The Good Old Days..... 137
gr8fulnded writes: "How many of you remember seeing some of these old computer ads?" I'm not sure whether to file this under humor or technology. I can imagine looking at a G4 Cube ad 20 years from now, and comparing it with the then-current generation. "Gee Grandpa, did your computers really have wires?"
No way... (Score:1)
Fuck coherency, I've got brahuabagah! (Score:1)
My favorites.. (Score:1)
Microsoft BASIC Compiler [min.net] - Note the misspelling of the word "genius" in the second column.
CompuServe Ad [min.net] - I'll just let this one's headline speak for itself.
Re: ...guess I did.... *ssss* (Score:1)
Atari 800XL in use TODAY at a HOSPITAL! (Score:1)
This page describes how an Atari 800XL (with datasette only, no floppies) is interfaced to medical diagnostic equipment in a Czech childrens hospital. Extremly cool! :)
http://www.asw.cz/~kubecj/aczhwho.htm [www.asw.cz]
Re:Wow (Score:1)
What's Worse? (Score:1)
Re:Bah, Who Cares? (Score:1)
> systems died because they couldn't compete
> with the PC.
Oh, you mean systems like this one [sbrowning.com] couldn't compete with the PC?
(yes, I know he's just trolling, but what the hell).
--
Re:20 years is a loooong time? (Score:1)
It doesn't seem that long, considering that a constant link to a single legacy has been maintained for all that time. I can just imagine an IBM PC programmer from 1980 asking, "So, do you MOV AX,0001H anymore?" I would answer, "No, we've moved way beyond that. Now it's MOV EAX,00000001H." The guy from 2020 would just laugh at our lack of the EEAX register.
And the 1980 guy would be pretty shocked to learn that all of his IBM PC code still runs on the latest machines. Who would have guessed, back then, that legacy compatability would become the #1 priority in the design of computer systems, with all other aspects (performance, ease of use, etc) becoming expendable?
20 years may have been a long time, but most of the computers these days sure don't look much different than they did 20 years ago.
---
Re:A few things I noticed.. (Score:1)
* William Shatner is still using that same Toupee
Insignificant piece of trivia I didn't bother to research: It'd be hard for Bill to be wearing a different "toupee", as he has plugs instead. Not so easy to change plugs.
Re:yay, slashdot (Score:1)
The stories have always been this pointless.
Wake up and smell the troll.
RetroComputing Culture (Score:1)
FYI, the Computer Museums and RetroComputing Culture WebRing [yahoo.com] is probably the hub of cool vintage-hardware websites where old skool users can reminisce.
Further proof.. (Score:1)
---
It was an amazing time... (Score:1)
---
inventor of email? (Score:1)
http://www.sbrowning.com/vintage/index.php3?p=19
---
Re:inventor of email? (Score:1)
---
A few things I noticed.. (Score:1)
* William Shatner is still using that same Toupee.
* Most of those computer ads were really looking for an audience.
Incidentally, I had that star raiders game for my atari, and it was great! That game had suprisingly complex gameplay for that time, and the added keypad controller was the bomb. Lots of space dogfighting history here.
Re:Computer Ads in 1958 Scientific American (Score:1)
The space program had gotten off the ground in October, 1957 in Baikonur, Russia. But I'm sure you knew that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:That's nothing... (Score:1)
That's nothing... (Score:1)
Difficulty (Score:1)
I agree (Score:1)
Wow (Score:1)
Yes a troll, but many, if not most, of these systems long predate the IBM PC. "Not being able to compete with the (IBM) PC" had nothing to do with it. You really think the $5000 monochrome PCs were selling better than the $500 color Ataris in the consumer market? IBM didn't kill these systems, Tandy did, and the 386 killed the Tandy (or was it the 486?).
Furthermore, the old Ataris and Commodores were used far, far longer than their technological level merited. Some of those 1978 machines were still in wide use in the mid to late 80s! Now you find me anyone who still uses a 10 year old IBM-compatible (which is likely a 286 or maybe a 386 if you're real, real lucky) for anything.
Re:1993 (Score:1)
Re:Wow (Score:1)
Re:1993 (Score:1)
Tag RAM (Score:1)
The HX is the only Intel Pentium chipset that can cache more than 64MB of RAM. The LX (Mercury), NX (Neptune), FX (Triton I), VX (Triton "III"), and TX (Triton "IV") all have poor buffering and cheap tag RAM, so they cannot cache more than 64MB.
Re:What? No Atari XL? (Score:1)
And in related news.... (Score:1)
-----------------------
Re:the Honeywell animals (Score:1)
Honeywell always bought the inside front cover of Business Week. Resistors, caps, coils, wire...
k.
--
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people
are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
John Hartford (Score:1)
If it is...holy god.
