BOOK:
The Mindful Way through Depression: Freeing Yourself from Chronic Unhappiness
https://www.amazon.com/Mindful...

No drug necessary.

Criminalizing drugs completely changes us politics. We learned a long time ago that the reason drugs were criminalized was so that the right wing could go after the left wing because statistically working class people are more likely to take drugs. Nixon's people came out and just admitted it because they felt guilty. The entire purpose of the drug war was and always is political.

Because of that you are never going to see things like this used properly and legalized which is a shame because psychedelics have been shown repeatedly to be a game changer for people with post traumatic stress disorder. And there are a lot of people with PTSD beyond soldiers.

The catch is that for it to work you need to do it under Dr supervision generally. You need someone there who can carefully guide you through the process. Just dropping a tab of acid isn't usually going to work. So by criminalizing it an entire group of people whose lives could be transformed or just left out in the cold. But compared to the billions and billions of dollars that can be made using the drug war to win elections that's a small price to pay.

And of course because we have been conditioned to view talk about politics as dirty anytime you bring this up you're guaranteed to piss everybody off. It is no coincidence that you are conditioned not to talk about your salary with your coworkers or your political beliefs.

Fun fact the reason rural towns tend to be right wing is because there is usually one extremely wealthy landowner who runs the show and if you deviate slightly from orthodoxy then he's the only employer in town and he runs the church and everything else and you're basically persona non grata.

I bring it up because it's another way that the discussion and debate in our country is locked down to the benefit of people who do not have your best interests at heart

The Underlying issue is: Why are some people depressed?

If we understand that, it is very likely that no drug will be necessary. People won't become depressed.

For a company that blows through 60 billion dollars a year like it's nothing... And this is the pilot. Meaning that a lot of people are coming in buying ads because they do not yet know how effective those ads will be.

We got a preview of how effective the advertisements are. Amazon and a couple other companies tried to use AI chatbots to do website sales. The results were basically a disaster with a 30 to 40% drop in conversion rate compared to the same product on the website. In other words people were 30 to 40% less likely to buy from a chat bot then from just going to a website.

Internet advertising does not work. The only reason it continues to survive is scams and large advertising firms convincing people to buy into it even though it's completely ineffective. It kind of sort of can work for branding exercises like letting you know that the Ford motor company exists but that doesn't sell specific products it just creates a rough vibe.

What does work is influencers. That's where the real money is to be made. And I could see AI influencers taking over from real humans to some extent but the reason influencers work is the parasocial relationships so that's going to be tough to maintain when people find out it's not a real person which is going to happen sooner or later.

If AI ever gets to the point where it can outperform human beings at finding defects then there's going to be a major issue with world powers.

That's because right now if you really want to hack somebody's data you can do it. There is a company out of Israel that will sell you software if you have enough money had enough connections and that software can break into just about any phone in existence. If they can break into the phones they can get past most encryption mechanisms.

So the question is what happens if intelligence agencies and law enforcement can no longer get data when they really want it.

I'm not so naive to think that is going to be a glorious time of freedom.

Facebook for example is facing an existential crisis from AI slop. There is so much slop and it is so hard to tell from the real content they are having a hard time getting data they can sell. Advertising rates are also at risk although it's less of an issue because as it stands advertising on Facebook is pretty useless and largely done out of habit. But the risk of slop overwhelming their data collection is a much bigger deal.

I bring it up because Facebook didn't just roll over and die. They are going around the world buying off politicians and getting laws passed requiring age verification that will in turn let them identify real users from bots so that they can continue to collect your data and sell it to their advertisers and governments and whatnot.

My point being that when a large powerful group faces a problem they solve it. And when somebody with that much money in power has a problem and they solve it it's usually to your detriment and mine.

What I would expect is that we are going to lose more freedoms. And any attempt to save those freedoms will fail because at the end of the day we would have to vote for politicians that would protect those freedoms and I think the 2024 elections proved that it's pretty easy to get people to do the opposite if you dangle cheap eggs in front of them...

This is that super bowl ad bullshit. The Epstein class wants all of us to accept and enjoy a complete surveillance State and 24/7 tracking of every single thought and action that goes on in our lives.

So they were looking for ways to package that because obviously having cameras and tracking on you 24/7 isn't a good thing.

