Comment Re:Anything for money (Score 1) 108
The biggest pro for a Tesla used to be the charging network & Elon. Now the charging network is open to many other EVs and the biggest con is Elon.
I love a good double entendre.
The biggest pro for a Tesla used to be the charging network & Elon. Now the charging network is open to many other EVs and the biggest con is Elon.
I love a good double entendre.
Who said tariffs? There just won't be trade. Look at the historic trade deal Trump made with Australia. It opened up the beef industry to Australia reduced the restrictions on import. Hurrrah!. Except precisely no one is importing American beef, and literally every major beef supplier in Australia said they have no intention of stocking any American imports as their idea of "quality" doesn't care what Trump negotiated with the Australian government.
At this point much of the world has figured out it's easier to just wait out another 3 years until the Orange Piggy is gone.
And in those three years, most of the world will have figured out how to route around the US altogether in such a way that it'll be a far bigger pain in the ass to start including us again than it would be to just continue to avoid us. Trump's lasting legacy will be that he's turned the United States into a non-player on the world stage. Making America Irrelevant Again should have been his slogan.
Rather than being a carefully considered weighing up of risk against benefit, I sense a revelling in the feeling of transgression - A sort of "drill baby drill" attitude.
I've seen it said elsewhere and dismissed it as hyperbole, but more and more it seems, "The cruelty is the point."
It's like something from that Captain Planet cartoon, or an 80s movie sci-fi dystopia.
Remember when the villains on Captain Planet seemed too simplistically evil and greedy to actually exist? Where even little kids were thinking, "These guys are absurd!" Sadly, some of the big decision makers now were little kids then, and watching those guys thinking, "I can't wait until I have enough power to do what those guys are doing."
Subject pretty much summarizes Altman's dream. That the unthinking masses will, without thought, fork over money, and without thought, fork over every thought they have to this device that will, also without thought (because AI doesn't actually think) suck up every data point it can to shovel into the mothership for more AI training data so they can better predict... uh, when to take a bite of your device? You'd think the AI companies would be gorged on data at this point, but apparently there's still some data they believe they don't have. All this device will be is an always on spy, perhaps one people with, without thought, carry around with them everywhere, sucking up background conversations around them, as well as answering queries that will be building a profile to best predict when to shove what ad at you in between answers.
I have to question what these data centers would be used for. The guys at the controls don't seem to be angling to provide people healthcare, housing, jobs, or education in any capacity.
The same people who have been telling me my whole life that government can't do anything useful. Makes you wonder what they are doing with it, then.
The outward plan, the one they admit, is the hope that they can replace the entire workforce with machines. Since the government has zero concern about anyone that can't provide for themselves, there's a "hidden" but corollary to the outwardly stated goal. Once they've removed the ability for people to provide for themselves, and therefore have enough game tokens (money) left over to spend on whatever products are being pushed by the owners, they'll need SOMEONE to buy things. And since they've managed to convince us digital assets are real enough to be worth spending money on, they'll simply want to create digital representations of consumers. Ones that are easier to control than even us. I assume there will be some digital payment system for work rendered per cycle or some-such that they can then use to spend on whatever digital flashy things.
Or maybe they'll just spin up some digital only version of the matrix, where the entire world is modeled rather than lived in, with digital humans living digital lives of misery, permanently enslaved to the owner class digitally, spinning on their digital hamster wheels, buying their digital goods, and never really knowing that's what's happening. We can't expect the owner class to be satisfied with wringing actual humanity dry. They'll want to continue to extract misery from something.
What will they call it in the US ?
RedundantOS.
That happened in a galaxy far, far away. No way it could make it this far.
Another documentary, Space 1999, would strongly disagree with this assertion. Space might be big, but the moon can be launched away from Earth via nuclear explosions so fast that it will come across an intelligent species every week!
All the creators of vibe coding tools are completely ignorant of the fact that specs, just like unicorns or Bigfoot, are a mythical being.
