Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Computer Room Hot?

Posted by timothy on Mon Jan 06, 2003 03:13 PM
from the temperature-control dept.
Anonymous Coward writes "Here is a cool PC ventilation product I ran across. Like many faithful on here, I have multiple computers in a small room which really heat up the place. My office is a good eight degrees warmer than the rest of the house This product called R.A.C.H.A.L (Reduce Annoying Computer Heat And Loudness) vents computer exhaust into the wall, not the room. Might cut down on the electricity bills during those hot months.." Another approach: An anonymous reader writes "If your 'puter is getting to loud, you might want to consider some silent cooling. And the gang at OverclockersClub has just that. A three page review of the Zalman VGA Heatpipe Cooler. This thing is pretty nice looking, and with no power, no noise, what else could a guy ask for? Check out the review here. How come more companies don't do the "silent" thing?" Borked link fixed.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Computer Room Hot? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 481 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • nice! by RyLaN (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:15PM
    • by Greedo (304385) on Monday January 06 2003, @04:50PM (#5028280) Homepage Journal
      A quick search [google.com] on the anonymous poster's email address [mailto] eventually leads to this page [elance.com] which includes:
      BACKGROUND: We're starting up a new company, Computer Exhaust Systems, wh ...

      So instead of "Here is a cool PC ventilation product I ran across", he should really be saying "Here is a cool PC ventilation product that my company makes."

      Sure, it's kinda neat. But I hope /. got some ad revenue for this.

      [ Parent ]
    • Toilet-water CPU Cooler (Score:4, Funny)

      by BigBlockMopar (191202) on Monday January 06 2003, @06:06PM (#5028867) Homepage

      Here's a thought I had, but probably will never get around to building.

      Lots of people go to the expense and effort of building/buying radiators or using large tanks of water as the heatsink for their water-based CPU cooler systems.

      Last year, I started measuring the temperature of the water in my toilet tank. After a flush, it drops to 5-6 degrees Celsius. Between flushes, it gradually reaches room temperature, of course, but this is still no worse than a radiator or bucket. In practice, however, it never actually gets above about 10C (while room temperature is about 20C).

      In other words, it's a supply of cold water which you were going to simply flush away.

      Place a small bucket inside the toilet tank. Put a submersible pump in there, run the water to the CPU coolers, bring the water back and drain it over the bucket in the tank.

      Everytime you flush the 6 beers you went through while flaming me for my Linux isn't ready for the desktop article [glowingplate.com], you can rest assured that the water which cools your CPU is being replaced with fresh, cold water. No mold, no mildew.

      The purpose of putting the pump in the bucket is so that there's always a supply of water for the pump, even during the flush. And the purpose of draining the return line over the bucket is so that if your toilet tank doesn't refill for some reason, you'll still keep your bucket full of water and buy some time for hardware monitors to shut the system down if it's getting too warm.

      I don't know how hot the water in the toilet will get, but think about this:

      • The bucket full of water in the toilet tank is replaced during each flush but isn't actually available for a flush. You'll save water.
      • You'll be removing the CPU-heated water from the house and will therefore reduce the load on your air conditioning system.
      • You get to piss on the scourge of the overclocker, that excess CPU heat.
      • Warming liquids enhances their ability to dissolve things, including ...dark matter. You might have to clean the toilet less often.

      Of course, the only thing I'd worry about is the quality of the submersible pump. After all, if water leaked into the pump, then the water in the toilet could come into contact with one side of the AC line... the other side of which is grounded to your fusebox. If you happened to touch another grounded object while urinating (concrete floor, sink faucet, etc), then enough current could find that your stream of urine and urethral tissues are a more attractive ground path than the plastic sewer pipe. I think I'd invest in an isolation transformer (search ebay) to reduce the risk of highly ...unpleasant... damage.

      Ahh... the joys of being an eccentric genius.

      [ Parent ]
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • My house... (Score:3, Funny)

    by MattCohn.com (555899) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:15PM (#5027430) Homepage
    My house is freezing, and I wouldn't be able to survive in my computer room (Basement, AKA utility room) without the heat. Good for corperations, not for me. Anyone else use spare clock cycles for warmth?
  • So... by Spazntwich (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:16PM
    • Re:So... by dakers27 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:36PM
      • Re:So... by tomhudson (Score:3) Monday January 06 2003, @03:56PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It's getting hot in here (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2003, @03:16PM (#5027437)
    So take off all your clothes!

