Comment Force update? (Score 1) 18
How does that work on machines not meeting the minimum requirements?
How does that work on machines not meeting the minimum requirements?
Why? They have the same agenda as the radical "Christians" running this country.
SS Officer #2: Er, Hans?
SS Officer #1: Have courage, my friend.
SS Officer #2: Yeah. Er, Hans, I've just noticed something...
SS Officer #1: [Looking through binoculars] These communists are all cowards.
SS Officer #2: Have you looked at our caps recently?
SS Officer #1: Our caps?
SS Officer #2: The badges on our caps, have you looked at them?
SS Officer #1: What? No. A bit.
SS Officer #2: They've got skulls on them. Have you noticed that our caps have actually got little pictures of skulls on them?
SS Officer #1: Uh, I don't...
SS Officer #2: Hans... are we the baddies?
I think I understand why he never got anywhere with these. And no, it wasn't because of the web...
Then you woke up.
Pardon? Have you not seen the barge landings?
There are many aspects of a flight profile. Some are based on where you put the payload when it is in orbit. Others are the weight of the payload. As an example, 9's Payload for a GTO orbit is 5.5t when recovered on barge, and 8.3t for an expended mission. LEO orbit, 17.5 t if recovered, 22.8t expendable.
Just because some flight profiles can land at a pad or on a barge, does not mean that this happens in all cases.
References from paper
A Survey of Launch Vehicle Recovery Techniques
Shraddha C.
Pankaj Priyadarshia
and Devendra Prakash Ghate
Institutes:
Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, 695022, Kerala, India
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, 695547, Kerala, India
A pretty good read if you have the academic credentials to access it. Clear, at a reasonably high level so not too deep in the weeds, with all manner of different flight profiles for many rockets - including StarShip. And a lot more. Otherwise, I think it is a little premature to claim the success of Starship. The Falcon's are good reliable Rockets. Starship might end up a tad problematic.
Apparently Waze exists for the sole purpose of avoiding speed traps.
I never knew that... guess I've been using it wrong all these years. I use it to minimize the time I spend on my daily commute.
Imagine if a bunch of tech bros said: "Hey, you don't need exercise. It's totally fine if your muscles atrophy. After all, we have technology to move you around and it can do so much more quickly than your muscles ever could!" We'd laugh them out of town.
Well, guess what? If you don't exercise your brain, it atrophies. If you outsource your thinking, you eventually become unable to think.
I've been into working out since I was a child...was born with the obesity gene and have to workout hard to be less of a fatty. Now all the execs are into biohacking, fitness, MMA, etc and won't shut up about it...quoting Huberman, Attia, and everyone else on Rogan. The most obnoxious is Pavel Tsatsouline...if another annoying exec talks to me about kettlebells, I'll fucking throw one at him.
It's fucking depressing...these guys used to see the hope and promise in technology and devices and making the world a better place with our actual skills and making small details of our life better. Now they're more excited by pipe dreams of longevity, flirting with MAHA beliefs, and largely unattainable dreams and wishful thinking of immortality and looking like male models while being tech execs and engineers.
Some of it is personal...I liked not having many coworkers at my gym, my quiet space, that thing that made me a little different...and I don't like being gym-splained by someone 1/4 my size in hallway conversation. But on the bright side, it brings costs down for protein powder and lots of new research into performance enhancing drugs.
That aside, what is additionally depressing about AI, if it actually worked, is they cede their skills to this magic box. Instead of solving their problems, they want the AI to do it for them, like their mommy. But regardless, 8 years ago, we were all trying to build things, with our skills, to make the world a better place. Now most of us are unsure how much longer our jobs will be relevant...and instead of building tangible change with tech, like clever devices, they're escalating to impossible dreams...AGI, eternal youth, drugs that mimic exercise (yeah, there is a promising one being evaluated), and whatever bullshit MAHA fans are pushing.
Collective bargaining for wages is a bad thing? Warehouse workers earning more does not make you earn less.
Refreshed by a brief blackout, I got to my feet and went next door. -- Martin Amis, _Money_