They have landed on pets and protecting children. Honestly it's working reasonably well. People keep setting up their own surveillance networks and handing them over to the Epstein class. Meta and Planitir have been going around buying laws to require age verification and operating systems and the internet. This is especially important because AI slop is becoming endemic and it's becoming hard for the platforms to tell the difference between the AI slop and the actual human content and if your job is to sell user data and advertisements you can't really do that if your data set is full of bots.

Incidentally, if anyone else wants to "successfully create plasma", you can buy the necessary gear from Aliexpress, with free shipping.

The facts are _really_ clear: The current factorization record without trickery and deception is 21. Might as well predict that "magic" will break classical crypto in any meaningful time with about the same level of justification.

Well, my current estimate id +5 effective qbits every 50 years. That linear scaling may be massive overestimating things, chances are the real scaling is inverse exponential, but lets assume it is linear for the moment. RSA130 needs around 450 effective qbits in a long calculation. We are currently able to factor 21, i.e. 5 bits. Hence we may see RSA130 fall to a QC in something like 4500 years.

I have absolutely no problem with QCs as physics experiments and for advancing some areas of Math. But pushing them as future computing mechanisms is dishonest and should count as scientific misconduct.

And that is just for them breaking even. Anybody thinks they can push ad revenue 150 times higher?

Indeed. Also note that "basically no progress" can be a lot faster than "basically no progress". At the glacial pace that QCs are making, and with the laughably low performance they currently have (factoring 21 after 50 years of research, seriously???) relative speeds are strongly subject to meaningless artefacts.

We are not going to get AGI this century. The people that claim that are lying (Altman) or are delusional. AGI is not a question of throwing more computing power at the problem. Something fundamental is missing and we have no idea what. Also note that most humans may not actually have any meaningful amount of general intelligence. Only about 10-15% are independent thinkers and can fact-check. And that is basically what AGI would need to be able to do to qualify. Unless we find out a lot more, we cannot even make predictions on whether machines can have AGI.

Now, given that state of affairs and tech history, this indicates we are at the very least 100 years away. And that is if we get a credible and practical theory how AGI works tomorrow. The one mechanisms we have that is AGI (automated theorem proving) does not scale at all in practice due to exponential effort and that is a hard limit. We do not have any other mechanisms. And some quasi-mysticism like "put in all human knowledge and AGI will result" is just bullshit and has no scientific value.

Yes. Not quite there, may take another 20 years or so, but I had an opportunity to see where they where 35 years ago. And they already were deep in the details at that time back when. But the thing is, self-driving is a classical problem and classical problems can be divided, parallelized, special cases and maps put into databases, etc. Self-driving is conceptually _easy_. The practical aspects are not. None of that is true for Quantum Computations. Quantum Computations are all-or-nothing and you cannot break them down into smaller parts.

That said, AGI is still completely out of reach and may not even be in reach of machines in this universe. There is far too much unknown to even credibly speculate. Going to Mars might be possible at this time, but you go there to die. Colonization is at least 100 years away and makes no sense. "Colonizing" the desserts and oceans on earth would be far, far easier and I do not see anybody doing that...

Heh. Heheh. Hahah. HAHAHHA. As if the company will allow users to dismiss the ads any more than any other ad driven revenue model company.

I guess I donâ(TM)t really have a problem with this. I get it. Every single Internet company has a self stated evaluation that only makes consistent sense if its future revenue amounts to 10-times-global-GDP and their profits are all-teh-$$$$. Its a part of salesmanship thats rife in the industry. There are at least a hundred tech bro CEOs that are just as shameless about it as Altman

QCs exist. With extreme effort and some trickery, they can even factorize 21 now (35 is still a fail at this time). That is 5 effective qbits in a somewhat complex computation. It makes for a nice physics experiment. But that is after about 50 years of research. And it looks very likely that QC effort scales exponentially in two dimensions of the the size of the computation (qbits and steps in the computation). Hence, if we progress at this speed, we may be able to factor 10 bit numbers with a QC in, say, 50 years. The current recommendations for RSA keys are 2048 bits. That needs about 7000 effective qbits to factor. If we assume the current scalability (+5 effective qbits every 50 years) continues, a current RSA 2048 key will be within reach in about 70'000 years.

The whole thing is nice for Physics, but completely meaningless for Computer Science.