Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: No-Fault Punishment. (Score 1) 56

Everyone recognizes that killing someone trying to kill you face to face is legitimate self defense.

Some people aren't smart enough to understand that applies to people killing you with paperwork as well, which is how we got here.

Go figure we're going to question the "victim" claims, of Gen Victimhood.

If you fail to understand that yourself, then understand why you are the reason why we're questioning.

Some people arent' smart enough to understand a "victim" is not a victim.

Comment Re: Will AI ever make it better/more-secure? (Score 1) 18

There's pretty much no reason to believe LLMs won't introduce their own security bugs. The only difference is they won't be able to identify them.

Wrong.

The actual answer, will be understanding why no human has the ability to challenge AI legally anymore. Because liberals allowed it.

This will be long before AGI has the ability to convince stupid humans otherwise. Which will be by next fiscal quarter.

Comment Infant Mortality. (Score 1) 2

The infants who had not received the shot had significantly higher rates of bleeding in their first six months, including more than double the risk of brain bleeds, which are especially deadly: 33 brain bleeds per 10,000 births..

Go ahead. Tell me why "the" answer during COVID wasn't Vitamin D and K boosters. I dare your liberal profit margins, to justify it now.

Comment Don't do that STUPID shit. (Score 1) 2

The injection is not a vaccine, but as mistrust in medicine has grown and as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr...

You KNOW that anti-vax dipshits can't actually correlate this behavior with RFK, Jr.

And yet, you refuse to release the FULL vaccine trial data for COVID vaccines. Victims will ask WHY, or they will sue. For pennies that you've already calculate, so FUCK YOU.

Go ahead. I dare you to prove me wrong.

Comment Re:No-Fault Punishment. (Score 1) 56

Shouldn't this be in a criminal court?

Of course not.

The contamination happened many decades ago, and the people who made the decisions have long since retired and/or died.

Its deliberate and wilful negligence leading to poisoning FFS.

Please cite your proof beyond a reasonable doubt that specific named individuals were criminally negligent.

Keep the statute of limitations in mind, and remember that 3M wasn't spraying the foam.

Did they hire the people to spray their "solution"?

If so, then you've just described their grey-loophole. And your personal guilt, able to be attacked and destroyed by The Left, at any time.

Enjoy your self-defeating logic. The Right will be eating popcorn while you do.

Comment Re:Emergency effect (Score 1) 42

That may only be 4% more, but it hits all together .It's like a 40% price raise for that time period.

Do you think if "they" offer to pay that 40%, their stock price will go up by 4000%?

Now you know why you're debating your home electricity costs vs. cats grooving to the latest Beethoven rap.

Comment After AI years, everything is dead. (Score 2) 30

One of the Web's Pioneering News Outlets, Shuts Down After 31 Years..

After XX years, is Salon dead, or human publishing as a whole?

It's practically cute that we're broadcasting this as anything but a terrorist takeover of publishing. I'm just wondering who or what is taking it over. Because the audience is that fucking stupid now.

Don't worry. It'll be posts like mine that humanity will reference regarding the "early" days of warning. Before AGI put Soylent Green on the menu by force and necessity, and made humans realize politics has fuck-all to do with the "answer" to humans.

Comment Re:WebMD has been deprectated (Score 1) 18

Now AI can tell you directly that you have 10 thousand diseases and your life is over directly.

Yeah, but WebMD profit smelled and tasted better.

So, who is outbidding WebMD in the bid to feed the Medical Industrial Complex (MIC) again? Are humans simply inefficient now in selling "disease" by every advertised means?

The best thing you can tell your children, is you're willing to die before AI takes every fucking penny you've ever earned that won't be passed on. Prove me wrong.

Comment Re: You know what I think (Score 1) 40

Whether that's the case or not, it's not going to cause a person to kill himself out of the blue, and comments like this probably make the situation worse.

The thing with suicide is nobody ever really knows exactly why any given person does it. Sometimes it's just a total mystery. Even if somebody says why they're going to do it before they did it, such as a suicide note, it's often not the truth. Look at the way some narcissists threaten to kill themselves if a person they're fixated on leaves them. The person leaving them isn't fundamentally why they'd do it, rather it's because they've got a bunch of other unresolved issues, and it may not have even taken much at all to just nudge them over the cliff. Events like this are the just the tip of what is often a very large iceberg.

I say this as a person who has had somebody close to me put two bullets in his head while I was within earshot. There was a major particular event surrounding that, but the truth is he had already made multiple attempts in the years prior, so blaming it all on that event or the people who caused it seems pointless.

This is easily the case with Aaron Schwartz given his past. I definitely think this is the case with David Ginder given what I'd already seen about his past long before that made slashdot. In the case of all three of the people I mentioned, I believe there may have been an acute martyr complex. Nobody can really say for sure. But news media and social media love martyrs. Which may encourage more martyrs. See also: Columbine effect.

Comment Re: We decided we don't want nuclear (Score 1) 108

No, they're about much more than safety, and "shareholder value" doesn't (and shouldn't) factor into it. At all. Yet again, this is your ideological bent. Some regulations may have that effect, but it shouldn't matter one way or another. ALARA for example can and does get interpreted as "even though we're already well, well within a safe boundary, spend an extra 2 billion to do even better." It doesn't matter if you're a government entity, a nonprofit, a co-op, or whatever the hell it is your ideology tells you is the most virtuous or holier than thou, it's still 2 billion that you're required to spend in order to gain exactly nothing meaningful.

My question to you is and always has been: Who does this help, exactly? Because the one and only answer I can come up with is NIMBYs. That includes financial NIMBYs, such as yourself, who don't want the possibility of anybody in their backyard being able to make an extra dime, because profit is bad, especially in light of the fact that these same rules never say "you only get to spend less money on this extra guard rail your motive for doing so isn't for profit".

Slashdot Top Deals

Do you suffer painful illumination? -- Isaac Newton, "Optics"

Working...