Two VERY silly Texas Instruments ads (Score:1)
http://www.geocities.com/~compcloset/TI994A-Cos
Not even Bill Cosby could save the 99/4A.
Re:Oh come on (Score:1)
a better URL (Score:1)
http://www.sbrowning.com/vintage/ [sbrowning.com]
Josh
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open windows.
the Honeywell animals (Score:1)
Gee, Grandpa... (Score:1)
Concidence ? (Score:1)
Resurfacing Supressed Memories (Score:1)
Re:CPU : speeds,models,makes,et cetera (Score:1)
Re:Yep yep (Score:1)
--
World Power Systems (Score:1)
Huge res! (Score:1)
And I thought my 1024x768 was too small. Just imagine something like that running... well anything for that matter.
The first computer I ever touched was an XT in my mom's computer repair lab (back in those days people with soldering guns could actually fix computers
I mean, sure... I love many of the newer games that seem so much better (and they are.) But to a 7 years old, playing on a computer for the first time it was like a whole new world.
Ahh... The memories...
Oh well, back to my Quake.
Re:favorite old computer commerical (Score:1)
Nostalgia, Antic Magazine and the Atari 800 (Score:1)
James Tiberius Kirk (Score:1)
JTK: must... resist... VIC-20...
JTK: credibility... fading.... [sbrowning.com]
Re:38911 BASIC BYTES FREE. (Score:1)
$ff into $d015
$d000 was sprite 0's x-position
$d001 was sprite 0's y-position
and so on...
so if you poked $d001 an $d000 with $ff you could see a sprite appear somwhere past the middle of your screen.
by poking $07f8-$07ff you could let the sprite data refer to a 64 byte data block somewhere in the first 16384 bytes of memory (bank 0)
for example poking $07f8 with $c0 let the sprite data start at 12288 or $3000. Filling $3000 to $303f with $ff gave you a massive square. Sprite data was encoded in three rows of 21 bytes. So poking $3000 with $0,$3001 with $ff and $3002 with $0, and so on
Pfff. That's really a long time ago...
Reading prior post brought it all back.
Re:zx81 (Score:1)
Re:38911 BASIC BYTES FREE. (Score:1)
Greedy me (Score:1)
Bought a Apple IIe $600 (2 x 5 1/4 inch fdd!!!) back then - did the job had fun (games machine
Later:
Paid $1300 for AMD 368DX/40 (4mb ram, 80mb hdd) Optiplex chipset (yes they were big back then) had good times, it was not the best, but it was considered powerhouse back then.
Recently
Paid $1500 for Pentium II 300, 128MB RAM 17 inch monitor, bought this just so I could run the OS (Windows) at an acceptable speed.
Hope you all had just as much fun as I did, (and will continue to do so). Merry Christmas.
favorite old computer commerical (Score:1)
Which helicopter was it, anyway? Airwolf or Blue Thunder?
love,
br4dh4x0r
Re:mentality = goatse.cx link (Score:1)
Someone points out a goatse.cx link, and gets moderated down as a troll? I can see "-1, incoherent" or maybe "-1, you're just encouraging them", but it's not a troll.
Oh, don't forget to moderate me down as offtopic. Heaven forbid that criticism of the moderation system be tolerated by the moderators.
My mom is not a Karma whore!
Re:Bah, Who Cares? (Score:1)
What William Shatner Did before Priceline (Score:1)
Though they are a new low!!
- subsolar
Re:favorite old computer commerical (Score:1)
Re:inventor of email? (Score:1)
For the good old days (Score:1)
--GrouchoMarx
Shatner! (Score:1)
CPU : speeds,models,makes,et cetera (Score:1)
Re:Shatner! (Score:1)
http://www.sbrowning.com/vintage/index.php3?p=35 http://www.sbrowning.com/vintage/index.php3?p=37
Re:inventor of email? (Score:1)
Wasn't this an Online Service in the vein of CompuServe in those days?
Re:favorite old computer commerical (Score:2)
only 4 color black and white, but it works ok.
Re:Whoa... Am I that old already? (Score:2)
And that computer would always be networked to the rest of the world, and from it there was an interface to ANYTHING.
The only 3 episodes I really remember (and given the run of that show, it might be all of them!!!) are:
- RALF(that's the computer right?) is taken and setup someplace else and the lead's dad is a spy who needs his sons help.
- Something computer-related makes the lead turn bad.
- Some episode with a major animatronic computer setup with a big dragon that the kids use to foil the bad guys...those meddling kids.
I wish I could find some of those episodes...sci-fi should run it. Ahh...nostalgia.
$4000 for a 10M hard drive (Score:2)
One of my other mags has lots of adds for IBM clones, with the take-off of IBM's Charlie Chaplin adds - all with "sorry Charlie" or other similar knocks.
