Comment Re: This is not about crypto (Score 1) 16
Caveat emptor.
Comment This is not about crypto (Score 2) 16
Rather, this is effectively about recording stock transactions on a blockchain. Nothing more and nothing less than swapping a distributed transaction log for a traditional ledger.
The implication is clear, the SEC is at least considering the idea of creating shares as a token cryptocurrency. In this case, the tokens are backed by real shares. That's not a technical requirement, though, and a future company might someday skip the major exchanges entirely to list only as a token. To be clear, there's nothing sacred about the exchanges and their "house rules"; there's nothing inherently wrong with using a blockchain vs a ledger; and to reiterate, this has nothing to do with "buying stocks with Bitcoin".
On that last point, I consider OKXICE's decision to accept payment in some nondescript "stablecoins" as extremely unfortunate. Not because I'm a cryptophobe, but because it muddies the waters as to the viability of the core concept of tokenized equity itself - Though that's a bit of a tautology, given stocks are already "tokenized equity". Whether we denominate them in USD or BTC or cowrie shells is an entirely separate issue.
Comment anyone who buys these but skips (Score 1) 60
I have a lot of faith in Apple, but this is an entirely new product category for them. This is the situation where the extended platinum-plated warranty makes total sense. If you're spending 2k on a phone, an extra hundred bucks a year is gotta be pocket change, anyways.
Comment down from 250x earnings (Score 2, Informative) 65
Comment Re:ha (Score 2, Insightful) 67
Of course employers are welcome to set the terms under which they'll give us money. And similarly, we're free to set the terms under which we'll accept their money. That's how it works.
Personally, I love companies announcing draconian new RTO policies - There aren't many better indicators their stock price is going to spike short-term then tank a few quarters later. But that has nothing to do with working for those companies. On that front, it's just a hard "no", to the point I'm seriously considering becoming a professional "interview troll" once I retire!
Comment Re: I would take them seriously but... (Score 1) 122
That said, if these are everywhere and the very fact I'm using FF with uBlock Origin is the exact reason I haven't seen these... That is the sort of viral advertising most companies dream of.
Comment Re:Whose gonna hire them? (Score 1) 136
Most of the complaining about data centers seems to be more hate the rich, with AI the current boogeyman for that.
Are you saying we are not justified in our malcontent towards the assholes in charge when they have been more then forward with their intent to replace us all with AI and robots?
Sure, it's a lot of marketing bullshit as it's not remotely capable of all that, and yet, look how quickly frontier models have advanced with programming and media generation? Not only are the models getting better, but they are becoming more efficient. You can turn out some pretty awesome stuff with just an 8gb video card. 16gb even more so.
As far as the robots go, have you seen some of the stuff coming out of Asia? I can't wait to see what they bring out next. It's both remarkable and terrifying at the same time.
Oh, and don't forget the push with self driving cars. The days of general population driving are numbered. It will be interesting to see how that transition goes but the potential is there. Not just cars but also freight trucks. Material movers will take longer, but warehouse to warehouse or warehouse to store, that's coming. We even have robots that can build and wrap product pallets. It's pretty impressive and it all amounts to fewer humans needed.
Comment Re: I'd take it (Score 1) 136
And when those are the only jobs, the wages will be driven down to nothing when everyone knows how to do those jobs.
Comment Re: I'd take it (Score 1) 136
It really depends on time lines. They could "sunset" the human species with some sort of virus that makes us infertile. We won't die overnight, but without new births it won't take long for the collapse to happen.
The rich of course will already have the vaccine, along with their ai robotics.
It's scary because this is entirely possible.
Comment Re:It never ceases to amaze me... (Score 1) 40
LPT: You can also turn your phone to watch the content. I know, mind blown, right? Pass it along!
Comment Re:Fire me (Score 1) 136
That said, I see the GP's argument come up quite often in any online discussion of layoffs, and it took me years to finally figure out, this topic basically comes down to a simple class issue: If someone is a moderately well-paid salaried employee, a severance offer is almost always going to beat UI by miles (and as you also pointed out, that's not a mutually exclusive choice, UI just picks up after severance ends). If someone is a low-paid nonexempt worker, by contrast, severance is usually nonexistent and employers playing games around UI claim appeals are a lot more common.
There's also other benefits to consider, most importantly health insurance. Severance offers usually allow employees to keep their group health insurance during the severance period, while COBRA is eye-wateringly expensive even for someone formerly paid well.
Comment Re:Fire me (Score 4, Informative) 136
Weekly, that's $4.7k vs $1.2k. Total, that's $184k vs 31k.
I can guarantee nobody smart enough to be an engineer at Microsoft (as much as we might make fun of their culture and products) is dumb enough to fail that one-question math exam.
Comment Re:Nothing major. (Score 1) 46
Just life- and career-ruining accusations spread far and wide with "evidence". And when disproven, as with all false accusations, the apology will be half-assed if there's an apology at all.
Search results will smear the writer's name forever.
But hey, that's a small price to pay for protecting society from... *checks notes* Nothing.
We're basically at the point where if you use Oxford commas, or write with any eloquence at all, you're flagged as AI. Because humans write slop, according to these checkers. If you don't misspell every third word, fuck you, you robot.
We're idiots in the aggregate, and we're scrambling desperately to make sure those of us who aren't idiots at the individual level are punished for it.
Comment Re: Do like China (Score 1) 19
Build in Mexico
Include the cartels from the outset, make it profitable for them, and probably still save money over what it costs to bribe politicians into compliance inside the US. Win-win-win.