Slashdot Log In
Still Suits and Body-powered Devices
Posted by
michael
on Sat Dec 01, 2001 02:48 AM
from the stay-out-of-the-rain dept.
from the stay-out-of-the-rain dept.
Helmholtz writes: "Soon
body powered devices may be a reality thanks to work being done at the Center for Space Power and Advanced Electronics, a NASA commercial center in Alabama. The article talks mostly about military and space applications, but I think it'd be really slick to make still suits, not to mention portable audio players, PDA, and even laptops that are powered by energy that we are generating anyway."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Still Suits and Body-powered Devices
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 136 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

But I don't generate any energy!! (Score:2, Funny)
Trust me, if my computer (or PDA for that fact) were to run off the energy I make sitting at my freak'in desk, we all would be in a world of hurt. :-)
The only excersize I get is running to the bathroom several times after that Super BigGulp of Pepsi!
The only other thing that gets my fingers moving fast, is seeing a new article appear on SlashDot without any postings yet!
Newt-dog
We could take it too far (Score:2, Funny)
|energy harvesting" and urine(!) (Score:4, Funny)
Hmmm. Somehow I won't be beta-testing the reverse-engineered water...
Re:Hmmm. (Score:5, Funny)
That's not new (Score:4, Insightful)
I have a Seiko kinetic [seikousa.com] on my wrist that tells me reality goes faster than Slashdot (and tells me the time too).
I call NEO! (Score:1)
It absolutely has to be said... (Score:2, Funny)
And your body crumbles to ashes...
efficiency (Score:3, Insightful)
IMHO, it is better to have efficient core business operations than a business/revenue model whose excessive burn rate losses are "balanced" by millions pop-up X10 video cam ads. The former model has greater inherent stability and therefore flexibility. While the latter is just plain annoying.
When no human is present... (Score:5, Interesting)
http://chronocentric.com/watches/winders.shtml [chronocentric.com]
All the irony involved there makes me think I should just go with a battery in the first place. =)
It's time to invest in YUM!!! (Score:2)
Revamping old technology (Score:1)
My father's watch would recharge itself by normal daily arm motions while my grandfather still winds his watch every morning.
Recycling energy sounds good, but one could probably just move less and eat less 8)
I'm curious to know how much energy the brain consumes and if it varies sensibly depending on the action performed.
I can see it now ... (Score:5, Funny)
Human batteries aka the Matrix (Score:1)
We are the creator.
The creation eats its creator.
Man thats weird.
Herbert was wrong (Score:2, Funny)
Sci Fi (Score:1)
Ultimate clothing (Score:1)
they forgot... (Score:3, Interesting)
Here's one I didn't notice in the article. How about sucking chemical energy from blood chemicals? Basically we're talking about a dialysis-like blood filter that pulls out stuff like glucose and fatty acids and does its own cellular respiration.
Good for controlling your weight ... diabetes ... arteriosclerosis ... but bad for maintaining high energy and preventing chronic fatigue ... hmmm, maybe it isn't such a good idea. (:
It's already here, well, kinda. (Score:4, Informative)
Seiko has the only Quartz watch of this kind, afaik.
However, self winding watches [howstuffworks.com] have been around for quite a while. Now, these watches don't run off body heat, sweat, brain waves or any else NASA might be thinking of, god knows. They work from adjustments in tilt, giving off enough power to build a reserve. Just getting out of the office chair and going for coffee, or off the couch and walking the dog, should be enough.
and... (Score:1)
A untapped source of energy?? (Score:1)
we can tap into a very available form of energy: Methane.
I guess I am not that much an asshole to be a solider/astronomer in the future. :-)
Pull-string powered devices. (Score:1)
Fit geeks! (Score:1)
This could be the best thing for geek health since interlaced monitors were outlawed.
how about a body powered world (Score:1)
Would you lose weight? (Score:2)
I'm so excited! (Score:5, Funny)
That's right! Forget about flying cars, I wish for the day when I can drink tepid water harvested from my own sweat and urine!
More precise information. (Score:1)
Not that much energy from heat (Score:4, Informative)
They claim that 81W are waiting to be harvested from a sleeping human. This is incorrect, due to Carnot's law [fuelcellstore.com] (a thermodynamic law). Basically if we have a heat source at Th (the body) and a heat sink at Tl (the environment) the maximum possible efficiency is
1- Tl/Th
All temperatures must be in Kelvin (or Rankine). So for a human at 37C = 310K, with an environment at room temperature 20C = 293K, the best efficiency is
1 - 293/310 = 5.5%
If they can get 3% efficiency with current materials, they're already doing extremely well. At this efficiency a sleeping human, putting of 81W of heat, can only provide
81W * 5.5% = 4.4W
of usable energy. It's true that 4.4W can power a fair bit of energy-efficient technology, but they're starting with a lot less available energy than they claimed in the article.
Even cooler... (Score:1)
Not for me. (Score:3, Insightful)
I fail to see why this doesn't sound like a royal pain in the end.
-- MarkusQ
Bicycle Generator Lights? (Score:1)
I seem to recall a simpsons episode with one of those too. Was it 7G13? I can't confirm it.
It's not still suit.... (Score:1)
it's stilsuit. http://www.darkholmekeep.net/dune/stilsuit.cfm
Sorry. It's one of my favorite books. Yes, books.
thermowax
How about other species? (Score:1)
Through this logic, the Matrix can be seen as a metaphor for human domination over farm animals.
I'm surprised noone's seen the irony of this yet. (Score:2)
I am of course, talking about The Matrix. I just hope that when they start making bioelectric power plants, they use cows instead of people.
wasteful, eh? (Score:3, Interesting)
The energy we waste is orders of magnitude below any machine that humans have built; if we were to create a machine that did half of what the human body did with current technology, I guarantee you that it would lose a helluva lot more in heat than we do.
Besides which, the heat that we generate makes possible our ability to keep chemical reactions going that are WORTH the heat expenditure. Sure, it may be wasteful to eat a thousand calorie meal to power us for six hours, but show me an mp3 player that can power itself off something so readily available as plant material or a loaf of bread before starting to argue that our ability to convert energy from diverse sources results in a wasteful process. In other words, I'd rather be able to be omnivorous and waste a lot of that energy than to need to be powered off electricity that can only come from sources like burned fossil fuel (and we waste a HUGE amount of energy when we harness that power).
If you ask me, the human body is remarkably EFFICIENT, because of the elements it can use for power, and because the wasted energy that is derived from those elements is minimal in comparison to the waste from, say, and Athlon processor.
What they're ACTUALLY doing in this article is trying to harness the efficiency of the human body, not its inefficiency. It's easier to feel a soldier an extra couple of peanuts a day and let them power all their devices than it is to try to use lousy, lossy batteries to do the same work.
Weight loss? (Score:2)
I dunno, but depending on how you harvest energy, could you start to force your body to metabolize more and lose weight? I mean, it would be uber31337 if I could lose weight by listening to MP3s, don't you think?
Sure, I would gladly wear this suit to get a job.. (Score:1)
As I allways thought, people has the last truth.
These days wake up our darkest side of life...For those who don't know what stillsuits are... (Score:2)
WTF? (Score:1)
Re:drinking reclaimed water??? (Score:2)