Seems more like he's always been one.

Unfortunately you aren't the only one in we, at least it's unfortunate in this case.

A lot of people voted for hate. And a lot of people voted to have whatever happen to them, by not voting...

There is also nvtop

It might even have an oil quality sensor, it's done by doing a dielectric measurement of the oil so it's pretty cheap. They aren't nuanced, but they are better than nothing. Mercedes likes them a lot, so Chrysler learned to like them too. There is one on our '06 Sprinter. It's also an oil temp sensor.

OK, but I've actually lived where I've been on spring water with a sewage connection, and where I've been on well water without one and using septic, and meanwhile I had to get internet via a local WISP. So while the water and sewage needs can sometimes be handled locally, the internet needs cannot and never can be by definition. But also, the internet is much easier to bring in, I can't reasonably send water through the air (though it does arrive that way sometimes) and I certainly don't want to airmail my sewage.

That's really important to Morlocks, but not so much for the rest of us.

Why all the escapism though? Isn't it only happening because of things we're not addressing and are in denial about at a lower level?

That's also an overgeneralization. There's lots of push buttons that you can feel your way across. My 240SX had a bunch of them.

If they find water it will certainly put them at the forefront of moon science.

By the way, those articles seem fine. The first two are well established history at this point.

It also assumes voters aren't dumb as stumps. Democracy doesn't work for dumbshits.

People are sick of this stupid trolling shit, so no, it's not suspicious at all.

Microsoft differentiated itself from slower-moving rivals by being willing to embrace (etc.) the hot new thing. Now Windows is on most desktops and we mostly use office, despite both being shit. (Yesterday, Windows 11 forgot how to pop up right-click menus from the taskbar and office forgot how to open new windows, while I actually had RAM free... I love rebooting!)

As such it makes sense to AI all the things since that's what stupid people have latched onto now, and there's no shortage of those.

Not sorry yes, you're going to have to look at those other things anyway.

Accuracy is not "extreme" on a site for nerds.

Pretending something isn't nonsense makes everything worse.

Touch screens are fine as long as you have physical controls for HVAC and at least volume. You can wait to change the radio station.

The person you answered to has nothing, especially not any understanding of what AI research took place in the last decades. Hence they just try to confuse the issue and introduce something completely irrelevant as the new main topic. Obvious and unsophisticated.

The reality is that the LLM fans are essentially cultists and that they have completely lost sight of all the limitations we find in LLMs. Sure, LLMs are not useless. They allow better search (with sometimes really bad hallucinations and misinformation), they can summarize things in a way that helps experts (non-experts may be grossly misled though). What they cannot do competently is synthesize anything. Text-slop, code-slop, code that on repeated changes re-introduces regressions (which competent coders will not do), and even art- and music-slop. So, to better deal with the mountain of data we have today, they are somewhat helpful to actual domain experts, but that is it.

But the LLM fans think that the synthesis aspect is pretty good as well. It is not, at least to anybody that is a domain expert. My guess would be these people cannot perform on professional level either and hence think that slop is just fine. For example, the only mostly adequate code that LLMs can write is attack code from patches or patch-notes, because that is use-once, throw-away code. For anything else, as long as it is not beginner's level, an actual expert has to request in detail what is needed and make sure it is all there. At realistic token prices, that seems to be a lot more expensive than to have an expert write the code and that does not include the cost of low quality aspects that are not immediately obvious, like LLM code being long, hard to read and hard to review.

There is no reason to expect drastic cost reductions either. The current LLM business models need growth-rates they cannot get in the real world. Most of the current providers will crash and vanish. The rest will drastically reduce what they offer or charge prices that make most uses for synthesis non-viable.

Add that we will very likely find other serious drawbacks of having LLMs write things. This tech is on "demo" level currently and the demo was scaled up beyond all reason. Maybe it will deliver something reasonable in the synthesis use-case in 20 years, but that is not assured at all and not only because the inevitable crash long before.