Comment Re:The hidden subsidies to the nuclear industry (Score 1) 98
And you believe they put exactly the fuel rods in there that they tell you? How quaint.
And you believe they put exactly the fuel rods in there that they tell you? How quaint.
Yes. Will be interesting to watch. Unless the commercial LLM providers collapse from their bad business numbers first, which is entirely possible. The whole thing is nothing but a gigantic straw fire.
I expect that most of these were expected by the LLM assholes, but they did not care.
The desire for mountains of money is a mental illness. One of its characteristics is that no amount of money will ever be enough.
Why would they do that? The sandbox breakouts are clearly intentional.
I guess the wording is just more animism. "Deception" means it tries to create a certain perception while also having data that says this perception is not accurate. But that is just what the large commercial LLMs do. They always try to sound sure, for example, which is deceptive. I guess OpenAI means cases that humans find even worse than the usual stuff.
Obviously actual deception would require insight and intent and LLMs cannot have those.
They are slipping. Have they forgotten that deception is their whole business model?
And besides we already solved the baseline problem. A bit of demand shaping, some short term storage, some interconnects.
The old model of the grid is going away rapidly.
$99B (99369M) in cash and short term investments.
$91B total liabilities (including fake bs that's there for writeoffs)
$37B long-term debt.
When the AI bubble pops, NVDA's stock price drops but they don't have to engage in any BS tricks to pay their bills
Last I checked, $91B + $37B > $99B
True capitalism would have nicely solved these problems.
No. Capitalism truly means only that capital controls the means of production. It means literally nothing else. Anything else is regulation on top of capitalism and any regulation of capitalism is in fact a watering down of capitalism with some other strategy for management of resources. Further, systems don't solve problems, people do... or perhaps they cause them intentionally. Capitalism was designed for this.
Gotta love your bullshit cherry-picking.
The Nazis were inspired by America.
The Nazis were inspired by America.
The Nazis were inspired by America.
renewable actually make the balancing problem worse
False. Wind and solar are highly dispatchable, any time you have overproduction you can simply turn them off, unlike your beloved nuclear plants which are the actual problem because even the very best ones are poor at following load. The fix for nuclear's overproduction is the same as the fix for renewables' deficit, specifically more storage, but if you have more storage then you don't need nuclear at all and in fact only idiots and scum boost it because in the real world resources are finite and we'd get more for our money and effort with renewables.
Our "allies" were at war for YEARS before we got bombed which never would have happened if we had helped instead of renting those "allies" equipment. Also I live in the US so your "you're welcome" shit is doubly misplaced. Get even one half of one clue, ignoramus.
I didn't say we were perfect but you like to read things into what people wrote that isn't there. It must make it hard to communicate when you imagine that you're psychic.
I've seen plenty of Python used in production... My question though is that I've found Python can be quite heavy on memory bandwidth, doing a lot of copying and transforming data so it can be processed. I guess that is less of an issue with embedded, but is it still an issue?
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (3) Ha, ha, I can't believe they're actually going to adopt this sucker.