Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Credit scores are not what you think they are (Score 1) 102

Basing a person's credit score on credit usage rather than payment history is part of the system's bullshit.

Sort of, but lenders aren't looking for people who have good financial sense.

Lenders are looking for people who will borrow a lot of money, then continue paying on that loan. Which is not the same thing as having financial sense.

Which is pants on head retarded.

Both from a moral level, keeping people in debt to ensure they're indentured to someone and from a business perspective as it's a imperial shitton (about 1.8 Metric fuckloads) of risk. In case you don't remember the last time the banks over-leveraged on risky customers, it was only 2008, there was a massive collapse we're still feeling the effects of.

I'm glad my country doesn't have anything of the sort. Experian are trying to "sell" their credit score system but no-one is buying. When you apply for credit here (I.E. home or car loan) your existing credit obligations including potential ones (like a credit card or phone contract) are listed as risks and detract from the amount you can borrow.

Comment Re:Not really a rival (Score 1) 49

Compare the market caps though, Nvidia and Intel are not on the same order of magnitude.

I don't think there is much a of frenemy relationship really to speak of.

My guess is this about two things:
1) Nvidia ensuring they have or could get some access to an x86 license if AMD is somehow able to both make some kind of great leap in MIMD compute space and at the same time is able to deliver some kind of integration advantage with integration in traditional compute in memory architecture with EPYC parts.

2) Being sure they have access to some kind of FAB capacity in the event the excrement hits the fan around TSMC, and with a "partner" to whom they could dictate terms.

I think everyone is over thinking this. NVidia need to do something with that money they're drowning in and there's only so much that can be syphoned off to tax havens before everyone starts asking questions. If they kept it, they'd need to pay tax on it and we can't have that.

Comment Re:Not really a rival (Score 1) 49

AMD has been outselling Intel in the DC for what, a year now or more?

No, AMD still trails Intel in the data center, both in terms of revenue and unit sales. AMD's server share was stagnating at 20% for many years despite an uptick in reputation and positive press. It's only been recently this year that AMD hit around 40% in server market share, and that's based on revenue. In terms of units, AMD's market share is lower at around 32%.

Of course, upward momentum is still with AMD, so it wouldn't be surprising to see AMD claim a majority of server market share in the near future.

What's surprised me in the processor market is AMD making inroads in the laptop space that Intel owned for decades, even when AMD were dominating on the desktop and had very strong server offerings (the Athlon 64/Opteron days, for those who's memories stretch back that far). 15% of laptops are now AMD.

Comment Re:And (Score 1) 121

So? 99.9% of laptop users will never upgrade their RAM anyways. This is a budget laptop. It doesn't need to be upgraded. It's made to do the basics, like a Chromebook. For someone on a tech website, you're certainly completely out of touch with technology needs.

Upgrading budget laptops is how you save.

I have a cheap Asus gaming laptop for travel. It cost me £550 and most of that was for the RTX3050. I was able to pop the back off, add in another 8 GB of RAM, doubling the original and replace the 512 GB SSD with a faster 1TB for less than £100, the next model up that had the same amount of RAM was over £200 more expensive (but it did have a 3060 to be fair).

A lot of budget laptops are deliberately underspec'd to force people afraid to upgrade to buying a far more expensive laptop.

All of this is a moot point anyway, Apple have been hostile to upgrades and repairs for decades, they already spend extra to solder in the hard drives and ram modules. Also anyone who didn't predict that they'd be killing off the Mac line for phone based ones? Anyone still denying that? Mac OS being killed off is next.

Comment Re:And (Score 1) 121

It's "so complicated" because with almost any other laptop manufacturer you can add RAM after the fact, and not have to upgrade everything else in the system that you don't need upgraded just to get more RAM.

The people who upgrade ram in their laptops are probably like 1% of the total market. Most are bought by corps or individuals who treat them as an appliance.

That's still 3 million people of the ext. 300 million laptops that get sold each year.

And I'm willing to bet a lot of people are like me who buy a lower spec'd model where I can upgrade the RAM and SSD on the cheap saving a hundred quid off the more expensive one.

However that's besides the point, Apple have been openly hostile to people who want to upgrade (and consumers in general) for years. Plenty of other manufacturers to choose from though.

Comment Re:It was never a secret. (Score 1) 239

"Smart" devices were ALWAYS a vector for advertising. First it was a vector for data collection to better target ads, now it's just blatant advertising all the time. I've shied away from smart devices whenever possible, and if I'm forced to buy a smart device to replace a defective device I don't enable the network. "But you're missing out on features, man!" Yeah, I'm missing out on yet another advertising and propaganda channel. Boo hoo.

