I would love to see rigorous standards for safety imposed but given the group who is currently in control of the US government, this has zero-percent chance of passing. Naturally, there is going to be a zillion idiots here saying, "CHINA WILL DO IT!" failing to recognize that the US is actually leading in having AI perform mental tasks while China has focused on AI robotics. In all cases, it's not gonna happen and idiots will stop it.

It sucks that they haven't fully reimplemented some features BUT one thing I was going to say was "unless they rewrote it in C++ using Qt then they shouldn't have bothered" and I was aghast to learn that is exactly what they did!

Considering the new possibilities opened by changing to Qt (people really underestimate it's power), I look forward to seeing what they do next.

I honestly cannot think of another person more who has lied more than the current US president.

If ANYONE can finance good security, it's a bank. Among banks, central banks are in better positions than other banks to properly fund security. At this point, they should be working on finalizing their own extremely well-tested OS build. Seriously, their code should be rock-solid and "old" instead of chasing the latest computing fad. Also, if they are using close-source stuff like Windows then they aren't even pretending to be serious about security.

If this statement proves anything then it is that for decades they have neglected their responsibility as a bank to invest in good security.

Everyone, go look quickly before it gets taken down: Half-life 3 is in there! :)

Limit IP an address to viewing X commits a day. After that provide AI friendly instructions for how use git to render the desired page.

I don't expect 100% of people or bots to comply but the ones that don't will get nothing.

Never going to happen because there is too much money involved.

I'll tell you exactly how this ends: a private settlement for an undisclosed amount of money.

Talk about trying to close the barn doors after the horse has bolted! You're only waiting until there are a gillion datacenters going up to talk? Oh wait, no, it's not that at all because fuck the environment, right?

See, it's all about losing the certainty that people like him have been afforded in life. Frankly, I hope they lose total control of the situation and are forced to shut everything down, only to be faced with the dire consequences of their actions. Fuck all the people that don't give a fuck until it could possibly impact them because they are the same assholes who want tax breaks and think empathy is a weakness.

Significant increases in pay will draw more people to join the field. Will it take time? Yes but it is how you get more people. However, if it were truly exponential then you would get people coming from other countries. It can be done, if you have the money.

While I mostly agree, the one part I may disagree with is with documentation. It's not uncommon that documentation can be scarce for certain things which means that if someone can generate, review, and publish documentation for part of the project, I see that as a way of helping users that would otherwise have very little, just poor documentation, or in some cases no documentation at all.

Given that we live in a "market-driven" society, the correct conclusion is that companies are refusing to properly compensate skilled workers. As for the cause, the only rational conclusion is that there is insufficient competition in the energy distribution market. To encourage competition, the correct move would be to start breaking up large energy distribution companies like PG&E.

If only there was some way to process these flammable batteries in a way that their components could be reused again for batteries, like some sort of cycle that goes again and again, a "recycle" if you will.

I dunno, I'm just spitballing here.

Mathematicians invented imaginary numbers because they refused to admit they were wrong which logically means that AI will invent hallucinated numbers to explain why they gave a non-sense answer to a basic math question.

That's fine because now everyone should be getting an EV which solves the engine reliability issue.

I want lots of things but I choose what I get. People need to take some responsibility for what they buy.