I think Sam Altman is a waste of precious resources like O2 and H20.

For willful negligence.

You are the only troll here.

You are full of shit.

"Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab said on Monday it is offering voluntary buyouts to about 60,000 employees, or more than a quarter of its global workforce, as the technology giant looks to âcontain costs and help fund its massive AI investments."

https://www.reuters.com/techno...

"The company told employees in March that it was cutting thousands of jobs as it faced investor pressure over raising huge amounts of debt for its AI infrastructure buildout."

"Oracle has started telling employees that it's cutting thousands of jobs, CNBC has confirmed, as the software maker deals with a plummeting stock price tied to hefty capital commitments for building out AI infrastructure. "

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/3...

"Today we're laying off over 1000 Epic employees. I'm sorry we're here again. The downturn in Fortnite engagement that started in 2025 means we're spending significantly more than we're making, and we have to make major cuts to keep the company funded. This layoff, together with over $500 million of identified cost savings in contracting, marketing, and closing some open roles puts us in a more stable place."

"Since it's a thing now, I should note that the layoffs aren't related to AI. To the extent it improves productivity, we want to have as many awesome developers developing great content and tech as we can."

https://www.epicgames.com/site...

I didn't say this. You can't even keep track of who you are talking to.

Wasn't it you who asserted industry layoffs are due to AI use?

"The vast majority of the software industry is embracing this tech as a productivity booster and you can just look at the layoff statistics for evidence. Microsoft is massively profitable but recently offered buyouts to 60k employees. Oracle laid off 13% of staff. Cloudflare, Wix, and Epic Games furloughed 20% this year. "

Where is your evidence to support your causal assertions? Oh right it doesn't exist because you are full of shit.

Yes you are, your words speak for themselves shill.

Anyone can use an LLM. Unless you are applying for a job at a code mill an interviewer who focuses on tool use is doing themselves and their organization a disservice.

Even in this situation IPv6 is still a huge benefit because peers are able to prime the ISPs association tables to enable direct communications amongst themselves. You might still need a third party to facilitate the setup of the communication yet data channels are still able to be maintained directly between peers.

Everyone should provide evidence to support their personal experiences to ZipNada's satisfaction. Of course ZipNada the sealioning shill will never be satisfied. It will always be you are doing it wrong or not using enough or using the wrong one.

I like LLMs and have a collection of them. I have prompts running in the background continuously most every day. What I don't like are psychologically manipulative shills spewing nonsense divorced from reality.

What does this even mean? AI tools are dead simple to use and prompt engineering is long dead. What is left and in how many weeks from now will it have completely changed? This whole notion knowing how to be an end user of an LLM constitutes some kind of "skill" is frankly absurd on its face.

The Internet is a robust global interconnected network of peers able to communicate with any other peer on the network for the cost of admission.

Protocol specifications and world class implementations are freely available to everyone.

High performance hardware enabling single peers to provide information to millions is cheap and (was) readily available.

High level world class server and client stacks and related technology are also freely available to everyone.

There is zero excuse for anyone here to be whining about the state of the Internet.

I think you've pushed all of the talking points any shill would shill. Focus on proposals, documentation, deployment, signaling this is the future and will cut costs + you're good as dead if you don't use our product. I don't see anything you've missed.

The only slight wrinkle is the stunning lack of real world results. Layoffs are a result of economic conditions and corrections for pandemic era hiring not "AI". When AI gets to that point it will be obvious to everyone. Right now it is just another tool and you are very much high on your own supply.

Are you sure? There's so much money tied up in circular loans and IOUs based on potential profits that I'm not sure they are.

For example: NVidia invests billions into OpenAI and Anthropic, who then use that money to buy NVidia products. Has NVidia actually made any money, or does the "demand" for the product simply drive up the speculative stock price?

=Smidge=

Your best engineers will be AuDHD, and AuDHD folk don't do well in these sorts of synthetic tests.

I can code in 20+ languages for over 12 different OS', write code that's good enough for CERN to run for particle accelerator data collection for a decade, have accelerated systems by an order of magnitude by understanding the poem space better than their previous engineers, but I am abysmal at exam style settings.

The software industry is riddled with SEs who write abysmal code but can pass a coding test easily. They're the folk that you have always needed to reject but didn't because they ticked a box.