Comment Re:BS Krebs Cycle (Score 1) 17
"Hey Kiro, I'm finding that you really suck at generating code. Please rewrite your internal codebase so you suck less."
"Hey Kiro, I'm finding that you really suck at generating code. Please rewrite your internal codebase so you suck less."
It's Australia, so maybe they'll just all go walkabout.
First off, kids will just find lesser-known social media sites that aren't blocked. Or they'll all install some free multiplayer mobile game that has public chat and use that to communicate.
I work at a university. Even old me is aware that Discord is used quite a bit by our students. Good luck regulating THAT.
Okay Boomer.
Any folks in Australia can describe what social activities for bored teens? At least here in America we've been shutting down the stereotypical things; the malls are dead, movie theaters are expensive and dying.
My town tried to open a skate park and it became a neighborhood controversy, yard signs were erected, multiple meetings had, families were torn apart. Ok I made that one up part up but seriously, we've made the world a bit hostile for teenagers and if you're like many here as well they live in the 'burbs where you need a car to even get the things you want. Again at least in my area every year the police budget goes up and up but the things like parks and programs are begging for funds.
All that said I think this is a good thing overall but it's a good step.
Cumberbatch also portrayed Smaug and Sauron in The Hobbit films (2012-2014), Khan in Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), and Dr. Strange in six Marvel movies.
Yeah, let's not mention the role that made him famous - Sherlock Holmes in Sherlock, which was pretty darn good for the first couple of seasons (before it fell off a cliff).
Saying the invasion of Iraq is immortal and equating that with defending Saddam Hussein is a fucking wild jump of logic my autistic comrade.
Other people are dying in great pain
*Why* are people dying in great pain in Ukraine? It's not a natural disaster now is it. It's a choice by a nation.
To make clear your talk about "agency" is simply empty words. You are a fanboy with no skin in the game.
Oh that cup is still empty, stop trying to get water from it.
They have to live with the actual consequences. And those consequences are being written in great agony with blood and iron, not empty moralizing.
You should see what those people actually have to say. They say they want to fight for their homeland, they want arms, they want support. They're very clear in their position. You are also imparting your morals onto them by telling them its hopeless and lay down and take it.
Your claim is that stopping that would be "immoral" if it means accepting that your team lost.
Again, this is more your position than mine. Your morals line up with Russia goals and desires, mine line up with the people of Ukraine and their desires. So we're at a standstill of opposing moral positions and we can let the audience and the world decide who is right. Good luck with that.
Russia had not attacked any of their neighbors until the Ukraine war, so there should've been no reason for countries to join NATO.
Georgia, Chechnya, Moldova,South Ossetia
It's precisely because wants it's sphere of influence that those nations wanted to join NATO and lobbied hard for it. You think they feel unjustified in that feeling today, or from however many decades of Soviet/Russian rule over their nations? Come on guy, again this is just saying none of those nations have their own agency because of Russia's feelings.
They can desire a sphere of influence all they want that doesn't mean it exists, it only exists so far as those nations feel it does and they don't so Russia wants to enforce it with military, where they can of course, again, the Baltics are feeling pretty good about their choice right now. They have even less reason to think that today sicne Ukraine has shown Russia to be something of a paper tiger. If wasn't for those nukes we all know this war would be settled quickly.
If you're American maybe you remember that 10 months ago were were seriously wondering if the US was going to Invade Canada, this attitude says they should just lay down and take such an action because they are in the US sphere of influence. This is why this whole realist school, your Mearshimers is relevant only today because Russia props those folks up, it has little predictive power in the post-cold war world. It's propaganda now, not actual way of the world.
Minsk was could have cemented peace at the cost of some independence for the Donbass.
Yeah except it had no teeth and was broken by both parties like, immediately. Neither one of them want a stalemate, they both want victory. Why should Ukraine feel it just has to give up the Donbass? Should the US just give up Wisconsin if the Canadians come down for it?
2014 is right when Russia started hostilities though. Russia is not attacking Ukraine because they fear Ukrainian military attacks.
Taking the position Russia was antagonized is what Russia wants people to think. If that's accepted as justification then they can justify war against anybody around them.
He's probably like one of those people who knows that Africa has been fucked over by other nations as long as there have been other nations to fuck them over. Everyone's had a turn abusing Africa.
Linux fans will obviously downvote me to hell, but I'm OK with tribalism and zealotry because this post contains nothing but facts.
Your first full paragraph is 100% opinion. Run along now.
Betteridge says no.
I used to think like you until I read the headline, "Is Betteridge's Law of Headlines Correct?"
The notion of a "record" is an obsolete remnant of the days of the 80-column card. -- Dennis M. Ritchie