Comment Re:wait, what? (Score 1) 14
Basically waymo cannot be cited for traffic violations and killing a pet is just a traffic violation. The most they could be held responsible for would be the value of the pet which is usually under $100.
Should we then apply the same logic to very fallible human drivers?
The entire positive side to bureaucracies and committees and governments is that they have enough people in them to do multiple things at once.
Usually when someone says something like what you said and I quoted above here, they are trying to argue that human drivers shouldn't exist. Maybe this is true, for some particular set of truths, but there's always a number of ways you can look at a situation. For example, I would argue that no one and no computer should be driving in the bulk of situations we are currently driving in, because cars are a terrible mode of transportation in the cities where most people live.
Mods are bigger trolls than ever.
That's true, but that doesn't make what you said above correct. Left and right are very, very different things, and it very much does matter which you get.
And to be fair, I have no idea what that is yet either, so far all the "real world" type devices have been big flops and the public reputation of the whole thing is iffy at best. One thing it doesn't seem to be is just chatbots, they're very impressive already so I don't think making them "even better" is going to move the needle.
For me personally the thing that's hard to shake is the trust factor of it. I don't think I can trust them to give accurate answers and information, both by either the lack of context or hallucinations or outright manipulation by the operators of the service, either by greed ("This chat session brought to you by Oreo cookies if you're wondering why all the responses hint at their deliciousness") or just straight up represent personal preferences (Grok)
What does OpenAI do if their AI is actually inferior to Google's or Amazon's? What do their investors do? What is their IPO going to be like if that happens?
My feeling for all of these companies and OpenAI that those diversification projects they just put on hold, they are all looking for the one thats really going to capture the mass public zeitgeist of sorts. In business AI is moving for sure but to the general public there really isn't that breakthrough yet. The money going into AI is trying by force of nature to make it as large as when the WWW first took off or like when smartphones took off.
OpenAI thinks it's Apple in 2009 but there's no App Store yet that turned the iPhone from a very cool smartphone to "everyone and their mother has one". They haven't found that real world mass public AI breakthrough yet. The Jony Ive thing in particular I bet they have a lot riding on on being the new thing everyone will want to have.
It used to take decades for companies to fully enshitify themselves. AI truly is an increase in productivity!
but the wealthy in my extended family bootstrapped from poverty
And the only reasons they were able to do that was the productive society that they, you, me and everyone else plays a hand in creating
I hear all this, you know, 'Well, this is class warfare, this is whatever.' No. There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody. You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.
Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless — keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.
Well first it was just a figure of speech but second I have no particular issue with Dell hardware. I'm not a fan but they've been perfectly cromulent systems when I've used them (i'm a Thinkpad fan myself)
But with something like this much like many have done with Target this year it's just a little nudge from "ambivalent" to "actively avoid"
Your whataboutism is a weak, stupid person's argument and isn't even tangentially related to anything being discussed here.
Go fuck your own face.
Who the hell just trusts AI code to not do bad things without at least looking it over once, or running it in a sandbox VM?
Anyone who does that deserves the output they get.
I love getting modded down by people who support rape. If the worst pieces of shit hate me then I must be doing it right.
FORTRAN is the language of Powerful Computers. -- Steven Feiner