    Chicks love nekkid geeks in hot computer rooms.
  • Why? (Score:5, Funny)

    by VistaBoy (570995) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:17PM (#5027442)
    How come more companies don't do the "silent" thing?

    The problem is, silence is golden. So therefore, in this poor economy, companies can't pay for the gold required and consumers can't really afford it.
    • Re:Why? by jhoffoss (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:58PM
      • Re:Why? by yobbo (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @05:36PM
        • Re:Why? by jhoffoss (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @07:52PM
    • Re:Why? by evilviper (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @07:00PM
      • Re:Why? by smithmc (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @01:06PM
        • Re:Why? by evilviper (Score:2) Tuesday January 07 2003, @11:04PM
    • Re:Why? Thermodynamics, my dear friend. by lukme (Score:2) Tuesday January 07 2003, @01:09AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Desperate for silent machines (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mccalli (323026) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:17PM (#5027444) Homepage
    I rate ambient noise as being important to me when buying a machine, and I usually pay extra for after-market fans to keep the noise down.

    I would love manufacturers to start taking this issue more seriously. Choice of fans is important, but also the hard drives as well. Apple fans can look smug here I think - Apple do take this stuff seriously. The PC world? Not so much, and it's a real shame.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  • Hey, man... (Score:3, Funny)

    by LiftOp (637065) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:17PM (#5027446) Homepage
    If you don't have to yell to hear over it, how do you know it's working? ...or is it just me and my Sparc?
    • Re:Hey, man... by Urchlay (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:03PM
      • Re:Hey, man... by ibpooks (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:19PM
      • Re:Hey, man... by GrumpyOldMan (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:58PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Hey, man... by doorbot.com (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:35PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • from the depths of AOL... (Score:3, Funny)

    by grub (11606) <slashdot@grub.net> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:17PM (#5027447) Homepage Journal

    An anonymous reader writes "If your 'puter is getting to loud, you might...

    BZZZT! Sorry Sparky. You lose any geek points by using the term "'puter".
  • What about appliances and rack-mount? (Score:4, Informative)

    by Fastolfe (1470) <david@fastolfe.net> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:17PM (#5027450) Homepage
    90% of my excessive volume and heat generation comes from various rack-mount appliances (like Cisco switches), not pee-cees. It doesn't look like these things are very friendly towards that type of environment.

    The basic concept might still be sound, though. Turn your rack into an enclosure, add some intake fans, and vent the entire rack's exhaust somewhere else. (I wonder what the exhaust temperature for an entire rack would reach?)
  • appealing by redtail1 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:18PM
  • Wont help me.... by Kenja (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:18PM
  • In an office.. by Troll Axe Thrower (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:18PM
  • Living in the Pacific Northwest by UnidentifiedCoward (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:19PM
  • I don't get it by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:19PM
    • Re:I don't get it by AuraSeer (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:26PM
      • Re:I don't get it (Score:5, Insightful)

        by tomhudson (43916) <troll.trolltalk@com> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:51PM (#5027806) Homepage Journal
        And then there's this quote:

        Since the ventilation system restricts airflow somewhat, we noticed some systems had increased chassis temperatures due to poor design.

        In other words, your computer will run hotter. While they blame it on "poor design", anything that restricts air flow out of the box (and trying to blow the air thru 4 ' of pipe, then into a wall, will restrict your power supply's air flow) will shorten your box's life. It will also void any warranty (counts as abuse).

        This idea is "so" lame that I can't help but think we've all been trolled.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:I don't get it (Score:4, Insightful)

          by jdreed1024 (443938) on Monday January 06 2003, @04:30PM (#5028141)
          This idea is "so" lame that I can't help but think we've all been trolled.

