Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:You are DAMN RIGHT she should be charged (Score 2) 274

by SensitiveMale (#48048579) Attached to: Could Maroney Be Prosecuted For Her Own Hacked Pictures?

Nope, my argument is "creating child pornography is a crime." It should be prosecuted whether a 40 year old creates child porn or a 14 year old creates child porn.

I understand that if the police are investigating me for whatever reason and they happen to see that a phone number that has never called me and I have never called sent me a 14 year sexting pic, eventually they'll come to the conclusion that it was sent by accident. HOWEVER, until they reach that conclusion, they'll investigate every aspect of my life, confiscate every computer and phone I own, inadvertently or not leak that child porn was found in my possession (years ago won't matter), and maybe find something else completely unrelated that they may prosecute me with.

You're missing the point that teenager is creating something that is so toxic that it could effectively destroy the life of anyone that happens to see it. Who makes it doesn't matter.

Comment: You are DAMN RIGHT she should be charged (Score 4, Interesting) 274

by SensitiveMale (#48048197) Attached to: Could Maroney Be Prosecuted For Her Own Hacked Pictures?

This is something that has always bothered me. If a teenager is sexting her boyfriend or girlfriend and they happen to get the number number and send a pic to me, I have child porn on my phone. It doesn't matter how it got there. It doesn't matter how fast I delete it. If there ever happens to be any investigation of me for any reason and they check my SMS messages at the phone company, the cops will see it and now they have a reason to investigate every aspect of my life, confiscate every computer I have, and generally fuck me over.

Teenagers sexting is paying with fire and can destroy completely innocent lives.

Yes, I get the inevitable joke "So that's how you're saying that picture got there."

Comment: Re:Pussy whipped bullshit (Score 2) 590

by SensitiveMale (#47460611) Attached to: Marvel's New Thor Will Be a Woman

Better than someone with so little mental fortitude that they going into a bawling rage over a slight casting change on a comic-book they don't even read.

I don't think a comment of "sad" qualifies as a "bawling rage" and I don't think "a staple of the Marvel Universe and Norse mythology" being changed into a woman is "slight."

Comment: I'm stunned at the tone deafness of these people (Score 0, Troll) 376

by SensitiveMale (#47207047) Attached to: Theater Chain Bans Google Glass

These glassholes, for lack of a better term, walk around and act like they are shocked when others don't want a camera on them all of the time.

It is just like if someone walked around holding their phone/camcorder/camera in front of him all of the time and was pointing it everywhere he looked. No one wants that. These glassholes act as they have some sort of inalienable right and if someone complains then their civil liberties have been violated by a glassist.

Comment: Re:Racism or Thought Police? (Score 1) 398

by SensitiveMale (#47182395) Attached to: The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy

Further, it's absolutely absurd to say that he's being unfairly characterized as racist due to "one minute of [his] private speech".

But I didn't say that.

Sure, he had a history or winning and losing such cases. I'm not saying he wasn't a racist. But that behavior was KNOWN by the NBA & NAACP and overlooked. This is about the tape.

Comment: Re:Racism or Thought Police? (Score 4, Insightful) 398

by SensitiveMale (#47179913) Attached to: The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy

Yeah, but privacy and free speech and all that only applies if you're saying politically-correct stuff. The second you say "nigger" or even mildly criticize some protected group YOU MUST BE DESTROYED!!!!!

That's the odd thing. Sterling didn't even use a slur.From what I understood of the tape, he didn't even have a problem with minorities. He told his girlfriend that she could sleep with anyone she wanted. Again, no slurs. Just don't brag about her boyfriends on Instragram or bring them to the game in public.

He didn't tell his ticket sellers not to sell to minorities. He didn't use any slurs. He employed, from what I understand was a general consensus, the worst GM in the NBA for over 20 years who happened to be a minority. He hired a minority coach.

He was illegally recorded and punished for something he said in the privacy of his own home, not for something he did. Not to mention he was goaded. Listen to the tape. She knew what she wanted him to say and she kept at it until he said it.

This is very scary stuff because there isn't one person alive who wouldn't be ostracized, using this ruler, if a select one minute of their private speech was made public.

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson