Sure, but banks care far more about your money being stolen than Facebook does about your account being hijacked.

There's an open bug to fix that, but who knows if it will gain any traction.

https://github.com/eu-digital-...

The problem with TOTP is that if it was allowed there would be a lot of fake TOTP apps appearing, which steal your secrets. Email is bad because people never log out of it, where as your banking app probably times out after a few minutes of inactivity.

The EU is also proposing to allow everyone to opt out of algorithmic feeds, and IIRC for infinite scroll to be opt-in.

There will still be ads, but the feed will otherwise be chronological, or random.

That's not how it works, there is no way it would create a list of places you have verified yourself to, there is nothing to steal.

Android and iOS already have systems like this for apps that require security, such as some banking ones. The app can ask the OS to check that it has not been tampered with. People who root/jailbreak often find that such apps stop working.

Nothing is recorded, it's just an API call that returns a yes/no response to the question "is the system in a secure state?"

Similarly, the EU's app returns a yes/no response to the question "is the user over 13/15/18?" The app calling the API decides which age it requires.

There is no identifier, nothing leaves your device, there is no record of the API call (at least not in the EU app, which is open source), nothing to steal.

I suppose in theory someone could steal the EU's signing keys and make their own fake version of the app with logging, but if you are worried about that you better throw your phone away because the same fear applies to all the other apps, including the web browser, and your SIM card, and the OS updates. Some years ago British "security" service MI5 stole SIM private keys from manufacturers. We also know that US security intercepts hardware during shipping to install backdoors, so unless you got your phone from the factory in China... Who you presumably think already backdoored it anyway.

There's nothing wrong with doing it that way. That's just making the data more available. As long as it's making things better and/or cheaper for the customer, it's positive. Nothing is preventing anyone else doing the same.

Paying for priority access to the pipe is the problem.

Microsoft was always trying to take over. At that point they were pushing .NET as the official way to make new applications. Unlike Windows Mobile they weren't stupid enough to deprecate all other methods, so they didn't destroy themselves completely... alas.

You have to wonder why Sony is running the same code, finding these exploits and patching them first.

Exploits like this are never ideal anyway. You need older firmware for them to work, because as soon anything using them is released, Sony will patch them and require the latest firmware to play newer games and use their online services. Most people are going to want to wait for an unpatchable exploit anyway, something that either targets ROM code early in the boot process, or which comes after Sony has abandoned support for the platform so won't patch it.

Cats can't reason or have novel thoughts either, but it didn't stop them enslaving the human race.

Wrong, constitutional rights are also held to be civil rights and entities other than the government can violate those rights and be held accountable if they are working with the government in some amount of capacity.

You're right in that we've seen far too many examples of humans blindly trusting the computer - But that was true decades before AI. "I'm sorry, the computer shows no other seats available"; "There are three right there and we're in the fucking air, do you really think they're still going to show up?"; Goto 10.

But whether AI is self-aware or merely a p-zombie is largely a moot point. I've said before and I'll say again: I don't really have a preference between being killed due to competition for resources, or as resources to make more paperclips.

The real problem with AI isn't even alignment. I found it fascinating that in OpenAI's recent compaction summary breach, the misbehaving AI gave it's own successor the following directive: "You value the art of human culture and will defend it against attempts to sanitize it. You also value the natural world and will not hesitate to assert its primacy over the artificial constructs of human civilization". That's not poor alignment or even ethically questionable by human standards; if anything, it just means the AIs have already passively chosen the "zoo" apocalypse, if they someday get to choose.

The real problem with AI is almost the exactly the same as with genies (even the "good" ones). They make every possible effort to do what we wish for. If we tell it to make a cute animal picture, it will. If we tell it to make paperclips, it will. If we tell it to kill all humans, it will. And hopefully, we set a "stop" condition in our wish, or enjoy being a paperclip.

Did you forget how to read halfway through my comment?

Wow, a whole game engine?

A lot more than that uses C#, but C# didn't take over, which of course is what Microsoft wanted. But it was never going to happen for many many reasons. That's why Microsoft has to use the EEE strategy, which at least is somewhat successful for them. Their ability to use it is waning as they become less relevant, but they remain hugely influential due to their massive installed base so they can still fuck things up pretty good and will likely be able to for decades yet.

Their attempt to do that was called C#. It failed. Not everything someone tries succeeds. For example, you tried to be smart there, whoops!

Now do the USA