Comment it's too much winning (Score 1) 135
We're gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you'll say, Please, please. Its too much winning. We can't take it anymore, Mr. President, it's too much.
Comment I'm glad we have a bubble (Score 1) 56
It'll distract us from the war and gas price caused inflation.
Comment Re:So.... (Score 1) 128
How about a Muppet babies version. All the characters you love, but they are toddlers.
Comment Re:because (Score 1) 128
No Tom Bombadil, so not the real deal.
Comment Re:Looks like meat's back on the menu, boys! (Score 1) 59
And don't make the mistake of thinking the government doesn't have more resources to throw at a case than any private entity does.
Legislature and Executive branches intentionally hamstring our institutions because some key people in power want to raid the wealth of our nation and bring about the downfall of our society.
Comment Re:Available on Temu? (Score 1) 288
We did capture Iran's drone (Shahed-136) and copied it as a cheap drone with practical use. So if we can snag a few hyper sonic missiles we might make those too if they are any good.
Comment Re:too bad (Score 1) 288
It means a military outfit. Well-regulated as in training and discipline. Not a bunch of yokels showing up to show off their new guns to their buddies.
But SCOTUS re-interpretes the 2A in part because of the 14A. So we have no one to blame but ourselves for the muddiness of the amendment. We had 250 years to fix it and we never bothered.
Comment Rosy Palm said "Hi!" (Score -1) 1
produces higher quality sperm
That's really important for the sperm destined for the septic system, sure...
Comment Re:Rust could be awesome. (Score 1) 31
It really is simple. Rust zealotry is 100 percent fact and provable.
Ubuntu 25.10.
What is a foundational tenet of Linux? "We do not break user-space."
But, we do for Rust. Why? Because Rust MUST move forward at speed. Can't pass tests? Fuck it. Works good enough.
Breaks user-space? Yes, but not all the time and not for most people. We are accepting Rust CoreUtils for no other reason that it must be.
It has been decreed. Ubuntu about CoreUtils is Bill, "Fuck it, we'll do LIVE!".
Large performance hiccups, failing tests? Does not matter. Pushing it live will bring the issues to light and we can fix it all over time.
What? That is not how this has ever worked. We do not break user-space. Especially on purpose so we can speed up Rust development.
Rust replacements should exist. Rust replacements should make there way into the systems we are using every day to make things more secure. Rust replacements should work though and not break user-space. If is not an acceptable replacement if it were written in C, then it is not one just because it is written in Rust. Real commands, real scripts, real jobs fail. Anything that works as a drop in replacement should be accepted. (Preferably because it is provably better, not just, "Written in Rust though!". Anything that does not, should not be a default in the release and should stay in the background, getting better till it is ready.
Anything other than that is religious zeal, not making a better Linux.
Ubuntu 25.10.
What is a foundational tenet of Linux? "We do not break user-space."
But, we do for Rust. Why? Because Rust MUST move forward at speed. Can't pass tests? Fuck it. Works good enough.
Breaks user-space? Yes, but not all the time and not for most people. We are accepting Rust CoreUtils for no other reason that it must be.
It has been decreed. Ubuntu about CoreUtils is Bill, "Fuck it, we'll do LIVE!".
Large performance hiccups, failing tests? Does not matter. Pushing it live will bring the issues to light and we can fix it all over time.
What? That is not how this has ever worked. We do not break user-space. Especially on purpose so we can speed up Rust development.
Rust replacements should exist. Rust replacements should make there way into the systems we are using every day to make things more secure. Rust replacements should work though and not break user-space. If is not an acceptable replacement if it were written in C, then it is not one just because it is written in Rust. Real commands, real scripts, real jobs fail. Anything that works as a drop in replacement should be accepted. (Preferably because it is provably better, not just, "Written in Rust though!". Anything that does not, should not be a default in the release and should stay in the background, getting better till it is ready.
Anything other than that is religious zeal, not making a better Linux.
Comment Re: Exploitation of children is inevitable??? (Score 1) 45
Uhhh... welcome to 1996?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
(c) Protection for "Good Samaritan" blocking and screening of offensive material
(1) Treatment of publisher or speaker
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
(2) Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of -
(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
Comment Re:Meta? (Score 1) 45
The same company that banned people for linking to the British Holocaust Museum (HMD.Org.UK) claiming the links were violations of the policy on "dangerous individuals and organizations." Zuckerberg is a pedophilic little-boy-raping sick-trash Nazi.
Comment Re:too bad (Score 1) 288
2A folks want an unregulated militia. Which is quite possible to have, they'd have to amend the Constitution first if that's what they want.
Comment Re:Available on Temu? (Score 2) 288
Flexing your arsenal is pretty standard practice for these aggressive, territorial nations.
Comment Re:Rust could be awesome. (Score 1) 31
Why not pick that instead of Rust?
Because then it would not be religious zealotry?
Comment Re:Rust could be awesome. (Score 2) 31
I see no evidence of that "religion" of which you speak.
Ubuntu 25.10
Is that evidence enough? "We do not break user-space."
Unless it is to implement Rust based tools in spite of knowing that they fail tests and break user-space. KNOWINGLY
There is definitely a problem. Not with creating Rust. Not with replacing things that can be replaced.
When thought, they knowingly break a foundational rule to implement their religion, it makes the point.
Slashdot Top Deals
You can write a small letter to Grandma in the filename. -- Forbes Burkowski, CS, University of Washington
