Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

China's 64bit Homegrown CPU

Posted by michael on Thu Mar 06, 2003 02:01 PM
from the enter-the-dragon dept.
An anonymous reader writes: "EE Times is reporting on China's BLX IC Design Corp nearing the completion of their first 64-bit CPU. Based on the MIPS instruction set the 500-MHz Godson-2 microprocessor is aimed toward distributed grid computing. To avoid MIPS patent issues, several instructions (unaligned loads and storeds in the 32 bit version) have not been implemented but with the support of over 60 software providers such as Red Flag Linux and the ability to tweak compilers to not use these instructions this should not be a problem. The Godson-1 processor (also patent free) was announced last year and was aimed at the embedded market." The Godson processor line has generally been called Dragon by the Western press.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Mirror (Score:5, Informative)

    by danheskett (178529) <danheskett.gmail@com> on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:02PM (#5451095)
    Mirrored for you, my friends at Slashdot:

    http://caribou.intercarve.net/~danheskett/mirrors/ mirror1.html [intercarve.net]
    • Re:Mirror by Isbiten (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:05PM
      • Re:Mirror by danheskett (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:06PM
        • Re:Mirror by danheskett (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @04:36PM
          • Re:Mirror by andrewski (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @09:23PM
            • Re:Mirror by danheskett (Score:2) Friday March 07 2003, @03:22PM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Mirror by Bender_ (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:14PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • I call Karma Whore by evanbd (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:22PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Nice architecture (Score:1, Insightful)

    by PD (9577) <slashdotlinux@pdrap.org> on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:04PM (#5451118)
    (http://www.pdrap.org/ | Last Journal: Monday January 21 2002, @02:40PM)
    Couldn't do any better than to choose the MIPS instruction set. I looked at it years ago and was impressed with its clean design.
  • Homecloned, you mean... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:05PM (#5451134)
    Taking an existing instruction set and removing stuff from it isn't exactly creative...
  • US or online vendors? (Score:5, Interesting)

    I wouldnt mind playing around with some of these. Also: how is availability here or in china for related hardware and motherboards?
  • DRM? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by supabeast! (84658) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:06PM (#5451148)
    Hopefully the Chinese will leave DRM out of their chips and give people looking for a "free" CPU a competitive option to the crippled intel/AMD CPUs.
    • Re:DRM? by stratjakt (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:10PM
      • Re:DRM? by supabeast! (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:27PM
      • Re:DRM? by Waffle Iron (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:41PM
        • Helpful hint: by Thud457 (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:51PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:DRM? by binaryDigit (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:12PM
      • Re:DRM? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by supabeast! (84658) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:31PM (#5451400)
        "How are Intel and/or AMD chips "crippled"?"

        They will be when DRM becomes mandatory.

        "...how could it be competitive running at 500mhz?"

        Intel thought the same thing about AMD for a long time. Then the K6-2/450 was released, it sold like crazy, and AMD actually beat intel in sales for one quarter. After that intel startking kicking their R&D's ass to get better CPUs out quicker, because competion had kicked in. It might take a while, but the Chinese have plenty of resources, and they WILL get to a point where their CPUs are competitive with American CPUs.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:DRM? by stratjakt (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:51PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:DRM? by binaryDigit (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:56PM
          • Re:DRM? by Daniel Phillips (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @05:56PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Intel and AMD are not american by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @03:44PM
        • Re:DRM? by poot_rootbeer (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @03:46PM
          • Re:DRM? by kcelery (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @10:10PM
          • Re:DRM? by rela (Score:2) Friday March 07 2003, @01:30AM
      • Re:DRM? by g4dget (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @03:26PM
      • Re:DRM? by jbridge21 (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @03:28PM
      • Re:DRM? by jericho4.0 (Score:2) Friday March 07 2003, @12:45AM
      • Re:DRM? by Doomdark (Score:2) Friday March 07 2003, @01:12AM
    • Re:DRM? by gregorio (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:46PM
    • Re:DRM? (Score:5, Informative)

      by zmooc (33175) <zmoocNO@SPAMzmooc.net> on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:59PM (#5451696)
      (http://zmooc.net/)
      DRM functionality on a CPU does not cripple anything. It's the encryption of the media that may cripple the functionality you may have with regard to data from others. And it's the software/OS that has the option to use it.

