Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:This always seems bass-ackwards (Score 1) 135

Maybe in past years that would have been true, but currently we seem to be in a stagnant job market. People aren't leaving their jobs and people aren't getting new jobs. So beware leaving your job. You could have a hard time, even if you excel in your field. I doubt very many have a job they can just walk into.

Comment Re:Not very cutting edge.... (Score 1) 58

>The problem is that no one distinguishes between AI and machine learning anymore

The founding definition of "AI" was behavioral. ML is a way of doing AI. Calling it a wholly separate category creates a distinction the original terminology doesn't support. ML may be thought of as a subfield of AI, rather than separate from it.

>These chips do image processing, which is not what any sensible person would call AI, but you gotta get those clicks somehow

No, it it *you* who have a totally narrow view of what AI is. The term AI goes back a long way, and many things that are done today using algorithms are thought by the normal public as not AI, but they actually are. From Google's spam folder AI, to planning the flights and trains, speech recognition, image recognition, even autocorrect and spell check. But as they become commonplace, people like you narrow what AI is. AI is not just LLMs.

Comment Montesano wrote the studies (Score 1) 85

Montesano wrote the studies, and the most cited study by the EPA and other departments, that found that the chemical didn't cause any cancer.

Meanwhile, studies by labs not linked to Montesano found that the chemical was a probable cause of cancers.

This is what isn't being discussed in this Supreme Court case. Whether or not the label is accurate, and it is. Sad that they get caught up in the procedural, and on the company side rather than with science, and on the consumer side.

Glyphosate most likely is causing cancer in people.

Slashdot Top Deals

I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.

Working...