Let me tell you how it works.
The client wants to add a feature. They pull a product manager, a developer and bunch of other completely irrelevant people into a meeting. The dev gets about about 10 minutes on a 2-hour call to ask his questions to clarify what the client really wants and to poke a thousand holes in the client's logic.
Ultimately, after 3-4 calls like this, the dev gets a rough idea of what needs to be done. A few high-level requirements are 0ut on a Confluence page that hardly anyone ever visits afterwards.
The dev gets to work and ultimately delivers the feature, with a few additional clarification meetings along the way for all those million of things you don't realise until you actually start coding the bloody thing.
The Confluence page gets a minor update at the end, some things are refreshed. No one knows why or for whom because the page is hardly ever visited by anyone.
The code is a de-facto spec. To lean a bit onto the mantra of crypto bros: code is law. Plus all the residual domain knowledge that remains in the short-lived memory of the dev.
That is the reality of 99% of software projects. There is no clear spec. Just enough to stop the product manager from moaning.
Code is the law. Code is the spec.
You missed the post-coding moment when the original requesting folk(s) say that this is not at all what they envisioned and the entire spec changes and then you're essentially stuck in a "GOTO 1" situation for a few months as they keep changing the request after the fact.
Uh, even if we wanted to do this why would we contract some random company to do it?
Companies fail, they don't have to be transparent, their leaders are rarely, if ever, responsible for any damage their companies do to people's lives, their primary responsibility is to give value to their shareholders, not do anything good or useful.
They are often led by low-intellegence, money-obsessed sociopaths who aren't actually interested in whatever their company actually does, but rather are entirely interested in becoming as rich as possible.
And talk about too big to fail.
And our government officials insist that private industry is "better" than government at getting things done. Your center paragraph there pretty much defines modern government as well.
"Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?" --Queensryche., Revolution Calling
Actually that's my initial reaction, too, but I do think there might be some kind of solution. On third thought I'm sure this is not it, but...
If (and that's actually a huge IF) we were able to model the atmosphere well enough, then I think we might be able to intervene in a sane way. My own favorite fantasy solution would be large arrays of orbital mirrors rotated as needed to control the solar energy reaching the earth. Take a bit off the sides here, add some extra crops there...
Time for a joke? We could use the mirrors to FINALLY get rid of DST. And if we had that atmospheric model we could do it without the adverse side effects...
It'll end up as a forever pay service just like everything else. "Pay us, or we block your sunlight and redirect it to space." That seems to be the way everything we do goes these days.
We only have about 1 billion, maybe 2 billion at max years to figure out how to build a generational starship. That may seem like a long time, but it'll be right up on us in no time. You realize that with present day tech, it's basically impossible. We don't have the faintest idea of how to build a habitat in space. It's not even in the realm of imagination as to how to do it. We need to start funding it at a massive level.
In either case, 1 billion or 2 billion years, we'll either have managed to finish ourselves off, or we'll still be bickering over the imaginary game tokens we've devised to ascribe value of a human being, i.e. money. We refuse to grow up as a species and think in the long-term, because there's a chance we may lose a few game tokens this quarter if we actually start planning for the future.
Super. Now let's see how microtransaction services impact big pharma.
$39.95 per day to continue receiving your insulin dose. Or we can turn on the insulin blockers. Your choice.
"Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you." -Londo Mollari
I was always surprised that no one ever responded to Londo, "Like I'm gonna take shit from somebody with that hair."
I see they mention translation, but that feels like a weird thing to want to do with a copy-paste. If I turn this on and copy some code from an older project and paste it into a new project, will it automatically refactor it into something that doesn't function but looks prettier? It just seems like copy-paste is one of the simplest, dumbest things a computer helps us with in a way that's unobtrusive. Is anyone asking for "smart" copy-paste beyond "paste as plain text?"
Beware the new TTY code!