Slashdot CSS Redesign Contest
from the at-long-last dept.
I will pick the winner based on a series of arbitrary and random criteria, many of which I will list below. The list is by no means comprehensive, but it should give you a good starting point.
I'm sure there are ultimately things that I'm forgetting. But the key goal here is to create the new look & feel for Slashdot. The winner is the one who creates what gets us the closest to a new site design.
This contest will be highly subjective. Ultimately tho, it falls upon me to select the winner based on arbitrary and subjective factors like aesthetics, as well as more tangible ones like implementability and compatibility.
CRITERIA
What follows is a brief list of criteria I will use to judge, as well as how to submit your entries. Remember that anything artistic I suggest is just that- a suggestion. If you hate green, go ahead and make a blue design. I'm just telling you what I'm looking for in a winning design... and while I am the judge, nothing is set in stone... like any good art student knows- you can do almost anything you want as long as you can rationalize it in your critique.
- Uses our existing CSS framework - We are willing to make minor changes to our underlying HTML if need be, but the ideal winner is implemented entirely by using custom images and CSS. Almost every element on Slashdot is appropriately classed or ID'd now, so you should be able to do it.
- Works compatibly on most browsers - IE, Firefox, Mozilla, and Safari represent the bulk of our traffic. Ideally a winning candidate works on these platforms, but also degrades nicely to the less popular browsers. We'll test winners against whatever we have access to. We're not expecting everyone's entry to work perfectly and identically on every platform that exists, but if your whole design hangs on CSS trickery that only works under 1 browser, you will lose!
- Retains all major bits of information - unless you can make a case for dropping something! Articles need bylines. You still need space for our ads. We still need a submenu to list out all the sections. If you want to trim down menus or something, we'll consider that, but most items on our pages need to be there for some reason. You'll need to rationalize dropping items from menus or removing parts of the UI that we need.
- Doesn't require us to add major new bits of data - There are a million great ideas for functions and features that could be added to Slashdot. This is not the place to propose them. This is about Look & Feel. This is not about telling us that we need voting on articles or tagging on polls. Those are valid feature suggestions that we would love to do one day. But this contest is about look & feel. Save feature requests for another time (and remember, patches are always welcome!)
- Topic Icons - So we have 150+ topic icons. Your design needs to incorporate our existing icons, and not require that we rebuild all of them. That means most likely that the icons sit on a white background. The icons themselves vary from around 50x100 to 100x50 but most float around 64x64. I'd strongly suggest that a winning entry is submitted using our existing topic icons as examples. let me say that again we have 150+ icons, and we can't rebuild them all. Your design should use our icons. Not new ones. That means sizes, and white backgrounds. This is the one rule that is pretty hard and fast. And no we're not switching to anti-aliased PNGs yet. Sorry.
- Entries ought not be bandwidth gluts. No hard/fast size limits here, but if your page requires 2 megs of jpegs to render, I'd suggest moving on.
- Retains some sense of visual continuity with Today's Slashdot - This one is the real challenge I think. From the Slashdot 'Shade of Green' (#006666) to the curve on the upper left hand corner of the page & article headers, to the use of the Coliseo font, I really think that many of these design elements need to persist. You are welcome to ignore me of course. But I'm being totally up front about this point: the winning entry ought to echo the current design. How loud of an echo is up to you.
- Entries should show as at least the index, but ideally a few other pages to see how their design might look showing other data formats. I really think Slashdot has 4 "major" pages: The Index, The Article, The Comments, and The User. I'm not saying you need to do all four, but the winning design needs to translate well to every data type on the site. The more guidance you give us, the more likely you are to win.
- I have to like it. Design something pretty. Design something high-tech. Design something minimal. Design something elaborate. I don't know what the winner will look like. I'm excited to see what you guys come up with.
