Open Library Project Takes Flight
Posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Mon Jul 16, 2007 05:34 PM
from the alexandria-green-with-envy dept.
from the alexandria-green-with-envy dept.
Aaron Swartz today announced the launch of the new Open Library project. The goal of the project is to produce the world's greatest library on the Internet free for anyone to use. Starting with the Internet Archive's book scanning project and organizing the insertion of new content via a wiki-type model the project seems to be off to a great start. The demo, source code, and mailing lists were all opened up today in hopes of drawing interest from the public at large.
Related Stories
[+]
Open Library Goes Online With Public Domain Books 103 comments
mrcgran writes "A competitor to Google Book Search emerges as the Yahoo-backed Open Content Alliance launches an 'open library' of its own. After several years of scanning and archiving, the Internet Archive and the Open Content Alliance this week unveiled the Open Library, their attempt at bringing public domain books to the masses. The Internet Archive has hosted texts for quite some time, but the Open Library makes fully-searchable, high-quality scans of books available, along with downloadable PDFs. It offers an experience designed to match paper: there's even a page-flipping animation as readers move forward and backward through the book. Ben Vershbow of the Institute for the Future of the Book says that when it comes to presentation, 'they already have Google beat, even with recent upgrades to the [Google Book Search] system including a plain text viewing option.'" We have previously discussed this project, though this is a bit more complete rundown on the initiative.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Open Library Project Takes Flight
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 126 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Awesome (Score:2, Funny)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 06 2005, @10:30PM)
Re:Awesome (Score:4, Insightful)
C'mon, I would be fairly disappointed with a library of 21,000 real books even if it contained only fiction from random authors from 1900-2000. Gutenberg doesn't even have that much depth.
That's not to take anything away from them. But to make claims about it being a good selection based on "21,000 - gee that's a big number" is a bit ludicrous.
PG (Score:1)
Perhaps this is going to contain books still under copyright? I doubt the full text will be available, which makes this "library" pretty useless.
In response to your question: (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday April 25 2007, @08:46AM)
Re:In response to your question: (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.ceyah.org/~jandrese/ | Last Journal: Thursday September 13, @11:11AM)
Re:In response to your question: (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.ideaspike.com/ | Last Journal: Monday October 22, @04:43AM)
No, of course not, because they're protected by copyright law, which in turn grew out of article 1, section 8 of the constitution. Just there will never be a restriction on keeping and bearing arms... uh, oh, wait. OK then, like there will never be restrictions on speech... no, no, turns out there are plenty of those. Mmmm, ok, just like the feds can only take action on interstate commerce, because you know, that's an enumerated power they can't step outside... aw, no, they do that all the time. Well, it'll be like how they can't do searches or seizures without probable cause, oath or affirmation, and a warrant... oh... I guess that's no longer true. Well, of course they can't make ex post facto laws... except for the ones they've made, that is, you know, thinking of the children and such.
Wait. Why is it again libraries "aren't going away?"
Project Gutenburg (Score:2)
It's been around for years, and I thought it was pretty well-known.
Re:Project Gutenburg (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.aaronsw.com/)
Re:Project Gutenburg (Score:5, Insightful)
Your issue is more likely that there are a lot of crappily designed webpages out there.
If you're reading "large swaths of ordinary onscreen text", do this:
- Copy-paste in into any word processor
- Choose a nice, big font. (Small is good for UI, not for 400-page-novels.)
- Use a dark background. A page reflects light, a screen projects it. You do not want glaring white.
- Use 8-10 words per line.
- Profit! Err... less mental exhaustation, at least.
Pay extra attention to words per line. It's a key reason onscreen text is often hard to read. Too many words per line, and you'll have a mental overhead every few seconds trying to figure out which line you just read and which is next. Basically, books do it right and you want to display onscreen text at a similar width. Scrolling is easy these days, and wide lines is a remnant from when computers required a click-and-drag to scroll.
Wide books and newspapers are divided into columns. There is a reason for doing this, but almost nobody seemed to think about that when they display text on screens.
Heck, even slashdot defaults to a glaring white background and text stretched all over my 1920 pixels. Go figure.
Re:Project Gutenburg (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.fallingcow.com/)
Older books are often hard to relate to without some context, and that sort of thing is what makes or breaks many editions of the "classics", IMO. If, when shopping for books, I pick up a copy of a book that was written more than 200 years or so ago, and it has no foot notes, most of the time I won't buy it. This is doubly true of translated works.
Wikipedia can usually stand in for an introduction, but there's nothing like footnotes to get you closer to an older text, and nothing that I know of provides that. If someone started a project to provide that kind of information for Project Gutenberg books, I'd get on board to help. Bonus points if they're also putting them in formats that don't suck (making plain text look good on the screen is a pain in the ass).
I'd start it up myself, but alas, I am poor (college). I'd definitely help out if someone else got it going, though.
Until someone does that, PG is practically useless to me.
Will this project do anything like that, or do you know of anyone who's doing this?
It seems to me that 500-1,000 really well-edited, footnoted, and formatted free books are better than 21,000 books worth of plain-text barf.
question... (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Wednesday September 20 2006, @10:30AM)
http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page [gutenberg.org]
they have a great collection of ebooks online already and your free to grab and share them. I wish that they would have the base for this though in a country which doesn't have insanely long copyright laws, then it could really add value over gutenburg
Relevance? (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://www.infinadyne.com/)
wikipedia 2.0 (Score:2, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 25, @03:49PM)
Take flight? (Score:1, Insightful)
Mod me down if you must but it's annoying when otherwise intelligent people cannot write a simple sentence and the editors are so lax in their responsibilities.
