Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Feature:Geek Jobs

Posted by CmdrTaco on Tue Jun 22, 1999 09:00 AM
from the its-the-dream dept.
Joseph Walsh wrote in to talk a little bit about his experiences lately getting a new job. It talks about using the various online services to try to get a geek job. It doesn't provide any answers but I think it raises a lot of good questions that are worth thinking about. As hiring becomes more automated, we'll see much more of this kind of trouble.

The following was written by Slashdot Reader Joseph Walsh

Getting a Geek Job

A few days ago, I was enjoying the hum of the half dozen servers in my office when I decided to do a quick check of the online job search engines. I wanted to know whether there were any worthwhile jobs listed. So I went to one of the larger job search sites, and typed in Linux. No luck. Java? Nope, not without a whole lotta web site design skills. C? Not unless I was willing to master a half dozen semi-dead languages before applying. Sigh.

So I plugged in my current position's buzzwords -- Novell NetWare, WordPerfect, GroupWise, Windows 95, Paradox. Plink! A job description popped up that fit me pretty darned well. They were looking for someone to run a Novell NetWare LAN who also knew WordPerfect and Paradox. And they were willing to pay at least 20% more than my current employer!

After pressing the "submit resume" button, up popped an email. Ah, okay. They wanted an email. So I composed a nice cover letter (pointing out the strong correlation between my skills and the job requirements) and attached a copy of my resume. Of course, the attachment was in WordPerfect format, which made sense to me in light of the fact that WordPerfect was listed as a required skill. (Those of you who are more familiar with this process are no doubt groaning at my nievete'.) I didn't expect to hear anything back, but I thought I might as well give it a shot, right?

A couple of days passed, and I essentially forgot about the whole thing. But last night, what should arrive in my in box but a response to my submission! I opened it up, expecting the standard "thank you for your resume; we'll keep it on file blah blah blah" letter. After all, I have a degree in Human Resources Management, so I have some idea how this stuff works.

Which is why I was rather surprised to find that, instead of a standard acknowledgement letter, I got a one-liner which read in its entirety:

doc or rtf

The brevity of this missive puzzled me. What did this person mean? Is it some sort of garbled language, or a dialect with which I am not familiar? I made my living as a freelance writer for a while, so I pride myself on being able to figure out the written word. But this had me stumped.

Then I remembered my attachment. It was in WordPerfect format, and this person seemed to want it to be in either Microsoft Word or Rich Text Format. When I realized that the file format of my resume was the cause of this brief email, I admit I became a little angry. But when I understood the whole situation, I was furious.

The situation is this: I submitted my resume in WordPerfect format to what turns out to be a temporary and permanent employment agency (as opposed to the actual prospective employer). As anyone who has changed jobs in the last decade knows, these agencies are becoming the gatekeepers of all jobs. Soon, no one who changes jobs will be able to do so without going through an agency of one sort or another.

That's all fine and dandy, except that the people who are employed as gatekeepers rarely have the knowledge required to accurately judge people in highly skilled professions, such as the computer field. So, this "doc or rtf" person, who can't figure out how to import a WordPerfect file into Word, who can't even write a civil and intelligible email, is deciding whether a prospective employer will ever see my resume. That frightens me.

From conversations with colleagues, my experience is not at all uncommon. It's necessary to please these functionaries in order to get a job. And on top of that, there is often a Human Resources Information System at some point in the process (I should know; I implemented the one at my current place of employment). That HRIS will likely be used to automatically scan resumes, then only those which are buzzword compliant will be looked at by humans. The rest will be summarily thrown in the bit bucket. So if the HR person at the company to which you have applied is looking for someone who has "JDBC" on their resume, while you have "Java Database Connectivity" or even "Java Data Base Connectivity", you're out of luck. No human will ever see your resume.

And even if a human did see it, he or she probably won't be someone who is qualified to judge you or your accomplishments. It will almost certainly be a functionary who can barely operate a computer, who might have a list of buzzwords and terms given to them by some pointy haired boss. If those terms aren't on your resume, forget about getting a job at that particular company.