HOW TO ENTER
My preferred method of submission would be that you email redesign at cmdrtaco.net with a URL to a place where I can see your design. Alternatively, if you have no access to a web server, I will accept a zip file or tarball, but would REALLY prefer URLs where possible.I fully intend to critique good entries. The goal here is of course to get the best looking, bandwidth efficient, compatible, attractive Slashdot. If I think your design is ugly, I'll tell you. If I think it's close, I'll give you specific ideas. I'm the judge here, so this is totally unfair. But again, my goal here is not to be fair, it's to make Slashdot look awesome.
I'm going to give this 2 weeks, and then I'm going to share with you some of my favorites at that point in a story. I'll try to tell you all what I like about these designs. I'll ask at that time for your feedback. Then I'll give everyone one more week. The contest will continue to be open to anyone who wants. Everyone is welcome to refine their designs, or submit new ones right until the end.
Between now and then, I will try to post a few journal entries as I see good designs float through. I want this whole process to be as participative as possible.
At the end of this time, I will pick a winner. I will be biased. I will be unfair. I will pick the design that I think is the best for Slashdot based on the criteria I mention above as well as my own personal sense of aesthetics.
The winner will get a fancy laptop. We haven't picked the exact one yet, but it's going to be a good one- we're not cutting corners. You'll be able to choose from a MacBook Pro or else a bleeding edge Alienware laptop. We'll pick the specs when we pick a winner so you get whatever is supremely awesome, but valued up to US $4500. We'll also be offering a $250 runner up prize.
Lastly, our corporate lawyer tells us that you are required to read the official rules before you enter.
Good luck to everyone. Happy designing. Have fun... I can't wait to see what people come up with!
OMG PONIES!
(Score:5, Funny)Green!
(Score:4, Funny)Is that acceptable?
Re:Not again
(Score:5, Funny)OK...
(Score:5, Funny)Re:OK...
(Score:5, Funny)(http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1066346/)
Re:OK...
(Score:4, Informative)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-P-P-Powerbook [wikipedia.org]
Save you some time
(Score:4, Funny)(Last Journal: Wednesday June 23, @12:11PM)
You can send the laptop to:
Troll, inc
Under your bridge
Mid-town, USA 00192
Re:Save you some time
(Score:5, Funny)It should be locked as the default for every account with negative karma.
Selectable Stylesheets
(Score:4, Interesting)(Last Journal: Tuesday May 04, @10:18PM)
However I quite liked the OMG Ponies design...
Re:Selectable Stylesheets
(Score:4, Interesting)(http://ptth.net/squish/ | Last Journal: Wednesday April 05, @03:22PM)
Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Insightful)Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Insightful)Seriously Taco, wake up. If you are bounding entries to slashdot's current scheme, you won't end up with anything much better. It'll be like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. This site needs a complete overhaul, unless you want to be the only site on the Internet that looks like it was designed in 1998.
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Insightful)(http://www.nosoup4u.com/)
Keeping the color (which I personally 'identify' Slashdot with) isn't one of the worst restraints one could get.
This site needs a complete overhaul, unless you want to be the only site on the Internet that looks like it was designed in 1998.
Damn, I just think I read a Pimp-my-Slashdot request: Isn't it a plus that with the 'looks' of '98, it also has the loadtimes of '98 ?
On a sidenote, I wonder why scalability (eg. mobile phone) isn't one of the judging points/requests: I would love to have a decent browsing experience on my phone.
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Insightful)(http://www.haeleth.net/)
What's wrong with looking like you've got a bit of history?
I think many buildings that were designed in 1860 look nicer than buildings that were designed in 1960. I think many books that were printed in 1960 look nicer than books that were printed in 1996. So why do all websites have to be identical ZOMG-ITS-TEH-WEB-2.0? Why not hark back to the 1990s and the golden age of internet growth?
Is this contest safe?