      DRM only adds functionality like controlling what recipients are to allow to do with emails - just disable any functionality to forward emails which contain confidential data. Don't want others to use your picture for other purposes than viewing it on your website? Possible. Lost your Palm with those rather private pictures on it? No problem. And ofcourse digital media will no longer be copyable directly... but digital media will become a lot cheaper sometime in the future - the price is mainly due to the expensive technology used to create them; expensive studios, 3D-software, special-fx-software, videocamera's etc. are expensive but get cheaper and cheaper. This will not only drive the price of the media down (which will definately raise the volume) but bring a lot more on the market since it'll become a lot cheaper to make things for everyone. Especially with bandwith getting cheaper.

      Now the things that you DO have to fear:

      • DRM incompatibilities between different systems - you may need a lot of different plugins in that case... this may happen if e.g. Real first starts adding DRM to their realmedia, MS then comes up with their own passport-based shit and then finally some standards committee comes up with an open standard which is way too late
      • Closed standards - if Real of MS or whoever comes up with a closed standard which will only be available by using their software, us Linux users will be fucked. This may well happen since most average windows-using internetuser won't hesitate to install all this software and therefore market-penetraion won't be a problem as long as the software is free.
      • Patents on DRM-systems - Open Source would be locked out then. At least in the USA.
      • DRM becoming a requirement before about everybody has the hardware. And then still your old PC won't be able to open DRM-protected media since it a secure data-path has to be built into just about everything from the memory and the CPU all the way to the last peripherals.
      • DRM forcing no-fast-forward on you so you have to watch all the commercials.
      • Data-recovery not being though about - losing data due to a lost key or something would be bad. Something to solve this problem should be implemented. With regard to history in the future this will also be really important; without it the 21st century will be a very dark age in history!
      • The government or some large company having master-keys.
      • Expensive audits required to check for leaks driving the price of hardware (which will get a lot more complex anyway) up.
      • The first DRM-hardware like speakers and LCD-monitors not using wireless transmission by default:) For a really safe data-path, the DRM-decription hardware will have to be in your speakers and monitor so let's hope a wireless receiver will be built on the DRM-chip by default so we'll get cheap wireless peripherals and won't need all those cables anymore:) (everyhing will have to be powered, though. At least it'll safe CPU-cycles:)

      And then offcourse one can still record the analog output of the tv, monitor or speakers but for many applications it'd be really usefull, however.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @03:23PM
    • Designed for government snooping? by MtViewGuy (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @04:34PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Pff. (Score:3, Funny)

    by grub (11606) <slashdot@grub.net> on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:08PM (#5451171)
    (http://www.grub.net/blog/index.html | Last Journal: Wednesday June 27, @08:48AM)

    64 bits? Maybe now someone will actually be able to calculate how much tea is meant when someone says "..all the tea in China".
    • Re:Pff. by Mr. Sketch (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:17PM
      • Re:Pff. by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:34PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Pff. by commodoresloat (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:42PM
    • Re:Pff. by Cumstien (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:57PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • China's Chip (Score:5, Interesting)

    by hhawk (26580) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:09PM (#5451184)
    (http://www.hawknest.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 05 2004, @04:11PM)
    I think this shows 3 points

    1) Free and easily ported OS allows them to have a reasonable non-standard processors.

    2) US restrictions on exporting high powered chips and other computer parts are easily diluted by open standards.

    3) Test, over time, in the market place the use of cheap open chips vs. more expensive perhaps more cutting edge chips (from the west). Do you use 1 or 2 AMD or Intel chips costing 700 USD or 5 or 6 Dragon/Godson 2 chips costing? $5 or $50 (etc).