          Agreed. This hardly smacks of professionalism. Check out these gems from the FAQ page [computerexhaust.com]:

          Won't [the wall] fill up with hot air? They have yet to build a wall that is air tight, anyone who has ever worked in construction will tell you that there are probably 50 different places air flows into your walls.
          They of course don't talk about 50 places where air flows OUT of your walls. Plus, they fail to address the questionable legality (re: building codes) of this "product".
          Won't bugs get into my computer from the wall? Your system fan runs at anywhere from 2500rpm to 4500rpm and is putting out about 35cfm of air. If bugs actually make it to the system fan, the blades will chop them to pieces.. muuuhaaahaaa
          Right.... 'Cause there are no bugs that _walk_ instead of fly, and they certainly couldn't crawl up the tube. Oh, and of course, you'll never turn your computer off ever, so there'll never be a time when the fan might be _off_. And what self respecting company would put "muuuhaaahaaa" in a FAQ.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:I don't get it by dasunt (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @07:26PM
        • Re:I don't get it by alexburke (Score:2) Wednesday January 08 2003, @01:28AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • This Product is Bull Pucky by spiedrazer (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @06:30PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • the tradeoff by tps12 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:19PM
    • Re:the tradeoff (Score:5, Funny)

      by The Evil Couch (621105) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:23PM (#5027506) Homepage
      then there's the 3rd option. the waste energy manifests itself as mana and enables me to cast lightning bolts to smite the puny dwaves AAAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      dammit. I really need to lay off the RPGs.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:the tradeoff by Modern Hamlet (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:30PM
    • Re:the tradeoff by BrianH (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:36PM
    • Re:the tradeoff by geekoid (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:37PM
    • Re:the tradeoff by Swanktastic (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:40PM
    • Re:the tradeoff by WiPEOUT (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:43PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • how is silent cooling by Phosphor3k (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:20PM
  • Ack... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by shepd (155729) <slashdot.orgNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:21PM (#5027494) Homepage Journal
    Just do the right thing to begin with. If you want silence and no heat use a Cyrix C3. I'm sure you'll say it's too slow for you. Hey, you know what the saying is:

    Silent/Cold/Low-Power. Fast.

    Pick 1.
    • Re:Ack... by evilviper (Score:3) Monday January 06 2003, @07:10PM
      • Re:Ack... by shepd (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @11:38AM
        • Re:Ack... by evilviper (Score:2) Tuesday January 07 2003, @10:56PM
          • Re:Ack... by shepd (Score:1) Wednesday January 08 2003, @10:40AM
            • Re:Ack... by evilviper (Score:2) Wednesday January 08 2003, @06:55PM
    • Re:Ack... by heliocentric (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:05PM
    • Re:Ack... by AGMW (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @09:50AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Alternate Idea to this-- by glsiii (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:22PM
  • That's not gonna work. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by PhantomHarlock (189617) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:23PM (#5027500)
    The cavity at any given point in your wall, if it's to code, is about two cubic feet, surrounded by wood and plaster. Unless you had a magically powerful fan in your PC you won't be getting any circulation at all, because you're pressurizing a fixed cavity. Furthermore, the tube isn't insulated. This is a really silly idea. However, if you vented it *outside*, then you're talking something useful.

    --Mike
    • Re:That's not gonna work. (Score:5, Informative)

      by tomhudson (43916) <troll.trolltalk@com> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:37PM (#5027664) Homepage Journal
      Of course this isn't going to work. And in colder climes, if the air did circulate, you're going to get warm, moist room air being pushed past the vapor barrier and ruining the insulation. At this point, you don't have to worry about excess heat anymore - since your insulation's R value just dropped to zero.

      You WILL have to worry about mold and mildew, as well as condensation ruining the wall panels, or running along the framing before pooling somewhere and causing more damage.

      Stupid product that has less than zero value. Hope they have good product-liability insurance to cover all the health claims from asthmatics, etc.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:That's not gonna work. by geekoid (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:40PM
    • Re:That's not gonna work. by FatAlb3rt (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:58PM
    • Re:That's not gonna work. (Score:5, Informative)

      by hackstraw (262471) on Monday January 06 2003, @04:19PM (#5028043) Homepage
      On a side note, some supercomputing center in Minnesota, or somewhere like that where its really cold in the winter, pipes out their heat into the parking garage to help the cars start. Also, the Pittsburg Supercomputing Center's heat output is equivalent to 169 pounds of coal [psc.edu] an hour!.
      [ Parent ]
    • HA! That already thoought of that! by scrod98 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:22PM
    • Re:That's not gonna work. by User 956 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @08:04PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Trying to avoid a /.'ing by johnalex (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:23PM
  • 404? by jhines0042 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:23PM
    • Re:404? by nogoodmonkey (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:26PM
      • Re:404? by Mantorp (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:41PM
    • Re:404? by friscolr (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:43PM
    • Re:404? by larien (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:09PM
    • Re:404? by Omnifarious (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @05:31PM
  • Priorities by JUSTONEMORELATTE (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:24PM
  • Would hot air in the walls encourage mold, ect? by teamhasnoi (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:24PM
  • Moisture problems? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by gorillasoft (463718) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:25PM (#5027525)
    It seems to me that venting the heat into your walls could cause condensation or other moisture problems inside of your walls. It also seems like you could get some very strange noises resulting from the forced air going into an enclosed space. The backpressure from exhausting into the wall could also shorten your fan life or possibly worse. If you have fire blocking in your walls, you could be blowing hot air into a space as little as 16" x 24" or so, and once that heats up you'll be getting the heat back into your room as it radiates through the drywall.

