Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Doesn't really make sense (Score 1) 47

Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, and Essential subscribers getting 15, 10, and 5 hours respectively before they have to buy additional playtime.

Microsoft said this impacts 4% of Game Pass subscribers

Microsoft said it was making the changes because the cost of providing cloud gaming has grown as more people use it and play for longer.

They're doing this because 4% of their users play longer than those limits? The extra charges from that 4% is going to cover their increased costs? Sounds more like they picked some initial numbers to gauge the pushback with the future goal of lowering those limits and/or raising prices further going forward.

That doesn't make sense, the average gamer will play more than 15 hours a month, that's a tiny bit over 3 hours a week. At that point, you'd just not bother with a console that costs hundreds at all.

So Microsoft is misleading, obsfucating or just flat out lying that only 4% will be impacted. Plus it makes terrible business sense for your cheapest product to meet the needs of your 96% of your customers, its the "2nd cheapest bottle of wine" effect, if you know nothing about wine you buy the second cheapest bottle as it's usually a fair bit better than the cheapest for a fraction of the price extra. So effectively your cheapest product is there just to be shit and drive people to slightly more expensive options. You want most customers buying the 2nd tier (or 2nd and 3rd if you've got a 4 tier system) which isn't much more than the bottom tier whilst your top tier is expensive.

Consoles were always money sinks, however I suspect Microsoft has gotten sick of subsidising them.

Comment Re:Time limited gaming (Score 2) 47

Subscription to be cancelled. 5-15 hours per day is more than reasonable. But per month? Sorry kids, you'll have to find another way to game.

PCGMR here, steam quadrupled the price of my subscription this month, as they do every month... let me run the maths... 4 x £0 is still £0.

Don't think I'll be cancelling, even though I still get to keep all my games.

Time to admit the XBox and PS are both effectively dead. And nothing of value was lost.

Comment Re:At least itâ(TM)s an option unlike Tesla (Score 0) 165

They may be responding to consumer preference in that market. Plenty of people buy Teslas without instrument clusters. Adding the cluster does cost money. This isnâ(TM)t like putting in seat heaters and then charging to have them functional. This is an additional component.

Should we complain that there is an up charge for fog lamps? There is the space for them on some cars, but theyâ(TM)re not always installed.

And think of how many car models are out there where one trim level has a tachometer and another doesnâ(TM)t. They are giving the consumer choice. Get extra displays or not.

Remember ladies and gentlemen, you're sharing the footpath with drivers who think a car without an instrument binnacle is a good idea.

Comment Re:It's because they can't prevent them (Score 1) 61

This is necessary and important because if you put them in wealthy neighborhoods people there have time out of their day they can take to organize petitions to get them banned and removed. Poor people can't do that because they're too busy working three jobs to afford a one-bedroom apartment they share with five guys.

You have this entirely backwards. People in Florida's gated communities love their security. Every gated neighborhood I've ever been has security cameras pointed at the entrances and exits, and some even have an actual human making copies of the driver's licenses of everyone who enters. The residents with transponders or barcodes to enter? Yep, that activity is automatically logged, too.

Most of the people physically protesting Flock cameras are college (age) kids and this retired guy with a pool pole. They're generally not wealthy.

Wealthy people don't physically protest, that's just for the proles.

Wealthy people protest by calling their bought and paid for politicians (or merely rented if they're not wealthy enough) which is far more effective.

The rich would love to have everyone tracked except for them. What Nineteen-Eighty Four didn't mention is that the inner party members were not subject to the same rules as normal party members (or proles).

Comment Re:The sequence of events is fascinating (Score 2) 62

Kalshi: builds a platform specifically designed to encourage and profit from insider trading
Santos: engages in insider tradiing
Kalshi: no, not like that

His crime was getting caught. Never, ever let the authorities, let alone the general public in on the scam.

But I wouldn't worry, this isn't Kalshi telling Santos he's unwanted, this is Kalshi telling Santos to cover his tracks better. His secret, illegal account is still safe and active... Oh crap, I shouldn't have said he has a secret account... Oh crap, I certainly shouldn't have said it was illegal.

This is entirely performative to maintain a very thin veneer of legitimacy.

Comment Re:Seriously, what do you guys think of this? (Score 2) 233

We all know that politicians like any other human being are often out of their depth when society gets into a critical situation. They have blind spots, ignore trends with the regular people and fumble. And talk trash about people issues without even noticing.

But this Trump thing you USians have going on seems to be an entirely new level of malignant corruption. I mean, like some satire of a corrupt government with some man-child in charge asking for rockets to be more pointy because pointy is more dangerous.

Is anybody taking this seriously anymore over there? Wouldn't impeachment of this President be overdue by now?

An inquisitive European is curious to know, please enlighten me. Seriously.

Some of them live in their own bubble of unreality. Murdoch and Fox News have had over 30 years of being their sole source of untruth to make that bubble. Americans tend to have a tenuous relationship with reality at the best of times but the MAGA crowd turn it to 11 and then some. When confronted with evidence they don't agree with they will find any excuse to handwave it away, no matter how much they suffer because of it, they'll vote for more of it because the Fox News man tells them to do so. And we're not immune to it, AFD (DE), National Front (FR), Vox (ES), Refrom (UK) are all using the same tactics. I can't speak for all European nations but the British Reform voters are literally the turkeys voting for Christmas. Reform has promised to cut benefits (welfare) and it just happens that most of the Reform voters are in the most deprived towns and counties in England. Clacton, where Nigel Farage was elected, has over 47% of it's working age population economically inactive and 1 in 5 have never held a job at all. They just assume it'll be someone elseâ(TM)s welfare that gets cut... Hell, as it happens they'll still blame anyone but themselves.

