Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: It’s a bit charitable to say (Score 0) 33

Google has reduced the value of Gemini to near zero with their web search Gemini results. If you search for anything that you know things about, you rapidly see that it doesn't know shit about shit. They say that those results are produced with an inferior version of Gemini that's cheaper to run. Well, guess what? It just makes them look like incompetent assholes every time anyone who knows anything does a web search.

Comment Re:Maybe Apple would be more enterprise friendly? (Score 1) 33

Apple HAD servers and enterprise management. Then they discontinued it.

Yeah, there are corporate customers fed up with Microsoft. But they won't trust Apple after two rug pulls. They'd go to Linux first. Apple could do those things and STILL not be successful, after they poisoned their own well. Again, twice.

Comment Re:No (Score 1) 50

Xenix was $500, which was the standard price for major software back in the day.

Windows 3.1 debuted at $149. OS/2 2.1 was $249, so for $400 you could get both OS/2 and Windows 3.1, and run software for both. There was approximately no desktop software for Xenix, and most people didn't have enough machine to run X11 gracefully anyway, which took a LOT more RAM than Windows 3.1 and a bit more than OS/2. So, no, and also no.

I think the bigger reason Unix never took off in the PC mass market is that there was no reason for it.

There were lots of good reasons for it. It was a superior OS on all levels. But the prices were absurdly higher than the competition. Consequently it only got picked up to do big jobs were reliability really mattered, like run the POS at McDonalds, or delivery routing and tracking systems (I worked briefly for a company called ADAQ which sold such a system for SCO Xenix.) There was nothing you could do to make DOS reliable enough for multiple users; if you wanted one system with terminals, Xenix was a rational choice.

Comment Re:So this is about Tesla stock (Score 1) 103

This is known as a false choice. It is also incorrect, buying gasoline does, in fact, support a nicer sort of oligarchs. There is no more malignant sociopath than Elon Musk

Just because you aren't seeing the oil barons' personalities, that doesn't mean that they aren't even worse than Leon's. It only means that they are either smart enough not to be in public, or disinterested enough in us peons that they don't interact with us. They don't care if they set the whole world on fire in order to live a life close to kings, they are simply not better people.

Comment Re:A lot of hype, pump and dump !! (Score 1) 35

Based "we have huge sums of money to throw at AI, and most if it will be wasted but if we buy into the next Google early enough we can become trillionaires."

X-energy is probably a scam. Their website gives it away: https://x-energy.com/xe-100/

A little 80MWe reactor, obvious lie about the land use requirements. It needs a water pump to avoid melting down, so it's "intrinsically safe" design is clearly bollocks. Hilariously they claim that their SMR is "economically viable" while others are not. Their FAQ on load following gives the game away too - they use 40% as the low point for ramping, i.e. it can't integrate well into a modern grid.

Of course they don't have a working prototype and don't seem to have any credible timescale for building one. Certainly no licence in place.

Slashdot Top Deals

Do you guys know what you're doing, or are you just hacking?

Working...