Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Comment Meanwhile, at Carnegie Mellon... (Score 4, Interesting) 177

Jensen Huang to college grads: "Run. Don't walk" toward AI

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/...

Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang told graduates at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh yesterday that demand for AI infrastructure is creating a "once-in-a-generation opportunity to reindustrialize America and restore the nation's capacity to build."

Why it matters: With many college grads fearing AI could obliterate their career dreams, Huang pointed to boundless opportunity as a "new industry is being born. A new era of science and discovery is beginning ... I cannot imagine a more exciting time to begin your life's work."

Nvidia, which makes AI chips, is the world's most valuable company. Huang told 5,800 recipients of undergraduate and graduate degrees that the AI buildout will require plumbers, electricians, ironworkers, and builders for chip factories, data centers and advanced manufacturing facilities.

"No generation has entered the world with more powerful tools â" or greater opportunities â" than you," he said. "We are all standing at the same starting line. This is your moment to help shape what comes next. So run. Don't walk."

"Every major technological revolution in history created fear alongside opportunity," Huang added. "When society engages technology openly, responsibly, and optimistically, we expand human potential far more than we diminish it."

Full speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Submission + - The Audio Industry Is Grappling with the Rise of 'Podslop' (bloomberg.com)

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes: Welcome to the modern era of podcasting in which thousands of new shows are released into the world every day with a sizable portion likely being AI-generated. Figuring out exactly which ones fall into that growing category is becoming more difficult just as the industry is starting to take this issue seriously. In only the past month or so, Amazon launched a feature that explains a product by generating a quasi-podcast, complete with co-hosts talking to each other and taking questions from users. Shout out to Business Insider reporter Katie Notopoulos for spotting this (and, naturally, demoing it with an adult diaper rash-cream). Not long ago, Nicholas Thompson, chief executive officer of the Atlantic, noted “podslop” dominated his Spotify search results when he typed in the word “Sora.” This was around the time that OpenAI shut down its user-generated, AI-content-only app.

[...] All of which raises some big, difficult questions. For one, what should the listening platforms do about this incursion? As of right now, Apple Podcasts requires creators who generated a “material portion” of their show using AI to disclose it. The platform also bans misleading or deceptive content. Spotify hasn’t published any specific guidelines around AI, though it maintains general rules around dangerous and misleading content. Where this conversation gets even trickier is when it comes to money. Many of these podcasts are hosted on at least one free service that allows programs to opt into their ad marketplace with zero barrier to entry, meaning these shows (and the hosting service) profit off every listen or download. Spreaker, a company owned by iHeartMedia, is the primary one to watch here. Though it tells users to disclose when they rely on AI, it still allows those shows to opt into its programmatic ad marketplace, which pays creators 60% of the revenue generated by the ads placed in their shows. It stands to reason that most of these thousands of shows don’t reach many people. But in the aggregate, the ears and dollars could add up. Are the advertisers on board with being next to AI-generated content, some of which might be deemed “slop?”

Submission + - Cisco releases open-source 'DNA test for AI models' (scworld.com)

Submitted by spatwei
spatwei writes: Cisco released an open-source tool to trace the origins of AI models and compare model similarities for great visibility into the AI supply chain.

The Model Provenance Kit, announced Thursday, is a Python toolkit and command-line interface (CLI) that looks at signals such as metadata and weights to create a “fingerprint” for AI models that can then be compared to other model fingerprints to determine potential shared origins.

“Think of Model Provenance Kit as a DNA test for AI models,” Cisco researchers wrote. “[] Much like a DNA test reveals biological origins, the Model Provenance Kit examines both metadata and the actual learned parameters of a model (like a unique genome that comprises a model), to assess whether models share a common origin and identify signs of modification.”

The tool aims to address gaps in visibility into the AI model supply chain. For example, many organizations utilize open-source models from repositories like HuggingFace, where models could potentially be uploaded with incomplete or deceptive documentation.

Submission + - A 22-Year-Old Dropout Just Reverse-Engineered The World's Scariest AI (forbes.com)

Submitted by ZipNada
ZipNada writes: When Anthropic introduced its powerful new model, Claude Mythos, this spring, companies and countries freaked out. The general-purpose model, its creators claimed, could discover software vulnerabilities that no one knew existed.

Rather than release Mythos to the world, the company gave it to cybersecurity experts at major companies that build or maintain critical software infrastructure and told them to use it to find and fix bugs before Anthropic unleashed it on the world.

But less than two weeks later, 22-year-old developer Kye Gomez made educated guesses about the core design that makes Claude Mythos so powerful and published OpenMythos, a public project that approximates Anthropic’s breakthrough. Gomez’s code raced through the research community like a prairie fire.

This story has several startling implications: if a self-taught developer can reverse-engineer the structural innovation of a multi-billion-dollar lab in a matter of days, then the proprietary moat around AI architecture may already be gone.

Submission + - Physicists just found a tiny flaw in time itself (sciencedaily.com) 1

Submitted by alternative_right
alternative_right writes: Physicists are rethinking one of quantum mechanicsâ(TM) biggest puzzles: how fuzzy possibilities become definite reality. New research suggests that spontaneous âoecollapseâ processesâ"possibly linked to gravityâ"could subtly blur time itself.

Comment Communists demand Communism (Score 0) 82

So yeah your AI can outperform a doctor that gets 5 minutes with the patient before having to move on to the next one in order to keep their private equity Masters satisfied.

So, suppose, we stick it to the "private equity Masters", compel them to double the number of doctors — forget for a second, who is going to pay for them — and afford them a whopping 10 minutes with the patient.

ChatGPT will still beat humans... And it will be getting better with every month, whereas the humans will not...

Comment Don't seek an ideal (Score 0) 82

A new study from Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess found that an OpenAI reasoning model outperformed experienced ER doctors at diagnosing and managing patient cases

AI is sufficiently anthropomorphic to be capable of making mistakes. Demanding perfection from it is stupid. It does not need to be error-free. It just needs to be better than humans...

Comment Re:He's an idiot but he still won two elections (Score 2) 287

by EmagGeek (#66116396) Attached to: Trump Administration Will Pay More Energy Firms to Cancel Wind Farms

Yep, to your point, it wasn't Trump who won two elections, it's Democrats that lost two elections that the electorate would have handed to them on a silver platter had they simply not continued to ignore the concerns of 80% of democratic voters in favor of a system that continues to punish poor people for trying not to be poor.

Comment Re: Nice data center ya got there! (Score 0) 110

by mi (#66111140) Attached to: Community Votes to Deny Water to Nuclear Weapons Data Center

because only a few at every level of government liked them *and* their legal status is very dubious

There, there. With enough of China-sponsored whipping up, the liking of a nuclear weapons research lab can be sunk overnight just as well. Indeed, this very story describes a symptom of that happening.

the rule of law is excruciatingly imperiled atm

"At the moment"? Laughing out loud...

Comment Re:Nice data center ya got there! (Score 0) 110

by mi (#66110504) Attached to: Community Votes to Deny Water to Nuclear Weapons Data Center

This effectively is a fight between two branches of government, one federal, the other municipal

Federal government is at quite a disadvantage on local level — as ICE have found out dealing with other (or the same) anti-Americans.

David just might defeat Goliath

David was neither an insurrectionist, nor given aid or comfort to the enemies of his government.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you had better tools, you could more effectively demonstrate your total incompetence.

Close