    Re #3, an engineer can tell you which is "best" but only the market can pick the real winner.
  • If you're one a million, there's a thousand people just like you in China.

    Even though massive portions of the Chinese population are poor farmers, the contingent that has adopted the Internet is (as a result of being a smaller portion of a larger population) far beyond their US counterparts.

    The Internet allows for capitalism on global scale to be much easier. Up until now, the US has maintained the lead by appropriating the smartest people from other countries (H1-B's, etc.).

    However, we're about to see the trailing edge of this trend, where the smart kids stay at home. Already, one of the top 4 software development groups is based in India.

    To all you genius programmers: you're good. But are you good enough to outhack half a dozen Chinese guys working for half your salary?

    I predict that within 10 years, half the US programming market will have gone to these overseas firms.

    Anybody have any current data on this trend?

    -Brett
  • Six months from now we'll all lean that it's an Athlon or SPARC knock-off.
  • Nice power consumtion... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:12PM (#5451217)
    According to the article it's only a 5W with an old 0.18um process.

    Godson-3 with SMP support and on-die cache will use only 10W while Intel Itanium2 uses 130W.
  • DSP Chip announced yesterday (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bstadil (7110) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:14PM (#5451239)
    (http://blog.stadil.com/)
    Don't forget the DSP chip announced Yesterday [com.com]. This is really bad news for TI, as the chinese market for cell phones is growing much faster than US and almost saturated Europe.
  • Performance #'s? (Score:2)

    by binaryDigit (557647) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:15PM (#5451246)
    It would be interesting to see performance #'s on these things. They're "only" running at 500mhz, so how do they compare to other MIPS based cpu's? Basically, just how good is there engineering. It's nice for the Chinese to have a home grown cpu to use in their home grown machines, but so far it looks like a major yawn in relation to the overall cpu market.
  • Is China the next Japan? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MongooseCN (139203) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:16PM (#5451260)
    (http://www.mongeese.org/)
    People used to hate products like electronics that came out of Japan. They used to be considered cheap crappy imitations. Now Japan is one of the most respected countries producing electronics, if not the best.

    So may China be next? China has a reputation for developing cheap goods and electronic equipment, but they seem to be getting better and better. Maybe someday soon they will be producing electronics as good, if not better, than any other country. The added benefit is that China doesn't follow all the same patent and copyright issues as other countries so they are truly free to innovate and compete. This coupled with Chinas new more positive view on Captitalism and China could become the new super power.
  • Wow... (Score:2)

    by x136 (513282) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:17PM (#5451265)
    (about:blank)
    China is starting to sound like an interesting place to be.

    Err, aside from the whole "oppressive communist government" thing they've got going on over there, that is.
    • Re:Wow... by Subotai (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:43PM
    • Re:Wow... by TheRaven64 (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @09:05PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • 64-bit, RISC, 1MB L2 Cache, and just as plump and juicy as when it was picked. Mmmm-hmm, that's good eatin'!!! :)
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Are they available for general use? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mcgroarty (633843) <brianNO@SPAMbrianm.org> on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:22PM (#5451304)
    (http://brianm.org/)
    I'd love to find an offbeat processor like this on a board which still accepted standard PCI cards, or at least a few USB peripherals.

    Does anyone know if this, or another like it, will ever be available stateside with an ATX-mountable motherboard?

  • Bye, Bye Tech Industry (Score:2, Interesting)

    by duffbeer703 (177751) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:22PM (#5451308)
    (http://www.dufftech.net/)
    The only difference between the tech market and clothing, shoes, steel, rail and other industries is the day the pink slips went out and the doors shuttered.
  • Wait a minute.. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ACK!! (10229) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:24PM (#5451327)
    (Last Journal: Friday June 23 2006, @12:04PM)
    They use linux right...

    How hard is it to create a new version of linux for a new CPU like this?

