Slashdot Log In
I Believe You Have My Stapler
from the chisel-point dept.
- Re:I put. . . by Jonny Ringo (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:44AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
If you never saw the movie... (Score:5, Funny)
PETER GIBBONS
'So I was sitting in my cubicle today, and I realized, ever since I started working, every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's me on the worst day of my life..'.
- Re:If you never saw the movie... by scott1853 (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:40PM
- Re:If you never saw the movie... by laserjet (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:49PM
- nitpick - sorry by SkulkCU (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:15PM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
All around the country... (Score:5, Funny)
- Re:All around the country... by SnakeEyes (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @07:50AM
- Re:All around the country... by Raul654 (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:20AM
- Re:All around the country... by operagost (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:41AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
Office Space creates Anarchy (Score:5, Funny)
-
Re:Office Space creates Anarchy (Score:4, Funny)
by Peyna (14792) on Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:38PM (#3862154) HomepageYou would be surprised how much the movie Office Space applies to non cubical jobs as well. While working a factory I experienced many similar things to the movie. Such as, if I messed up, I had 5 people telling me about it and reminding me about it. And there was a lady one line over that would talk on her phone and had the most annoying laugh in the world (and this was a pretty loud factory too!). There's more than that, but it was pretty amazing how it paralleled to even a factor job.[ Parent ]-
Re:Office Space creates Anarchy (Score:5, Funny)
by scott1853 (194884) on Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:44PM (#3862181)I worked at a Xerox factory after high school. I only had one boss tell me I wasn't doing something right. The next day though, there were posters ALL over the clean room with clipart people showing the right and wrong ways of doing it. Talk about overkill.[ Parent ]- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by RatFink100 (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:27AM
-
Re:Office Space creates Anarchy (Score:5, Interesting)
by Monkelectric (546685) <slashdotNO@SPAMmonkelectric.com> on Thursday July 11 2002, @12:12AM (#3862546)Office Space is really an indictment of corporate culture and to a much lesser extent capitalism. One thing that was disturbingly true at my last place of employment [systems admin] was always the "staying late." My fucking boss would walk in at 1:00pm for his first meeting, get out of that at 2:00, catch up on some work, maybe teach a class, then at 4:30 he'd wander in and ask you "how late can you stay tonight? " To quote brain candy I said, "fucker I've been here for 8 hours already!" but then out loud I said "How late do you need me?" Another just criminal thing they would do to me is, at noon they would they would tell me, "I need to see you at 4:00 its important." And then I'd spin my wheels for 4 hours, and finally they'd drop some shit on me like "I need a webmail system running before you leave tonight."(not exadurating, this was said to me). But most of the time it was shit that wasn't even my job "I need you to convert this journal paper into a PDF" (hardcopy only). One day I had worked 17 hours with no lunck/breaks to help meet a deadline created by my boss not starting a proposal until 24 hours before it had to be fedexed. By the end I had a crushing headache and was having trouble seeing from exhaustion, and at 3:00am my boss had the balls to ask me "What time can you be here in the morning? 10:00? We need you at 10" (knowing full well I had a 35 mile commute each way) ... which brings me to the real problem - respect. Most managers have no respect for their employees.[ Parent ]- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by The_Shadows (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:10AM
-
Re:Office Space creates Anarchy (Score:5, Interesting)
by Monkelectric (546685) <slashdotNO@SPAMmonkelectric.com> on Thursday July 11 2002, @09:00AM (#3863908)No offense man, but grow some cajones. If they fire you, they fire you
One thing that was disturbingly true at my last place of employment
I know it's subtle, but "was" and "last" are past tense, indicating I am no longer working there
:)That story is actually more like enron meets office space. I had wanted to quit for about a year, but I had debts to pay and I wanted to stay at the job for atleast two years to look good on a resume. My boss and a official from accounting approached me one day telling me they were going to have the university write me a check and I was going to write most of the check back to them and that they needed to do this because they had paid me out of the wrong account
:) Long story short I dont believe shit my boss tells me and the plan would have gotten me in *UBER* hot water with the IRS and NSF both whom the plan defrauded.So I went to the universities Judicial Director (the university interface to the legal system), who hooked me up with a detective and a deputy district attorney, for whom I agreed to setup my boss for prosecution by completing the fraud under the supervision of the police. On two occasions I wore a wire to document the planning of the crime for the police... and now that my boss is either going to be fired, sentured, or jailed, I quit.
