The fun part of it is that the hydrogen enters and leaves the rocket in exactly the same form; it's simply there to function as a working gas for the lithium fluoride.
I'm actually somewhat of a fan of metalized propellants, although that one is certainly extreme.
floaters to arise to the surface
Well, that is kinda by definition. And worse, the candidates are a true reflection of the public. The 95% reelection rate confirms that.
He's already super-rich. He's seventy fucking years old.
So are Mick Jagger and Paul McCartney, but they still go on stage to perform. The man loves the lights and cameras, he's certainly not doing anything "different" with his life. He made a TV show. He very successfully turned "Election 2016" into a Trump Productions LLC pageant, and it's a smash hit all over the world. But even more fun to watch is the panic attack the democrats (voters, not the party) are suffering, especially over the third party vote. It only reveals their own weakness and insecurity.
If you actually believe pro-gamergaters were acting badly en masse, then all I have to ask you is what flavor was the koolaid?
But that's my point. I don't think that either side was acting badly en masse.
So you died on Mars, how did that benefit anyone else?
Mars needs biomass
(In fact, I don't think my life's ever been in mortal danger at all, unless there was some close call somewhere that I was never even aware of.)
You've been on a highway, right?
Anyone? Even people who put 100+ hours into the game? It shouldn't take that long to determine that the game doesn't live up to expectations.
Oh my dear god, not this all over again? We discussed this here already, and it's been discussed why that's wrong. Please go back to the prior discussion and read about it.
No citations or evidence to support my viewpoint. Such a shame common sense isn't.
No, it is. You've just explained why nobody is taking you seriously. There's nothing to support your viewpoint. It's common sense to ignore it until such time as there is. He's useful tp Russia even if he does nothing but speak occasionally and rile us up, keep us arguing amongst ourselves. If he gets caught being involved in espionage then he loses all credibility, and it's easy to leak information in that fashion. It makes more sense to assume that they're just using him to nettle us.
Everyone benefits if each group can have Nationalism, and preserve itself.
Well, that suggests the question of whether each group can have nationalism and preserve itself, especially when a number of them clearly have directly opposing ideals and want to inhabit the same space. I submit that nationalism is bad for both the Zionists and the Palestinians. Absent their irrational bullshit beliefs, of which the nationalistic ones are only part, they could live together — and they'd probably both benefit from throwing away the dumb parts of their cultures even if they didn't do that. That doesn't make them unique in the world, they're just currently an extremely visible case study.
Evolution tells us that different environments create selection pressure for/against different traits, which causes species to differentiate into distinct haplogroups or entirely different species.
Science tells us that "species" as a term is highly overrated and grossly misunderstood. But by no definition are different kinds of humans anywhere near to being different species. You might describe them as different varieties, at most.
Most everyone agrees that modern humans left Africa and spread throughout the world between 50,000 - 100,000 years ago. Now if I were to take any other animal, say a canid, and stick a bunch of them in northern europe and a bunch of them in Africa and then ask if you if it's possible that after 100,000 years we'd get very different animals descended from the common ancestors, you'd agree.
The things about them that needed to change will have changed. The things that didn't mostly won't.
But if that animal is man instead of a dog you'd call me an evil racist to suggest that perhaps the cold climates of northern europe selected against those humans who weren't intelligent enough to make long-term plans while the year-round abundance of food in Africa selected against the weak and slow but not against the unintelligent.
That's because it's an unintelligent argument. Intelligence is good for you no matter what your situation, and strength and speed don't preclude intelligence. Also, stupid people have intelligent children, and vice versa.
For instance, in the United States the average IQ for blacks is 85, 92 for Latinos, 100 for whites, 108 for asians, and 115 for Ashkenazi Jews. This correlates very well to income levels for each group.
Correlation, he said, is not causation. That's a sophomoric error. Is this just a kiddie troll?
SJWs rarely work that way, opting to mete out their own version of justice by harassing and finding ways to ruin the victims lives by getting them fired, evicted, etc.
While no doubt there's plenty of so-called SJWs who behave that way, those tactics are used a lot more by the dickheads they fight with. You're surprised when they take up those tactics? See: Gamergate.
He's so into pigs he got himself a younger pig
dailycaller's take, slightly more amusing
The troll persists because people keep feeding him.
Honestly, I don't know what has to be wrong in a person's life for them to feel the need to spend their time acting like that. But it's the case for some people. I hope that whatever is wrong, things turn around for them.
He's not "asking" anyone to do anything. It's a simple reality that if there was a mission to Mars coming up shortly and you passed a signup sheet around, and at the top of it was written in large letters "YOU WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY DIE AT SOME POINT DURING THIS TRIP", you'd still get thousands of signatures from people who are utterly thrilled at getting the chance and couldn't give a rat's arse about the risk.
Every program is a part of some other program, and rarely fits.
