Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Ironic (Score 1) 283 283

By shutting down the event where his video stream was (almost) shown.

No, as long as they don't restrict the content of the bills and they do permit them somewhere reasonably where the public will see them. No dodges like letting them post them on the inside of dumpsters only.

Comment Re:ah, Tajmar eh? (Score 1) 356 356

I was primarily reacting to rubycodez post being the 4th or 5th time he said exactly the same thing in this article.

As for Tajmar, he is not the first or the last experimenter who has been in error, it's the nature of science. Remember the FTL neutrinos? As for warp drive, I can find no reference to him making such a claim. I can't even find a wild media claim of that for him.

Comment Re:Believe it when I see it (Score 1) 356 356

No, healthy skepticism allowed us to realize that the mass of an object won't affect it's acceleration due to gravity in a vacuum and yet not be on repeated expeditions looking for a unicorn nest. Cynicism would have us still believing that an object set into motion remains in motion until it gets tired, then it falls.

Comment Re: Looking more and more likely all the time... (Score 1) 356 356

But it's not generating thrust by microwave emission. If the thrust is of the form of action-reaction, we have yet to detect what it is pushing against. Hence the wild speculation about virtual particles or the fabric of space. Even those seem more likely than it being truly reactionless but it wouldn't be any less useful if one of those proves to be the case.

Many people write memos to tell you they have nothing to say.