Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:How stupid are the Saudis? (Score 2, Insightful) 34

It's not that nobody wants to learn it's that an educated populace can't be controlled so they're not allowed to learn.

And every religion is fucked up. You're believing something because somebody told you not evidence. That's the definition of faith as it is described in the bible. Not sure about the Quran but equally likely.

And the Quran can be reinterpreted however the hell you want because of how weird the Arab writing is. I don't know the details but because of the way punctuation and tense works in the language you can basically read whatever the hell you want into it. The Christian Bible has the same thing going on because there isn't a single voice in the bible. It's just a collection of documents. Not even books half of it is just somebody's letter is to other churches. And half of that wasn't even written by the guy it claims to be.

Basically you can use religion for anything and everything you want regardless of anything. Just like how in America half the country used the Christian Bible to condemn slavery and the other half used it to support slavery.

holy texts mean whatever we want them to mean. They have no inherent meaning. And the same goes for religion in general. That's the downside to a hidden god. He never actually shows himself to anyone. So any old charlatan can make up anything they want.

Comment Re:I thought EU was about Privacy and Protection? (Score 3, Insightful) 47

Somewhere there has to be a master record that keeps track of your identity as a single entry in a database. There's just no other way to do it. the identity verification system needs to know who you are and the way they know that is you send your data in and they keep it on file.



Sooner or later that database is going to leak and when it does it's going to be a disaster like Ashley madison. In particular a bunch of people who go to gay porn sites are going to commit suicide. Or possibly be murdered.

But at least the private company who stores all of the data is going to make a ton of money off the government contract.

Comment Re:Old news (Score 0) 115

The first people against the wall should be all the people who think you can kill your way to a thriving high trust society.

You certainly cannot, but it's unclear how you can get past the being attacked by people who are trying to kill you stage without doing some of it. I'd love a nonviolent solution, but not if it gets me killed in the process of making the attempt. I'm willing to risk death to some degree, because life is a risk, but most of us have limits.

Comment Re:Not just social media (Score 0) 115

Nothing I am about to say excuses Fox's obscene weaponization of attention, but this has always been true of all news media starting at least with bards, criers, and orators, and that's assuming that prior primates didn't have members of bands that fulfilled the same function. Sensationalism has always gotten eyes and ears and what news is or isn't reported, and how it has been reported, has always been a means of manipulating the masses.

Comment Re: Houses (Score 0) 300

Lay it all out... what makes one candidate better than the other, then.

I'm not going to go over the entire list. That would take all damn day, and I owe you nothing.

For me, it's frankly sufficient to say that Trump is a racist, rapist, and pedophile, and Harris isn't.

For a slightly longer statement: Everything bad that Harris is, Trump is more of it. Authoritarian? He's a full on fascist. In favor of genocide? He wants the genocide done faster so he can build a hotel on top of it. A liar? Doesn't even bear inspection, he's one of the lyingest liars who ever lied.

Comment Re:Primetime (Score 1) 11

Yep. That is the level of "insight" LLMs operate on. And, contrary to an incompetent human, LLMs will always hallucinate some lie. Some humans will do so too but many will admit not having a clue.

Here is another example from teaching a 2nd semester Python course to engineers: The students has to extend a game-of-life in 100 lines of code (including all fluff, placeholder functions, comment lines, etc.) They asked ChatGPT questions about it and it was a total and utter failure. Their take was that if you have a max of 3 simple lines, you can usually get an explanation faster than looking at the documentation and that you usually could get single-lines written competently by the LLM. Now, the "coding" LLMs are supposedly somewhat better, but even then they will completely fail on any non-toy examples.

Slashdot Top Deals

Biology is the only science in which multiplication means the same thing as division.

Working...