Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Nothing to do with emergencies (Score 1) 199

In a dire emergency, your car is the last place you should be, and the last thing you should try to hang onto. FEMA's official disaster preparedness communication calls for you to have a PORTABLE AM radio and to avoid travel unless absolutely necessary. "Let's get in the car and go to Disney" is not part of FEMA's official recommendations.

Also, to assume that AM radio will even work in an emergency or disaster is a stretch in the first place. Ancient broadcasting equipment living in swamps with hundreds of meter tall towers, seldom internet access, and nonredundant uplinks, are not reliable.

When Helene hit us in 2024, AM/FM radio was the first thing to go off the air, followed by the land-based Internet providers, followed by the cellular networks. We got by with local amateur radio operators who were able to communicate outside the zone on batteries and solar panels.

There is no "one thing" that is going to be universally reliable in a disaster. You have to have an "all of the above" mindset and prepare to communicate by different available means.

Comment Re:Rude (Score 1) 149

This is exactly analogous to the power companies pushing people to "efficiency" programs at the cost of comfort just so they don't have to spend money to build out infrastructure.

"We'll provide a worse experience for you so the powers that be don't have to do anything substantive to solve the problem"

Comment Why do I care about instruments? (Score 0) 165

As long as I know how fast I'm going and how much fuel I have left, what do I care about engine speed and oil pressure and coolant temperature, and so on? I don't need to monitor all of the minutiae of my engine's operating point while I am driving. That is handled by the FADEC. The FADEC will tell me when and if there is a problem. I do not need to monitor these things myself. This emotional attachment to the past is just that, an emotional attachment.

Comment Re:I know its not an original idea (Score 2) 29

If dark matter interacted with itself, you would expect to see its distribution change as the collisions cause it to clump together. Those clumps would tend to gather a bit inwards towards the core and you'd expect a distribution similar to that of visible matter (I.e. the stars, which underwent exactly that colliding and clumping process when the galaxy formed). We don't observe that: instead dark matter seems to form diffuse halos in galaxies, as you'd expect from something that interacts very weakly (or not at all). That said, some theories of dark matter do allow for stronger self-interactions, possibly creating an entire dark sector of physics invisible to normal matter. But those models tend to be considered more niche possibilities.

Comment Re: The existence of the database endangers us (Score 0) 142

Tell me you've never used an AI coding tool, without telling me ...

I don't know about the rest of the peanut gallery, but I can say first hand that claude is excellent at commenting and documenting code and architecture, as well as keeping track of lessons learned.

Slashdot Top Deals

A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is not worth knowing.

Working...