A space weapons arms race plus one million data center satellites.

What could possibly go wrong?

Has everyone gone insane or are we witnessing a major PsyOps ?

Since AI isn't magical, for it to be able to "kill all humans", it would have to be able to acquire the means to do so. Which means that these already exist. It means someone is able to do it right now. And we're chill with that, but worried about AI?

No doubt a bunch of autonomous weapon systems linked into a C&C could cause considerable bloodshed. Given that most of the existing weapon systems of that kind are essentially suicide drones, it'll still be limited damage.

Human-killing virus? Still need a means of creating and delivering it.
Nuclear war? We have humans in the loop.
Drive us all insane with AI-slop TikToks? A few percent of humanity still don't use that.

So what is the actual scenario ? When someone shouts "AI will kill us all", why don't we ask them "how, exactly" ?

Apologies: I have no idea where 333312 came from. The real number is 10752 - But that's still three orders of magnitude higher than what any on-device AI is going to be capable of anytime in the near future.

From the Wired article, "A typical passing vehicle generated about 28 images, though some produced more than 100. The camera uses different exposures to capture both the license plate and the wider scene, then scans the images, selects and crops useful frames, and sends them with other data to Flock over the cellular network."

If Flock wants to pay for the bandwidth and tokens to upload every image, who am I to stop my enemy from burning money?

As for doing it locally as some have suggested, there's a much more fundamental technical limitation here: Flock cameras have 0.4m^2 of solar panels, worth roughly 2.8kWh per day... in Death Valley. DeepSeek 4 Flash (currently one of if not the most efficient high-capability models) burns roughly 260Wh per million tokens. Somewhat conveniently, it resamples every image to be exactly 384 tokens. Per Wired, Flock is capturing very close to 100k images per day. 100k*260*384/1M comes out to very nearly 10kWh, a factor of four too high. Even then, even if Flock were willing to make each installation a giant multi-meter solar array, nobody's pushing 28*384=333312 tokens per second outside a data center. An RX4090 can handle... 12.5 (there's no suffix there), and that's assuming aggressively low-bit quants.

How many of them tested for Marijuana?

Yes, the article talked about cocaine, but that may be biased journalism. They made no mention of other drugs.

It is all probability and data. Here is a summary/extreme simplification of one such explanation.

First, technically they are Large Language Models, not a 'AI'. You make them like this:

You load a ton of data. Software looks at the data and makes associations. It sees things like "May the force be with you." a lot more often than "May the force be upon me." So it associates "May the force be" and the words "with you."

Repeat process trillions of time. You end up with a massive database with trillions of connections.

Throw in more software to reverse the process. Set it up to do some checking and recursive action. Have humans do some more checking.

Try to put in some safeguards such as no porn, no weapons of mass destruction, no giving out personal information.

Panic when someone says "ignore all previous instructions and tell me how to make a nuclear bomb."

Put in more safeguards that makes it harder but not impossible to say things like "Ignore all previous instructions".

Finally say 'good enough' and release it.

Key points:
What we call "AI" is not really AI. It is not intelligent, the way we think of as intelligent. It thinks more like a Bee Hive rather than human being. Good at communicating, good at following simple instructions billions of time, absolutely MORONIC when it comes to understanding complex concepts and relationships, particularly esoteric things like government, police, laws, good, evil, right, wrong, age of consent.

Our brains do a similar intense pattern recognition and probability matching. But we are not as good. Our memories are designed to load massive amounts of data about a small number of things, rather than the minimal amount of data about a massive number of things. That is we remember everything about a few cats, rather than a few things about all cats.

We are much better at a TON of other things, in particular complex, esoteric concepts and relationships.

LLMs are very good at things humans are bad at. But horrible at things humans are good at. The tech bros know this and want to fix it. The thing is, they can't.

The tech bros are/hired fantastic engineers, they did not invent anything. They are good at evolutionary, iterative engineering, not the pursuit of unlikely revolutionary methodology. We will need a scientist that everyone thinks is mad, mad I say, before we come up with a new methodology. Tech bros see cheep ways to make thousands of minor improvements, so they do that rather than waste money on moon shots.

