Comment Re:Finally! (Score 1) 17
If they find water it will certainly put them at the forefront of moon science.
By the way, those articles seem fine. The first two are well established history at this point.
If they find water it will certainly put them at the forefront of moon science.
By the way, those articles seem fine. The first two are well established history at this point.
Just because it is sold cheap doesn't mean it isn't valuable. It may just be that people who value it don't know it exists, or it isn't available due to international shipping, or they won't start looking for years to come.
That's why I get scanned books onto the Internet Archive. Maybe nobody will care, but maybe someone will 10 or 100 years from now.
Competition is usually good. YouTube has been rapidly enshittifying, and there isn't really any alternative.
You can have both physical controls and a big screen. I like having a big screen for Android Auto, but wouldn't give up the buttons for other functions either.
Some of that stuff is good. Autopilot systems that actually work are great for long distance driving. You need some compute power for Android Auto/Carplay, and having a built in sat nav can be useful too. Remote management of air conditioning and charging are very nice to have.
Of course BMW's ads and other bullshit would be enough for me to return the car. My car has physical buttons for key functions too.
If they do find ice there, it's going to be huge. And an issue for the US, because everyone wants to go look there, but if the Chinese find it first it will be politically difficult to justify following their lead.
Unfortunately cooperation is too much to hope for, but it looks likely that China will get boots on the ground there before 2030 either way.
they could stop putting massive computers inside of cars. I don't know which idiots thought these systems were a good idea but I think they are worst development since the Pinto introduced an integrated detonator switch into the bumper.
You're mixing up poorly designed screens with useful ones. Remember, the Japanese SUCK at software. I LOVE Japanese products, but hate anything they do involving computers, like cameras, cars, TVs, etc. Everything they do involving software seems 20 years behind. Their expensive flagship cameras that cost more than my last car still can't match conveniences we all took for granted on Android and iPhones 15 years ago. The same applies to their cars. The interfaces look like they're 10-20 years old....not even good interfaces, just ordinary
So...if you're buying a Japanese car, you just have to assume their brains are in 2006 mode...and still learning what's an intelligent vs stupid utilization of technology that Apple mastered long ago. The Tesla is just bad idea after bad idea with tons of stupid gimmicks (before you consider Musk is a POS and that WAS a Nazi salute) and the other American car companies are not run as well as American tech companies. I honestly never have ridden in a modern Chevy or Ford with a touchscreen because I don't know anyone who owns one.
A well designed touchscreen is an essential interface to your phone....maybe some obscure settings you set once and forget about, like speaker balance or equalizers.
A touchscreen should NEVER be used driving. Those should require physical buttons, by law, for everything you use, like windshield wipers or climate control. It should merely display your map, what's playing, and possibly a weather summary. Everything else is noise. From what I can tell most, car companies do that today and have moved away from touchscreen controls like the Teslas seem to love....but regardless, they're just behind...very conservative, not very innovative. It seems to broadly apply to Japan, generally. FIRST-RATE manufacturing and components...dogshit software.
they could stop putting massive computers inside of cars. I don't know which idiots thought these systems were a good idea but I think they are worst development since the Pinto introduced an integrated detonator switch into the bumper.
OK, off topic, but how do you display videos to somebody inside an MRI scanner? The magnetic / EMF forces those machines generate are pretty titanic, and any piece of metal gets sucked into the center of it.
Assuming it is installed inside somehow, you can avoid the projectile risk by not using any ferrous metal in its construction. Non-ferrous metals (e.g. dental fillings) aren't a problem in an MRI, though you may feel the electrical eddy currents induced by the magnetic fields. For something like an LCD panel, you'd probably want to shield the ever-living crap out of it to minimize problems, and I'm not even certain that it is feasible for that reason, but that's different from the LCD panel physically flying off the mount.
Real Users never use the Help key.