Once all of the above had gone through my head, I got a wee bit depressed. I started to question whether I wanted to continue in this industry. How else should a sane person feel when confronted with sheer insanity? Should he embrace it, or run away from it?

But, before I give up, I'd like to make a solid try at fixing this system. There just has to be a better, more reliable way for geeks to find jobs. Does one already exist? If not, can we invent and enforce one?

How do we get ourselves out of this idiotic morass?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Feature:Geek Jobs | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 301 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3
  • Good experiences too.. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:42AM
  • Re:Perks? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:03AM
  • Re:get an MBA or an MS by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:15AM
  • HTML, the true universal format (RTF is a pain) by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:42AM
  • From Scientific Placement's President..... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:32AM
  • Email still isn't taken seriously by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:21AM
  • Prerequisites by whoop (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:29AM
  • Re:And they can't open a pdf by whoop (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:31AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by whoop (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:34AM
  • A counterpoint by mosch (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:45AM
  • Perks? by abischof (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:24AM
  • Re:These agencies are a bit out of hand... by dgris (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:56AM
  • Re:Middleman missives by Analog (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:11AM
  • Re:Text Only is the best by Eric Green (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:52AM
  • by Enry (630) <enryNO@SPAMwayga.net> on Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:35AM (#1839457) Journal
    This is a book I must recommend to anyone considering changing jobs. It's updated yearly, and my last one was '93, but it had a lot of good information I've used since.

    For example:

    1) Go directly to the person responsible for hiring
    2) Ask said person for 5 minutes of their time. Give your 5 minute spiel, then say "I see my 5 minutes is up, thank you for your time". (I used this and it worked).
    3) Networking networking networking (people that is). It's probably very hard at the 20-25 yr old age, but it works.

    Plus there were chapters on why you want to change, finding the best job for you, negotating salary and benefits, etc.
  • "What's PostScript?" by gavinhall (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:05AM
  • Geek Jobs by gavinhall (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:12AM
  • Re:Personal Experience (-> a solution) by gavinhall (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:54AM
  • Re: Agree - onlin job listings are bogus by gavinhall (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:14AM
  • forget mailing resumes... nothing beats networking by gavinhall (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:29PM
  • by gavinhall (33) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:15AM (#1839464)
    Posted by Dahakbert:

    This is great for college students, but if you're working, I highly suggest putting your resume up, but WITHOUT any phone numbers. Most recruiters I've dealt with have been annoying as hell, calling me at work, telling the front desk that they are "returning my call" even though I've never talked to them, so they will be passed through. But since I revised my resume, put only my home address and NO phone numbers, only an e-mail address for contact, it is much more managable. Here are a few tips I would suggest for people who want to put their resume's up and NOT be annoyed:

    1) don't put any phone numbers on there. Only e-mail addresses. That way, you can easily return messages and have it take up less time

    2) if they call you at work, and you never put up a work phone number, DO NOT TALK TO THEM. Here's what they did, they looked at your resume, got your current employment's number from directory service, and are xcontacting you a way you did not ask for. This should always be highly discouraged.

    3) if the recruiter tells you they heard about you from someone who highly recommended you, 9.9 times out of 10, they are lying. Recruiters usually say things like this to make you believe that they are really interested in you... if you ask who refered you and they refuse to tell you, guess what...?

    4) do NOT answer any questions about your current business, how many employees are working there, what they do, etc. Tell them if they are that interested in your company, you can refer them to a sales person, tell them you do not want to answer too many questions about your business which can get you introuble for non-disclosure. Trust me, they have no qualms about being unnecessarily nosy. Most likely, they are probing you for info so they can decide to target other employees at the company who you work with for recruitment as well.

    5) if they want a resume submitted to them by fax or mail, that is ok... however, tell them you want to know who they are recruiting for if you give them that. If they refuse, they are wasting your time. The best recruiters I've dealt with told me whom they are recuiting for and what the job is within one or two e-mails to them.