Is that enuf "cajones" for you? You really shouldn't use your +2 bonus for stupid comments.
[ Parent ]- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by AppyPappy (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:49AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by LatJoor (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:03AM
-
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by MaxVlast (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @07:38AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by The_Shadows (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:10AM
-
-
Re:Office Space creates Anarchy (Score:5, Funny)
by delcielo (217760) on Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:02PM (#3862292) JournalYou know, the only reason I don't watch that movie very often is that it's TOO realistic. Watching that movie is like going to work.[ Parent ]- Except no Jennifer Anniston sitting on my face. by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:17AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by JackRandom (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @11:28AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by ealar dlanvuli (Score:1) Friday July 12 2002, @12:59AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by ealar dlanvuli (Score:1) Friday July 12 2002, @12:59AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by MrP- (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:37PM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by MrP- (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:26AM
- 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by guttentag (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:22AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by NeMon'ess (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:29AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by guttentag (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:28AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by NeMon'ess (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:29AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by taernim (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:07AM
- 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by babbage (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:31AM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by M-G (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:16PM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by babbage (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:01PM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by M-G (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:16PM
- Re:Office Space creates Anarchy by MagnaMark (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:55AM
- Tom Tomorrow by crucini (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @07:03PM
- Re:Tom Tomorrow by MagnaMark (Score:1) Friday July 12 2002, @10:13AM
- Tom Tomorrow by crucini (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @07:03PM
- 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
Cultural Icon (Score:5, Interesting)
On the subject of red staplers, why has the post WWII workplace insisted on mono-color conformity? It seems almost a conspiracy to ensure that office workers be isolated from as much visual stimulation as possible. Is it so important that the occasional visitor/client not see a single clash of colors that offends their sensibility? It would not revolutionize the drudgery of the workplace, but more allowances for individuality and color can't help but improve the condiditon of those who must exist in that environment from day to day.
The whole "flair" concept at the Houlihans type restaurant carries the same theme. Even where modern business allows disorder, it cannot be individually expressive disorder, it must be carefully regimented and designed to communicate the corporate message, not a personal one.
The dot com bust has given added credence to those who actually advocate this kind of enforced conformity - they point to a free form, more open dot com workplaces as a symptom or cause of the crash, and are using it to crush any new proposal to create a more humanized, comfortable workplace. Just my two cents. Great movie if you haven't seen it.
- Re:Cultural Icon by GriffX (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:54PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ZaMoose (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:17AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by Covener (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:22AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ZaMoose (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:34AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by Covener (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:56AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ZaMoose (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:34AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by Covener (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:22AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ZaMoose (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:17AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by orion67 (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:59PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by forkboy (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:42AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by TheOnlyCoolTim (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:46AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Cultural Icon by TheOnlyCoolTim (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:46AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:25AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by Mononoke (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:20PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by metachimp (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:08PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by Mercuria (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:05PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by kin_korn_karn (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @05:25PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by magnified_plaid (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:41PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by forkboy (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:42AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by superflippy (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:59PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by IronChef (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:54AM
- Re:Your Sig by dmatos (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:08PM
- Re:Your Sig by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:32AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Cultural Icon by The Cat (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:15PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ElectricRook (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:38PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:45AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by Pig Hogger (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:42PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by SN74S181 (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:18AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Cultural Icon by Art Tatum (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:51PM
-
Re:Cultural Icon (Score:4, Funny)
by IxnayOnTheIxnay (579226) on Thursday July 11 2002, @06:55AM (#3863372)Errr, so the pre-WWII workplace insisted on multicolored objects?
Seeing as color wasn't invented until the late 1930's, how could it?[ Parent ]- Re:Cultural Icon by fockewulf (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:05PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:05AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
-
-
Re:Cultural Icon (Score:5, Insightful)
by gsfprez (27403) on Thursday July 11 2002, @12:24AM (#3862576)> individuality and color can't help but improve
> the condiditon of those who must exist in that
> environment from day to day.
