Comment Re:This is partially true but has its caveats (Score 1) 59
Close to the joke I was looking for, but I was thinking more along the lines of "suitability to be a Bond movie villain".
Perhaps "How much do you like feeding sharks?"
Close to the joke I was looking for, but I was thinking more along the lines of "suitability to be a Bond movie villain".
Perhaps "How much do you like feeding sharks?"
That was Clarke, not Asimov?
Grid conditions are highly variable, and if you're in the AI biz, you aren't gonna want to shut down your LLMs for a heat wave.
There's plenty of "AI"-related processing which could be delayed and nobody would notice. Training of new models, for example. You get [access to] a new model a couple days later and you won't even notice, because you get it when you get it already. Google is also sufficiently distributed that they can simply move this processing to another location, since both the queries and the results are very small and there will be no appreciable delay associated with doing the processing far away.
Focus group results are subject to two pretty obvious problems. One is that the kind of people who want to do them and have time to do them are not usually the people you actually want input from. Two is that the criteria for selecting focus group members can be selected for the purpose of getting a desired result, you read research that says certain types of people want certain things and then you select people like that to give positive feedback for your shitty ideas.
It isn't like they have to bow down do Abbot and kiss his pinky ring.
The question is why you're kissing his O-ring.
They can just adapt their deletion bot that instantly removes content that is of interest to conservatives.
You mean the one that removes links to child porn and cuck videos?
Peter Thiel studied fucking philosophy (aren't humanities useless and dumb according to this crowd as well?)
Humanities sure didn't help Thiel turn out human.
Inadvertent? I do not think you know what that word means.
A researcher has scraped nearly 100,000 conversations from ChatGPT that users had set to share publicly and Google then indexed, creating a snapshot of all the sorts of things people are using OpenAI's chatbot for, and inadvertently exposing.
USERS SET THEM TO SHARE PUBLICLY
THAT IS NOT INADVERTENT
IT IS A CHOICE
TL;DR: GFY clickbait clowns
Microsoft has published a new video that appears to be the first in an upcoming series of videos dubbed "Windows 2030 Vision,"
Microsoft has consistently failed to implement any of their visions for Windows, ever, except making it a privacy nightmare. Seriously look at Windows history, every time they try to make substantive changes to Windows they fail. They could not even bring us a more featureful filesystem. Now we're supposed to believe anything they say about future Windows? I refuse unless they tell us it's going to kill babies, that I could believe.
Yet Thiel was recently in the ALL-IN podcast and seemed fairly normal (for a tech bro)
IDGAF how people "seem", what I care about is their actions, by which standard Thiel is a lizard person.
because that's how I got hired (not at Palantir but similar).
Similar how? Same trampling of human rights? Insert goose motherfucker meme here.
Texas needs to secede from this vile shitstorm
Texas is the vile shitstorm. The gov having arrest warrants issued for lawmakers who are doing what he has done to avoid prosecution in the past is the cherry on the shit sundae.
Did someone shit in your coffee again?
Some coward is proud to shit on facts, and they can fuck off.
"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch