Comment Re: And this is news why? (Score 1) 16
Yeah, but not the old Delhi.
Yeah, but not the old Delhi.
Ok bot.
No monopoly is required for them to violate the law.
That's true even in the US, not that we enforce antitrust law here.
And you've made your own non-anonymous coward comment. You're afraid to not be a cuck for corporations.
Meta has offices and employees in Ireland, so was this simply an oversight or is there some reason Meta would benefit from or prefer Catherine Connolly not winning?
The Luddites didn't want to ban technology.
They wanted The People to share in the benefits, not just the capitalists (who have all the investment capital.)
You are still falling for and propagating anti-Luddite PR over a century old.
After that, there may be mass disease spreading in livestock which could severely affect our food supply.
You will eat nothing and like it.
Or, you know, starve.
Now do the calculations with a non-swasticar.
Tesla is worst at service of all US automakers, who wants to be chained to them?
Fold 1: Trump believes if he pushes hard enough he can be "The President that took us back to the moon." And his ego absolutely refuses to believe that credit will go to any other president, so SpaceX's timelines slipping past 2027 is a possibility that is absolutely unacceptable.
And I'm betting he'll definitely want something gold that says Trump to be put on the Moon. He's in a build large/expensive legacy things, that we won't be able to easily undo mode, like the new White House ballroom (which may be proceeding illegally) and proposed "Arc de Trump" (officially, "Triumphal Arch") in DC. Tick-tock, time's running out...
I don't buy the implicit implication that because it's old it's not as good as new
There's been a lot of progress in programming languages in the last 60 years.
To be fair, the problem isn't simply because the language is old.
> Why? Absolutely no idea
This isn't surprising to anybody who's studied the psychology of political science.
Those who identify as 'conservative' value maintenance much higher than those who identify as 'progressive'. You're more likely to see them in their driveway changing their oil and measuring their tire tread depth. It's just different kinds of people with different time-preference mindsets.
Note that with a limited budget maintenance spending is money that cannot be spent on immediate benefits.
You need to allocate some of the benefits money to upgrading the IT systems so there's less to hand out. "How could you possibly cut their benefits?" is the kind of misplaced empathy that undercuts the system that they feel is valuable.
Of course there's usually a Federal bailout in the wings for people who don't plan ahead so the incentive systems are all completely misaligned for good governance. Since the Lockdowns we've seen the weaponization of the Dollar through sanctions and tariffs that have pushed world oil markets to the Yuan and cross-border settlements in sovereign currency exchanges, so the Dollar is in freefall compared to commodities which means those bailouts are going to end very soon.
As this reckoning becomes too real to ignore the populations will move strongly to vote for candidates who seem to understand the value of maintenance.
A small percentage of Americans could barely get used to cab over vans
Driving a cab over is not hard. We got a diesel pusher bus where you're way further out in front of the front axle than that, and the only adjustment really is turning a little later. You get reasonably used to it in short order. If you don't have to deal with an 8' vehicle in a 10' wide lane (yeah they're meant to be 12' but then there's bridge crossings and such) then I bet it's not even scary.
Yeah, and Healthcare is 20% of GDP.
According to Keynesian economists, if we were all much healthier the economy would be worse off.
I'm not sure how much more evidence you need that the entire economic school is a bunch of self-styled money-priests making excuses for government spending.
Keynes did some really good early work but then he got caught diddling kids and after that the King's spending was all the best thing anybody could do.
An early version of "trust the experts".
So the code was written by people who aren't familiar with the idea of "fail-safe"?
I might have gone to school for software engineering but I never equated it with building a bridge at 4000' over a canyon. Those are different things.
But none of my classmates would have thought about building a stack that fails into random or dangerous conditions. We always built from the ground up and verified states as new functionality was added with test evaluation of the possible error states.
And those classes were in C++89 without the advantages of proper exception handling like Java or Python provide.
I think if I were in the market for a $5000 IoT mattress I'd want to see something like a UL label on it. I guess the hardware guys put in a thermal switch so the heating elements shut off at 110*F? Thank goodness a runaway fire wasn't a failure mode.
I wouldn't personally ever spend that kind of money on something like that but if I were rich and disabled maybe there would be use cases.
I thought that systemd was created to boot faster by starting daemons in parallel.
That's a feature of systemd, but it's also a feature of other systems which predate its adoption, so it's not actually a change for most users.
Memories of you remind me of you. -- Karl Lehenbauer