    6) Always have an enemy or a wate-of-time's e-mail address or contact information infront of you, so if you get a recruiter who just annoys the hell out of you, you can say, "I am not at all interested, but let me give you the contact information for someone who might be." In one case, I explained to someone I wasn't interested, and they proceeded to tell me how I really was and I just didn't know it, so I explained it to them a little more forcefully, and highly suggested they contact the career center at my previous university. I knew this would be a waste of time for them, so ... :)

    All in all, from my experience I still think the best way to find your dream jobn is the old fashioned way --- either know someone, or send in a resume to a company directly using newspaper adds or with a job fair. Most of the time, recruiters are going to be a waste of your time and energy.

    -- Dahakbert
  • Problem by Tim (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:23AM
  • Re:Suits by Sanat (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:17PM
  • Online resume is the best. by DunbarTheInept (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:40AM
  • What clear instructions? by Paul Crowley (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:56AM
  • Recruiters can't always see websites by Paul Crowley (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:46AM
  • The Hacker Recruitment Agency by Paul Crowley (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:04AM
  • PDF has a published specification by Paul Crowley (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @12:41AM
  • gatekeepers by Wansu (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:32AM
  • get an MBA or an MS by jabbo (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:15AM
  • I'm sorry but sending a WordPerfect file is really
    like asking them to throw your resume in the
    wastebasket.

    I've had to sort through piles of incoming resumes
    and this is how it goes on the receiving end:

    1. Garbled attachments (delete)

    2. BinHex'd attachments (damn Mac users - delete)

    3. doc files (I don't have Word and I'm not
    impressed by you doc formatting skills - delete)

    4. WordPerfect attachments (are you kidding me? - delete)

    5. doc files with macro virus (oh why thank you,
    get a virus scanner you friggin' putz! DELETE)


    The best ways to send a resume online:

    1. Plain text in an email message

    2. URL where the resume is posted online

  • Re:Solution: Slashdot Jobs by /dev/niall (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:04AM
  • How I love finding work. by Scott (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:29AM
  • Re:The suits were the geeks till they wised up by greg (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:05AM
  • Bunk I say, Bunk! by greg (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:18AM
  • Re:Recruiters can't always see websites by Kyril (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:35AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by sjames (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:22AM
  • UNIX at work by sjames (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:58PM
  • Similar experience by KmArT (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:15AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Rick Franchuk (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:14AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Rick Franchuk (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:01AM
  • Re:They aren't all bad..... by sql*kitten (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:18AM
  • Internet Job hunting isn't ALL bad. by Hitch (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:15AM
  • Re:Geeks don't use Word, HR better deal with it by ptomblin (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @10:48AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by ptomblin (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:15AM
  • Re:Geeks don't use Word, HR better deal with it by ptomblin (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:25AM
  • Re:Networking - It's not just for computers by profesor (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:15AM
  • Same Experience by Matts (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:28AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Mars Saxman (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:05AM
  • Re:Techies Unite! by Mars Saxman (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:11AM
  • Re:As a receiver of resumes, I delete any attachme by Sabby (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @05:41AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Jeff Licquia (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:00AM
  • A slightly better experience... by Steven Pritchard (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:58AM
  • Re:Linux user group = hiring hall by Steven Pritchard (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:29AM
  • Re:Your so right. by Chang (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:25AM
  • similar experience by wardk (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:26AM
  • by dattaway (3088) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:40AM (#1839500) Homepage
    I wouldn't go that far, but I will say I haven't had luck with them. I moved down here to Mississippi to marry a sweetheart who was finishing a PhD. I tried headhunters and mass mailing my resume. The companies that headhunters returned were quite a drive or what friends told me were sweatshops. Resumes just got headhunters refering me to out of state jobs that seemed to require frequent traveling.

