Comment Re:The Oxford comma makes the difference (Score 1) 19
Yep, if there's one thing that needs fighting, it's those pesky lower gas prices.
Well, you have to admit they've done a darn good job of fighting them so far!
Yep, if there's one thing that needs fighting, it's those pesky lower gas prices.
Well, you have to admit they've done a darn good job of fighting them so far!
Is ChatGPT Changing How You're Writing?
No, it's not changing how I write. I don't actually like the long-winded prose these AI agents spit out. I typically end up completely rewriting it, on the rare occasions that I use it at all.
However I do share the OP's affection for the Oxford comma.
Whenever autocorrect inserts an m-dash in place of a short dash, I always undo it. I hate m-dash.
Most current Jew population on the planet are Nazis, you realize that? Right?
Oh, you want to nitpick about the fact that the "National Socialist Party of Germany" does no longer exist?
Nazi is a neologism for: racist, fascist
Gamma rays and neutrons do not accumulate at the poles.
As if the world's problems are unrelated to each other.
The two articles were probably written by two different ghost-writers.
AI isn't actually smart. It's an at best average intelligence thing with an insane amount of available knowledge. Like the village idiot with eidetic memory.
As soon as you do any work with AI that's not available as a ready-to-apply solution from its training data, you begin to notice how much you need to correct it, keep it on track, remind it of basic constraints you already mentioned five times, etc. - it's performing at a level I'd accept from an intern, but not from a co-worker.
What it does have is data. Tons of data. Any question that would take you and me half an hour on Google and Wikipedia to answer it can answer in 10 seconds. That's a great tool. It is not intelligence, however.
How is this "news that matter"?
Bill Gates is an old man who has zero AI credentials and has long ago become irrelevant. Not to mention his previous predictions of future developments are not exactly brilliant.
Yeah, that comes from sitting on the lap of a passenger pressing her chest into his face, while he has a phone at his ear: her own fault!
you think people don't fly over Russia because of some war, whereas in reality you don't fly over Russia because most of the world recognises the earth isn't flat, and a trans polar route is often the fastest and cheapest way to get across the northern hemisphere.
Most flights currently going over the pole: would go via Russia. For example Tokyo - London.
Russia has banned the air space for western airlines since the war. And the Asian ones: follow example and avoid the airspace, too.
So, for your example of flying over the pole, you need specific routes where it makes sense. Which are not many.
Simple cloth does not shield anyway.
To shield an airplane you probably would need a magnetic field, no idea how practical that could be put onto a passenger pane, though.
lol
Welcome to the 21st century, you might have to catch up on a few things. Start with Mozilla Media Engine and AVFoundation / WebKit Media Stack.
Your website sends me an H.264 stream (or whatever you decided you'll use). It doesn't need to know shit about my graphics hardware.
They're building quite the Duck Dynasty.
In the EU the trend is going to on device or "on prep".
Actually: you only need to click "oaky" when the pop-up pops up and tells you: "this software was downloaded from an unauthorized source" - "so you want to run it anyway?"
The exact process varies a bit from OS to OS.
Experience varies directly with equipment ruined.