Comment Re:So much for do no evil (Score 1) 20
There are 640 acres in a square mile
[Sighs in metric]
There are 640 acres in a square mile
[Sighs in metric]
That's right, chum. Cutting down trees can bring the wolves down on a village.
When will these villains learn that actions have consequences?
The proper response to being in an area where datacentres are crowding in is "lobby your elected officials to increase property taxes and not give out tax increment financing deals". Tax everything, and tax it well. They'll stop building new datacentres in your area, and the ones that are there will (unless they were given a long-term sweetheart deal beyond your already-low tax rates) start being cash cows for your area.
I'm sorry, I don't buy this story from the police agencies that these guys didn't have permission. If you can log into a system, then you have permission to access that system. That's the whole point of the login process: to determine who can authenticate and authorize usage of a system.
No. Per the Computer Fraud And Abuse Act, exceeding your authorization (even if you have legal access to a system) is a crime. Access and authorization are not the same thing.
Just because you can do a thing does not mean you have permission to do so.
a car analogy: Having a key to your former employers company truck does not mean you have authorization to take it for a drive. Even if they forgot to get the key back when you quit, that is still grand theft auto.
There is a really good case that public sector unions should not exist and I am generally a pro-union type of person but the dynamics of public vs private sector just don't make sense, the negative factors unions try to correct for are already baked into statutes. Police unions really bear a good portion of the negative opinions law enforcement has today.
It is common for police officers who leave the force voluntarily to retain their data access credentials. For years. Decades in some cases. As long as they do not offend someone high-ranking, they keep their police access to search records. Quite a few Private Investigators go their whole career misusing former police access to databases.
Once an official credential is in the system, it is there until revoked -not until the officer leaves the force. The databases are not tied to an individual police force, and it is common for credentialed officers to move to another police force. Think of it like a security clearance -you need a reason to get one, but it can follow you to a new posting. There is not a well managed revocation process for police access credentials.
If you see that, they are usually friends.
Knowing each other long time.
I saw a raven stealing food from a bald eagle. Pulling his tail feathers, the eagle did not even get angry. He just stepped back after pull #3 or #4 and let the Raven eat the rest of the fish.
I always keep this in mind when getting into arguments over monitor refresh rates. The average person cannot percieve motion at the rates some people claim.
The monitor refresh rate is associated to mouse curser aka cross hair.
And yes, we can perceive "motion of an enemy" much better if the refresh rate is higher.
Does a movie look better if the refresh rate is higher? Nope.
But if we play a game where my game engine is at 200 Hz and yours is at 60Hz: I kill you one shot every time I spot you.
I mean Republicans have always been MMT believers, debt don't matter. Remember boaters for Trump? Bring-On-Another-Trillion. I'll see myself out.
We need to get to the moon before the Democrats put it in school and then trans it! Also there are illegal immigrants on the moon that need to be deported, Joe Biden put them there himself!
Please one more time fall for the only two scaremongering issues we have left!
Really, you don't see any difference between Elon Musk and, say, John Stankey? Is John Stankey actively transforming the US into an autocratic fascist-adjacent state?
Would you buy from a company called Plantations Inc which proudly advertises that all of its products are made by daily-whipped slaves? Are there no limits to how self-focused you are in your consumption?
It's one thing to say "this particular issue isn't mine, so I'm only going to think amount myself". It's an entirely different issue to have no moral bounds.
Is the argument here really "EV's don't work because I can;t currently take one to my cabin in the bush 400mi away?" Is it 2009 again all over?
Your good nature will bring you unbounded happiness.