    I gave up on the suit and tie resume job hunting shit and went to the local state employment center here. After a few weeks of checking in with them, she finally picked up the phone to call someone, "I think I have the person you are looking for." They got me what seemed like a decent job at a local manufacturing plant. I interviewed with an engineer, took the employment test and heard back a month later they wanted me to start the next day. I kept getting reviews and rewards every few months until my 40 hrs/week salary matched those of my engineering degree holding buddies.

    I enjoy the hell out of my job. My resume didn't get me here, but the usual approach that any normal worker tries. I would say showing up unemployed at the employment center got me a good job. The job I have gives me 100% vesting, all the paid overtime I want, paid vacations, insurance, and job security. Its a good feeling working with older, more mature people as they don't quit, but retire or die.
  • Re:Personal Experience by AMK (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:25AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Mawbid (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:19AM
  • Re:Solution: Slashdot Jobs by Minmei (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:58AM
  • I got lucky by Pascal Q. Porcupine (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:14AM
  • My experiences have been decidedly mixed... by jht (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:13AM
  • Re:Word, Politics, Networking, and Buzzwords by clawson (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:49AM
  • The Proper Way - Support the Engineers by drig (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:54AM
  • I work for one of those companies. You're right. by clintp (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:15AM
  • Word, the bane of this industry by cthonious (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:31AM
  • The solution is not simple by Quetza (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:12PM
  • Amen to geeks who can talk to the Suits by TBone (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:06AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Gordo (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:34AM
  • I got a job.... by andrew cooke (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @12:23AM
  • Jobs... by pqbon (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:39AM
  • My experience by The G (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:23AM
  • Placement Services by llywrch (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:32AM
  • Document formats and fun... by Roogna (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @07:38AM
  • Resumes themselves will be obsolete by Cooty (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:24AM
  • Eesh--the world is a strange place. by Rozzin (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:23PM
  • The Chicken or the Egg? by NoHandleBars (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:32AM
  • How do you get out of this situation? by Pig Hogger (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:51AM
  • Recruiters CUT your possibilities. by WonkoTSane (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:49AM
  • Re:Resumes themselves will be obsolete by ralphclark (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:36AM
  • The solution is in our hands by ralphclark (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:14AM
  • Re:evolutionary tension by ralphclark (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:33AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by smileyy (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:07AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Delphis (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:36AM
  • A better way, from a headhunter by mikeraz (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:28AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Kamelion (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:24AM
  • Re:evolutionary tension by espace (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:35AM
  • Usenet saved my fanny by mjackso1 (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:03AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by Chelloveck (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:35AM
  • For interchange, use a standard format by Sloppy (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:13AM
  • Geeks don't use Word, HR better deal with it by Sloppy (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:20AM
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by Sloppy (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:51AM
  • Why no sort by salary? by Hammor (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:57AM
  • similar experience by bunicula (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:41AM
  • Re:Text Only is the best by earlytime (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:17AM
  • agencies by rvr (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:23AM
  • Cool! Wish it would catch on ... by Yosemite Sue (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:21AM
  • If at first you don't succeed.. by Smitty (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:26AM
  • Re:evolutionary tension by The Mad Hawk (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:11PM
  • by The Mad Hawk (16167) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:19AM (#1839543) Homepage
    This situation bothered me a bit, as well, during a recent job search. Then I realized something: Organizations that rely on such "generic" HR resources to select new employees are going to get employees that match their efforts: people who throw around buzzwords in attempts to impress management types, not people who actually know what's going on. Eventually, these organizations will be at a competitive disadvantage as the highly skilled information workers end up other companies - their engineering efforts and products will suffer, and their more highly skilled competitors will move into dominant positions.

