Slashdot Log In
New RFC Adds "Evil Bit"
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Tue Apr 01, 2003 08:02 AM
from the that-does-simplify-matters dept.
from the that-does-simplify-matters dept.
Nashirak writes "This
is new RFC that introduces new security measures into IPv4 header. The measures include an "evil bit" that can be set an unset according to wether the packet is evil or not."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
New RFC Adds "Evil Bit"
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 160 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
Intentional? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://limi.net/)
First 1st April Joke Dupe! (Score:5, Informative)
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/01
Dupe. (Score:4, Funny)
New bit for Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
(http://home.netuse.de/~ms)
I just heard they have a new bit at Slashdot. It's called "DupeBit" and this is the first article which got it.
Yours, Martin
CmdrTaco adds new bit to story submissions (Score:4, Funny)
(http://idunno.org/)
Re:Dup (Score:4, Insightful)
Check the download.com april first joke. [com.com]
Same page duplicate for goodness sake (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.digiguide.com/)
Cmdr. Xerox! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.wavelengthsjournal.com/)
This is a good thing (Score:4, Funny)
Slashdot! The only place where . . . (Score:5, Funny)
2) New scientific discoveries sound familiar.
3) 10 questions turn into 20.
4) Last interviews turn into next to last.
5) Congress is considering the first ever digital cloning ban.
6) Duplicate replies to duplicate posts get duplicate moderation.
7) The only thing not duplicated is polls (not even sure about that).
8) 1000/1 = The ratio of time it takes for moderators to discover a dupe vs. the readers.
9) 0 = The number of dupes deleted.
10) The post (God forbid) announcing its closing will probably be posted twice.
This dupe is okay.. (Score:3, Funny)
the RFC update already, you wouldn't even have seen it!
That's all fine and good, (Score:4, Funny)
consistent, but not particularly funny (Score:3, Insightful)