Comment Re:A modest proposal (Score 1) 123
Have you checked out tanker rates lately? You absolutely save money by having more domestic supply in this environment.
(Crude isn't exactly "cheap" either)
Have you checked out tanker rates lately? You absolutely save money by having more domestic supply in this environment.
(Crude isn't exactly "cheap" either)
Trump is usually pretty good at coining nicknames; "Super Intelligence" is so lame.
I would have expected something like: "Terrific Intelligence", "TrumpIntelligence", "Golden Braininess", "Intelligence of America" or similar.
I just tried this for fun with Gemini (hardly the best model, but I wasn't about to spend the money having an agentic framework of high-end models go over it
1) Working with the Iranians at the upcoming UN meeting to try to strike a deal where the US stops its blockage of Iranian oil in exchange for Iran allowing free traffic through Hormuz, without nuclear programme preconditions.
2) Adding pressure on Putin to accept the Ukrainian offer of a mutual energy industry targeting ceasefire
3) Focus freed up US naval forces on protecting convoys through the Bab-el-Mandeb
4) Launching an emergency Jones Act waiver
5) Order the EPA Administrator to issue temporary waivers easing seasonal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) gasoline restrictions and granting flexibility on Tier 3 sulfur credit banking.
6) Convene the CEOs of the top domestic refiners into a taskforce run by the Department of Energy to coordinate autumn maintenance schedules to avoid multiple regional coker and hydrocracker units taking turnaround downtime simultaneously.
7) Formally announce that the administration will not conduct large-scale, unrefined crude releases from the SPR. Signal to the industry that physical crude in domestic storage is adequate, shifting regulatory focus to downstream bottlenecks.
8) Reprogram allocated DOE infrastructure funds ($1.4 billion) to expedite cavern repairs at Bryan Mound and Bayou Choctaw.
9) Deploy the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve (NEHHOR) strictly on an exchange/loan basis (where refiners borrow diesel barrels now and repay them with interest in refined barrels next spring) to protect national balance sheets while easing spot tightness
10) Issue an Executive Order under the Defense Production Act (DPA) to expedite pipeline compressor stations and pipeline permits connecting the Permian Basin to Gulf Coast refining hubs
11) Direct the Surface Transportation Board to prioritize crude and chemical feedstock movements on Class I railroads.
12) Use USDA Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) authorities to establish emergency fuel cost-offset credits for agricultural producers and commercial freight carriers until crack spreads retreat below $30/barrel.
13) Announce this unified security-and-energy plan publicly to provide appropriate signals to the market.
The US economy as a whole would lose more from banning exports than it would gain. If one is concerned about "ordinary people", it makes more sense to continue allowing exports, add a windfall tax on oil companies or add export duties, and then rebate the revenue from that across the US population, than to ban exports.
Had the oil industry not been so naive and spent this whole year betting on TACO and/or Iranian surrender, the US could be making even more money right now on this crisis. New shale production from an existing lease can be added in just 3-6 months, yet shale expansion rates didn't increase over baseline from spring through the summer. Refining capacity is harder to add that quickly, but probably could have been boosted several percent, which would still be a quite meaningful added value. It gets harder to improve capacity now because most types of capacity addition involve downtime and absolutely nobody wants to be shut down now while crack spreads are this high.
I'd love to see the US congress pass a bill renaming Trump
His own party doesn't have the balls to distance itself from that mutant. A few peripheral pols have suddenly realized they were losing coming up to the midterms and have been makes noise, nothing more, about how the Epstein-Iran war must end, or that tariffs must end. Oh, when precisely are these endings suppose to occur?
Maggot Mike as sent the House home because he doesn't want a vote on impeaching our alleged Sec. of Christian War Crimes. And conveniently, they cannot vote on anything more embarrassing. Meanwhile, after passing the Epstein law for releasing the documents, you never a hear a peep out of them while la Presidenta stonewalls any release.
One of the latest developments in the papers case brought by Katie Phang is that Judge Sullivan ordered the foreign language documents in the papers be translated forthwith and turned over to him. He could release them if he saw fit. Our alleged Justice Dept. told the judge they couldn't because they didn't have the personnel (he shot that down) and now they have some other excuse. He said bullshit and ordered they be translated. The alleged JD filed for a stay, he denied it, but gave those goomers 2 days to file an appear before the D.C. Appeals Court. Three judges from that Court will be chosen to hear the appeal. Of that Court, three are la Presidenta bootlickers. If two of them get chosen, those assholes will get to kick the can down the road further thus further delaying any justice for the victims. The papers to be translated name names of those who used Epstein's "services". There's a good chance la Presidenta is named there.