Re:1993 (Score:2)
Re:a question (Score:2)
'course, you can do the same with most modern TVs, but this was pretty slick!
Pope
Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!
This is very cool to see.... (Score:2)
Recently I went to the local Goodwill store looking for old movie equipment and they had a TS1000 new in a box for $11. I did not find my movie stuff, but I did find my first computer!
Now, thanks to things like xmess [mame.net] I can still enjoy my old computers.
Also, for you Atari fans out there, you might want to check out Atari Magazines [atarimagazines.com]. They have the entire Antic magazine library online, including the source code, program disks, etc. It is a neat trip if you have a few hours to waste. Heck, even if you are not an Atari fan, it is still interesting.
Hmmmm, I dunno (Score:2)
I don't know if I buy this. People are always going to find good ways to waste memory and CPU. Games, for example, are among the most hardware-intensive applications out there. And that's just consumers. On the pro side, you have to do compiling, 3D rendering, real-time video and audio manipulation, encryption/decryption and scientific analysis. Plus, web sites will continue to get more and more complicated as bandwidth and other various technologies improve.
Then there's the Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence [berkeley.edu]...
- Scott
------
Scott Stevenson
zx81 (Score:2)
Finally you can afford to satisfy your lust for power
[zx81 ad]
It was funny 10 years ago, it still is.
William Shatner invented computing (Score:2)
great minds think alike (Score:2)
http://british.nerp.net/experimental/80s/oldmag
enjoy
Re:Whoa... Am I that old already? (Score:2)
Re:An interesting trend (Score:2)
Re:inventor of email? (Score:2)
http://british.nerp.net/texnet.html
You wouldn't by chance have missed... (Score:2)
Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
Shatner (Score:2)
Can anyone imagine this... "The VIC-20. It's big... Really Big."
Re:Whoa... Am I that old already? (Score:2)
For example, they said professionals wouldn't need colour, colour computers are for games and therefore are not meant to be used in the office
As fun as it is to bash billg@microsoft.com, that wasn't Bill. That was IBM.
Re:An interesting trend (Score:2)
That's a new one!! *g*
the atari 800 (Score:2)
Aaarrrgghhhh (Score:2)
Back to square one...
Oh come on (Score:2)
Whoa... Am I that old already? (Score:2)
That was a real trip down memory lane.
Old School: notice how, back then, Microsoft was the hero and Bill Gates represented the ultimate success story of school drop-outs? We had Microsoft Basic, Microsoft Word (which was a really nice, simple text editor with an innovative format called RTF, back then), MS-DOS floppy formatting, etc. Just when you least expected it, our old-time hero turned into a big greedy jerk. Oh the times, they are a-changing!
Memorable hardware: TRS-80 Model 100 (the first "laptop" that got massively adopted by writers on the move and schientific projects in far-fetched places such as the Himalaya alike), the early 8-bit machines that got most of us started: ZX81, TRS-80 Color Computer (a.k.a. CoCo), Vic20/C64, Atari 800.
Marketing freaks: Fans of typography will have noticed the futuristic sans-serif variants used in contrast to the boxy-looking computers of the time, hardware designers no doubt noticed the predominance of grey and/or metalic colours, while writers certainly enjoyed the over-abundance of openly published specs and page-wide texts explaining the merits of each product.
Of interrest to Atari fans: early Atari Computer ads said "We can make beautiful music together" ages before the 520 ST stormed the music business with its built-in MIDI ports.
--
Re:Bill Gates (Score:2)
See you in hell,
Bill Fuckin' Gates®.
Who will need more? (Score:2)
Who's ever going to need more than 48K?
Dancin Santa
Old Apple Commercials in Quicktime... (Score:3)
ftp://ftp.ausmac.net/pub/mac/Quicktime-Movies/ [ausmac.net]
Enjoy!
and... (Score:3)
old Amiga ad (Score:3)
Bill Gates (Score:3)
An interesting trend (Score:3)
When you buy a PC today, the specs include memory and CPU and not much else. We're pretty close to the day where CPU won't matter for personal workstations (my P200, now almost 3 Moore-generations old, is still a highly usable NT machine; until last year I did most of my coding on a Linux P90 with 12 VC's). The web is accelerating this trend, since any machine that can run 10 browser windows will always be useful.
Memory is similarly stagnating; unless you work with Photoshop or its ilk, chances are you have no use for >256MB.
Anyway, my prediction at that time was within five years, the only spec on a new desktop PC will be the screen size; you'll buy a 20" PC or a 35" PC, and not care about what's inside. A month later, Viewsonic conveniently propped up my assertion with a campaign pointing out all PC's are the same; the only differentiator is the monitor (they favored Viewsonic monitors for the best PC experience).