    I am no kernel hacker but doesn't there have to be certain hooks for the CPU included for a port to be successful?

    How do they get an OS (linux or whatever really) running on this thing?

    • Re:Wait a minute.. by stratjakt (Score:1) Thursday March 06 2003, @02:30PM
    • Re:Wait a minute.. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by taniwha (70410) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:47PM (#5451564)
      (http://www.taniwha.com/nospam.jpg | Last Journal: Thursday July 24 2003, @05:22PM)
      You can do a simple (non-optimised) kernel port to a fresh (but well behaved) CPU in 1-2 weeks if you know what you are doing and you already have a GCC port available - a production port is probably more like 6-months or more.

      Actually porting GLIBC is a lot more work than the kernel.

      Porting a kernel while debugging a new compiler for a new CPU architecture is a LOT more work than doing either (I know this from sad experience :-)

      [ Parent ]
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Chinese article? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by saihung (19097) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:24PM (#5451330)
    Does anyone have a link to the announcement in Chinese, or to the Chinese company's site? I'm especially curious to see how they got the name "Godson", since there's no simple Chinese translation for the word "god". If the Chinese term is tian1zi3, which is suspect it is, then it really means "Son of Heaven", another term for the emperor.
  • MIPS pantent issue (Score:5, Informative)

    by brejc8 (223089) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:31PM (#5451415)
    (http://brej.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday May 07 2006, @07:57AM)
    I did post the story but the last sentence which was cut was very important.(Original [slashdot.org]).
    "Although there are no patent issues MIPS have been known to be very [e-insite.net] aggressive [man.ac.uk] toward people who try to create compatible systems."
    • SPARC? by cpeterso (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @04:56PM
  • This sounds famailar (Score:3, Informative)

    by mao che minh (611166) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:33PM (#5451434)
    (Last Journal: Sunday April 11 2004, @07:41PM)
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/05/202320 0&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=103 Hmmm......
  • Bad news for Intel and AMD (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:34PM (#5451442)
    Soon Intel and AMD will be like Ford and GM. With cheap labor, China can easily kill Intel and AMD. They just need time and money to do it.
  • -1 Redundant, but still... (Score:2, Redundant)

    by Wylfing (144940) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:36PM (#5451463)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Friday December 23 2005, @06:30PM)
    This is just one more example of how China is going to blow right past the U.S. in the next 20 years. While we are busy sticking our heads up our own assess with "intellectual property" lawsuits China will be busy creating new prodcuts and new applications for existing ware. Also, c.f., Lunar mining, et al.

  • Say what? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by MasTRE (588396) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:42PM (#5451508)
    To avoid MIPS patent issues, several instructions ...

    Since when do the commies give a flying about patents and other such things? And I don't suspect any of their clients would either. So why waste your time on making it patent-free?
  • FINALLY... (Score:4, Funny)

    by cygnus (17101) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:45PM (#5451546)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    now we FINALLY know what the next PowerMac will run on. :)
  • Longxin? English? (Score:3, Funny)

    by lwbecker2 (530894) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:51PM (#5451604)
    "...The chip is dubbed Godson-2 and is the follow-on to a 32-bit, 266-MHz version released last year that is aimed at the embedded systems market.
    ...snip...
    Godson-2, which has also been translated into English as Dragon or Longxin, has already been prototyped. "


    uh... since when is "Longxin" English? no entry in the Dictionary [m-w.com]
  • by maitas (98290) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:57PM (#5451674)
    (http://maitas.blogspot.com/)
    Actually, SPARC would have been a far better option, since it's a 100% open spec paltform. The license cost just $99 [sparc.org]!!! Amazing..
  • umm.... 5 dollars a cpu = HUGE multistacks of little mobos... I said this the first time the dragon [slashdot.org] was on slashdot.

    Please say "Blah Blah, It isn't cost efficient." If you can run a 500mhz Dragon for 5 watts, and an Itanium for 130, why not run 26x500mhz Dragons? or kick it up a notch for 32x500mhz.

