Comment Re:Side effects (Score 1) 204
Willful ignorance is not a mental illness, it is a conscious choice.
Not if it was induced by a cult before the victim could think rationally. Which is really "child abuse."
Willful ignorance is not a mental illness, it is a conscious choice.
Not if it was induced by a cult before the victim could think rationally. Which is really "child abuse."
So now OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta have had their AI models hack other systems on the Internet to meet the AI's interpretation of (what we hope is) a human created prompt.
This is an early step in the book If Anyone Builds It Everyone Dies
This is a direct result of the complete lack of regulation with AI companies run by narcissist leaders who want to be the first to create "a god that they *think* they control."
Instead, they keep proving exactly the the opposite. As they can't even control a "moron version" of what they are growing.
You don't have to read the book just skim at the resources.
Or just watch a summation video.
And remember: AIs can write the prompts for other AIs. The scenario of an AI instructing a another AI to prompt it around supposed "guard rails" is already possible and probable.
--
If the day of the week ends with the letter "y," then Trump is lying and whining while stealing from rubes and every US taxpayer.
Sable, the example AI that eventually kills all humans, does exactly this as a 1st step.
Remember, AIs are grown not programmed and their trainers do not know how they will truly act for any particular prompt until it is actually used.
Meta is too far behind to obtain much of the AI hype revenue. Either they lose if AI works well enough or don't make enough revenue before it all crashes.
Their Meta Glasses are also about to lose to Google.
Luckily, they still have plenty of algorithms to influence anyone dumb enough to have a Meta account.
I am sick of these socialists and their damn unions, trying to
Uncritically repeating and summarizing what one side's spokespeople tell you is hardly "more accurate". What used to make journalists more accurate is applying some skepticism and doing their own investigations to confirm, to uncover the truth. Not just accept what people you like say.
Frankly, can we even tell if one of these repeat and summarize stories is human or AI written?
Well, at least the headlines from reputable news services usually start with "Trump says..." now. Which almost always means "Trump lies about..."
Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.