Smart devices were *NEVER* about adding features for the end user. It was always, and always will be, about advertising. Don't fall for it. Don't support it.

As a side effect, they're going to become a huge vector for malware.

A fridge will last for a decade or more, they'll stop doing software updates after 7 years maximum, maybe even as low as 2. In fact some may never receive a software update.

Comment Re:"Strenghten the value" (Score 1) 239

Pi-hole.

They'll just put in defences they will put in place to prevent it.

"Your fridge will shut down in 20 hours unless we're able to reach the Enrichment server" which is also the advertising server.

What needs to happen is laws need to be passed making this shit illegal. There's a reason they're starting in the US, even before their government was more corrupt that all the other tin pot dictatorships put together, there were enough people who were irrationally afraid of competent governance that they'd willingly prevent laws against this kind of thing.

I can see no reason a fridge should ever need to be connected to the internet.

Comment Re:Going for gold (Score 1) 239

I kind of want my refrigerator to send me a notification if some idiot leaves the door open. I'm just not willing to pay extra for that feature.

All that does is requires a beeper.

The idiots who leave it open are the kind that want these beepers removed because they find them annoying (erm... it's kind of the point, to get your attention). They're the same kind of people who openly invite being bombarded with ads because they think "they're not affected by them" which is evidenced by the amount of branded crap they don't need strewn around their dwelling.

I want my fridge to reliably keep things cold. Efficiently would be nice, doing so without releasing harmful chemicals would just be a bonus the way things are going.

Comment Re:Going for gold (Score 1) 239

Consumers need to reject it. Return the fridge if an update brings ads.

In countries with stronger consumer rights there is little question that this kind of enshittification would be a refund issue. It fundamentally changes the product, intrudes into your private space with unwanted and obnoxious ads, and it cannot be repaired.

Consumers don't get a choice.

They don't give a shit either. Try finding a non "smart" TV in the UK because you just want a TV that doesn't have a long boot time or requires network connectivity as you simply want to use it as a display unit for other devices.

People need to petition to make laws to make this kind of shit well and truly illegal. That is unlikely to happen in the US however as making this illegal is "government overreach" and being bombarded with advertisements is "freeze peach". Not likely to fly in the UK though. At least not yet, who knows what will happen after the 3rd glorious decade of total law enforcement thanks to Fuhrer Farage.

Comment Re:Not going to work (Score 1) 136

It's nothing like that.

They want to have the narrative that "leftists are violent!!!" because they killed Charlie Kirk. Never mind the other deaths like January 6, George Floyd, etc.

Never mind the fact that when the right spews hate, they claim censorship when platforms start to remove their posts.

The whole point is to say the left needs to be censored and everything. Ever notice how many people are being cancelled because of their less than complimentary comments about Charlie Kirk?

Double standards and all - if it's your speech been censored, then cry free speech. If it's someone you don't like, censor away!

They want Steam, Discord, etc. to start deplatforming all those leftists.

It's gotten so far that some Republicans are trying to back away because they realize that those laws being used to censor "the left" could easily be used to censor them for the exact same reason. The big fun being to see how the Supreme Court will allow the censorship but then twist themselves into knots trying to deny the same rights if a (D) gets to be President.

That is a good post except for one thing. Charlie Kirk's killer isn't "left". He grew up in a very republican household, very much "left" hating MAGA. Jimmy Kimmel has been cancelled for saying what everyone knows. Tyler Robinson wasn't some Leftist, he was one of them, a MAGA. At the very best you have a very conservative upbringing being a key part of radicalisation.

Trump and the Republicans are going to try as hard as they can to suppress that and push the narrative that it's the "left". This will involve even greater abuses of power. Anyone want to take bets that witnesses will be reading prepared statements for the press, no questions permitted in case they accidentally go off script and that the court proceedings will be held behind closed doors. No access to any media that might deviate from the narrative. I'd go as far to suspect that a fake confession indicating support for MAGAs favourite hates will be created (if it has not already). Definitely no media access to the accused.

This is going to be a farce and the more people who allow it, the harder it will hit everyone including them (and they'll whine that they never expected the leopard to eat their face).

And of course the MAGA faithful don't want to see this, so they attempt to suppress it.

I have to wonder, when does it finally dawn on some people that they're on the wrong side of history? I guess for some the realisation never comes, I'm willing to bet some died in the wool German and Italian fascists went to their graves still believing they made the right choice supporting Hitler and Mussolini long after their downfalls.

