Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Perfect. (Score 1) 93

And I'm sure that "working group" won't come to the conclusion that this testing and certification process will need to be done by an "independent" contractor, where one of the President's dipshit kids just happens to sit on the board as of a few weeks ago.

This isn't a huge opportunity for corruption at all, especially against a handful of companies that have overwhelming amounts of investment.

Nope, not a grift at all!

Comment Proprietary irony. (Score 3, Insightful) 24

Anyone else getting a chuckle out of the HDMI Consortium, the current ruling kings of proprietary technology and implementations now that the MPEG LA tripped over their own genitals and made themselves redundant, rejecting open source implementations as "proprietary technology"?

Fuck HDMI. I still don't know why people are using that shitty port when DisplayPort is royalty-free, has better specs, is supported by everyone, and can be used over other cables that don't have all the licensing attachment (USB-C for example).

Comment Re:Podcasts are shit - podslop is always the stand (Score 2) 58

Can we extend this to people that think a YouTube video is the proper place to give a tutorial on how to do something with a CLI?

Give me a text document I can read in 2 minutes, and copy and paste stuff out of. I'm not interested in your 10 minute screed asking me to like and subscribe while pitching advertised drek at me, without the most obvious help when I'm looking for your "content."

Comment Re:Here we go again (Score 3, Interesting) 75

It could be freakin great though, if they adopted a bit of the Amazon logistics soup recipe. They have shitloads of pickup locations scattered about already.

It would be sweet if I could buy from eBay and go pick it up at a local GameStop for free / reduced price instead of paying to wait 3 weeks for the slowest media mail on the planet because the buyer wanted to use the shipping money as extra profit.

Submission + - Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? asks Wall Street Journal Opinion PIece (wsj.com)

destinyland writes: A Wall Street Journal opinion piece warns of "a troubling trend" in AI's growth. "Rather than selling software, some AI companies are paying their partners to use it. " It cites OpenAI's $1.5 billion joint venture with private-equity firms, Anthropic's $200 million contribution to a private-equity firm joint venture, and Google's $750 million subsidization of Gemini's adoption by consulting firms. "These agreements muddy the distinction between a company’s sound growth trajectory and artificial financial engineering."

This warning comes from a prominent figure in the investing community. For six years Robert Pozen was chairman of America's oldest mutual fund company, after five years at Fidelity. An advocate for corporate governance, he's currently a lecturer at MIT's business school (and the author of the books Remote Inc.: How to Thrive at WorkWherever You Are and Extreme Productivity: Boost Your Results, Reduce Your Hours. .) "As AI companies prepare initial public offerings, investors should scrutinize their numbers closely..." Pozner writes, warning about "time-limited financial support."

[T]he scale and structure of the recent AI deals go beyond standard incentive mechanisms... When a seller pays customers to buy its products, it is unclear if its revenue growth reflects vibrant demand or a willingness to accept subsidies...

In evaluating AI sales figures, analysts should consider the distorted incentives that the recent financing deals create. Private-equity firms, enticed by promised returns, might demand rapid rollouts of AI products, rather than ensuring their orderly and safe development. Portfolio companies of private-equity firms may embrace AI tools not because they are needed but because adoption is mandated by their owners. Consultants may favor one set of AI models based on the subsidy instead of the merits.

If guarantees and subsidies are major factors in the rapid adoption of AI tools, investors should be skeptical of AI companies’ revenue projections. Many of their customers enticed by consultants will stop paying full price when the financial incentives are gone. Many of the portfolio companies of private-equity firms could back away from selected AI tools once these joint ventures expire. The challenge with evaluating these AI financing deals is the lack of transparency. At present, AI vendors don’t separate revenue driven by subsidies or joint ventures from standard sales.

The lesson from the telecom debacle is that financial engineering can obscure, for years, the difference between real customer demand and demand driven by incentives. When AI companies begin to finance their own product distribution, guaranteeing returns to investors and subsidizing sales, it’s a signal for investors to dig deeper.

Comment Re:Of all the possible reasons why some are starvi (Score 0) 154

These people are much more likely going to starve because of drought, or because excessive heat brings crops to their limits. In other words: less food is going to be produced, if large areas around the equator become infertile. Compared to this the almost nonsensical "research" of nutrient free tomatoes feels like rearranging deck chairs on an already sinking Titanic.

Comment Re:Someone's missing (Score 1) 154

Whoever is meant by your comment could rightfully argue, that a local exploit like this one is completely shadowed by Microsoft's OWA and their Sharepoint exploits, which ravaged the whole industry only few years ago. And that person would be 100% correct with that statement.

You may begin to have a point, if we see Slashdot articles with 80+ comments about local Windows privilege escalation exploits.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." -- Will Rogers

Working...