    You also couldn't effectively use this on an exterior wall because insulation should be taking up all of the available air space inside the wall cavity anyway. Also, not all of the heat your computer generates is going to be exhausted by the fan, so this may not result in a huge reduction anyway, and it becomes even more problematic if you have more than one exhaust fan. Just a few thoughts I had.
  • Most people don't care about noise by Zelet (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:25PM
  • Whole Case Heatsink by HaeMaker (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:25PM
  • the opposite by Twillerror (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:25PM
  • Correct Link by FosterSJC (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:26PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • On the bright side by greechneb (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:27PM
  • Except by The_Shadows (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:27PM
  • wowza by LinuxCumShot (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:28PM
  • Exhause into the wall cavity? Seems restrictive by EddyGeez (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:29PM
  • by Anonymous Custard (587661) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:29PM (#5027564) Homepage Journal
    Hook the tube up to a water faucet, and connect it to your computer's intake fan (rather than exhaust), you can lower the temperature of your computer with an efficient, cooling mist!
  • Is it just me.. by Karamchand (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:30PM
  • It doesn't work. by teamhasnoi (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:31PM
  • From the FAQ by jhines0042 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:31PM
    • Re:From the FAQ by SoupIsGoodFood_42 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @06:59PM
  • Check the link! by AuraSeer (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:31PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • wrong url by tomhudson (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:31PM
    • wrong url by PunchMonkey (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:44PM
      • Re:wrong url by tomhudson (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:53PM
        • Re:wrong url by PunchMonkey (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:28PM
  • You can always... by questionlp (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:32PM
  • Use the heat properly. (Score:3, Informative)

    by geekoid (135745) <dadinportlandNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:32PM (#5027604) Homepage Journal
    In the new Emery building in downtown Portland, Or. there is no furnace. The entire building is heated with the waste heat from the computers and server rooms.
    It works well.
  • Unbelievably bad idea (Score:5, Insightful)

    by msclark (413170) <mclark@NOSPam.gorgeswebsites.com> on Monday January 06 2003, @03:32PM (#5027608) Homepage
    As a carpenter/electrician/plumber in my spare time, I think sending computer exhaust to a residential wall is one of the dumbest ideas I've heard of. Venting to another room, crawl space, basement, outside, etc. is OK, but a proper wall cavity with normal studs only has a few square feet of volume. For an outside wall, breaking through a vapor barrier and sending the exhaust to fiberglass insulation is very, very bad.

    The only valid application I can think of is for some commercial office space, where usually cheap extruded steel studs hold up sheetrock and the wall tops are open to the space above a drop ceiling. Also, the steel studs have holes in them to allow for cables and some horizontal air movement.

    The website does not have any of this information concerning checking the validity of walls. Ugh.
  • My room is hot because... by SoVi3t (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:34PM
  • Won't work.. by Karamchand (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:34PM
  • hmmm by lophophore (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:35PM
  • Annoying Computer Heat And Loudness? by core plexus (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:36PM
  • Dell by Kaypro (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:36PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • This is already there... by j_kenpo (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:37PM
  • OverclockersClub Graphs (Score:4, Insightful)

    by stever00t (618001) on Monday January 06 2003, @03:37PM (#5027666)

    Does anyone else find it horribly bad journalism/science to report with a graph where one bar is a third as long as another bar, yet the large value is less than 1% larger than the other because they start the graph at a random number instead of zero, and then just using a graph break in the scale?

    If you make a bar graph and the values are 1% different, the sizes of the bars should be 1% different. Why do they not understand this?

    one [overclockersclub.com] two [overclockersclub.com] three [overclockersclub.com] four [overclockersclub.com]

    I've seen this at other websites, too. Does it irk anyone else?