Wait..
how could this get a Score of 4? When Apple did this - they got beaten about the head and neck on slashdot.
this place makes no sense sometimes.[ Parent ]- Re:Cultural Icon by danox (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:45AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by TheOnlyCoolTim (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:50AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Cultural Icon by eviltwinimposter (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:53AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ceejayoz (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:48AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by jkirby (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:03AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by SmittyTheBold (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @06:00AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:41AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by cr@ckwhore (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @07:35AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Cultural Icon by Covener (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:20AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by cdub (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:27AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by sharkey (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:20AM
- Re:Cultural Icon by ronfar (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:48PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by mjamil (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:50PM
- Re:Cultural Icon by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @04:04PM
- TGI Fridays by ShaggyZet (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:34AM
- Re:TGI Fridays by operagost (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:47AM
- Re:TGI Fridays by Storm Damage (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:26PM
- 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Our DBA talks like Milton by oingoboingo (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:42PM
- Re:Our DBA talks like Milton by MrP- (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:13PM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Our DBA talks like Milton by MrP- (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:13PM
**£££'s in eyes moment** (Score:5, Funny)
...merely twice the price of a plain black stapler...
- Re:**£££'s in eyes moment** by Roosey (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:58PM
- Re:**£££'s in eyes moment** by Bouncings (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:19PM
- Re:**££?s in eyes moment** by Provolo (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:58PM
- sneh! by Max the Merciless (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:41AM
- Re:what I want to know is by Tadghe (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @06:56AM
- Re:what I want to know is by millette (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:11AM
- Re:what I want to know is by tomstdenis (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:05AM
- Re:what I want to know is by tomstdenis (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:09AM
- 10 replies beneath your current threshold.
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
5W1NG71N3 IZ 4 5UXX0RZ!! (Score:5, Funny)
- Re:5W1NG71N3 IZ 4 5UXX0RZ!! by micahjd (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:42PM
- Wrong! by Pope (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:49AM
- Re:5W1NG71N3 IZ 4 5UXX0RZ!! by Loligo (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:55AM
- Re:5W1NG71N3 IZ 4 5UXX0RZ!! by Cryptnotic (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:41AM
- Re: also note by Lord Bitman (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:13PM
- Re: also note by MsGeek (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @11:46AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re: also note by MsGeek (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @11:46AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
Swingline /.'ed (Score:5, Funny)
- Re:Swingline /.'ed by YahoKa (Score:3) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:59PM
- Re:Swingline /.'ed by Xenographic (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:35PM
- Re:Swingline /.'ed by MrScience (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:43PM
- Re:Swingline /.'ed by JPriest (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:44PM
- Re:Swingline /.'ed by MicroBerto (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:21AM
- Re:Swingline /.'ed by operagost (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:57AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:what I wonder... by wadetemp (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @10:55PM
- Re:what I wonder... by laserjet (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:58PM
Obligatory Onion Reference (Score:5, Funny)
New Stapler Makes All Other Staplers Look Like Worthless Shit
There was no article, just a headline and a picture of a generic, black stapler.
- Those are called "bullets" by RumGunner (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:52AM
- Re:Obligatory Onion Reference by MassacrE (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:55AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Obligatory Onion Reference by emil_nikolov (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:08PM
save money and be more authentic... (Score:4, Informative)
The red Swingline stapler that Milton was so afraid of having taken away was never actually manufactured by the Swingline company; it was instead painted red by a crew member in the props department. However, following the movie's success on video as a cult film, the demand for red Swingline staplers (apparently as a symbol of quiet rebellion among cubicle-bound employees) was so great that the company began to sell the red Swingline stapler on its website..
---
So break out that red paint and make your own...
- Re:save money and be more authentic... by God! Awful (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:26AM
- Re:save money and be more authentic... by jarran (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:10AM
- Re:save money and be more authentic... by Joe Tie. (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:28AM
- Re:save money and be more authentic... by IxnayOnTheIxnay (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @07:00AM
- Re:save money and be more authentic... by operagost (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:59AM
- Re:save money and be more authentic... by Nerds (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:52PM
Why Milton and Dilbert succeed (Score:5, Interesting)
Ancient cultures (like China and India) tend to emphasize on hierarchy and obedience rather than questioning and innovation. When immigrant bachelor developers stay till midnight everyday and come to work on weekends, they set the same expectations on everyone else. Anyone who leaves at six because he has a life is viewed as being less of a team player. Also, important technical decisions might end up being taken outside the normal working hours.
