Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I don't know how people sit for hours at a time (Score 1) 39

After about 30 mins I need to stand up , stretch, maybe take a short walk around the office or the house, otherwise I just get uncomfortable with very occasional leg cramp.

Enforced sitting. School and desk jobs teach us to sit in one place for hours at a time. And if you don't actively fight it when you aren't attending school or the job, you fall into that as a habit that you can't break. I have to actively try to do upright things as much as possible outside of work or I fall into the habit of driving home, making supper, then just sitting in a chair until I conk out.

Comment Re:welcome to the corruption of science (Score 1) 34

classism and greed are destroying our institutions and our societies, all you selfish irresponsible elites are wrecking everything for everybody

this is exactly what evil looks like

Evil and stupidity enhanced with shortsightedness look like twins. I suppose greed plays a role as well, but I feel like the root of what we're seeing sweep over the world right now is stupidity and shortsightedness. Greed is always there. We're just dumb enough as a species at this point in time to let the greedy make all the decisions about the important things, and the rest of us just shrug and go along with it as if there's nothing to be done to stop the greedy from riding roughshod over us, the biosphere, and the planet itself.

I suppose laziness plays a role there as well. Though it could be existential exhaustion manifesting as laziness.

Comment Re:local (Score 1) 6

There doesn't seem to be anything in the article about locally run models, probably because law makers there realize such things cannot be regulated. However, I'm sure more idiotic countries (maybe the UK?) would try to regulate local use too; restricting stable diffusion models or try to force open source tools to submit all prompts to a government API before rendering. You might say that sounds dumb or crazy, but the UK is imprisoning people for years over facebook posts. As ram and storage prices continue to rise, it might get easier. Having a power local computer could become out of reach for everyone.

I could see the US trying to regulate locally run models. Mostly because the broligarchy wouldn't much care for people running anything AI related that doesn't give them a direct hoover line for all the data, and our government is currently operating as a part of the broligarchy.

Comment Re: Duh (Score 1) 97

I see some people saying it'll calm down after trumps out of office they don't seem to realise once the effort has been put into moving off US tech it's unlikely they'll ever come back. Not only the loss of EU customers it's creating competitors funded by government.

I keep getting told I'm an idiot for saying that once the world figures out how to cut the US out of its transactions, whether it's digital or financial, it's not going to rush to hook back in once it seems we've reinstated some form of reasonably sane government. We're setting a precedent that every four years there's a possibility we'll go completely insane again, and nobody likes dealing with an unstable individual with some form of bipolar disorder. When it comes to planning for the future, you can't trust that entity to remain on course, and other countries are routing around the US to avoid dealing with its inherent instability.

People can keep telling me I'm wrong on this one, but it's not going to change the fact that the US is going to be a loner on the world stage for decades to come if not longer. We've turned into some weird combination of toddler and bully, and the bully part won't be able to stand once other countries realize the toddler is in major need of a timeout.

Comment Re:Outrageous claims (Score 1) 16

Musk knows how to act like a supremely confident bully. He's claiming that he, many years ago, imbued OpenAI with his knowledge and expertise of AI that constituted the value of OpenAI from the very beginning and that the subsequent money, effort, and expertise from others were essentially immaterial. That's how he's hoping to convince the court that his $40 million is now worth $134 billion.

Of course, that logic is laughable. There are basically no experts that would agree with the idea that Musk is an AI genius, then or now. So, why isn't this a waste of time on Musk's part. Well, there's this deal of a jury trial, where Musk just needs to convince 9 out of 12 jurors that he's right. His lawyers get to try to stack the jury with as many ignorant and pliable jurors as possible. And in the very likely result of a hung jury, he gets to try over and over again, which allows him to press for a settlement. He really deserves no more than the $40 million plus interest that he put in, but any settlement will likely be the same as hitting a venture capital jackpot.

Lawyers would most likely try to argue that the company wouldn't exist to have advancement if not for his initial outlay and try to blah blah blah they're way into making the legal powers that be believe investment encompasses all value. It's a completely idiotic tactic, and one that should blow up in their face if we lived in a just world, but since we live in this world, it just might work.

Comment Re: The Dark Ages (Score 2) 184

Because America's privatized, for-profit healthcare system allows for way bigger price markups than the rest of the world's responsibly managed public healthcare systems.

I wish I had mod points to raise this up. It's probably the most important part of this whole situation and should have honestly been included in some way in the summary above.

Comment Re:The Dark Ages (Score 1) 184

America is hellbent on seeing people die, aren't they?

The owner class has decided that they don't really need a large population. They'll replace the need for "workers" with their AI and robots. I'm sure they'll keep a few folks around just for fun. I mean, they'll need some sex workers and the like until they can perfect robotic replacements. Perhaps some gladiatorial types for entertainment. But for the most part, they need a population decrease once they fully realize their AI ambitions, having AIs do everything, feeding other AIs, and automating the web in such a way that profit continues to flow without any actual humans involved.

