>"I am seeing countless, mostly elderly, folks using Edge because they dont know how to convince windows to let them use chrome by default."
But using Chrome is no better for our ecosystem. They are both Chromium and ultimately Google-controlled. They both harm web-standards, freedom, security, and privacy. So that would still be a lose for everyone.
Companies that sell control systems with proprietary software running on Windows could distribute their software running on Wine/OpenBSD as an appliance without reengineering the application.
Windows updates/hardware abandonment etc. are real headaches while control systems ought to be secure.
GPL virality has many vendors scared of linux appliances, warranted or not.
AIUI they need to grab the cryptokeys too to be usable.
What a shame that would be.
> The proposition was shocking to CISA's career staffers,
Security people don't know about redteaming?
They don't know about the Executive Branch hoarding vulnerabilities?
This story can't be accurate unless they're unqualified.
Gell-Mann Amnesia seems most likely here.
Nonetheless, here you are.
It's also been done in large volume before. TMobile did this a few years ago, 10 million or so recipients.
You're right there. Running anything on OpenBSD is exactly like BDSM.
Sooo, they...like it that way?
Wow. Clearly not your average penguin preener.
AI is a blip on global carbon emissions. Videogaming itself is a much larger power consumer.
Humans still review and authorize the specific decisions. And the bot will have spent far more time trying to meet the user's need than the user would ever have had time to do so.
They could breed the algae separately and load up a UAV with "bath bombs" buoyant at the correct depth to deploy them where it sees bleaching. One of the large solar powered planes wirh giant wings would suffice. Speed isn't valuable, just range and payload. Payload can be multiplied with increased numbers of aircraft.
With polarized lenses and sufficient ML cameras it should be quite precise.
Some work would need to be done to work out dispersants and adhesives.
It wouldn't be conceptually different than the fish breeding and stocking operations already common in most states, just more complicated.
Yeah, would a smart speedbag be illegal, if held?
More importantly this is all clearly theater, not a contest.
It almost seems like a MIC play to get people to be OK with humanoid soldiers.
The real Terminators can't lose to a human in martial combat.
Perhaps the boxing commission is complicit in the psyop.
OTOH, having done the latter, what have we learned? That we can design and build a robot that we nerfed just enough that it usually loses in hand-to-hand combat?
Humans pretty much knew for the last thousand years of competition that men are built different.
Then 21st Century Feminism came along and started to justify the destruction of the entire concept of competition. Which is why the WNBA may soon see slam dunks that will make Shaq shudder.
You ask what have we learned? Human Competition today is wondering why you’re even asking that. It’s now both irrelevant and offensive.
I expect a lot of these game companies to change to a system where:
1) You pay for a yearly contract to play ANY of their games.
2) Despite them having only one or two games that people want to play, in addition to 8+ crappy games that no reasonable person would pay to play.
This allows them to screw over people in a manner similar to what they do now.
You do know that you wouldn't have to sign up for such a scheme, right? There's no gun to your head?
Meh, we're talking something that should in bulk be the price of a low-end car and works 24/7 without breaks. Hard to make the case that that's not "economically practical". And as for realism, I'd take a mixed stance.
Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man -- who has no gills. -- Ambrose Bierce