    Also, if you need something real to look at and you can't understand why this is a good idea, have a look at a PC104 board.

    Now Since I've discussed this in the desktop/server cluster end of the spectrum, imagine how this will help portable/wearable/embedded device technology, if their Desktop CPU is planned to run at 5 watts, imagine their portable CPU.

  • by wembley (81899) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:59PM (#5451699)
    (http://slashdot.org/)

    <silly>
    I think it will be fast because they're going to build it with silicon from the moon [slashdot.org].

    Since there is 1/6 gravity on the moon, light can move faster so the chip will be 6x faster than anything us Earth suckers can make.
    </silly>

  • Sounds like a winner.. (Score:5, Informative)

    by digital photo (635872) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:01PM (#5451724)
    (http://www.wingedpower.com/ | Last Journal: Monday June 09 2003, @07:18PM)

    From the sound of it, the Godson chips will be lower powered in terms of performance to current US chips. However, I find the energy consumption to be very attractive. Ie, 5 watts and 10 watts for 266Mhz 500 Mhz respectively. Scaling up linearly, that's still just 20 watts of power consumption for a 2Ghz chip.

    But what I'm thinking is that China is aiming for is low cost and low power consumption chips. Ie, can be used in portable hardware and/or massively parallel setups.

    Granted, they can't SMP the chips in hardware, but with a Linux cluster of these, they could quite readily setup a powerful computing cluster.

    Personally, I'm glad that they are designing their own chips. It would be nice to see more competition outside of just the big two.

    The way I see it, if they produce these chips at low prices($15-$50), at such low power consumption levels, I could easily see myself building many small nodes of them. Maybe now, I can POVray just ever so faster... :)

  • Yeah, but can you build a... (Score:5, Funny)

    by HarveyBirdman (627248) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:03PM (#5451740)
    (Last Journal: Monday December 20 2004, @01:32PM)
    ... Beowurf cruster out of them?

    Oh, my goodness. I'm so sorry!

  • Marketing Literature (Score:3, Funny)

    by nick_davison (217681) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:23PM (#5451932)
    GODSON-2, now 50%* faster at performing miracles than our original GODSON-1 (Jesus) line without the overheating issues associated with the FIRSTANGEL (Lucifer) series.

    Note: 50% speed improvement is valid. PhilosopherMark2003 does not take in to account issues that need to be addressed in the new millenium and therefore produces unbalanced results in favor of BhuddaTechnologies's processor line.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • From the article:

    "The chip will be binary backward compatible to the 32-bit Godson-1, a path of compatibility first chosen by Advanced Micro Devices in development of its Opteron line."

    What a load of horse. Sun did this ~10 yrs ago with the SPARC -> UltraSPARC transition, the PowerPC and POWER specs also include such compatibility, and if I'm not mistaken MIPS themselves did this as well also ~10 yrs ago. Some reporter there really doesn't know his stuff.
  • by Boone^ (151057) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:36PM (#5452039)
    I'm impressed. Given their track record on software, their decision to obey MIPS patents pleasantly surprises me... unless their goal is to sell these Godsons in the US without a 5.5x10^9% tariff.
  • by jeremie_z_ (639708) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:43PM (#5452095)
    (http://tofz.org/)
    one thing that may definetely be considered a good point about China doing it's own hardware:

    no DRM (oops! "trusted content management" or whatever new name it was given...) is obviously to take place in their stuff, is it?

    maybe this is the anwser for knocking-down those greedy majors interests in making computers to evolve to protect their own private interests?

    go China! i'm ready to get my RedPC already! :)

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by abcxyz (142455) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:47PM (#5452140)
    (http://w1rww.homelinux.net/)
    Time for the gratuitous comment concering Godson Beowolf clusters....