I must be new here.
Not good (Score:1)
(http://filer.case.edu/~bct4)
Not Project Gutenbeg (Score:5, Insightful)
The actual site ... (Score:2)
IPL? (Score:1)
(http://topomaps.rpseeley.com/)
Re:IPL? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.ciar.org/ttk | Last Journal: Monday October 15, @05:30PM)
OpenLibrary is a lot more complete, for one .. searching on "Ogorkiewicz" in IPL yielded no hits, while OL gave me several. The Archive is well-connected to various institutions like the Library of Congress and Bibliotech, and is able to pull a lot of help from these other organizations into making a more complete service.
OpenLibrary is also a catalog of metadata, providing information for each book like physical format, publisher, ISBN#, number of pages, and so on. This metadata has a lot of holes for now, but hopefully that will change as publishers and/or people who own copies of these books fill in the blanks, much like the Internet Movie Database.
Finally, OpenLibrary has its own staff which is dedicated to working with Internet Archive partners to make this the most complete catalog on the planet. IPL is cool (I like it!) but it does not seem to be very actively maintained.
(disclaimer: I work for The Internet Archive, but I do not speak for it, and the OpenLibrary team is in a completely different department from mine so DO NOT treat this post as necessarily any more authorative or correct than any other slashdot post.)
-- TTK
One thing new about it (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/~treeves/ | Last Journal: Friday August 25 2006, @02:51PM)
<type 'exceptions.TypeError'> at
unbound method remove_node() must be called with LRU instance as first argument (got NoneType instance instead)Python
Web GET http://demo.openlibrary.org/search
Traceback (innermost first)
/1/pharos/code/production/pharos/infogami
...
node = LRU.remove_node(node)
▶ Local vars
/1/pharos/code/production/pharos/infogami/t
...
self.remove_node()
▶ Local vars
That was just my first try, but it doesn't really encourage me to try again.
A Library Card Tip (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://websitetuts.com/internetbillionaires.php)
Gutenburg (Score:1, Redundant)
I'm curious how they'll make money? (Score:1, Interesting)
Lastly, in an age where the visits to libraries are increasing mainly to use computers, and budgets keep dropping and print collections suffer (notice how many still have science books from the fifties in them?) I wonder how will this will work since it's a private enterprise. My dream would be the Library of Congress becoming the online resource with all the books available or at least links to where you can buy OR borrow them, but that will likely never pass. Still, one can dream.....
Kinakuta (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://ensilzah.deviantart.com/)
Are there really any working data havens?
Vandalism controls? (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.people.virginia.edu/~drs2n/)
First thing I did on the site was pull up an entry for a book my university press publishes. It had no "Buy" option. I edited the metadata to add the ISBN-10 number for it, and voila, a Buy option.
It then took a certain amount of self-control for me not to go into various titles dealing with George W. Bush and enter the ISBN-10 of the storybook [amazon.com] containing "My Pet Goat". Purely as a proof of concept, you understand.
This is simply the Wikipedia vandalism problem writ large. What controls will OpenLibrary put in place to guard against it?
Some thoughts (Score:5, Insightful)
They should republish the raw data the same way Wikipedia and even IMDb does. I for one am not going to contribute to any data collection project that I can't later use myself.
Their schema [openlibrary.org] doesn't differentiate between editions. If I understand it right, that means that for the 3000 existing editions of "Tom Sawyer" released over the years, by different publishers in different countries and languages, the book's description has to be replicated for each one. That can't be good. I don't have a quick solution to this myself. Sometimes (esp. with tech books), a new edition changes content significantly compared to the previous one, sometimes they're exactly the same.
Collecting the cover images is a great service. However, doesn't this infringe on the publisher's copyright? Is this still fair use? What about countries like Germany without fair use laws--will German books still be OK because the data is collected in the USA (I guess)?
Add a feature to upload book descriptions as XML. Suggest a DTD. I have a list of my book collection stored as an XML file, so have others (maybe not natively, but book collection management software usually has an export function). It should be possible to automate the process of adding book information already stored in some digital format.
There should be some category system to pick from. Some may put Tom sawyer into "Novel, USA antebellum", others into "Novel, USA 19th century".
Somehow connect this to Wikipedia. The more prominent books have article pages. Maybe data could be retrieved from it as well. There are currently Tom Sawyer articles in 16 or so languages.
The edit page should group items better: stuff everyone understands (year published, title) first, then those things only specialists know.
The edit page's descriptors shouldn't be images but text which links to an explanation page for the same reason. BISAC? LCCN? UCC13? I know, I can find out what those are with a search engine, but I shouldn't have to.
Prepare for i18n. I guess LCCN is a library of congress code number? Those types of libraries exist in other countries, too. Each book can have a gazillion codes. Make this another tuple in the database: (book_id, code_id, code_value) instead of (book_id, lcc_id, isbn10, isbn13, 10 other codes in the same record).
Also i18n: store language codes with all textual columns. A description is most likely going to be Hungarian for a book published in Hungary in Hungarian.
This complicates the schema a lot. Having very few tables is tempting, but it usually doesn't work well with the real world.
Change the name first (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:What good will it be? (Score:2)
Or just old, almost like James Joyce's work, which arguably nobody reads, but for Joyce at least, a lot of people talk about it.
And as for getting stuff...at least for now, the experience of an ebook is a lot less enjoyable to most people than that of a dead tree book. Dead tree books have portability advantages as well. So if someone likes a book they find on Open Library, they might well buy it on Amazon.