  • What a sham... by warpSpeed (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:38PM
  • Better idea by ScannerBoy (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:38PM
  • www.mini-itx.com by horster (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:39PM
  • Russia by mrscubasteve (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:40PM
  • Technological dreams by zunger (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:43PM
  • Keeping it silent by geldart (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:43PM
  • Prevent heat? by Chymaera (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:45PM
  • for lack of better equipment... by Charlie Bill (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:45PM
  • heat!! by carpe_noctem (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:49PM
  • Why not just... by guido1 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:50PM
  • Heat solutions are depressing by Junks Jerzey (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:53PM
  • Excessive heat? by loucura! (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:56PM
  • Cheaper and easier by Strange Ranger (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:56PM
  • RACHAL by elnerdoricardo (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:59PM
  • Can you say "Flameable"? by Audacious (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @03:59PM
  • Not a great idea by Micro$will (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:59PM
  • Zalman coolers by stratjakt (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:02PM
  • heat issues by 95_gst_al (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:03PM
  • Best part of their features list by Chris Canfield (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:04PM
  • Outside vent by Jay L (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:04PM
  • hrm by carpe_noctem (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:05PM
  • I pulled a similar stunt over a decade ago. by Ungrounded Lightning (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:06PM
  • Outside? by dlcantrell (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:06PM
  • Fantastic. by xA40D (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:06PM
  • Musicians/Audiophiles need not apply by tuba_dude (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:10PM
  • Not exactly blazing news. by Pig Hogger (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:10PM
  • /.'ed by Deal-a-Neil (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:11PM
  • Nice one Mr. Coward... by cybermace5 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:13PM
  • Air Intake of HVAC system by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:14PM
  • What about the CPU? by Once&FutureRocketman (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:16PM
  • What a stupid product by cp5i6 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:17PM
  • Stupid AND a code violation by lucifuge31337 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:18PM
  • Hot? Cold, rather. by nafmo (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:19PM
  • Water Cooled PC by Aggrazel (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:20PM
  • It work great by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:27PM
  • Interesting by Cyclometh (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:27PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Old story about venting heat to another room by dpilot (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:27PM
  • To, Too, and Two by simetra (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:29PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Central Vacuum system by rschwa (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @04:33PM
  • The only heat my office gets... by kpooley (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:33PM
  • These people should know this: by drfishy (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:35PM
  • Simple Solution by TheSimkin (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:36PM
  • Apartments with vacuum tubing by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:41PM
  • Heat? by atomicdragon (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:42PM
  • If you want to get rid of the noise... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:43PM
  • I was thinking about this at lunch today by AssFace (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:47PM
  • Basement life savor. by Slums (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @04:51PM
  • as a home owner... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bmajik (96670) <matt@mattevans.org> on Monday January 06 2003, @04:54PM (#5028316) Homepage Journal
    this is woefully unimpressive, and uninspired.

    first off, with 16" on center stud walls, constructed of 2x4s, and an average studheight of 92 and 5/8ths inches, you can see that the volume inside a stud wall "cell" is pretty piss poor - roughly 5800 cubic inches.

    There are a few issues that make this "solution" stupid.

    1) the heat doesn't go anywhere. there should be a correspondingly large diameter cut out in the top plate of the wall, so that the air can escape in the attic (where it might do some good, as the attic is cold and properly ventilated, unlike the interior of a wall)

    2) there may be cold water supply pipes in wall. do you want to heat your cold water ? especially if they're copper pipes with a very effective heat transfer characteristic

    2a) there may be runs of NM-B (romex) electrical cable in that wall cell. The ampacity of electrical wire is a function of its rated capacity, and while most ampacity ratings are given up to 70C, if this thing were _seriously_ efficient at cooling a computer, then it would perhaps begin to cause problems with in-wall structures

    3) how does the national fire code feel about stuffing heat into closed interior walls (made of flame-retardant drywall, typically)

    4) if the excess heat it dispells isn't enough to cause any code violations, then it clearly isn't sucking enough heat to be worth installing

