cut them off at the network... NYC are talking to the wrong people they need to speak to GSM and CTIA.

they do it in Europe as well the USA is very slow about this...

" Carriers AT&T and T-Mobile offer a joint database, as the carriers use the same basic networking technology. Verizon and Sprint offer a second database. By the end of November 2013, the four carriers will combine databases, and adding smaller carriers like Nex-Tech and Cellcom. Plans exist to link the US database with an international version hosted by the GSM Association to prevent stolen phones from being shipped to overseas markets and used on other networks."

a good specification can be written, only difference is then translating that into machine code and proof is relatively easy

in fact IBM etc tried and was successful in producing a model that worked only thing was it took someone who knew how to write the specification in a formal language and guess what... those very same people with those skills where programmers/engineers that the "management" got annoyed about after they told them to do things like please produce a "traffic control optimisation system" (in relation to what...).

all I can say really is "do not be a DICK"

cheers

John Jones

right and rockets dont blow up because the spec has been followed and tested several times the tolerances tested etc\

never heard of a car being recalled ? - BTW they try not to do this but...

WTF - seriously everyone involved in this thread seems to have very little to say... study some history or repeat yourself...

cheers

John

ok they are not even filtering they are producing a drop list

clearly they do not understand how a IP network functions and are simply taking whatever huawei can fund...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_by_country

surveillance via huawei marketing dollars... working well...
(just ignore the fact huawei copy cisco kit and install backdoors and your fine...)

have fun

John

its 2 Kilometres distance so its a repackaging of WiMAX... and we all know how well that turned out...

now personally I prefer the 1.05 Petabit/s that fibre will provide... though thats in development oh wait thats what this wireless speed is in "development"

cheers

John

please pretty please kill these gateway "hacks" just send mail correctly using a standard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S/MIME

I simply cant believe this...

MathML is a pretty important to allowing papers to be...

includes broadcast

basically you need to figure out the phy/eth portion of the network not the software side

so if you can do SDN/Software defined radio and come up with a nice way to scale then your good

I would have thought that zigbee / sensor networks would already scale you just have to boost range but hey thats me just guessing

regards

John Jones

actually I'm refering to being dyslexic, as such not being able to spell dyslexia. google does not have all the answers, but good try...

Thats nice I still don't understand why my tax's are spent on OS license only for the users to login to web applications

Linux supports kerberos so authentication is not a problem its down to choices and management

what would be interesting would be what applications they need to run... is there a list somewhere ?

regards

John Jones

at least the BBC have :

In quotes: Margaret Thatcher

Obituary: Margaret Thatcher

Video obituary

whatever the politics at least link to the BBC...

John Jones

so its a task list...

can I sync it with my task's for calendar via standards such as CalDAV ?

otherwise forget about it

John

personally I have been looking forward to this !!

thank you finally validation works

John

ARM based servers already has file server cluster design win's

http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4407353/Baidu-taps-Marvell-for-32-bit-ARM-storage-server

what will be intresting is ability to leverage designs for phones as clusters because then you can use the volume e.g. SOC for phones costs $20 roughly so imagine filling a DC with those...

have fun

John Jones

seriously show me numbers

also 9.6W for decoding MPEG is pretty horrendous but this is because I'm guessing they have to power the whole of the GPU rather than a simple specialised unit

where is the benchmark ?

regards

John Jones