Comment Re:Not ethics (Score 1) 57

Like most companies, Apple has been ethical when it suited their interests. There's always been a slimy side there - Jobs cheated Woz before Apple even existed.

No, What Apple lost was taste.

They used to profit from producing products they'd want to use. Now they make profit-maximizing devices.

I'd argue that the OSes are starting to suffer, too. I mean, bugs are up again, but that's always been cyclic. But I feel like they're losing coherence, too. And a lot of subsystems more technical users like are rotting or being made much more difficult to work with (Gatekeeper and shell scripts, for instance). (I also find it ugly now, but that's subjective and it has has ugly iterations before, too.)

Anyway, yeah, Apple will make a ton of money for a long time to come. But I'm pretty sure it is losing its sense of taste. It might make the most popular and most profitable phone, but they aren't trying to make the phone people want anymore.

Apple under Jobs was always sleaze city... it's just that it's now the Reality Distortion Field has broken down and people are seeing through it.

Just 10 years ago, Fanboys would be defending the idea of putting ads in as revolutionary, unprecedented, imaginative and groundbreaking whilst jerking themselves silly. Now days the Apple crowd are 40 yr old dads in socks and sandals (and not the fashionable style of hippy, no this is Derek from Accounts Receivable socks and sandals) that has too many kids so no MX-5. I remember when ./ would melt down over every apple rumour, now days a motoring forum I frequent has more attention given to major product releases from Apple and we're talking about one thread in a small "computers and stuff" section of a car forum.

Apple's always been a cult, hence the tolerance of sleeze but it's not the cool cult that Tom Cruise joins, it's the cult that your boring dad joins.

I am a 40 something, but have a 2 seater sports car and no Apple devices (hence I can afford the "kid free" ride).

Comment Re: Only the "flagships"? What a ripoff (Score 2) 69

Most budget phones you are used to buying are subsidized, either by your carrier, by the bundled crapplets, or both

Except that Motorola sells a huge range of phones with costs varying by more than a factor of 5, all with identical Android images and unlocked. The only difference is the hardware specs. The only possible way these phones are subsidized in a way the flagships aren't is if Motorola thinks of the entry-levels as a way to get customers "hooked" on the brand and start paying for the more expensive (and presumably higher-margin) flagships.

I have a Motorola Edge 60 Neo, it was a reasonably cheap phone at £300 when it was relatively new (I think it's around £250 now. I'm yet to find all that bundled crapware the GP speaks of... hell it didn't even come with Facebook. I've gone and disabled all the AI stuff so it's now a decent phone with quite good hardware for the 300 quid category.

I bought my mum a G56 and it was largely the same story, except no AI as that was an older and even cheaper model (about £150). She loved it as it weighed half as much as the ancient Samsung she was lugging around.

I'm not particularly brand loyal though, I previously bought Nokias (HMD Global) but nothing they make is remotely good any more.

What people forget is that hardware isn't particularly expensive when you're buying it in bulk, especially before the recent RAMAGEDDON (which makes the full 8GB in my 60 Neo even more amazing). So production of cheap and mid range phones isn't that expensive especially when you're not customising the software to the Nth degree to preserve your brand. Margins are probably razr thin on a sub £400 phone but they're not being sold as loss leaders in the hopes of selling £800 phones to people who want £200 phones... You deserve to go out of business if you think that'll happen.

Comment Re:Project, much? (Score 1) 229

This is *within Canada*, you dimwitted pillock. The Canadian government doesn't require Netflix to broadcast Canadian content or French-Canadian language *in the US*, but the US government is trying to get Canada to change the rules for *within Canada*.

Canada is not projecting soft power within Canada.

The softest thing round here is whatever you call the mush between your ears. Soft yet pompous. What an absolute bell-end.

And this is just how much power the US has lost due to the Republicans. 25 years ago, just after Clinton the idea that you'd say no to the US was absolutely unthinkable for a nation like Canada, Australia, Mexico, et al. anyone who was an ally of the west. The US used to literally put laws on the books of foreign countries via trade treaties, even the EU wasn't powerful enough to give an outright "no". This is how US drug laws and US copyright laws became "international". I watched it happen to Australia in the 90s and early 2000s but then the US elected Bush and that power began to wane. The Australian and UK prime ministers followed Bush into Iraq with tails wagging like the sycophantic little lap dogs they were. This was when the US started losing it's power because it became embroiled in a war it couldn't win despite Bush declaring it won (TBF he didn't do it 17 times).

Now Bush, to his credit, what little there is didn't abuse this power too much but countries were finding the new copyright laws to be... well, frankly retarded as the MPIAA tried to do speculative invoicing in Australia and constantly running up against judges who would actually apply the laws fairly and justly (you know, "activist" judges as they like to call them). This was the late 00s. Obama came in and realised he'd have to start negotiating because the power the US had lessened. Started building up good will. Then you had Trump that pissed all that away... the Republicans kept doing damage as best they could through Biden and now you've got Trump 2, you've got nations that were once willing lapdogs telling you to go do one.

The Canadians, one of the, if not the nicest nations on the planet is telling you to fuck right off... if a British politician had done this we'd have quietly shuffled him off to the Svalbard consulate with an Apology to the Norwegians made on a copious quantity British vodka so that the worst he could do is offend Pingu.

Comment Re: It's about destroying privacy and security (Score 1) 80

This was widely criticised as an incredible atrocity and recognised as one of the darkest moments in American history. The fact of the matter is people are using this dark period of the past to excuse the acts of the present is a major issue which just shows that America has learned nothing.

American history is filled with such moments, trail of tears, Wounded Knee, et al. up to Mai Lai.

Kiwi history only has a few smudges in comparison.

Covering up such crimes is as American as selling beads to natives and then force marching them.

Slashdot Top Deals

No directory.

Working...