If an insult intended to cause someone to lose status is factual, is it then legal? If so, that helps somewhat but doesn't address the base issue of freedom of speech, especially since it depends on an impartial judiciary.

You're right. It does not matter. Whether someone thinks it is true is of no consequence, if you are not free to insult others then you do not have free speech.

I am not sure what will cause nvidia to "die". They're still the best at what they do and AI/LLMs aren't going to evaporate, it's far too useful. I can definitely see them having lay offs though.

Nobody makes better hardware for this than Nvidia. Nobody makes better software architecture for it either. Their graphics drivers keep getting worse, but the percentage of their income which comes from graphics keeps falling so that makes sense. It is quite unfortunate for those of us depending on them, of course, but makes all the sense in the world right now.

Hint: it's not a dollar amount

That's exactly what you're doing when you claim insulting people is not free speech. Just in case you haven't read the thread you're "contributing" to, that is exactly what you are doing. If you don't understand why insults can be free speech, then you must be still be mad that people said mean things about Hitler.

This isn't going to affect you at all. Statistically nobody not working on KVM cares about this. It's almost exclusively just going to make KVM development easier. There is no reason why this should have hit the front page.

I wasn't arguing about the procedure, so no, I am not mistaken in any way.

Yeah, came to say something like this. This is offensive at best. 50k is poors money in NY or CA or frankly any of the developed parts of literally any other state.

Compliance fines and civil asset forfeiture. Charge the old people on a fixed income who cannot afford to repaint their house fines which they can't pay, which you roll into property taxes which they now cannot pay, which you use as pretext to steal their home.

No, you just don't understand it.

The vast majority does not even look into candidates' positions on CAF. They literally do not care if anyone is stealing old people's homes.

That was before Tim Cook crossed Donald Jehosaphat Trump's palm with silver^Wgold.

No, Apple is not better than this.

When you're arguing about whether the problem is worse in US or Germany, you're admitting there's a problem.

Formally, what's happening in Germany where you can't express your opinion that someone is bad is destruction of free speech.

They aren't, but just calling someone names is slander in Germany, where in the US it's an expression of opinion. Also, in the US fact is an absolute defense against slander and libel. It doesn't matter if your intent is to cause someone financial harm, for example; if you are doing it with facts then it's legal, because expressing facts is legal.

It's not about free speech, it's about speech I don't agree with!

Clown.

Please look at the link I gave. The link is using estimates for all externalities. Everything you are concerned about is being taken into account.

This isn't US specific. South Korea and France have had a lot of successful use of nuclear power. And if you look at different types of power and the negative externalities they produce, nuclear power is very low. See https://janrosenow.substack.com/p/the-bill-we-never-see for a good run down of the different power types and their actual costs.