    Yes, it's frustrating now - the environment is changing and the situation has not yet evolved to meet the new environment. This is an annoyance, yes, but a temporary one - the history of the world is driven by the resolution of such evolutionary tension.
  • Word, Politics, Networking, and Buzzwords by GP (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:38AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by rolla (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:10AM
  • Re:They aren't all bad..... by dillon_rinker (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:43AM
  • evolutionary pressure by technoCon (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @02:11PM
  • Re:Good experiences too.. by idic (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @11:22AM
  • Recruiter's Best Interest by gazpacho (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @01:39PM
  • You display your ignorance. by AJWM (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:17AM
  • When "in the ladder" does an MBA become necessary? by cpeterso (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:51AM
  • Re:personal connections always count by emv (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @02:53PM
  • Agencies and Evil by Robert Goulet (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:36PM
  • Human networks, not computer networks by Aliera (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:26AM
  • The solution? Agents! by the_tsi (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:33AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by FreekyGeek (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @02:37AM
  • Here's worse... by John Whorfin (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:22AM
  • Re:Word, the bane of this industry by Siege (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:59PM
  • Re:Solution: Slashdot Jobs by Siege (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:06PM
  • One suggestion by AstroJetson (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:47AM
  • Job Agencies -- good and bad by pcburns (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @01:45PM
  • Jobs for those still stuck in the Hellmouth by laktar (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @07:43AM
  • Band together and start our own geek society by rawg (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:48AM
  • Re:What clear instructions? by skullY (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:54AM
  • Buzzword Bingo by Dunx (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:10AM
  • Just accept the agents.... by TheGrimReaper (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:26AM
  • You can often judge a book by it's cover by nabucco (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:49PM
  • Investigate and infiltrate by mwood (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:23AM
  • Hopefully this is on topic and informative. You're a geek looking for a job. I'm a job looking for geeks.

    Ok, my team just lost one of its senior guys to a startup opportunity. Despite the fact that we expect him to return in 3 months :), we need a new body. Hey, JavaONE was last week, and we need a java programmer!

    • There was no job posting board at the conference. We have immediate need for a fairly senior Java programmer (all Solaris, server-side stuff, no clients, guis, or swing, at least not immediately) in the Boston area, yet we couldn't find an efficient way to tell anybody this.
    • Nobody wanted to hear from a big corporation (I work for a mutual fund company). Despite the fact that the e-commerce team is tiny (about 12 people) inside this big corporation, and at times feels like a startup, there were toooo many people with dreams of gold who only wanted to talk to you if you knew when your IPO was coming. If I hear one more person tell me that he's got the idea for the next eBay....:)

    So the problem exists from both sides. Yes, we use recruiters, but we much prefer to hear from individuals. The few times we get good old fashioned cover letters, they get shown around the team - "Hey, look! A cover letter! Let's get this person in here!" We run ads in the local paper -- yes, it's the old fashioned way, but it still works strangely enough.

    I'm torn over whether I should do this...oh, what the heck, I'll just use hotmail. If you're a fairly senior geek (5+ years experience in the biz preferably), and have some project experience with server-side Java, preferably with an e-commerce slant, and are in the Boston area and looking for a job (and don't mind working with people who speak in run on sentences :)), let me know. duane_morin@hotmail.com [mailto]. A degree is not required, but it certainly helps. My boss actually prefers people who've got a degree in something other than CS (he likes em well rounded). We don't pay relocation (that I know of), so please don't write me from Florida if you don't plan on moving anyway. We do lots of Sybase here, so if you've got some of that, tell us. None of the above is written in stone (is it ever?) so if you're close, it can't hurt to write. But I'll tell ya, if you think you're good, but have got absolutely nothing to prove it, you can't really expect us to hire you.

    Disclaimer: This ain't no startup, and I ain't even close to CTO, so I don't do the hiring. I just bring in the bodies.

    d

  • Here's something that I've seen work. Got webspace? Put your resume up. Then submit it to some of the search engines. Make sure it's got the right buzzwords (I find that Java CORBA does it nicely). Within days you'll be getting calls. Mostly from recruiters, sure, and most of them suck. But isn't getting called at all better than no calls? I've had lousy recruiters and mediocre ones (haven't used them enough to have found a really good one).

