Comment Re:Taxes (Score 1) 75
in the long run
Thanks for making my point for me there bro
in the long run
Thanks for making my point for me there bro
Yeah, and even native stuff is super bloated now.
I noticed an instance of Brave with all of the features turned off sitting at a new tab page was using 230MB.
I remember doing OK with a version of Firefox that supported xhtml and JavaScript 2 that ran on a machine with 16MB of RAM total.
And the current browsing experience isn't somehow instantaneous on a CPU with 16x the cores running at 10x the clock. The user response time is about the same.
I think that browser itself ran in 4-8MB. Probably with the Flash plugin loaded too.
FWIW that old machine would take about 15 minutes to encode a 3 minute mp3 file and my current machines does it in about six seconds. So the hardware gains are real.
Maybe ML will actually be able to find some optimizations that are too cumbersome for humans to manage.
Did you think we were the 'only surviving industrial infrastructure' until the 80s?
I'm going to go ahead and assume bad faith on your part, because otherwise you're very stupid. But nobody in your potential audience is stupid enough to believe there aren't lasting effects to being bombed to shit.
I take your point about this being before the dawn of ubiquitous tech companies, but what kind of chilling effect did the Bell monopoly have?
Do you wear your mask while driving, too??
Do you think about me when you're jerking off, too? I know you do.
It would take an AI to not get bored trying to construct working configs for SElinux
Perhaps you did not buy a Tesla. They are probably the most service-hostile vehicle ever sold in the US. Not sure about the UK, I haven't heard stories (horror or otherwise) about service for Chinese EVs yet. They would have to try really hard to be worse than Tesla, though.
Google xkcd extrapolate
s/best/only/
No, I remember owning a calculator watch with phone directory because I could never remember phone numbers, outside of a few I used all the time. Then I got a cellphone and now I don't need to wear a watch.
Simp harder
Wouldn't building GPS into vapes make them much more expensive, especially for something that doesn't work inside buildings? That being said, Google does a fairly good job of triangulating your position from nearby WiFi access points, but WiFi would be even more expensive than GPS.
TFS says the vape would use Bluetooth to connect with the phone/app. The vape won't work w/o the app, so they'd build any extra functionality into the app, like ads, tracking and geo-fencing. See my other post Why stop there?
Move the vape too far away from the phone, and it shuts off again.
If the vape is going to be app-locked, then the app can be (a) tracked and (b) geo-fenced. Establishments/locations can post if they allow vaping and the (nanny) app can track where you are and disable the vape if it's prohibited. Marketing bonus: The app will probably be running a lot, so the data it could collect could be HUGE.
Maybe someday Aptera will manage to get off the ground.
With three wheels? No doubt they will, insert clip of Reliant Robins here
You people have gone insane.
Stop trying to control every atom of existence and every move people make.
You're sick in the head, not visionaries, not thought leaders.
Go plant a garden and get back in touch with the real world.
No, NOT FARMVILLE!
Your mode of life will be changed to EBCDIC.