That whole inevitability argument is a tough one, because it's become a religious mantra to the true believers, and you can not, will not be able to make any argument against it because it, like all religious beliefs, is sacrosanct, and those who don't already believe it are simply living in denial, completely disconnected from the reality the people holding it occupy, and will be destroyed by their hubris, for daring to stand against computer god. I keep hearing various versions of the same argument. I think my favorite thus far has been, "You either get aboard the AI thing now, or you will be destroyed by it. The only jobs left will be for those who understand AI, and you won't understand it if you don't get into it as fast as you can."
It's only inevitable because we've let it be. As I keep telling folks at work, we lost the machine war before it ever began. We've been handing them more and more of ourselves, bit by bit, for convenience. And with AI, we're accelerating that to include our ability to think for ourselves. Frankly, I'm ready for the Butlerian Jihad. Leave me a machine that can take keyboard input and save it as a file and I'm good. I don't need it to do my thinking for me.