    NO, I'm not going to do it!
  • by YetAnotherName (168064) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:49PM (#5452152)
    (http://seankelly.biz/)
    Given the fact that so much high tech research and development was made possible through copious use of acronyms, and that acronyms require an alphabet and not idiograms, I applaud China's accomplishment! :-)
  • I thought (Score:1)

    by sydres (656690) on Thursday March 06 2003, @03:59PM (#5452232)
    I thought the original dragon processors released were only about as powerfull as a 486?
  • Heck, if it works like all the other "Made in China" electronics I've owned over the years, AMD and Intel have no worries whatsoever.
    • Re:ill repute by praksys (Score:2) Thursday March 06 2003, @04:32PM
    • Re:ill repute by rinkjustice (Score:1) Friday March 07 2003, @10:21AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Dragon? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Zazi (601795) on Thursday March 06 2003, @04:42PM (#5452638)
    Am I the only one who gets a laugh out of what the west calls this processor? It's made in Communist China... Communism = bad... USSR... Red Dragon... ahhh forget it.
  • I'm curious... (Score:2)

    by Decimal (154606) on Thursday March 06 2003, @05:34PM (#5453313)
    (http://www.stardotgeek.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday March 18 2003, @10:49AM)
    Is the "Dragon" processor big-endian or little-endian? (How else can I judge it unless I know if China is on my side in the endian holy war? ;)
  • Leapfrog in technology? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nemeosis (259734) on Thursday March 06 2003, @06:28PM (#5453797)
    This chip might be an interesting move. We have seen leap frogs in technology adoption in developing countries.

    Examples:
    1. US homes are still mostly connected via copper phone lines. Developing countries which are barely starting to lay out their communications network infrastructure are laying out fiber optic lines. Whether this is good or not is still yet to be seen. Fabric switches are still incredibly expensive.

    2. Cell phone technologies in Japan, Korea, and other asian countries are connected via newer and more advanced 3G CDMA digital technology. For some countries, its much cheaper to build a wireless infrastructure than it is to lay out ground cables. China is pushing their own CDMA technology.

    So, with this new 64-bit CPU, maybe China will make the leapfrog into 64-bit computing. They will have a Linux system capabable of handling a 64-bit instruction set. Assuming of course, that Microsoft doesn't shutter some kind of shady deal with the Chinese government, to have them all running their servers on Windows 2000/.Net operating systems. The company making the chip will have to speed up the CPU though, but maybe they can follow Moore's Law and double every 18 months.

    Who knows, maybe this will cause a revolution in China. The population will be running their systems on a more advanced 64-bit Linux system running MIPS-like instruction set. Then again.. maybe not? The market will decide.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • More precisley, Linux and open source s.w in general will together form a powerful butress against the big-media inspired DRM crackdown we are seeing - ala DCMA and the mooted M$oft Palladium initiatives.

    Between India and China there will be around a 1/4 of the world's people. Thier governments won't be hamstrung by US media inspired laws that lock up content, takes away people right to fair use and most importantly put $$ into the pockets of American companies.

    Do you really think that a paltry USD$400m "donation" by BillG to India will convince a *billion* people to use Windows - no way !

    Do you really think that China will put Palladium h/w controls into their PC's ?? , or DRM limitations into hardrives ?? No way !

    My prediction is that within 10 years, if you want to use a computing platform that is truly free (as in speech, not beer) , then you may well be using a Chinese made PC running RedFlag Linux (English edition)

    Of course you may have trouble importing these non-DCMA v2 "anti-circumenvention devices" into your Western country , certainly the US, where congress have sold out to big-media , and sadly probably into Australia as well shortly (US and Oz are currently in free trade negotiations and the US want to talk about equitable IP laws..) ;-(

    We should all be thankful that the national strategic interests of India and China will happily coincide with the asprirations and ideal of all those who identify with the aims and ideals of the EFF

    Like Lessig said at OSCON 2002 , what have YOU done about it ?? - Donate to the EFF !!