Things only get worse when, after a few years, these same people become managers.
Some other symptoms are (i) dependence on individual brilliance rather than a good system and (ii) concentration of knowledge within a few individuals.
I am not blaming anyone and certainly not all immigrant developers fit the above pattern, but there is a cultural aspect to work and I am merely pointing it out.
BTW, I came from India three years ago.
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by sean23007 (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:00AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by teetam (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:00AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by Zarf (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @04:43AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by Cryptnotic (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:34AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by teetam (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:00AM
-
Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed (Score:5, Informative)
by Skyshadow (508) on Thursday July 11 2002, @12:21AM (#3862568) HomepageAmen.I was one of three westerners in a Chinese office (as in, moved-from-Beijing-a-year-before) for just short of a year, and the place burned me out faster and more completely than I thought possible.
Nobody, and I mean nobody, ever put in less than a twelve hour day, six or seven days a week. Even when there was no deadline, you were expected to be there. What was really happening was that nobody was really *working* that much, they'd just all adapted their lives around work -- they'd take long lunches and dinners, play at least an hour of ping-pong a day, have their kids would come visit at night, etc.
As an native American (although only a fraction Native American) with (IMO) a pretty solid work ethic, I looked terrible if I left "early" or said I couldn't come in on a Sunday for whatever reason. My boss called me on it one time, and I pointed out that I *always* met my deadlines and that I applied myself at work more than any of my coworkers. From his reaction, it was clear that wasn't the point -- I wasn't showing the proper dedication, defined strictly as spending time at work.
Anyhow, I got laid off last year after I told them I was going home to the midwest for Christmas (during a time with no pressing deadlines and using the company's posted holidays and a weekend). It took me five months to find another decent job, but not for one second did I wish I still worked there.
[ Parent ]- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by petis (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @06:21AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by ManitobaMoose (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:19AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by petis (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:44PM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by Skyshadow (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @11:38AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by ManitobaMoose (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:19AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by petis (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @06:21AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by australopithecus (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:01AM
-
Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed (Score:5, Interesting)
by teetam (584150) on Thursday July 11 2002, @01:10AM (#3862717) HomepageAs I said in my original post, I am an Indian who came to USA three years ago. I am so glad to see replies that have stuck with objective views.So let me tell you something - there are many, many Chinese and Indians who feel like you and I do. They tend to be silent because they are in a worse position than you. If you don't like a job, all you have to do is walk off to another company.
Take me, for example. I am working on a H1 visa. If I am laid off, the INS immediately treats as being out of status and my countdown clock starts ticking. Even if I get interviews (past the citizens and GC only companies) and a job, I still have to wait a few more months for my new H1 to be approved. Under these circumstances, would I risk telling people at work how I really feel? No. I work as late as anyone else and make sure I am always around when people are looking for me, whatever be the time
The H1 visa is a brilliant form of modern slavery that has the consent of everyone involved!
[ Parent ]- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by australopithecus (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:15AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by gaj (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @06:29AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by arkanes (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:12AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by SubtleNuance (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:12AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by gaj (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:34AM
-
Roman History (Score:5, Informative)
by ronfar (52216) on Thursday July 11 2002, @08:30AM (#3863765) JournalIn Ancient Rome, educated Greeks would often sell themselves into slavery to wealthy Romans. [csun.edu] However, the thing to remember that these slaves were planning to earn their freedom. They weren't planning to stay slaves forever. If the slave managed to earn his (and I mean his) freedom in this case, he would not only be a free man but a Roman citizen and a client of his former owner. This comparison to the H1-B system is not hyperbolie.It beat the conditions they had at home in Greece, but it really was slavery.
Unfortunately, Americans, being very provincial, tend to think only in terms of American style slavery, in which manumission was rare and unexpected. (Oh, and no one was really sure what to do with free slaves, except repatriate them to Africa.)
For more information on Roman style slavery, try reading the Masters of Rome series by Colleen McCullough.
