OK. But what about removing parts that are meant for private cars? I'm willing to subsidize the oil infrastructure for the things I use, after all.

The average large EV fuel economy is 4 _miles_ per kWh, but your math is correct. Except that you're comparing a large-ish SUV (Model Y) and the tiniest, most sluggish Camry. Model 3 RWD short range is 5 miles per kWh. Fuel price is also very volatile, and it's pushed down by the very EVs that benefit from its increase.

More importantly, the vehicle price itself is a big part of the savings. The US does NOT produce cheap EVs, but China does. E.g. Leapmotor A10 CUV is priced at $15k for the base model: https://moparinsiders.com/leap... Sure, it would be more expensive if produced in the US with the stronger safety standards and more expensive labor, but even at $25k it would blow any competition out of the water. The closest ICE car is something like Chevy Trax at $23k that has the 30mpg fuel economy. And EVs will get even cheaper as the battery R&D and capital expenses get paid back, ICE cars will not.

So yep. ICE cars are dead. The US just hasn't realized it yet.

I drive an EV. Why should I subsidize your gas car with oil industry tax incentives?

Also, it's a false dichotomy. Apartment buildings can install metered chargers and pay for them through user fees. At 2 cent per kWh surcharge, they'll pay themselves back in about 7-10 years.

I thought wind mills kill whales and eat pets in Ohio.

You bet!! Climate change always awaits the market making choices for it.

Your attitude is precisely why Trump is going to declare himself God-Emperor Of America and send the left to Happy Camps.

Less coal burned in America means more coal for China to burn.

Most of the areas where Russia is fighting are full of ethnic Russians and they literally asked for Russian peacekeepers in 2022 because Kiev kept attacking them.

And it's quite likely that Trump will soon be invading Canada to protect the Western provinces from Ottawa. I suspect he's already set that up with Carney, since it will give him the most valuable parts of the country at very little cost.

Why would you send new tanks to Ukraine when they'll be destroyed in a few hours on the front lines? Might as well get a few hours of use out of the old ones that would otherwise be scrapped.

And the citizens also pay for environmental degradation.

Bullshit, good just means the schmoe cannot be arsed to do it correctly.

Clearly you didn't read the link. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/1... CCP hates human rights and are not afraid to admit it.

Why? What would that accomplish?

Ukraine had "unfair" elections, so Putin stole Crimea from them. It's super logical.

What gun manufacturer was ever sued for violating export curbs? I think you should spend more time on Wikipedia.