Way to out yourself as being American by being simultaneously loudly, assertively ignorant and racist at the same time.

** - Collective guilt is a fallacy; modern Germany is a highly democratic constitutional state with a commendable record on teaching against extremism; Marx and Engel drew heavily from French utopian socialists (e.g., Saint-Simon, Fourier), while it was the Russians who actually implemented communism; World War I began with the assassination of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Bosnian Serb nationalist, triggering a chain reaction of ultimatums and alliances involving Austria-Hungary, Serbia, Russia, France, Germany, and Great Britain, with any individual state bearing guilt for the war being a notion firmly rejected by modern historians; Hitler was born in Austria-Hungary and was an Austrian citizen until he renounced it in 1925, not gaining German citizenship until 1932; the East German government and the Stasi was forced on the people of Germany by the USSR, and it was not a global phenomenon "brought to the world", but rather dissolved with the GDR in 1990. TL/DR: Go fuck yourself.

It's penalizing the significant part of society that desperately wants to embrace a high-trust society.

Fuck all the goddamn racists who racist-think otherwise.

the Facewatch system has a 99.98% accuracy rate,

So one in every five thousand people who walk into your stores is going to be falsely accused of a crime? Wow, thanks for making abundantly clear that people should NOT shop there...

... before or after the skunk pot, the shiny hubcaps, the $300 sneakers, and the $2000 iPhone?

I'm not sure how to break this to you, but "making payments on something" has been around forever.

Subject line.

’Nuff said.

P.S. - You’ll own nothing, because you never really bought the fucking thing. Stop believing girl math, adds up.

I'll be the first to correct you: Those who value nothing, are the people who will be happy about owning nothing.

The rest of us are quite pissed about the idiotic concept.

Except that on bluesky, that's basically all there is. If you look at the time periods where there's the most user activity, it almost always lines up perfectly with some event involving trump. This is something I've noticed ever since slashdot's editors first fell in love with bluesky and started posting about it every time it gained a new user account whose owner never really used it.

Exactly. Calling that a void is like asking what will happen to all the poor opioid addicts if we get rid of fentanyl. The void where the addiction used to live is called real life- that is what will fill it.

While I can see how you arrived at that, I don't think they're all the amoral actors you describe.

Zuck has shown some changes in the last couple years, though I agree he's largely amoral.

Musk has a very peculiar set of morals which might be described as pragmatism or amorality, but he's always been very focal in both action and word about both ethics and responsibility.

You could probably accurately describe them all as transhumanists with varying degree of consistency.

If there's a crisis of trust - which there is - it's almost certainly largely provoked by Amodei. The guy has been a regular prophet of doom regarding AI: it's going to take all the jobs, it's dangerous and going to cause all sorts of disasterous side effects socially, economically, and politically. No wonder people are untrusty.

Pair that with the obscene levels of what appears to be state-level anti-AI and anti-datacenter propaganda, and you've got the current situation. The amount of absurd claims I've seen about datacenters and AI, from people who should know better - everything from completely false narratives about water use, land grabs, power use, and so on. The truth is, an AI DC doesn't uses less water than a Cosco and about as much electricity as a comparable industrial facility, or a similarly sized restaurant.

Well they've done 95% of the work required to make the books available to everybody.

Perhaps they could be persuaded to do the last 5% after some competitive advantage latency?

If I had to choose between preserving the physical book and allowing access for a billion people, I would sacrifice the paper.

"It belongs in a museum" is really dated and felt to be wrong today.

Why isn't anybody else making these books available? That's the bigger question.

Granted, modern Copyright Law is ruinous to society.

The Google Books project has many of the older ones. There is no moral case against duplication for books that are impossible to purchase but still "protected" by Copyright.

I would like to know the average price of these books. If they are $7 that means something very different than $700.

Thank you, full (no mod) points awarded.

It's so obvious to me when a Youtube script is written by Claude, even when read by a human.

Odd that all that training still doesn't predict human-like next words. There must be prompts to favor certain voicings.

Enjoy your abysmal watch-percentage metrics
as we click away, boys.

It's sad when good old channels decide to cash-grab with slop and dishonesty.

And one that was the darling of the American left, for most of its modern existence.