    I've had my resume online since I had web space (about 3-4 years). Only recently I had to take it offline because I was getting too damned many calls (about 2 a day). However, when a friend of mine exhausted her real-world resources, I put her resume on my page, and within 2 days Microsoft called her (she didn't go, of course :)).

  • Another one....don't ever let the conversation go like this:

    "So, are you looking?"
    "No, thank you, I'm quite happy here."
    "Oh, well, do you know anybody that's looking?"
    "Nope, as a matter of fact if I did, I'd hire them, we've got openings."
    "Oh, really??? What kind of openings do you have?

    Instantly they go from wanting to place you somewhere else, to wanting to place someone else where you are. They've all got two faces.

    Favorite recruiter story : After telling her no thank you and goodbye on the phone three times and her ignoring me, I hung up on her. I then got an email from her (turns out someone really *had* referred me) saying "I've never been hung up on before!" I told her she must not have been in the business long. Ironically, 3 months later I was looking, so I told my colleagues "Watch this. I could go over to her house and kick her dog, and she'd still love me and want to place me." Sure enough I called her and told her I was looking, and all bad feelings were forgotten.

  • by dewey (25683) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:55AM (#1839573) Homepage
    I'm a programmer at a headhunting company, and I can give you an idea of what it's like on the receiving end of the deal. Disclaimer: I realize the situation described in the original article is not the same as what I'm talking about here.

    We get literally hundreds of resumes each week, by snail-mail, fax, and email. We probably ask for about 10-20 of those from potential candidates. The rest are unsolicited. Most are not for a specific position, just for "anything that fits my background". Most of the resumes are from unqualified people -- certainly over 80% of them are garbage.

    Our Web site tells people exactly how to send resumes (plain text in the body of the email), yet we still get dozens of attachments in all formats -- Word, Word Perfect, PDF, HTML, even TIFFs of scanned resumes.

    Given the following facts: (1) these resumes are unsolicted, (2) there's an 80% chance that they're trash, (3) the submitter can't follow directions, and (4) we have a couple hundred other resumes to process this week, we generally delete such resumes without even replying. We feel the chances are low that we're losing any good candidates this way.

    On the other hand, the thread that says headhunters are morons has some truth, too. Their job is to do a buzzword-level screening of a large pool of candidates and bring a few to the client for in-depth interviews. They need to bring good candidates, but not necessarily the best ones. So if they can do that without the clerical overhead of doing a lot of document conversion, you can bet that's the route they'll take.

    If you're applying for a job that's being filled through a search firm, here's what you need to do:

    • Put together a brief resume with lots of buzzwords on it. These folks have a lot of resumes to dig through, and yours is only going to get a few seconds of attention.
    • Follow their directions for resume submission. If they have to convert your resume to .doc format, your few seconds are up.
    • Make sure your contact information is correct and easy to find. Most of the time, if your resume looks good they'll want to call you to chat in person.
    • Remember the headhunter is trying to fill a particular position as fast as possible -- not help you find a job. You're raw material. Don't expect that they'll be willing to go out of their way to help you find exactly the right job. They're going to see if you fit any of the positions they're currently trying to fill.
    • If you get an interview with the client company, make sure to ask lots of questions about the company and the position, because the headhunter may have oversold the position to you. Also make sure that the company gets a fair picture of your skills, because the headhunter may have oversold you to them.
  • Email terseness by davedavedave (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:27AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by 0xdeadbeef (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:34AM
  • Middleman missives by RomulusNR (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:29AM
  • Get a clue by shaun (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:36AM
  • Re:For interchange, use a standard format by Kartoffel (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:40AM
  • delivering medicine to remote hill tribes by Kartoffel (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:12AM
  • Personal Experience by RabidMonkey (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:09AM
  • Re:Solution: Slashdot Jobs by dougayen (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:31AM
  • Apply for your own company? by D3 (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:58AM
  • Great jobs don't need headhunters by RiverRat (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:59AM
  • Similar Experience by Izaak (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:56AM
  • Re:Techies Unite! (Score:4)

    by Izaak (31329) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:57AM (#1839585) Homepage
    If there were a unionization of tech people there wouldn't be this problem.