Is this necessarily a bad thing? For quite some time, coding has been pushed as a way to make yourself marketable. For a lot of people who have no particular passion for it—nor for anything else, which is why they're dabbling in everything—but were only in it because they thought it was a good career move, it is smart to look for greener pastures now. The real question is, what adjacent fields are easy to slide into, but AREN'T equally vulnerable to the unblinking gaze of AI once there is the critical mass to justify the effort? Are there any?
Counterpoint, Until the late 90s, programming was the domain of the autistic and severely mathematically inclined. In most areas, the pay sucked, and their output sucked even more. It was a hostile environment everywhere but in the bay area and Seattle...maybe a few others. My (much) older sister was a COBOL programmer...her life sucked. She was grateful to be laid off with severance and start a career elsewhere. Hearing about her experiences made me recosinder a programming job...I was great at writing code, but didn't want to live her life. Luckily the dot com boom pulled me back in.
Would you rather have the software of today or the software of 1995? Let's be real, most programmers before the internet couldn't find good work outside of working with programmers. They lacked the soft skills to work anywhere, but in front of a computer, FAR away from customers.
The programmers today certainly aren't as hardcore as those in the 80s, myself included, but we make MUCH MUCH MUCH better stuff. Plus I like diverse work environments. I've even got Asperger's and my version of hell is being trapped in a room full of hardcore autistic engineers who obsess about micro-optimizations (which happens to be a passion of mine).
We don't want shitty programmers, but we also don't want to scare off creative people with options. There's a nice balance. Plus it's nice to have at least a few coworkers who aren't white or Asian. We want to hire passionate people who put a lot of love into the craft.
AI is really killing programming. It's simply not fun. You write something by hand and put love and good work into it and you feel like a dinosaur failing your manager telling you to have Claude write it all...with a sense of guilt wondering "did I take longer than Claude and waste money?"
Then I do the opposite and have Claude write something simple (which is what my bosses want us to do). Today, it was writing a unit test for some underloved code I inherited. I wrote the skeleton and 1 test by hand to show Claude how it's done and told it to replicate the pattern for the other 16 endpoints. It took nearly all day, probably cost a ton of money and the output is SHIT. I keep refining things and pointing out mistakes and it just creates this indecipherable convoluted mess. Now I'm doubting myself. I had a simple functional project...here is an input, assert the output....why is it 10,000 lines of Java? I had to go helper method by helper method and tell it to use extremely common annotations in the classpath which we use elsewhere than write it's own bullshit.
Each minor optimization like "on method fuckMeUpTheAssWithABroomSideways(), the try/catch isn't needed. Use @SneakyThrows instead"...something an IDE plugin can do in 5 seconds, takes 10 minutes on Claude Opus 5.0. It'll copy and paste it's own code to an insane degree. It's SOOOO stupid that it makes me doubt my sanity and eyesight. Surely Claude isn't STUPID enough to copy/paste a boilerplate function into 5 classes within 1 single session?!?!....These 5 methods must be different somehow. "I" must be wrong because there's no way an AI can be THIS stupid..... Nope, I was right, so I told Claude to stop it....another 15 minutes to change 1 method to public, delete the 4 copy/paste and statically import the new remaining method 4x.
So the final product is of poor quality, took longer than it would have taken me to write it myself, and I feel ashamed to release it. But my boss is happy with me and thinks I did the right thing.
AI certainly hasn't made my life better. I can't recommend this career path as enthusiastically as I used to. When people ask me today, I tell them. "I really have no clue if your kid should become a programmer today. He/she needs to figure this out on their own. " But regardless, it would be nice to have coworkers who were talented enough to choose software development over other options...not just the duds who couldn't make it anywhere where human interaction was required.
I saw it with a group of four people.
Three of us enjoyed it quite a bit.
I didn't mind it but nothing was surprising to me.
I saw several scenes that could have been more cleverly written but I was glad to support the group that saved a creative work from the burn pile. The idea of killing a movie for accounting losses seems sinful.
The motion-control photography, practical effects, and integration of animation were at least as good as Roger Rabbit.
If you enjoy the craft of filmmaking it's at least worth seeing.
I didn't see any marxist social commentary. Perhaps folks in the "Flock does nothing wrong" camp might feel otherwise.
If you teach your children to like computers and to know how to gamble then they'll always be interested in something and won't come to no real harm.