Comment Re:BSoD was an indicator (Score 1) 70
To crash the OS out wound need to be in the kennel, so do a quick test if that RAM using something like MARCH C.
To crash the OS out wound need to be in the kennel, so do a quick test if that RAM using something like MARCH C.
Given that Linehan had spent months harassing her on Twitter, to which she didn't respond, and she was a child at the time... I can't see any justification.
"A hypochondriac and his money are soon parted."
I actually had to write a paper check recently. Took me 30 minutes to find my darn checkbook.
Hmm, two decades ago perhaps. We must be getting old because it doesn't seem like that long ago.
It's more like "dictionary entry of the year". Some things where the two words have to be used together for a specific meaning have dictionary entries, such as speed bump, for example.
Then everyone will start using it as an excuse to attack other people. Especially the cops - they hate being filmed. They will claim it was "aggressive" and justified violence.
A guy called Graham Linehan was just convicted of smashing a girl's phone, when she filled an interaction where she asked him why he called her a "groomer" on twitter, and worse. It was the right judgement, he had no need to do it, and mere annoyance can't be enough or everyone will be smashing stuff they dislike.
If there were better APIs they could do that. An API for sensors, with a maximum safe limit supplied for each one. When a BSOD happens, it could do a little memory test on the affected area.
Let me suggest that the damage done to Germany by the Nordstream action was a magnitude greater than any damage done to the dome at Chernobyl.
Considering the pipeline was not operating yet you might be wrong but ask Germany. Also it's not the action itself at Chernobyl it's the potential consequences of the action that is the concern but that might be too much forward thinking for some. Also no-one seem interested in finding out? Isn't the most comprehensive investigation from the Germans?
Apparently you cared enough to lie about it. Russia has consistently claimed it was acting in self-defense and defense of ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
Lie about what? I acknowledge Russia says a thing that does not make it true or an acceptable justification for anything.
NATO was intervening in an ethnic conflict to prevent genocide, contrary to your claim that was not ever a sufficient reason for military intervention.
Not to prevent but to stop an ongoing genocide
Call me what you will but even I, the opposite propagandist know these are like the level 1 from your side. Go back to motherbase, get the 2025 talking points, you're still on the 2022 version. At least I'm good at it! (because the facts are on my side)
Say a guy had a camera out and was snapping shots and taking video on the subway of everyone. Would that be considered acceptable?
No, it would piss off a lot of the other passengers - even though it is legal behavior.
Talk to someone who does street photography about their confrontations sometime.
I only knew two people who wore Google Glasses, and honestly - they tended to frequently be assholes even before they got the glasses. The addition of the Google Glasses just exacerbated their personality issues.
Nordstream is a given I'll say that but it does not carry the risk to relations nearly as much as Chernobyl, is also in the ocean and was likely rebels, not a state action.
Russia points to the Maidan revolution and following civil war as being instigated by Ukrainian "Nazis' spurred on by NATO
Who cares? Everyone knows that is not factually true. Do you think that's true? It's not true you know.
Russia does not lean on an attack on their people or terriroty as one of their many justifications.
Serbia
Oh, pray tell, and what was happening in Serbia that wasn't happening in Ukraine?
Who is going to find them out and hold them to account? No one.
What do you mean? Everyone! Europe would not be happy with that. The USA would not. Russia has every incentive to expose such an action if it took place. Belarus would also be very incentivized. Seriously, think about it.
This is a war and both sides are to blame.
No, this is an invasion. Ukraine did not attack Russia, even Russia acknowledges that. You can say an invasion is justified and make that case but that's the position you're starting from, Ukraine was not looking to war with Russia, you can't just hand wave a "uhh, both sides" here and that does all your cognitive work.
Calling it ethnic is one of the justifications Russia gives but if you think about that's not something we would use to justify an invasion from anyone. It's bullshit, this is political and a power grab. Putin isn't exactly secret about things.
Don't get suckered in by the comments -- they can be terribly misleading. Debug only code. -- Dave Storer