(Score:5, Funny)(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Monday June 26, @02:35PM)
I won't be submitting an entry for two reasons - first, I actually like the layout of Slashdot. It's one of the most readable layouts out there, conforms nicely to all of the "best practices" of typesetting, and is far more elegant than 99.9% of all other blogs out there. That's one major reason I've stayed with Slashdot. The other reason is that I regard CSS as satanic hellspawn, the consequence of major corporations molesting the W3C. It would be better for LaTeX to add hypertext links and for browsers to move to a real presentation system. That's not going to happen. Hell, efforts by people to support TCL as a replacement for Java haven't got anywhere, and far more people use TCL than use LaTeX. Internet Explorer doesn't even have proper PNG support yet!
What's needed isn't a new look & feel, what's needed is a scoreboard. Each company's website totally smashed by a Slashdotting scores 5 points, 4 points for a SQL error, 1 point for merely being slowed and -2 if there's no noticeable impact. A bonus of 10 points should be awarded if it's a major corporation.
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
the white background is more about necessity. We don't have the source material and time to rebuild 153 icons.
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Interesting)We don't have the source material and time to rebuild 153 icons.
Um, what does rebuild mean, anyway? Just plain redraw of the icons? Can't I use my own icons if I create all of them by myself, thus requiring you /. people to do nothing about them?
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Funny)(Last Journal: Tuesday May 30, @05:22PM)
That is probably because you are spending your entire day surfing Slashdot instead of doing REAL WORK!!!
Oh wait....sorry, I just had a flashback to my last manager.
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Informative)Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Funny)Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
I would love to one day rebuild all the icons. I just don't want to force someone to think that rebuilding a full icon pack is part of this contest. It could be- but it isn't required. So my suggestion is to work with what we have.
Lets collaborate to de-GIF the slashdot icons
(Score:5, Insightful)(Last Journal: Wednesday April 26, @04:16PM)
Collaborate to de-GIF the Slashdot icons for the benefit of all. [slashdot.org]
Re:Improve it without changing anything?
(Score:4, Insightful)(http://www.nivenhuh.net/)
the the main logo is also terrible. i think a new logo should be designed and a similar font could be used to give you the same "feel" for the old logo...
i'd also like to see an off-shade of white used, it's MUCH easier on the eyes than #ffffff. and instead of using #000000, a nice dark, but not pitch black color makes things look SO much better... (like #353535)
the forest green #006666 is
i agree with the parent poster, it's easy to gripe about the current problems and it's unreasonable to expect a good design when you have to incorporate all of the existing bad elements of design into it. please please please do the readers a favor and lighten up your rules a little bit...
Oh Boy, Isn't This An Incredible Coincidence!
(Score:5, Funny)Wait... they're NOT?
sorry... never mind...
Re:The whole shebang.
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
I absolutely would consider a design with all 153 redone topic icons.
We have stylesheets already that target some minimal browsers. Look in your user preferences for the low bandwidth and simplified design options. These are CSS themes already in place. Designs absolutely can include mockups for alternate platforms, but the contest is really about the main view of the site... on a traditional web browser.
Re:The whole shebang.
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
This brings up a possible new feature for slash
(Score:5, Interesting)(http://slashdot.org/~wowbagger/journal/87552 | Last Journal: Friday May 26, @09:15PM)
That way, I could go to my prefs, set my CSS to be http://www.example.com/my.css [example.com], and then slash would send meas the last stylesheet of any page served to me.
Re:The whole shebang.
(Score:4, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
Re:The whole shebang.
(Score:5, Interesting)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
However as always, patches are appreciated.
A personal request
(Score:5, Funny)(http://goldspider.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday October 26, @01:40PM)
Re:Bleeding-Edge Bootage
(Score:5, Informative)(http://cmdrtaco.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 15, @02:11PM)
Re:Well, at least CT is being honest.
(Score:5, Funny)Runner up?
(Score:5, Funny)Re:Runner up?
(Score:5, Funny)(http://www.stchristoffel.nl/)
It will remind people that second place is just the first loser.
(As previously seen in The Acts of Gord [actsofgord.com])