What if it's a smear job on Take Two? At taxpayer expense?
Then they have the same recourse as anyone else - even those without a library of trademarks; they can sue for defamation after broadcast.
Are sales up?
The only reason piracy is illegal is because it affects legitimate sales. If people are not getting media for free, but still aren't buying it (for whatever reason) then this is a net cost to the economy.
This is a single blog criticising the film. And it is only criticism and calls for a boycott!
Yes. There are some stupid people. Yes. Some of them have blogs. Hell, even ROK itself has a reasonable article about how stupid the media is over this.
Second how is this surprising to anyone ? It's long been possible to describe and mathematically manipulate sets with more elements than the observable universe.
That's what I was wondering. Even going to the extreme, the diameter of the universe is about 5x10^61 Planck lengths. This is the sort of figure mathematicians have been happy to play for years now.
The nicer projects use standard types, base the architecture on existing successful products, and have a fairly simple class heirarchy.
The only way this is possibly harmful to anyone is as a result of the Mirror digging up the footage and publishing it, carefully processed and biasing the audience to actually hear it that way.
If you aren't aware that certain modes of dress are considered slutty, then you're ignorant. If you really want a concept, then google "slutwalk". Even women who are against this generalisation are clearly aware of what the social convention is on this.
If you dress that way anyway then why complain when people make judgements? If you care about how other people perceive you then dress in a way that will make them perceive you positively.
Seriously, how is this harmful to anyone in any way? The whole thing is so idiotic.