The US officials are either going along with this knowledgeably, or, much more likely, being useful tools for the cause as they fall into their own rhetoric over the past two decades and forget that it was mostly meant to goad people into fights so they could own the libs.

Gonna be an interesting future we're creating. Even if there's a turnaround in policy at some point, we're setting up for a very slow recovery from this era of stupid.

Comment Re:agreed (Score 1) 55

"I'd like to see copyright go back to a reasonable time limit, like author's lifetime, or even less."

Copyright in the US was originally 14 years, renewable once for another period of 14 years if the copyright holder was still alive.

As someone who writes both fiction and music, I'd be all for a return to this.

Comment Re:agreed (Score 5, Insightful) 55

Stealing isn't innovation, which is why we shouldn't respect the modern term of copyright. Its original limit's intent was to allow The People to have control of their cultural identity. Those terms have been extended again and again specifically to prevent that for the purpose of guaranteeing profit not for creators, but for corporations.

The natural limitation on copying is no limit. Copyright was supposed to be a limited time thing, not for longer than the typical creator's lifetime. Copying is a natural right.

I'd like to see copyright go back to a reasonable time limit, like author's lifetime, or even less. But I really don't like the trend of folks decrying copyright as a concept at all right when it's convenient for the corporations who have traditionally supported extended copyright to abolish copyright outright so they have the right to outright steal all creative works from the moment of inception. Copyright of reasonable limits? Yes. Abolish it outright right now? Fuck no. Let those fucking tech companies work around it like the other corporations have made all of humanity work around it over the past few decades.

Comment Re:Lest you think Big Tech aren't psychopaths (Score 1) 41

What's the purpose here? The smart glasses craze (among Big Tech, thankfully not among normal people) at least had the notionally positive idea that a HUD would be useful under certain circumstances.

This appears to exist purely for the purpose of getting people to get angry at one another and to destroy privacy. Why the fuck wear this? The only possible use is to film other people without consent, and do so constantly, not because you want to film some Karen having a meltdown or an ICE Officer... uh, having a meltdown, but because you want to piss everyone off.

This is absurd. Big Tech seems to just want to destroy society at this point. Why? Because we didn't want Bitcoin? Because we thought VR headsets that aren't immersive are impractical? Because we don't want AI in everything? Is this some kind of revenge for that or something else?

David Brin had an insightful take on this in his novel Earth. That the tech keeps getting more invasive until there comes a point where society deems privacy some sort of sin. The whole "what are you trying to hide" thing that people throw up when it comes to police searches will eventually overwhelm us through tech creep to the point where it's deemed exceedingly eccentric to want privacy at all. And it seems these tech companies are obsessed with making that future happen.

Comment We want to create a digital garbage dump. (Score 2) 20

We will use AI to create massive piles of digital garbage, that will eventually flood the entire online realm with digital garbage that no one actually cares about, maintains, or wants to see or hear. Maybe, when we finally clutter it up with so much AI generated shit, and more AI generated shit created by AIs trained on the garbage of the previous generation of AIs, we'll finally create a new network for humans to use for a few years before it too becomes a digital dumping ground.

Our obsession with pollution is reaching new levels with AI's help. All praise the new AI God. Capable of shitting up entire networks with useless content.

Comment Re: This is the story of Man. (Score 1) 117

I wonder if animals have trolls too, that cause this. Just critters who thrive on getting any reaction to make themselves feel powerful...

I know cattle do. We had one cow in a herd of 125+ that would find a good patch of grass, then do the threat-pose to get the rest of the herd to respond. Head up, tail up, ears perked, looking panicked. The others would stare where she was staring, and eventually run off. She'd then lower her tail and head and get to munching all the fresh grass she wanted to before the rest of the herd would cautiously make their way back. Saw her pull this trick at least six or seven times, and according to the others she did it quite a few more times when I wasn't around.

Cat's are all trolls in their own way. Cute, fuzzy, little assholes, every one of them.

Comment Summarizing workflows (Score 5, Insightful) 66

My director is extremely excited about how much time AI saves him writing up his weekly summaries to pass up the chain. He can write a single sentence, pass it to the AI to be written up into a big fancy report, the next guy up the chain uses another AI to decipher the big fancy report into a single sentence summary that may, or may not, be vaguely like the original sentence used to prompt the AI that wrote the big fancy report, and both of them are super pumped that they saved so much time. My director saved writing time, his next-up-the-chain saved the time of having to read what my director wrote. They've just used a bit more compute to avoid typing and reading things that were, at best, busywork created to make it seem as if they were involved in the process of what happens beneath them. AI can really help with busywork reporting.

I'm guessing neither of them will realize they're automating away the entire reason their jobs exist.

Slashdot Top Deals

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein

Working...