Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: very large anti-static pouches (Score 1) 86

All I'm saying is that jamming is illegal so it's not an improvement over just cutting them down, which is illegal. It seems to me to make sense only either to just cut them down, or render them temporarily inoperative with a bag which might be legally better than cutting them down.

Comment Yeah no shit sales tax wouldn't work for that (Score 2) 69

Sales tax is a regressive tax. The reason they switched to sales tax is that the Republican party let them do it because the Republican party knew that it was a bad idea. You do it with income tax for fuck sakes. Then you have progressive income tax brackets so that it's fair. Rich people have to live in society and so they have to pay for everybody else's kids to be educated. If they don't like it then they can die with the guillotine because that's coming.

The funny thing is guys like you are going to be the first on the shopping block. A bunch of angry young men are going to show up at your nice suburban home and they're going to fuck shit up. Yeah you'll go ahead and shoot one or two of them but there's going to be like 50 or 100 of them. Then they're going to beat you to death and that'll be the end of you. Hell of a way to spend your final moment so you could ship post on a dumb dying website but hey you do you.

Remember the guillotine doesn't come down just on the ultra wealthy in fact these days it's not even going to touch them because those guys have private armies and they're on touchable. Instead there's going to be chaotic violence and it's going to hit the bourgeoisie which is you and me. Guys who aren't working 60 hours a week just to do have a little food like gen z is. We are the ones who are going to get caught up in all that violence. We aren't going to have private armies to protect us

Comment Re:Eight?? (Score 1) 86

Honestly the thing they keep leaving out is they catch every one of these guys eventually and throw them in jail for several years. With the way our prison system works they will be brutalized in prison and when they get out if they go back to fighting for freedom the next time they'll do 20 or 30 years.

Hell Donald Trump just sent a bunch of protesters to prison for the rest of their lives for being at a protest. You would think that would be bigger news that a bunch of innocent people who just happened to be activists at a protest or now rotting in prison for their entire lives but it's not. I would wager most people didn't even hear about it

Comment Plenty of politicians do care what people want (Score 1) 86

They run in primary elections and they often lose. If they make it out of the primary they lose again. That's because we allow voter suppression and limitless propaganda and we've been underfunding education.

It turns out education is ludicrously expensive when you're trying to teach people who don't just learn everything on their own. In the past we would split kids into two groups the ones who would learn on their own, aka the academically inclined and then the ones who needed to actually be taught. We would take the kids who are academically inclined and make them useful to the Epstein class to build stuff for them and then we would take the rest of them and send them off to factories. Well the factories are full of robots now.

So the cost of education overall has been going up because we can't just kick those kids to the factories and we've been trying to at least get them to the point where they can be semi-functional in society. That is very very expensive. If you look at rich people their kids have the same problems as everybody else's and rich people spend a fuck ton of money educating their kids.

Us poor plebeians don't get to do that because we're not in the Epstein class. So what's been happening is we can't abandon those kids because they get dangerous when they're just wandering around hopeless with no future so we have been forced to pour a bunch of money into teaching them but we don't want to spend that much money so we keep increasing class sizes.

What it comes down to is we got used to being able to only run kids through the school system who are literally just there to be tested to make sure that they could do the jobs we were going to stick them in. We weren't actually educating anyone we were taking people who are educating themselves and then administering tests. And yeah that's going to be pretty damn cheap.

And now we actually have to teach kids or we have to deal with the fact that somebody is sooner or later going to come along and give them weapons and point them at us. But I don't think we want to pay to teach kids so I think we're heading into world War 3.

Comment So those gas and Bank cameras are part of it (Score 1) 86

As are every single security camera in the country. John Oliver brought it up. Anywhere there is money to be made somebody is going to make it and the wealthy want to be able to monitor us 24/7 for control. The wealthy are well, wealthy so they've got money and they're going to buy that footage with the limitless amounts of cash we keep letting them have.

There is a city in California where if you want to open a business you have to put up cameras for your business and then you have to share that footage with the cops on request. Warrants are of course optional because it's all privately managed. They have command centers where they monitor you. The Simpsons did a bit on it and as usual The Simpsons later episodes it wasn't funny but it was fairly accurate.

You don't build a big brother Network in America with government because we spent the last 70 years convincing Americans government bad so that they would leave a giant power vacuum that the Epstein class could fill. Every time somebody discourages you from thinking about and talking about politics notice that it's perfectly okay for your crazy uncle to talk about how great it is to have a billionaire be president of the United States but the moment you talk about giving everyone healthcare and free school lunches suddenly that's political and you need to shut up.

Trouble is the people who want the flock cameras are winning and at this point I don't think we can stop them. They have a pretty solid tactic of using county level voter suppression to win elections and nobody seems to want to do anything about it.

Comment Re:Taken too far (Score 2) 86

D'oh, but DarkOx, I actually do agree with you on something: the license plates are there and they're visible in public. We don't need Flock to have our privacy compromised; everyone can do it.

We haven't denied our adversaries the capability; we're just trying to regulate their good intentions. That strategy doesn't work.

Flock is the symptom not the disease. People either need to demand anonymity and insist we stop displaying things like plates at all, and actually limit public photography, or just accept we will be tracked everywhere. There is no middle ground to be had.