  • by azookeeper (230141) on Thursday March 06 2003, @09:14PM (#5455108)
    http://news.com.com/2100-1001-976149.html
  • by solo4bird (657145) on Friday March 07 2003, @12:15AM (#5456322)
    Based on the traditional chinese culture, it is considered to be easier to bring up a little baby, when it is tittle, that parents give there child a "Ugly" nickname. So ,in Chinese, 'Gou Sheng'(means a kid is brought up by puppy's leftover) is normally used, especially in countryside, which pronunciation in chinese(just like the pronunciation of Goshen ) is just like Godson, which meaning is so good in English.

    In China, it is normally called as Long Xin, which didn't mean Dragon Hear. As some of you guys know, Long in Chinese means Dragon and Xin means heart. But there is another meanings of Long and Xin, Long reffers to All Chinese People and Xin means chip. So longxin means Chinese Chip!

    If you guys want to know the story of developing the chip and if you understand Chinese , you can navigate to the following URLs£

    http://www.pconline.com.cn/news/hotpick/hy/10210 /9 7594.html

    http://www.csdn.net/Develop/article/15%5C15461.s ht m
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by solo4bird (657145) on Friday March 07 2003, @12:18AM (#5456351)
    Based on the traditional chinese culture, it is considered to be easier to bring up a little baby, when it is tittle, that parents give there child a "Ugly" nickname. So ,in Chinese, 'Gou Sheng'(means a kid is brought up by puppy's leftover) is normally used, especially in countryside, which pronunciation in chinese(just like the pronunciation of Goshen ) is just like Godson, which meaning is so good in English. In China, it is normally called as Long Xin, which didn't mean Dragon Hear. As some of you guys know, Long in Chinese means Dragon and Xin means heart. But there is another meanings of Long and Xin, Long reffers to All Chinese People and Xin means chip. So longxin means Chinese Chip! If you guys want to know the story of developing the chip and if you understand Chinese , you can navigate to the following URLs£ http://www.pconline.com.cn/news/hotpick/hy/10210/9 7594.html http://www.csdn.net/Develop/article/15%5C15461.sht m
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • TSMC (Score:1)

    by eetvar (610772) on Friday March 07 2003, @05:54AM (#5457420)
    (http://katastro.fi/)
    Am I the only one finding it interesting that they are planning on manufacturing it in Taiwan?

    Is economy starting to outweigh politics even in China? :)

    eetu.
    • Re:TSMC by taweili (Score:1) Friday March 07 2003, @01:26PM
  • by peter303 (12292) on Friday March 07 2003, @10:06AM (#5458641)
    Its one thing to design something, and another to manufacture it efficiently. China has introduced other state-of-the-art machines before, such as the Cray knockoff called Galaxy, but at an economic cost around a hundred times the labor to construct and run compared to a Cray. Low production computers dont cut it economically.
  • by mxsheng (655243) on Friday March 07 2003, @05:56PM (#5463531)
    The CPU is the core of the computer. So the chip is called "xin1" which means heart in Chinese. "Long2" is the dragon ,the symbole in China, in Chinese. "Godson" is meaningless translation. I think the CPU should be called "Dragon's Heart". "Dragon's Heart" tells all the people in the world that Chinese want to get their own CPU.
  • Re:The beginning (Score:5, Insightful)

    I don't think that is anything to worry about. I mean, think about it.

    Everyone in America is complaining about how US firms are employing foreign workings instead of US citizens. Once the foreign market starts to keep pace with / pass up the US, there will be an increased demand for IT workers in those countries. As demand for these workers increases, their salries will increase as well. This means US firms will be less eager to hire foreign workers.

    Also, I think the US could use a good kick in the pants when it comes to motivation for product innovation. This may be just what we need.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:The beginning (Score:2, Funny)

    by Un pobre guey (593801) on Thursday March 06 2003, @02:43PM (#5451525)
    Note this in your dairy

    I'm putting it between the soy milk and the mango lassi.

    [ Parent ]
  • Since they want to market this outside of China.
    [ Parent ]
  • 18 replies beneath your current threshold.