Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Possibly (Score 1) 88

emotion-based fear mongering can be successfully countered with rational fact based counter arguments. I strongly disagree will all of that.

That always happens when you mistake fact-based rationality for partisan persuasion.

The problem with your arguments is that you love one party too much, and can't accept the reality that both parties are lying mud sacks, filled with leaches and clinger-ons and occassionally a man of wild ambition, including yours.

Comment Re: Buy the book not the t-shirt ... (Score 1) 165

Talking to your steaming cup again I see. Though if it has maggots in it, that means you're reheating it. Why would you do that? If anything, heating kills off the parasites you have such a soft spot for. And why wait for the maggots at all, especially considering they usually eat those same parasites?

Comment Further live reporting from the ceremony (Score 1) 52

After signing the executive document, the room was in a good mood. At that time a reporter asked the illustrious orange leader what he hoped to achieved from Artemis.

The great orator replied, "Our dame? Big plans. 'Ar dame's gonna the moon and then Our eye on land, show Our Anne what for."

The room was silent, but the good mood was hardly diminished.

Comment Re: The long-term impact of this on the US (Score 0) 186

Citation required for every single thing you said.

No evidence I benefited from past nastiness any more or any less than any person alive today. The direct descendants of slaves are long-dead and the last people to come of age under institutional racial segregation in this country are past retirement.

No evidence the bag of crazy one finds in Robin DeAngelo (read her work, I did, and there's literally elementary school logic mistakes on every page), Ibram Kendi, or their many copycats actually does any good to anyone other than the consultants pocketing fees for their diversity training services.

Also no evidence that saying land acknowledgements ad nauseum, renaming columbus day, or prefacing all your statements with a header packet listing your ancestry and supposed guilt has the power to reach back in time and undo the slave trade or innoculate the natives against smallpox.

Comment Re: The long-term impact of this on the US (Score 1, Insightful) 186

Scientists are fallible humans the way everyone else is. And my personal observation is that academic science is a magnet for several particular human failings.

At its best, the intentionally adversarial nature of the scientific process (in experiment, nature is your adversary; in publication your peers are your adversary) separates the wheat from the chaff.

At its worst (when money and personal reputation and prestige are on the line), it's far easier to go along to get along, get the grant, get the publication, get the recommendation letter. And bad ideas fester.

There are a lot of bad ideas festering in American universities. Not least of which is the idea that having the letters PhD after your name qualifies you to opine on $current_events with unquestioned solomonic wisdom regardless of whether you have any expertise in the subject or whether your next grant is riding on a particular direction of public opinion.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Necessity is the mother of invention" is a silly proverb. "Necessity is the mother of futile dodges" is much nearer the truth. -- Alfred North Whitehead

Working...