"Enhanced." But for who's benefit?

Yes, there is a new contract created every month. Feel free to quote Italian conditions, but in the US a contract requires consideration, which occurs on a monthly basis.

In any case, it doesn't affect the ethics, and Netflix gives ample time for a customer to cancel renewals.

Nope. It simply renews every month (and that's a convenience, not a contract) unless you cancel. There is no contract beyond a month.

>you cant just unilaterally change a contract even with "30 days notice"

Whoosh. If the contract only lasts 30 days, you can change the terms for a future contract.

Forget about the law. Ethically, Netflix is in the right. Someone signs up and pays for a month. They get a month of service. That continues month to month. At some point, Netflix tells them "it will cost more next month, if you don't want to pay more, you can simply cancel and not pay." There's no force or deceit. Continuing to pay and then coming back later and suing Netflix is an attempt at theft, plain and simple. The law is unethical.

There doesn't seem to be much to this story. As far as I can tell, they haven't done any scientific or even casual tests to clone open source or closed source. It's vapor ware.

Then why is the Kim family still in power in North Korea?

The types of neural networks used in these classifiers are not LLMs. The expense and difficulty of collecting an image set is going to far outweigh the compute time used to train them.

We are questioning whether the AI is creating something new, or whether it's just copying the original.

It's a question because the AI was trained on the original. Clean Room Design is a well-known engineering technique. It's not a problem when cloning closed source if the AI wasn't trained on that closed source code.

They will also be replacing the LED lighting in the schools with candles, and heat will be provided by hand-stoked coal furnaces.

OMG!!! PONIES!!1!

It's relatively easy to setup VPN over SSH, that might work if you need it at some time in the future.

OK, so your viewpoint is a little more clear now. You don't have a problem creating and killing animal life.

What about stem cell embryo research? Or sperm research? Does that bother you?

That's what you do every time you eat. Are you monstrous?

Only Jainism opposes it.

Instead of laws, how about parents take responsibility for parenting?