Comment Re:Having a laugh? (Score 1) 52

You might want to read up on how economists talk about supply/demand graphs. They have to offer me enough to make taking the job be better than my next best alternative (which might be sitting on my duff flaming on the Interwebs). If I have no skills and few opportunities, yes, that's going to be starvation wages. But the vast majority of people do have options so any employer has to out-bid the next best choice.

Without a minimum wage the floor drops out of your next-best-choices and large chunks of the population end up on starvation wages. This isn't a theoretical issue you need to estimate with graphs, it can be seen in practice in jurisdictions with extremely low or nonexistent minimum wages, or even in first-world gig work.

I do not believe that is the case. Standards of living consistently rose in England throughout the industrial revolution. I just read a book by Don Boudreaux and Phil Gramm which has an entire chapter documenting this.

That makes sense, you don't believe that's the case because you just voluntarily and uncritically filled your head with a warm load of grifty bullshit "documented" by a couple of right-wing lobbyists. If you'd ever read a real history book focusing on workers' standards of living in that period, the way that the propaganda book you hopefully didn't pay for flew in the face of it would've set off some alarm bells. Here's something to get you started: https://www.crei.cat/wp-conten...

Did you live through the '70s? I did. Life is immeasurably better now for everyone but the homeless guy on the corner. The wage stagnation myth is just that created by twisting statistics (e.g. ignoring transfer payments).

Look at the median home price vs. median salary in the '70s vs. now and the homeless guy might look like the only person who hasn't been totally hosed. It's the same for education costs, two things conveniently left out of inflation measures. Accounting for transfer payments doesn't change the picture either:

https://equitablegrowth.org/sl...

Tell me about it. I got laid off from my cushy high-tech job and spent 13 months trying to land a new gig. I lost count of how many applications and interviews I went through. High tech and software job markets are in a world of hurt right now.

So you know, and at the same time think that most anyone who wants a job has one right now? How does that work?

I have no doubt working in a Nigerian nickel mine sucks ass. But just like other sweatshops going back to the aforementioned dark satanic mills, you have to ask, why are people working there? Because it beats the alternative. The long term answer is to make Nigeria and Haiti (to pick two examples) more productive so they generate wealth, not make hiring people so expensive the employers all leave. And that's my point: yes some regulation can help some people in the short run. If it makes hiring people too expensive relative to their output, the jobs will leave and everyone left behind will be worse off.

People were often forced into the earliest mills because the (once popular) alternative, farming the commons and telling business owners to fuck off with their hellhole factories, was conveniently taken away. The alternative that people are choosing work over is usually not a lower-paying job but the threat of homelessness and starvation often worsened by the very business interests they're forced to work for.

Productivity alone won't do anything for workers, both the industrial revolution and the last half-century in the first world are proof of that. If you're worried about employers leaving for cheaper labor costs, good luck competing with every Chinese political prisoner.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Antiques being melted down 2

A restoration expert in Egypt has been arrested for stealing a 3,000 year old bracelet and selling it purely for the gold content, with the bracelet then melted down with other jewellery. Obviously, this sort of artefact CANNOT be replaced. Ever. And any and all scientific value it may have held has now been lost forever. It is almost certain that this is not the first such artefact destroyed.

Comment Re:Safety reasons (Score 1) 153

Gas stoves/ovens are being banned around the world, to prevent houses catching fire. It's a very rare event but electric heating is much less dangerous. This means everyone needs a portable gas-stove or barbecue stove (and lamp) for the stormy/windy season.

Erm... Citation needed on that ban sparky.

Gas stoves are still commonplace here in the UK and in many other nations... We just have standards on installation and maintenance so that houses don't catch fire and guess what, houses aren't burning down left, right and centre over here.

We also have this thing called "reliable power"... That means you don't need to keep a portable stove or lamp for a time where there is a prolonged power outage because we don't have regular prolonged power outages. Now before you rush off and find that time where parts of Spain were without power for several days last year (or was it the year before) the fact you can so easily find articles for it, is proof that it is a very rare event, not a regular occurance (also in the UK, the gas network is independent of the power network, so in the event of an outage my gas stove will still work).

That being said, I prefer electric for cooking as it gives you much more fine grained and accurate temperature control. It's a shame it's more expensive than gas, but thems the breaks. Electricity is really one of the worst ways to provide heating or cooling.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It is easier to fight for principles than to live up to them." -- Alfred Adler

Working...