Comment Re: Renewable+storage = reliable (Score 1) 148
He doesn't understand that power lines heat up so he's also not going to understand that they stretch when that happens, you're going to have to write it out for him in big letters
He doesn't understand that power lines heat up so he's also not going to understand that they stretch when that happens, you're going to have to write it out for him in big letters
We had to work around capitalism, PGE was never going to do it on its own.
I don't know about all that but it seems to me like the lawyer's client has a fraud case against him. The lawyer didn't actually do the job.
It is destroying far more jobs than it is creating, so no it's not creating jobs, because when we say that what we mean is that it's creating NET jobs. So just no.
Also, even if that were not true, it's doing it at a rate that will kill people, if it hasn't already. Therefore celebrating it or even making excuses is ghoulish at best.
Well, now at least we know your origin story. You keep your brain in your ass and it was paddled at least one too many times in school.
What if the new tools scoop you, making all the work you have done in a problem worthless to you overnight? Was it still a good idea to use them when they eliminated your justification for existence? We're all destroying ourselves by using these things.
For coding can you not give it access only to write into your IDE? Which in theory could restrict it to specific files that you're working on?
Artificial does not mean not real. It means made with intent and skill. (The amount of skill varies.) But it's not intelligent, so it's not artificial intelligence.
A better but not perfect term would be "simulated intelligence". It gives a similar but not equivalent result to intelligence. It can even appear intelligent, and it's often used in this way. But then it does things which are obviously a product more of the RNG than anything else, and you can see through the facade. If you said something as stupid as it's capable of you would likely notice as you said it, and maybe even as you were preparing to say it. LLMs don't have whatever it is that we use to do that, obviously, or they would do it too.
It's a real problem because that information is supposed to be used for oversight.
Any cop who misused the system should be disciplined, but we all know that only happens for not being abusive enough.
They eventually put some of that stuff in their stores and it was selling ok, but it was too late.
Aww, did I hurt poww waist feefees? Poww wittwe swowfwake.
How do you propose that this would work?
Cop puts in a case number. Foreign system queries cop system, asks "is this a valid active case number?" Cop system responds "yes" or "no" and foreign system reacts accordingly. Rate limiting and fail2ban or similar prevents an attacker from using it to enumerate valid active cases, though that information is probably public and available via FOIA anyway.
And meanwhile it's very clear that LLMs cannot cite their sources. When they claim they have done so, a review of the alleged citation generally reveals that it does not in fact support the claims, much like when using Google you find that the page does not in fact include the terms you searched for. And ironically, Google does both of those things to you, because IME Gemini's citations are almost never legitimate.
So where's all the hue and outcry of age identification on PCs which will require a mandatory ID check just to play a game or use the internet?
We have been talking about it here.
Same answer as your other bullshit.
Fuck off, coward.
Do you guys know what you're doing, or are you just hacking?