Would be in awe of this. No more having to try to slow down trucks while a guy shoots harpoons into the passenger seat and then jump into the cab to tranquilize the driver and steal the entire truck and trailer!
Yep, does the criminal in question look similar to Vin Diesel?
I believe hacking into things was the plot arc of a few of the later F&F movies.
The UK don't even have a sun. "The Sun" doesn't count because it can't get any dimmer.
Nonsense, even John o' Groats gets its regulation 5 minutes of sunshine per day.
BTW, I love the Scottish summer, it's my favourite day of the year.
Releasing a database of personal info? Shame on you! But we have laws against that...
Do you believe in a right to privacy of action? If I've murdered someone and taken their wallet, is that none of your business?
Money is not speech. Money is action. Money is backed by obligations - public obligations. The only bilateral agreement is a gentleman's agreement. As soon as you need any kind of stronger agreement than that, you need a third party. And that can be a mafia don, or it can be your tribe's patriarch to wage blood feuds over you, or it can be a government.
From public view? That's trivial. Deposit it in a bank, and pay your bills from it there. The public can't go in and see what you've spent money on.
But you probably meant from the government's view, didnt you? That's called money laundering. The reason it's illegal is that if it weren't, the whole system that makes money practical and safe to use in your everyday dealings would come crashing down. Even faster than it already is, I mean. We would be back to blood feuds before you could blink.
There's a word for a person who would submit untainted coins to a tumbler without compensation (i.e, getting back more coins than they put in).
That word is "sucker". Sure, there are many people who will tell you that it's a perfectly normal thing to give your money to a likely money launderer in the hopes of getting back the same amount, just for "privacy". They're hoping you'll do it. They're fishing for suckers.
When folded, the Z-flip is also about twice as thick as a non-folding Galaxy phone, but it's actually more comfortable in a front pants pocket if you climb stairs often enough.
I've experimented with this. It's because the tradeoff lets the folded phone slide around more freely (compared with a larger phone), and that's the key to comfort.
By the same argument, the Z-fold design combines the worst of both the regular, non-folding phones (namely their height is comparable to a pants pocket) and the extra thickness of the Z-flip.
That's not a gas station!
And it was as if a million people in the audience cried out at once.
And if that doesn't work, we'll appeal to an even higher authority.
It's already in the works.
The Pope is technically infallible.
He has a direct wifi connection to the Invisible One In The Sky.
So when he gets put to the question, it will take a day, two tops, and he'll relay the Big Boy's exact wishes to the old girls.
Two and a half, if saturday's barbecue party in the Vatican's garden is particularly bangin'
Are you crazy?
No, I'm not. Don't be a sperg.
Red Bull is at least $3/can.
No, it isn't. 12oz 4pk@$10.99 = $2.75
A trailer full of Red Bull is about 70,000 cans.
No, it isn't. ~56,500 12oz in a 80k lbs trailer, max.
sold at 1/3 value
Wrong "value." Retailers don't pay retail, obviously.
There's always somebody who can be intimidated by a bully.
That wasn't *all* I said, but it is apparently as far as you read. But let's stay there for now. You apparently disagree with this, whnich means that you think that LLMs are the only kind of AI that there is, and that language models can be trained to do things like design rocket engines.
Particularly striking as they started from a pretty solid premise, that mismanagement broadly is the cause. Especially citing Boeing, which was *well* documented that the changes can be traced back to acquiring McDonnel Douglas, which was ripe for the taking after being mismanaged into failure and Boeing having the genius idea that the best thing they can do with a leadership team that tanked their former company is to put them in charge of the still viable Boeing. People who wanted to scream DEI pointed to DEI initiatives that started *after* the troubled MAX program was already in the air.
I wager engineers are willing to agree, as they see their work as solid but the business mismanaging things to make good engineering infeasible.
"We (the broader company) doesn't know how to engineer, but *I* still do" I could easily imagine being the takeaway. I think most of us can relate to being part of a broader mismanaged whole.
Put your best foot forward. Or just call in and say you're sick.
