The iron hand is always wrong, No matter whose the ruling song. When Trump holds court or 'bama sat, The principle remains just that. In scarlet state or sapphire land, The same hard fist, the same command. So stop the quarrel, left or right, And stand against the tyrantâ(TM)s might.

That's just one of the ways it lies. Another is that a job building an AI data center is not a job, it's a gig. Also: "initial effects look positive" doesn't support the title, even if it were true, the job numbers are all jobs, not ai, it's one jobs report, not ai jobs, it's building on job statistics that carefully count people who have given up but would gladly return to the labor market if jobs were out there as not looking, ignores underemployment and undesirable gig work, layoffs "due to AI" are a lie as firms use the latest excuse, job listings are not jobs, and the economy is way bigger than this small number of openings. Money covers many blushes.

Its an age bracket now. In three years the owned media will start pushing "accurate age information would have prevented this", in 10 years it will be a left vs right thing. In 15 it will pass, shoved into the back of a budget omnubus. This is the VERY OBVIOUS thin edge of a wedge. When identity infrastructure is standardized and normalized thats when the screws will start to tighten.

Yes, passing out in the back of a taxi is definitely the equivalent of grabbing for a cop's gun. I'm glad you spotted that.

Revoke corporate personhood.

No, human-controlled robots have much better response time. This kind of incompetence can only be created with AI.

The lips are too big, the expression is slack, the skin flaps like it's dead, it moves robotically, it lacks the movement to make the sounds, and it's very stiff. That thing is horrifying.

When everything is illegal, nothing is illegal, but an authoritarian government can enforce laws against anyone it likes. This isn't about stopping companion bots, it's about creating an excuse to stomp down on anyone They want who is using the latest tool.

There's no reason Slashdot would suddenly come down hard on "infringement" by AIs except misguided general anti-AI sentiment and consensus cracking. Some people don't like AI and have seized on this as a way to stop it. Some other people are paid to say these things, to create the illusion that there is consensus for strong copyright laws. But strong copyright laws hurt almost everyone and have gone far, far beyond their original justifications. Rent seeking owners of publishers are holding our culture hostage, and it's evil.

No. It is not copyright infringement, and there's no reason to hold copyright so sacred anyway. Are you seriously wanting to protect hundred year old fairy tails from being retold? Information wants to be free.

It sounds kind of like private equity, but even more cut throat. Why would I want anything to do with any of that?

That's not the least bit misogynistic. And your warning these days reads as "warning: offends delicate sensibilities"

Unless the company does something really cheesy like overprovision, then run those extra cells first over the warranty period, and only then use the whole pack, the degradation curve of a car battery pack is surprisingly linear. linky
linky

Yes. In the grand tradition of revelations that elicit a collective shrug from anyone who has ever glanced at a corporate tax strategy, it has come to light that Microsoft has directed a considerable share of its earnings toward locales with more accommodating fiscal policies.