I am not arguing for no sweet stuff at all. I am arguing for no sweetened stuff and making "sweet" the exception not the rule. For example, fresh fruit with a lot of sugar because it is very ripe is fine, bit only if consumed in moderation. And having ice-cream once or twice a month is not a problem either. But sweet stuff every day, every meal is not fine. And making that "sweet" effect artificial does not solve the problem at all, even though many people apparently think it does. A bit of self-discipline goes a long way here.

Of course, as society is so pervaded with "sweet", some things get more difficult. For example, if I want cake, I have to bake myself because what you can buy has so much sugar I find it utterly disgusting.

Last time most of the people in the high risk group didn't even consume it ...

Arguably that's what America is doing to China, with the insane focus on AI. China is desperate to get the technology.

Compare that to Europe, where they are just calmly waiting.

To begin with, the poster hasn't figured out the basic concept of "topic sentence" and "supporting sentences." The poster isn't able to use simple punctuation. Factually, the poster thinks the future is Optane. Why not Niagara? Structurally the post is untied.

As for you, frankly I think you might be braindead. But don't let that stop you from posting.

Sad as that is, I agree. I am not calling for violent suppression or anything like that, but they were intellectually tolerated and their deranged views and denial of reality and Science were seen as valid stances and they were not called out on it. And now a very high price for that failure of the rest of the population has come due.

And when you look a bit closer, your mindless comment mostly goes out the window. Because the human body neither produces nor craves this crap to any significant degree.

That one's easy. Without data centers, I would have to use a paper map. I'd have to do my own calculations on a calculator. I'd be back in the lifeless 80s.

Without agriculture, I'd be dead.

Indeed. A bit more insight required. For those that need a clearer argument, I recommend looking at the effects of some entirely natural cyanides.

In a more general sense, this mental failure comes from people that only can do correlation but fail at causation most times. Which, unfortunately, is most of the human race.

It takes a bit of getting used to it, but all forms of sugar and sweeteners are problematic. And they are often used to cover product defects like low-quality ingredients on top of that, making things even worse.

If only the interface was the hard part.

Enough people just have enough of this crap. The Chinese can stand back, watch and enjoy the show.

Nope. Everything, literally everything Trump does is a bad idea and badly executed. There is nothing he does well these days. He used to be at least a good scam artists, and he got away with raping children for a long time, but even those skills seem to be not working so well anymore.

Sure, the cultists think he will herald a golden age, but one look at what is actually going on reveals that he cannot even get basic things right. Kakistocracy at its best.

Well, lets be fair. Trump is an excellent example how you can utterly ruin a prosperous nation in just a few years and how stupid and disconnected the MAGAs are. So he and his incapable and repulsive followers can at least serve as a good story for the history books how it can all go wrong.

That is the "Trump Deficit", not the US one. I think filling his coffers is about the only thing he does that seems to actually work to a degree. Kakistocracy at work.

I am not sure this will even work as get-rich-quick. It will certainly do nothing else for the foreseeable future.

Graduation test will be the ability to pass the basic cognitive function test twice! Perfect qualification for colonizing Mars togetehr with the space-NAZI.