around with friends, doing homework or going off-campus to smoke pot with friends. Incidentally, none of my friends were computer nerds; I was pretty much the only computer nerd in my class (it was a small school, about 100 people per class). I never let computers define me... it was a hobby. Had I let my life revolve around computer (games|systems|hacking|programming), I probably would have found I had nothing in common with anyone at my school.
On the other hand, I think it would have been cool to have a couple geek friends in high school.
This was obviously a little off-topic, but I have tons of karma and that quip from the story topic made me think about it.
Re:memories (Score:2)
Errr no... (Score:3, Funny)
Damn didn't realise I should have been worrying about other things
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
No, I Just Didn't Get Invited (Score:2)
Yep, we did that... (Score:2)
My friend who did the music was the only one with talent, so he eventually realized the rest of us weren't going to be mastering vector based 3D graphics engines in the middle of grade 11. However, I did end up learning how to write an assembly library and link it into a QuickBASIC program... that's something!
Re:Yep, we did that... (Score:2)
Oddly enough, I didn't make the connection between linear algebra and 3d graphics until I had a spaceflight dynamics course in college...then it hit me...this satellite equation stuff is exactly what I could use to do 3d graphics on the pc...Cool! :)
Nintendo Power sponsored a create-a-game... (Score:3, Informative)
The great game notebook... (Score:3, Funny)
Here's a kid that followed through (Score:3, Interesting)
Poor Kid! (Score:2)
Submitting a link to a kid's site on
Here's from his site: "Thank god for my slow upload speed, or my poor little 100mhz linux server would be getting owned. I guess our site got posted in a slashdot comment, and now im getting quite a few hits (alot more then my 256k upload can handle). So, i guess if you are reading this, you are lucky to get through
Still have a Notebook (Score:2, Funny)
Still do that.... (Score:2)
music? (Score:2)
Pole Position on a TI-82 (Score:2)
othello (Score:2)
Mirror (Score:2, Informative)
I'm trying to mirror the site but it's going slow. Only 2 of the images so far.
http://razor.hemmet.chalmers.se/garote.bdmonkeys.n et/notebook/ [chalmers.se]
Nope. (Score:2)
Well, I never kept a notebook. That's just more evidence they can use against you at the trial.
No computers when I was in high school (Score:2)
So us high school nerds played chess instead.
My first year out of high school (1965), OTOH, got me hooked on computers - Fortran programming on a 7094 at the University.... and life has been nerd-dom ever since!
Me thinks the slashdot folks are a bit, shall we say, less experienced (all right... younger
Looks like I got canned by Slashdot! (Score:2, Insightful)
You might be entertained to know that Slashdot managed to completely annihilate my firewall in just about 2 1/2 hours!
The firewall box was a little 486-66 with 24 megs running Linux out of a RAMdisk.
The data on the hard drive (The boot media) has somehow been corrupted. I can mount it on another machine, but I can't boot from it at all. Interesting, considering that the drive wasn't even mounted at the time it died...
Also, the machine is totally flaky now. Memory errors out the wazoo. I can boot from a floppy, but it'll only stay up 5--30 minutes. I think you guys actually managed to completely trash this machine!
When I first found it, it was just spewing a bunch of hex numbers to the screen. Probably BIOS error codes or something, I don't know.
No big deal. It completely cracked me up yesterday when I saw that my machine was actually *physically damaged* by the Slashdot Effect.
So, I picked up a P-150 with 64 MB today for $20. I finally got it configured about 20 minutes ago.
The instant I brought it up, the "ACTIVITY" light went solid.
Anyone wanna make any guesses how long this one will last?
Re:Here's that notebook (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Here's that notebook (Score:1)
Re:Here's that notebook (Score:2)
Re:Here's that notebook (Score:2)
Google Cache of the main page (Score:2, Insightful)
I can't find the
Re:A mirror for the notebook... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:but did anyone actually do anything? (Score:3, Interesting)
But after five years and 8 people cycled through the team I am proud to say that we did it. And what can I say we got from it? I learned that making games is tough and in the end pretty unrewarding. That is why I am starting a new one
Re:Next-Generation! (Score:2)
Re:Slashdottage Avoidance Stratagems (Score:2)
But you have to understand that the "editors" don't give a flying fuck about this and they are not going to do anything about it.
I can almost hear them giggling hysterically: let them buy more banwith!!!1! ... hey..,. we got urselves some and we paide for it!!1!!