... A tutor for the superior school and university interns.
The programmers will assume the role of the tutor who assings tasks to the interns, the interns being the AI. Sometimes the AI will give back results conmensurate with what a TSU (Tecnico Superior Universitario - University Level Tecnician) student would produce. other times the result will be more aligned with what an engineering student would produce (slightly better)
In both cases, the tutor is the one who doles out tasks, specifying how to do them. And it whould be very irresponsible from the tutor to let loose the interns' code without grading and correcting it first
I think the term "babysit" was chosen to induce rage, as in ragebait
Now it's just a place to park my resume
Have you ever received a legitimate job offer, or even a nibble, from an employer that you might actually consider working for, that came through LinkedIn?
Me neither.
You'd be much better served by posting your resume or having it on file with a few employers you would consider and who are legitimate.
I get no cold offers, or recruiters. But I do get those automated linkedin job offer mails. Applied a couple of times. Entered the proces? Yes. Canonical. Twice. For a couple of Cloud Positions.
Sadly, did not get hired, god knows why
So, yes, LinkedIn still has a little value.
Anarcho-capitalism isn't really a thing. Or at least, it isn't anarchism. It's essentially end-stage libertarianism. If you want to see what it looks like, Somalia is currently in such a situation. It ends up being less freedom and more feudalism with petty warlords all fighting for dominance. It's not unlike the Crips, Bloods, the Mafia, etc., just with everything instead of just with illegal vices.
This is all to say that this kind of anarchy would not be pleasant. Only teenagers, idiots, and assholes actually want it. Actual anarchism, by the way, is the end-stage of Communism. Totes different things.
for clean room implementations.
If the AI model was trained using the OG software project that is being replicated, they are screwed.
That should be very easy to see, in the discovery phase just ask for a list of all the software that was used to train the AI model. IS a yes/no answer, if the AI saw the OG software, then there was no clean room, the room was dirty, very, very dirty
Reading that book (or, more exactly, its "Reader's Digest", the book itself I read a long while afterwards) was what made me want to become an Electronics Engineer
One of the most influential books in my life. Perhaps, the most influential one.
GodSpeed Mr. Kidder
There's no way on (or off) Jupiter's Green Earth that you could ever put a terawatt of anything in space. Every one of those watts would have to be radiated into space somehow. Can you imagine how large the heat sinks would have to be? Keep in mind that radiating heat in a vacuum is about the most inefficient way to get rid of heat that one can think of. On Earth, you can use air and water to move heat around and then dump the air or heat into the environment. In space, you only have radiation, which is basically proportional to exterior surface area and temperature. And, that exterior qualifier is important in space. Using some kind of finned radiator like we use in air or water won't work very well, since most of the heat radiated off will just be re-absorbed by other parts of the radiator. This means that in space, the most efficient (in terms of mass and heat loss) is gigantic, quite thin, highly conductive disc of metal. To distribute the heat across the entire disc, you'd probably embed a grid of heat pipes.
And, then, holy space solar panels, Batman. A terawatt is a LOT of solar panels. You could probably make the solar panels double as radiators, but that would only work if you kept them relatively cool. You're still going to also need a bunch of radiator disc. The only way I think that you get possibly get this to work is to make like a sort of triangular prism type of design. Make one side solar panels and face the sun. Make the other two sides radiators. Keep the computers in the middle, connected to the radiators through heat pipes. And then you'd need a satellite dish sticking out one end, or, preferably, both, along with a smattering of thrusters.
Considering the difficulties in dealing with the and the delay added to communications by being in space (even LEO would be bad; roughly half the time the satellites would be on the other side of the planet.), it would be much, much simpler, and cheaper, to put all of that computing power on the ground, preferably nearer to the Poles than the Equator, and preferably near a large body of water, like a lake or ocean. The Great Lakes region in the US and Canada would be great. Solar power isn't super great around The Great Lakes, but wind power is quite feasible, and the cooling potential is off the hook. I mean, there's cold water everywhere. I would think that, in Europe, the fjords of Norway and Sweden would be pretty ideal. Iceland would be pretty good too, so long as you bring in enough cross-oceanic cables from Europe and Canada. The mere fact that you wouldn't have to launch satellites into orbit along would make Iceland seem like a steal compared to space, even with the cables. Hell, even Antarctica would be cheaper and easier than space, and would have similar ping times.
A Canadian AI (or a national/multicountry AI) would work as a nice baseline for everyone in the country.
Instead of having hamstrung gratis AI that can be withdrawn at a moments notice, you get fully fledged Gratis AI that depends solely on your country. If then you (or your company) wan to pay for some other AI, so be it.
From a soveringty point of view is cool, as you are not beholden to for profit companies, be them national or foreign.
And please remmeber that AI ius much more than LLMs and other Gen AI. Slef-Driving Cars, Platoon Driving trucks, (semi)Autonomus androids/robots, and context aware industrial machine tools/robots need AI too.
I hope canada is contemplating these cases as well, and not fixated on LLMs
The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa.