Indeed. We seem pretty conflicted about that, so we're getting the worst of both worlds.

Comment Re:Taken too far (Score 1) 86

A lot of people are intentionally commiting crimes of various severity and they don't actually want police to have a more effective enforcement tool

This set of people is dwarfed into insignificance be non-criminals who are also being caught on camera. And the problem with that isn't false positives, it's true positives: non-criminal John Doe's car was spotted at a certain place at a certain time, so let's make that fact available on the market. That way, we can target him with ads, increase his insurance premiums, let his wife's PI know what neighborhood he had lunch in, let assassins when he's home, and let burglars (or his wife's rapist) know when he's not home.

Comment They will just take over the state governments (Score 1) 86

And then override the locals. Every time they want to do something people don't want that's how they do it. They have a name for it they call it government small enough to drown in a bathtub.

The Epstein class wants a government that can control you and they're going to get it. It'll be just big enough that they can own it but not so big that they can't completely buy it wholesale. That's the problem with the federal government and why they want to undermine the federal government power. The federal government is just a little too big for even a trillionaire to completely buy off.

Local governments can be bought but they're too numerous so they focus on voter suppression at the local level. That can be targeted and gerrymandering can limit the expense by creating safe districts for their cronies.

State government is just the right size. Big enough to push everybody around and force them to do what they want and take all their stuff like eminent domaining away their property for AI data centers, not so small that there's just too many individuals to bribe but also not so big that the attention given by the voting public means they can't always sneak fascist candidates in.

Whenever the Epstein class wants to do something really nasty to you they will always use the state government to do it and that's why you hear so much about the importance of states rights from their mouthpieces

Comment Speculation: "AI Bankruptcy rigs" (Score 2) 103

The sheer amount of not-quite-what-consumers-need RAM that is going to be auctioned after the AI companies' bankruptcies will be unprecedented. Remember we're literally talking about an amount equal to what the entire consumer market was using. It's going to be a few years worth of the entire RAM manufacturing industry!

The scale of not-quite-right RAM we're going to see, makes me imagine (warning: red flag for talking out my ass) consumer motherboards specifically made for the mountains of weirdly-packaged cheap-but-fast-as-fuck RAM at hyperscale data center auctions. We'd end up calling them "AI bankruptcy rigs" or something like that. Yes, they'll perform differently (more throughput than you need, more latency than you want), but it still ought to be usable. IGPs usually included, I suspect.

And they will just be a product of the times; ten years later no one would want one and bankruptcy rigs would be seen as odd late-2020s relics; the lemonade from Sam Altman's lemon industry. It would be a dead-end tech. But during those late 2020s? Could be a neat-o opportunity.

Comment Europe is going to have to drop Microsoft (Score -1, Offtopic) 20

America can no longer be trusted and that goes for American companies. Donald Trump is openly talking about invading Greenland and I cannot believe that's a sentence I just said. And the only reason for him to take your Greenland would be to go and take the rest of Europe.

This is what failing empires do. You put incompetent thieves and rapists in charge of everything and they crashed the economy. In America We lost 123,000 jobs in the last 3 months and that's probably going to be revised to 200,000 by the time it's over.

When empires fail because of incompetent leadership inevitably the coffers get empty and they start looking to expand and loot other countries. We will take Canada and Mexico first and then the rest of South america. Using them as a manufacturing base for non-compensated labor we will build back a large military but the incompetence will continue to empty the coffers and eventually we will have to go after Europe.

And no we won't care that Europe has nuclear weapons. Incompetent people are also insane. God will protect us in our holy crusade or some nonsense.

It's frustrating because Europe is allowing this to happen because their Epstein class all wants to be trillionaires too and they're hoping that as America falls they will rise. That would work if America wasn't so fucking crazy and dangerous...

For everybody thinking this is cool because they will get Linux improvements out of it that's going to kind of dwarf all of the chaos and disasters and wars. If you can't get hardware for your cool hobby because War rationing is going on then it really doesn't matter how much cool software there is...

Politics affects your hobby. It's weird because the right wing seemed to understand that during gamergate without realizing Jeffrey Epstein was behind that and it was all bullshit and it was the finance Bros and their AI slop and the economic chaos they create coming for your hobby

Comment Re:No good outcomes for Chrome here. (Score 1) 28

Maybe Chrome should be a government run open source project.

Which government? The US (relevant as it's where Google is located) does its best to do everything through contractors. It would have to be through some international body, like the United Nations. I can't imagine that not slowing development to a crawl and leading to some other corporate browser taking over and creating the same problem all over again.

Comment Re:Can you re-use old DDR3 or DDR4? (Score 1) 103

There are some motherboards which will let you use DDR4 with an AM4 processor, and AM4 processors have made sort of a comeback with AMD bringing back production of some higher end parts which remain competitive.

Though I actually built this as the AM5 stuff drove down the prices rather than going back and doing it, I run a 5900X (12C24T 3.7-4.8 GHz) and it remains a beast given the costs. I use 4x CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF for 64GB dual channel, and the mainboard is an ASRock B550M PG Riptide. It's been absolutely solid, though ASRock has had some lemons and the RGB on this board is lousy.

Slashdot Top Deals

Overload -- core meltdown sequence initiated.

Working...