The real problem with comparing things to the H1-B system is that there isn't anything exactly like the H1-B system. It somewhat resembles both indentured servitude [pbs.org] and Roman style slavery.
American style slavery was really more like feudalism, almost no hope of freedom or every raising your social status. [geocities.com]
Of course, it is difficult to compare the H1-B system to anything else, since it is a modern invention with its own rules and peculiarities. However, to dismiss a comparison with slavery, especially non-American slavery simply reflects a lack of knowledge of the history of the ancient world.
[ Parent ]- Re:Roman History by gaj (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:19AM
- Re:Roman History by ealar dlanvuli (Score:1) Friday July 12 2002, @01:14AM
- Re:Roman History by glitchvern (Score:1) Friday July 12 2002, @11:24AM
- Indendured Servitude by Myco (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:07AM
- Re:Roman History by gaj (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @09:19AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by operagost (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:06AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by teetam (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @11:54AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by thogard (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @06:38AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by SubtleNuance (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @08:05AM
- Re:Why Milton and Dilbert succeed by HBergeron (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @04:23PM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
-
- not completely true by lingqi (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:24AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:OT: Office Space Quiz by ObviousGuy (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:34PM
Liquid TV--the birth of Milton (Score:5, Informative)
The skit basically showed Lumbherg and Milton having their classic confrontation about the stapler, moving his office down to the basement, and what not.
Judge made 'Office Space' from this skit.
- Re:Liquid TV--the birth of Milton by schussat (Score:3) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:04AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Liquid TV--the birth of Milton by HeavensTrash (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:46AM
- Re:Liquid TV--the birth of Milton by Myco (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @10:11AM
- Re:You never know what will be worth money someday by mr_gerbik (Score:2) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:32PM
- Re:You never know what will be worth money someday by MrP- (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:47PM
- Re:You never know what will be worth money someday by Meowing (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @02:41AM
- Re:You never know what will be worth money someday by jerkychew (Score:2) Thursday July 11 2002, @11:50AM
- 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
Umkayy? (Score:3, Funny)
yay! (Score:5, Funny)
- Re:yay! by nege (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:24PM
- Re:I'll buy one by ccwaterz (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:18AM
- 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
Peter -- Check Out Channel 9 (Score:3, Funny)
- Re:Peter -- Check Out Channel 9 by MrP- (Score:1) Wednesday July 10 2002, @11:59PM
- Re:Peter -- Check Out Channel 9 by ObviousGuy (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:01AM
- Re:Peter -- Check Out Channel 9 by Cplus (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @01:26AM
- Re:Peter -- Check Out Channel 9 by ObviousGuy (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @03:50AM
- 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
- Re:Peter -- Check Out Channel 9 by ObviousGuy (Score:1) Thursday July 11 2002, @12:01AM
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
DOD version... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:DOD version... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:DOD version... (Score:4, Funny)
My cube-mate had a case of Office Space (Score:5, Funny)
Ahhh office space, will you ever learn? (Score:5, Funny)
Lumbergh: Great.
Portwood: So um, Milton has been let go?
Slydell: Well just a second there, professor. We uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it will just work itself out naturally.
Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem solved from your end.
excuse me... (Score:5, Funny)
You leave me no choice (Score:5, Funny)
Ahhh Office Space (Score:5, Funny)
PC Load Letter! What the fuck does that mean!!
Re:Ahhh Office Space (Score:4, Informative)
You have it backwards.
To be specific, it breaks down like this:
PC (Paper Cassette) Load Letter (Size paper).
This happens when you send a print job that requires Letter size paper, but the printer does not, or thinks it does not, have letter size paper.
This can be cause by having the wrong paper size in the printer, but is more commonly caused by those who insert the paper tray guides incorrectly. Many people mistakenly insert the tray guide for letter size paper in the A4 (our European friend's letter-size equivalent) slots, because they are close in size.
This causes a different sensor arm to be tripped, and the printer thinks it has A4 size when it actually is letter.
This is what can cause this error message. Either that, the wrong size of paper, or a broken sensor.
Re:Ahhh Office Space (Score:5, Funny)
In summary: INTERNAL SERVER ERROR, WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN!?