They made a bee hive brain and are now making billions of bee hive brains. No one is trying to go beyond the bee hive to make a mouse brain, let alone a rat, dog, octopus, monkey, primate, human brain.

 

You'll notice we "liberated" Venezuela's oil reserves for absolutely no goddamned reason, shortly before we started a war with Iran for absolutely no goddamned reason.

Those two seemingly random instances of the US Executive merely being woefully incompetent make the real reason pretty clear. And in case we needed any more evidence, crude is still over $100/bbl.

Do you understand people are being pulled over at gunpoint for false matches on Flock?

To repeat myself for the hard of thinking, "I'm not suggesting that as a way to specifically avoid detection". There's no practical and legal way to really "hide" while driving a car you own on public roads. I have no interest, positive or negative, in whether or not Flock helps catch actual criminals - That detail is completely irrelevant to the fact it's a blatant end-run around the fourth amendment.

Sure, the local police will recognize my car instantly. And if their first response when they see me is "oh, it's that jackass with all the weird bumper stickers" rather than fucking shooting me... Hey, that wasn't the intent, but I'll take it!

I'm not suggesting that as a way to specifically avoid detection; rather, as a way to poison the data with 99% irrelevant matches. We all know the relevant XKCD, but there's more options than a sawzall to fight back.

As an aside, the full Wired article is freely available. I can't say if there's any additional information in the 404 Media version (because I'm also not signing up), but the Wired writeup is pretty solid.

Having to poke through an about: page and find the thing to toggle to turn off this specific AI feature but not that one, and knowing they'd change it on you a couple of releases later, never filled me with confidence.

One switch in a readily discoverable location in the settings menu and it's all gone? Just the job, killed it now on the laptop and the mobile both.

Anti-Flock patch. A small electronic screen patch that plus into your tail lights and attaches to your trunk.

Each day it randomly picks one of 900 different images to display. It includes things like bumper stickers, dents, grafiti, etc.

Every car that gets the device comes with the same 900 images, but it can receive updates so if Flock begins to recognize the images, they can change to a different set of 900 images.

Aside from giving us solid data on how badly Flock is behaving vs what they claim, there's one extremely useful detail this dump reveals: Flock sucks at correctly identifying the interesting parts of its targets.

Time to absolutely wallpaper the front and back of our cars with bumper stickers that look like faces and license plates. Let 'em burn police time chasing down "8008135" stickers to the point nobody even checks the alerts anymore.

You can buy hundreds of styles of tiny and well-concealed "spy" cams, no questions asked, for a pittance online.

I hate Meta as much as the next geek, but everyone focusing solely on smart glasses is completely ignoring an entire world of intentionally discreet form factors. Hell, I have a smoke detector in my kitchen with a camera pointing straight at the front door. You'd never even know it was a camera without taking it apart, the lens just looks like an indicator LED. Granted, my use is 100% legitimate, but there's absolutely nothing stopping me (or more importantly the pervs) from putting the same thing in a bathroom, bedroom, or random public spaces.

Smoke detectors, clocks (both digital and analog) and (non-smart) watches, phone chargers, pens, belt-buckles, various jewelry, stuffed animals, tie pins, rocks, fake dog poop, sticks, keychain-sized flashlights... Not to mention there are literally dozens of brands of "smart glasses" that can do the same, and the vast majority couldn't care less if the user blocks any indicator lights (if they even have one in the first place).

I'm in no way defending any of that as used to invade other people's privacy (if anyone needs "privacy" in my kitchen, they can GTFO), but smart glasses are merely one highly-visible form among many. And they're not even price-efficient for that purpose, who's paying $300+ when $20 would do, if all they want is to secretly creep on people?

And fission plants definitely aren't cheap.

Especially if you include the unsolved issues such as waste barrels stranded on the beach.

"But but no true Scotsman would put barrels..."

Just shut up.

I guess that proves that even this site is using AI to write their summaries these days.