Nested volumes on TC does this nicely.
Nested volumes on TC does this nicely.
Even if not pushing for extraordinary life extending therapies, it could be that those elderly who have dedicated advocates during their declining years benefit more than those who don't.
I know I fight a losing battle each time I defend being a parent on
It's easy to put down people with kids from the safety of your mothers basement.
well, since my e-mail was in the db (https://haveibeenpwned.com/) I would love a copy of it...
Anyone have a link to it?
Indeed. They recently went to an open plan here...
blacklist teamviewer connections from india?
Yes they can still use proxies, but anything to make their life more difficult... Like this:
And I'll bet there's *tons* of aspects of the job that can be done from home, without violating any contractual obligations.
Do the sensitive stuff 8-5 and do the rest at home.
As someone who's been penalized for trying to use their (former) company's work-life balance programs I am going to assume the little guy's side on this until evidence to the contrary is provided.
charter air freight.
Or regular air freight (but with the HazMat surcharge from the freight company).
They're only banned on passenger aircraft.
T-Mo branded accounts are different then.
I get throttled only near busy cells (based on observation such as: at the mall while lots of other people are there).
Near my house I don't see any throttling at all.
While I'm being throttled my phone is still reporting LTE, but I am seeing speeds drop to about 40-70% of normal.
Unless they inserted it after the build and signing process (which I will agree is certainly possible, though I feel highly improbable) I happen to actually know what is in that blob, what that blob is capable of supporting, and (as of 8 months ago) what the roadmap for that blob is.
The ME is a signed binary.
The chipset has key material fused in at manufacture time.
The ROM on the chipset won't load a binary into the ME hardware that isn't signed in such a way as to match what is in the secure fuses.
*if* a chipset sku series is compromised then yes, you can sign and run external FW on that series, but if it is unsigned it won't load on the hardware.
The driver interface to the ME is the "HECI" or "Intel Manageability Engine Interface" depending on version.
It uses a defined interface to pass messages to the FW from the host side.
Anyone can write a driver for this... Intel published the spec and linux source. The firmware treats it as a hostile interface.
I get the "he's a shill" BS from the ACs, but seriously, I worked on this for 6 years, and while I would certainly load a min sku on my machine if I was concerned about access by a state actor, I personally have no worries about my data on an ME enabled machine.
I no longer work for Intel, I have less than 100 shares of stock left, no incentive to help or hurt them.
If you're truly paranoid about the data access then just use a PCI/e NIC and don't use the on-board LAN. Problem solved.
Well, the way I see it (and from my experience with the firmware) if you *don't* want the active parts of the Intel ME, then just put a min sku (or at least the 1.5 meg version) on your platform. That kills the majority of what people are up in arms about.
That much is easy to do, low risk, and accomplishes what people say they want: disable the active ME content.
I get that there are some that feel that it should *all* be taken off, but seriously, your platform won't be stable without it.
Modern systems run on firmware. The ME aggregates a ton of what used to be little firmwaree pieces and puts them in a common runtime. It's not rocket science.
Things that used to be stand alone (and are all needed for optimum performance, or even boot in some cases):
CPU uCode patch
ACPI support (S3, S4)
and I'm sure I'm forgetting plenty of other stuff that I just didn't even think about on a day to day.
It's the platform firmware version of systemd on linux. (and there are plenty of people that hate it too, so.... )
You mean you didn't *know* she was off making lots of little phone companies?