    Uhg what a repulsive thought! Unions are great if you are in a low skill job where the employer can treat you like a replaceable cog in the corporate machine, but if you are in a high skill / high demand field. Do you really want a union dictating wage scale based on seniority? Or making it near impossible to can the code monkey who is dragging down your project?

    Personally, I LIKE the fact that I can work as a free agent, define my own work conditions and pay scale, and basically make out like a bandit for doing something I love to do.

    Here is a major clue alert. It is a seller's market right now for programmers. YOU are calling the shots. Don't be afraid to ask for what you want.

    Thad

  • by AtariDatacenter (31657) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:43AM (#1839586) Homepage
    Ironic, isn't it, that the Internet is supposed to get rid of the middleman which provides marginal services (such as the RIAA), yet this particular group is thriving. And I can say that they provide little value, other than advertising, to the candidate or the company.

    From the side of the company, no matter how many ways we tell them we want someone competent at the enterprise level, they throw all sorts of near-entry level resumes at us. Misfits, rejects. People who you might want to change tapes for you. Our own technical interviews are far more enlightening.

    From the side of the prospective employee, the recruiters get in the way. I recently visited a large jobs site to find some interesting jobs, but I couldn't get even a SIMPLE description of the job or the details without handing over the resume -- which means getting forever hounded.

    I could do a lot better job of selling myself than these headhunters could. And even with them, it is difficult to sell yourself as a "signal" in a sea of "noise". They just don't know how to evaluate people. All they are interested in is pushing bodies through to get a commision... and I doubt that they have my true best interests at heart.

    As for the company, they need to step up to the plate and have their own HR departments be more active in advertising and evaluation. These recruiting firms only thrive because HR isn't doing their job, so lower level managers have to work around the system.

    The funny thing is that the headhunter/recruiting firms actually work AGAINST the companies that they find employees for. They recruit individuals away from their existing jobs. And once you are in the system, they'll be giving you a call back a year or two later, trying to move you somewhere else. And while they bring a new employee into the shop, they're talking to your other IT guys!

    The value of headhunters, in most cases, isn't marginal. It is negative. They thrive on churn. They cost money. They provide poor service. The tight labor market and a poor HR department are the only two things that keep them afloat.
  • Re:The solution? Agents! by Green Light (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:43AM
  • Just use ASCII by aithien (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:28AM
  • They aren't all bad..... by Greeno (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:08AM
  • talk to your LUG... by nmarshall (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:21AM
  • Try a headhunter/recruiter by SpinyNorman (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:52AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by CrudPuppy (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:02AM
  • by CharlieG (34950) on Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:00AM (#1839593) Homepage
    You CAN take the "I'm going to do it my way" attitude, and get jobs, BUT it's a lot harder. I was doing obscure programming for a while, and didn't want to learn the "Hot" languages. I'd see maybe 2 jobs a month I was qualified for. I had cut myself off from 99% of the market. Eventually, the market became HOT, and I was instantly in demand.

    I'll give good odds that this happens with Linux, BUT, it is a gamble - high risk, higher potential reward, as you'll be the only person with with that skill set when things get hot.