    5) this does little to eliminate the overall heat+noise of _systems_

    My idea for this was to find an abandoned refrigerator, or better yet, freezer, and just putting whole systems inside there, and then running flue-spec double-walled exhaust vent pipe elsewhere. Having all the PCs stuck inside a fridge/freezer (shut off, of course) that was properly vented should make things cool _AND_ quiet. Don't beleive me ? Try putting your battery powered alarm clock in your freezer, and see if you can still hear it once the door shuts. You want whole-system noise cancellation ? Then you need real insulation. Want to keep your office cool? then you'll need to do a lot more than putting a turbluent undersized vacuum hose on the back of your PC. ...if i ever find a fridge and hook this up, i'll be sure to post pictures :)

  • Chrome? by Xunker (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:01PM
  • Shouldn't this be under "It's funny. Laugh." by stinkwinkerton (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:03PM
  • Easy way to lower your computer noise by 30db by skintigh2 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:07PM
  • exploded view by cheezfreek (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:14PM
  • Warranty by dcigary (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @05:16PM
  • Finally! by Stalemate (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:17PM
  • Obvious problems. (Score:3)

    by JWSmythe (446288) on Monday January 06 2003, @05:22PM (#5028544) Homepage Journal
    This has so many obvious problems, it isn't funny...

    First off, I've worked in PC repair for years. So many machines power supply fan is so weak, it can barely make a breeze behind the machine. The restriction of that pipe would pretty much kill off the flow. Make a straight smooth walled pipe would do better, but not that flex hose.

    Next, the 4"x16"x8' space is going to be very small, and heat up quickly.. My office is roughtly 8'x12'x8'. You're dumping out the heat into roughly 3 cubic feet of space, with minimal ventalation. My 768 cubic foot, with a 24 square foot hole in it (doorway), with 4 PC's and 2 monitors running gets rather warm rather quickly, even with forced cooling (A/C ducts).

    So, besides ruining the insulation in the wall, if it's an outside wall (interior walls are usually uninsulated), he's going to build up lots of heat and moisture (the heat won't be enough to really dry out the air).

    I don't think the heating of the wall will be much of a factor, since the PC will overheat rather quickly and die.. I'd give it a few months, before the user wonders why it crashes several times daily, and then finally won't boot.

  • Stupid Product. by gurps_npc (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @05:34PM
  • This far, and NO FARTHER! by blincoln (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @05:38PM
  • R.A.C.H.A.L. is stupid by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @05:38PM
  • Seen 'HeatPipes' on some old laptops.. by nurb432 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @06:15PM
  • Computer not "'puter" by zootski (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @06:17PM
  • Mmmmm.... CPU-block eggs! by TheVidiot (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @06:32PM
  • Welcome at LAN Parties? by jhawkins (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @06:42PM
  • Put it in a closet by blitz487 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @06:48PM
  • Heat Pipes by Tacomanator (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @07:08PM
  • Laptops by Ratbert42 (Score:2) Monday January 06 2003, @07:12PM
  • As seen on TV price by jeffbruce (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @07:51PM
  • I can't wait to see by sporktine (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @07:57PM
  • What are they thinking... by orionpi (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @09:55PM
  • This a joke ... right? by bizitch (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @09:56PM
  • Silent PC from a vendor? almost... by caino59 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @11:36PM
  • You Will Be Assimilated by CognitiveFusion (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @11:36PM
  • Throw Cold Water on it! by bangzilla (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @11:44PM
  • From the FAQ by Turbyne (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @04:25AM
  • A for mof alternative heating? by re-Verse (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @04:54AM
  • At last.... by old_n_anal (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @09:22AM
  • Alternative? by SlappyNinja (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @05:29PM
  • Re:Insulation by heff (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:23PM
    • Re:Insulation by AGMW (Score:1) Tuesday January 07 2003, @09:31AM
  • Re:In the wall? by AuraSeer (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @03:36PM
  • Re:How about monitors? (Score:5, Informative)

    by gordie (139287) on Monday January 06 2003, @04:00PM (#5027884) Homepage
    If the excess heat is all from your monitors, then invest in a KVM switch, so you only have one Keyboard, Video (Monitor) and Mouse. While KVM's were once very expensive and seldom seen out side of computer rooms or NOC's, the prices have dropped. Also you can take the money saved on multiple monitors and invest in that nice flat screen you've been drooling over, but could not cost justify! Currently I have one very good 19" monitor, rather then 4 cheaper ones and much more "room" in the room!
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:A bad acronym: by Reece400 (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @05:09PM
  • Re:Cubicle by d3bruts1d (Score:1) Monday January 06 2003, @10:53PM
  • 32 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2