Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Big AI's business scheme (Score 1) 37

I have heard the following statement from someone around me:

These american chat bots will not give me advice on that, but when I asked deepseek it immediately gave me recipes how to kill myself.

Main reason this person is alive today comes from the fact, that the deepseek provided "recipes" were too complex to realize. You can tell me whatever you want about "Muh Freedom", but these "cripple the model" features are a good thing. At some point OpenAI reported, that they face thousands such questions every day.

AI

Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta Warn Against 'Premature Restrictions' of Open-Weight Models 17

Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, Palantir, and more than 20 other tech companies signed an open letter urging policymakers not to impose "premature restrictions" on open-weight AI models, warning that broad limits could "stifle competition or drive innovation overseas." CNBC reports: They wrote that open-weight models strengthen competition and ensure that the benefits of the technology are "broadly shared rather than concentrated in a few hands." "Relying solely on closed models is not inherently safe: they can be breached, misused, or fail in ways that outsiders cannot detect," the letter said. "And concentrating advanced AI capabilities behind a small number of closed models compounds that risk."

Elon Musk, who runs an AI business under his rocket company SpaceX, also amplified the letter on social media, writing that it has his "full support" in a post on X. SpaceX did not officially sign the letter. Greg Brockman, OpenAI's president, said Thursday that the company believes in broad access, and that he has not been involved in any conversations with the Trump administration about potentially banning Chinese open-weight models in the U.S.

"I think that, that fundamentally, AI and AI usage is something that is actually very important to democratize," Brockman told reporters during a briefing in New York City. "And so, for me, at a sort of deep level, I think that having more models, more usage, that is a good thing." OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed the letter in a post on X on Friday, writing that he wants the U.S. to win with both open-weight and proprietary models, and that he is "glad to see this."

[...] In the letter on Friday, the U.S. tech companies said that concerns about unlawful distillation should be addressed through "targeted legal and commercial frameworks" instead of with "sweeping restrictions on techniques that play an important role in AI innovation." "Our AI leadership will be judged not by one frontier AI model, but by whether the United States builds a strong, open ecosystem that diffuses into every sector," the letter said. "This is essential for creating opportunities for innovation and prosperity across the country."
The letter follows a separate appeal signed by nearly 200 Silicon Valley companies, including Proton and Y Combinator, warning that restricting U.S. access to Chinese open-weight AI models could cripple the next generation of American startups. "American leadership requires two things: world-leading American open-weight models and continued access for U.S. builders to open models already available worldwide," the startup founders wrote. Instead of broad prohibitions, they argue the government should adopt targeted safeguards.

Of course, these signees "have an obvious economic stake in seeing open AI models flourish," notes TechCrunch. "Companies like Nvidia, Microsoft Azure, and other infrastructure providers have a vested interest in pushing for commoditized models: If models are interchangeable, people will buy more GPUs, rent more cloud capacity, and build more applications."

Comment Re:Actually the Dems gave us Trump (Score 1) 25

What a bunch of pablum.

Did some democratic voters vote in a republican primary? Possibly. I'm sure some did, especially in states that don't matter in the late primary process (i.e. Oregon). It could not have happened in every state, and it absolutely did not happen in the crucial early primary states where a victory is a lifeline for your campaign.

Would it have had any effect? No. See above. Also consider: closed primaries - you get given a Republican or Democratic ballot based on your party affiliation. In many states you cannot get a Republican ballot unless you have already registered as a Republican.

Why? Because there was also a Democratic primary going on, where Democratic voters got to choose their preferred candidate from their own party.

You're acting like 2016 didn't have a hotly contested primary on both sides, when we know there was and there was no shortage of bitching about "anointing Hillary" as you just did in the same post. A small handful of people that would have navigated the bueaucracy to be able to vote in a Republican primary isn't going to make any difference at all.

TL;DR: nice try blaming Democrats for the worst president in history. Nobody is buying that bullshit, because at the end of the day, Republicans voted for this fucking chump. Three times.

Stop blamecasting.

Comment Re:priced too low (Score 1) 67

I am all for "open source models", as you call them, but would like to point out, that posting the weights is very much comparable to posting a binary, and it's definitely not comparable to posting sources. These "open weights" tell you nothing about how the model will respond to "certain questions" until you ask them. Such a model can still do useful work, if you can run it for yourself in private, but I personally would not offer it as a service to anyone else. YMMV, especially with models created out of reach for your jurisdiction.

Comment Re:priced too low (Score 1) 67

If the profit margin would be small and the demand is that large, why won't they raise prices?

Because China's business model is "do what the westerners do at half price". If they have to raise their prices to Anthropic/ChatAI levels, their whole unique selling point goes up in dust, and people suddenly start asking questions about the political posture of China.

Their low price may also be viable only due to Chinese subsidies, and they may be unwilling to spend infinite amounts of money on subsidies.

Comment Re:Movie theatre projectors (Score 1) 106

Yes, bad decisions can be made by multiple industries. Good job pointing out the obvious.

Meanwhile, I'll point to various industries that build for the long term, and Windows is nowhere to be found. See: Avionics. Even DAL-E equipment (not needed for safety, does not impact safety during critical failure) still doesn't use Windows, because it's shit and fleet operators are interested in supportable systems in their $100M aircraft that they need to keep in the air. Thus, you get designs focused around fast-swap line-replaceable units and long-lived supported release channels that just cannot be done on Microsoft software.

Comment Re:Most users are oblivious to updating. (Score 1) 106

Wow, did I show you to be a complete fucking moron at some point?

Thanks for letting me know I can live rent-free between your ears any time I want by simply posting something that has nothing to do with you.

It's wonderful to know that I've effected your day in such a manner to cause you to obsess.

Comment Re:Most users are oblivious to updating. (Score 1) 106

Of course they are incompetent. That's the problem.

The tooling is of sufficient complexity without sane defaults to give best practices by default. And the IT monkeys are incompetent so they don't know how to set it to best practices by default.

I never said there was just one problem here.

Comment Re:Still a user (Score 1) 106

The way that I got Windows 11 to the benchmark of "still works the same as it did yesterday" was to virtualize it, feed hardware into it via IOMMU that it needs real hardware access for (GPU, sound, segregated PCIe SSD) to still get top performance, and then snapshot that root drive. Keep anything that requires fast disk access on the PCIe SSD, including the swap file.

When they fuck things up, I revert the snapshot. Fuck you, Microsoft.

Comment Re:Most users are oblivious to updating. (Score 1) 106

Every IT-controlled Windows system I've seen in 10 years uses automatic updates because that's the default behavior of Windows - it's just a matter of if they are pointing it to a controlled update proxy, or pulling the default firehose direct from Microsoft.

And it's fucking horrible. No, I don't want to reboot in the middle of a presentation I'm leading to install a new mandated version of some shit I don't even ever launch.

Most IT departments have no idea how to set up automatic updating properly so that it still gets the job done, but doesn't piss off the users that you can't really piss off (executives, etc.) so they index on the side of threading the needle to not piss off the bosses, but still deliver minimum acceptable patching.

Comment Re:Results over tools (Score 1) 91

Which means, as I said, your process is fucked up because it's a rubber stamp.

A peer review where the code isn't actually reviewed by a peer isn't a peer review. AI review is not peer review - it's a really fancy linter and type checker. Unless you are doing some advanced automated testing using things like Xray / Cucumber / etc. to actually ground your AI review in product / feature specs, it's not going to infer that exacting information to know if you're over the target or not.

People know what the code is actually supposed to do, and not do.

Do proper peer reviews.

Slashdot Top Deals

To err is human, to moo bovine.

Working...