Comment NOT TRUE! (Score 1) 18
It wasn't me, it was my AI that went rogue! Opps, my bad. So, we're good now, right?
It wasn't me, it was my AI that went rogue! Opps, my bad. So, we're good now, right?
Both States just turned blue
That's not entirely accurate. Arizona did move to be fully controlled by Democrats (governor, senate, house) but Texas is still split as Republicans hold a majority in the Texas State Senate while Democrats have the governor and house.
I'm not saying anything you have said is wrong but Texas Republicans may move to frustrate efforts to curb data centers in Texas. That said, SpaceX is likely looking to cement any deals with the state governments before 2027 when the power shift takes effect. You are correct that the shift in political reality is likely complicate matters for SpaceX.
This is precisely the kind of inexact data that neural networks are perfect for forging. All you need is to feed bit of read data into it and it will be able to generate all the days of your life. Hell, classify the events you feed it and you can turn a narrative into "heartbeat" reality.
The upside of this is that if this takes off that you can have your bot post banal bullshit daily about your perfect fitness life and the cost of your health insurance may be lowered because you know they are selling your data.
The reason they are doing this is because AI cuts through all their bullshit that is designed to fool humans. Naturally, they have no problem with you using their AI which undoubtedly is instructed to lead people to accept worse options.
AI is stupid but United Airlines is a bunch of hypocrites that is bursting at the seams with malice.
After being exposed a merely a method of gathering data about users, yeah, people didn't think that was cool.
This problem existed before LLM were everywhere, you keep trying build platforms that turn a profit off of users and that's the problem.
Falcon Guardian has already been to be 100% effective at keeping bots away. It's also effective at shutting down airports and driving hospitals to the brink.
I would say, it's effectiveness is just short of a self-destruct option.
If I were an EU citizen, I could refrain from using tiktok. But I could not refrain from living under a government that thinks I'm a child.
Given the sophomoric nature of your regular posts, you are a child. Have you still not realized that the very things you scream for are also the things destroying this nation?
But whatever you do don't use it to make clean room implementations of Office!
Dude.. how fucking funny would it be if someone actually showed up to the competition and presented EXACTLY that.
...please help us figure it out. We welcome all suggestions. Please. Anything.
If you aren't going to use to make weird porn then why did you even bother building it?
None of the specifications seem to be useful for the advancement of science. Honestly, this seems more like a Skunk Works project.
News for nerds: No; Stuff that matters: Yes
You unfortunately have found yourself on the short end of the English version of a most vexing parse.
If you try to find the flaws as a defender, you have already lost.
Non-sense! There are plenty of very well designed software packages built using defensive programming practices that still have security flaws. To claim you have already lost when using those measures is to claim that only code with years of tireless review like NASA's near flawless software is good enough.
Just because we lacked the resources to find software flaws didn't mean that there were never massive vulnerabilities just waiting to be discovered, it just means it required dedication to find them. The lack of investment in security is about to be laid bare for all to see. Those that are actually interested in making secure software now have the opportunity to get even closer to that goal. Everyone that has been doing (and continues to do) the bare minimum is about to get a lesson in the importance of investing in real security.
Good security is expensive but having bad security is about to cost a whole lot more.
The issue of daylight savings has largely been solved by shifting clocks a minute every day for sixty days. The obvious problem is that we didn't build our electronics based on the concept of variable lengths in the days. However, we could mandate that all new electronics either have a built-in calendar, have NTP capability, use celluar towers for synchronization, or not have a clock at all and at the end of a decade or two we could switch to a much healthier approach. However, it will never happen because of businesses like trains, airlines, financial markets, and international logistics rely on a synchronized timeline which means it would need to more than just a single nation that uses this scheme but the whole world.
TL;DR: it's just not lethal enough of a problem to get solved, especially when the money changers get involved.
Once it hits the fan, the only rational choice is to sweep it up, package it, and sell it as fertilizer.