Looking at these ads, you can see the trend vividly -- the IBM copy [sbrowning.com], for example, has a box of tiny type listing the diagnostic capabilities, the printer port speed, and a dozen other things no one would care about today.
In fact, all of the really [sbrowning.com] successful [sbrowning.com] computers [sbrowning.com] have tons o'specs. Most of the ones touting usability, etc. without benefit of hard numbers were flops [sbrowning.com].
We live in exciting times.
cheers,
mike
What? No Atari XL? (Score:3)
And the games. I had over 300 games for my 800XL. Sure most of them were crappy as can be, but they were fun.
And the old Ataris even had voice synthesis! Man, how long did it take PCs to get that?
Man, I loved my old Atari. One of the worst days of my life was when my mom threw it away while I was at school. She told me "I didn't use it anymore," when all that happened was the disk drive broke the week before. Oh well.
A few months later I got an 8086 with the "full" 640K of RAM and when I heard how fast and how much RAM it had, I surely thought it would make my puny 64K Atari look like junk. Boy, was I disappointed. It had text only monochrome graphics and WordPerfect 5.1. Yeah, WP beat the pants off of Atari's Word Processor, but the machine was no fun at all.
A few years later I got a 386. Surely a 25 Mhz "monster" with 2MB of RAM and VGA graphics would beat the crap out of the Atari, right? Nope. It wasn't until my Pentium 90 did I enjoy computers as much as I enjoyed the ancient Atari.
Re:Bill Gates (Score:3)
The headline testimonial in this ad [sbrowning.com] refers to the May '83 issue of Byte Magazine, which, by odd coincidence, I had right in front of me in a little stack of obsolete literature keeping my monitor at a comfortable height. Curious, I turned to the referenced page 34 of the mag and found the glowing words of praise just as they appeared in the advertisement. This is not the interesting bit. What I found amusing was the closing paragraph of the article:
"Radio Shack could probably make money issuing just a mediocre portable computer. Instead, it produced an exceptional machine. The designers of this machine--including Bill Walters of Radio Shack, Bill Gates of Microsoft, and several others at both companies--should be congratulated. And I have a feeling they will be--all the way to the bank."
It's past 4am and I'm kind of tired, so you'll have to add your own Microsoft/Bill Gates/Radio Shack joke here.
Re:Bill Gates (Score:3)
On p.209 it sez:
So this was Gates swansong as a programmer and he made it into a fine product that is STILL being used by many journalists.
It goes against the grain of the popular image of Gates as a greedy businessman who profiteers from other's work and doesn't contribute anything himself but apparently Bill Gates was a competent programmer in his time.
20 years is a loooong time... (Score:3)
I think the astonished youth is more likely to ask "Your computers were really visible to the naked eye?" or "...required external power sources?" or maybe "...didn't rule the world as harsh yet fair despots?"
Computer Ads in 1958 Scientific American (Score:4)
Perkin-Elmer was one such company advertising back then. We had a laugh at work because until recently, they still used those beasts there. Because they never rewrite code when we change platforms, only port it, there's a routine called PEKLUDGE() which must be called. Nobody ever claims to understand what it does anymore.
I remember some detail of one ad - it was comparing one company's product to the competition and described how it had some 512 bytes of memory and could perform something on the order of a few hundred operations per second. And I think they boasted that it could use the new punch-card technology to input programs...
I gave the issue to a friend who was born that month, but I think I'm going to borrow it and put up a page with some of the ads on it. Email me if you're interested in the URL when it's available.
Yep yep (Score:4)
--
Old computer ads? (Score:4)
---
cat
20 years from now? (Score:4)
In the year 2020...
See you in hell,
Bill Fuckin' Gates®.
38911 BASIC BYTES FREE. (Score:5)
With the C64 it was common convention to prefix hexadecimal numbers with a $ instead of the now more common "0x". So $600 was decimal 1536. A location which, if you (POKE|ST[AXY])'ed it, you could make a character appear at a certain place on the text screen. That's because $0400-$07E7 (inclusive) was by default used to store the 40x25 text screen. The colour information was stored elsewhere though, at $D800-$DBE7. After the screen memory was a few bytes related to the eight graphic sprites (but you had to poke at the video chip registers in the $D000 range to actually make the sprites appear). And right after that came $0800, which was the start of BASIC program memory space, which extended all the way up to $A000 (which was the start of the BASIC interpreter ROM unless you fiddled with $0001 to unmask the RAM that was there). That's 38912 bytes, which when you exclude the zero byte at $0800 gives you the "38911" in the "38911 BASIC BYTES FREE." message that appeared when you turned the computer on.
Just a little arcane knowledge I thought I would share.