    Just remember though, you can get really hungry when your waiting around
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by kamileon (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:40PM
  • Re:Solution: Slashdot Jobs by DoktorMel (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:12AM
  • Re:Problem by DoktorMel (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:29AM
  • Solution: Slashdot Jobs by DoktorMel (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:42AM
  • I need a @#$%# job .. like NOW!! :( by joliveir (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:11AM
  • Linux user group = hiring hall by spudboy (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:41AM
  • HR people use Word - deal with it by L1zard_K1n6 (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:03AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by L1zard_K1n6 (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:09AM
  • The suits were the geeks till they wised up by L1zard_K1n6 (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:12AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by L1zard_K1n6 (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:19AM
  • These agencies are a bit out of hand... by ErichTheRed (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:23AM
  • Re:Amen to geeks who can talk to the Suits by Verde (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:53AM
  • Recruiters!!! of course this you know this means.. by gfolkert (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:46AM
  • Re:Recruiters are morons by mykey2k (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:42AM
  • Interviews by swestcott (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:52AM
  • Why Word or RTF? Because ... by The_Other_Kelly (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @12:17AM
  • GeekFinder - Job Search for Geeks! by MrP- (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @02:40PM
  • My experience by NullGrey (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:08AM
  • Hacking recruiters is a skill by anticypher (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:43AM
  • Re:personal connections always count by anticypher (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:05AM
  • My experience -- Go Contract-to-hire by Joe_NoOne (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:46AM
  • Re:%&amp;$^ing agencies! Someone COULD do bett by TheAngryMob (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:29AM
  • Re:For interchange, use a standard format by Betcour (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:28AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by MartinB (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:09AM
  • How to bypass HR by neilbaby (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:47PM
  • Advice for the near-sighted by Blackfire (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:15AM
  • Great advice by plopez (Score:1) Sunday June 27 1999, @09:30AM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by HardLogic (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:19PM
  • resumes by ray j (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:17AM
  • From my recent experience.... by kmb (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:42AM
  • Use the recruiter dimwits to your advantage! by Pyramid (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:21PM
  • Headhunters and Recruiters by Darth Binks (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:04AM
  • Job Finder HOWTO by rjaninda (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:22AM
  • Re:The solution is in our hands by Shadowcaster (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:47AM
  • Really want it by clump (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:49AM
  • Re:Suits by uberfunk (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:21AM
  • Re:Suits by uberfunk (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @09:28AM
  • Talk to the IS Dept... by S_Walker (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:21AM
  • Geeks unite! by pottymouth (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:23AM
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by pottymouth (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:13AM
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by pottymouth (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @10:22AM
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by pottymouth (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @03:19PM
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by pottymouth (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @03:26PM
  • The old ways seem to be the best ways... by Prometheus_NG (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:13AM
  • Re:Resumes themselves will be obsolete by Lucius Lucanius (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @11:53AM
  • Six degrees of cluelessness by Lucius Lucanius (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:20PM
  • Re:Suits by Lucius Lucanius (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:59PM
  • Re:with that attitude - enjoy unemployment by Get Behind the Mule (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:24AM
  • You hit the nail right on the head... by esac (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:01AM
  • %&$^ing agencies! Someone COULD do better. by Fiocco (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:20AM
  • This is the era of cutting out middlemen.... by shall555 (Score:2) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:56AM
  • So tell me... what does 'Object-Oriented' mean? by pete death, jr. (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @05:15AM
  • A job site responds... by diediebinks (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @08:00AM
  • Open Source Work Sites by KevinRaul (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @07:32AM
  • The technical HR Recruiter's thoughts by shay (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:48PM
  • Re:HR people use Word - deal with it by mantis_p (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @12:59PM
  • Re:Geeks don't use Word, HR better deal with it by mantis_p (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @01:14PM
  • Re:Suits by mantis_p (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @02:06PM
  • Re:Suits by mantis_p (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @02:25PM
  • Re:Tried recruiters and gave up by BoxTurtle (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @01:36PM
  • Re:If you don't know what the f*ck your talking ab by reflector (Score:1) Wednesday June 23 1999, @12:42AM
  • Re:Jobs for those still stuck in the Hellmouth by PrinceOfWombats (Score:2) Saturday June 26 1999, @11:14AM
  • Re:The View from the Other Side by mikefocke (Score:1) Monday June 28 1999, @03:30PM
  • you are 100% right... by Zach (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:21AM
  • Trials in Austin by mugoi (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:21AM
  • Recruiters are morons by Flinx (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @04:15AM
  • Slashdot helped me by tomscott (Score:1) Tuesday June 22 1999, @06:44AM
  • 85 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2 | 3